Guidelines & Recommended Practices Selection of Artificial Lift Systems for Deliquifying Gas Wells Prepared by Artificial Lift R&D Council 2.4o Downhole Separation and Injection This section has been moved to the “emerging technologies” section. This section discusses the practical limits of downhole separation and liquid injection in terms of liquid production rate, gas production rate, depth, pressure, temperature, etc. It presents rough guidelines on the relative costs of downhole separation and liquid injection. Obviously precise costs can not be given as they depend on many factors. It presents rough guidelines on the relative life expectancy of downhole separation and liquid injection. Clearly, precise expectations can not be given as they depend on many factors. Practical Limits - Cost Guidelines - Depth limits Size limits Pressure limits Temperature limits Rate limits Limits with sand, corrosion, erosion, H2S, CO2, etc. Power requirements Operating requirements Maintenance requirements CAPEX OPEX R&M Life Expectancy Guidelines - Infant mortality (early time failure) Normal operating life Practical Limits for Liquid Injection Cost Guidelines for Liquid Injection Selection of Artificial Lift Systems for Deliquifying Gas Wells Page 2 Life Expectancy Guidelines for Liquid Injection Information on Automation Logic that is Specific to Downhole Separation and Injection Injection of Liquids (water) to Allow Gas Wells to Flow Instead of producing the liquids in a gas well, why not inject them below the gas zone if possible? This technique is used only when water is the liquid loading the well for obvious reasons. Injection: Need injection zone preferable below the gas pay Beam-bypass seating nipple from HF works with Beam Systems With bypass nipple, need back pressure valve at time on surface stuffing box to provide perhaps as much as 300 psi. ESP can inject water below gas pay at higher rates If injection zone below gas pay, gravity may be enough to inject water Injection Example: IPR: Pr=1000 psi, PI=1 bpd/psi Well: Depth = 3333 ft, 2 3/8’s tubing, Surface pressure 100,500,10000 Fluids: 100 % water, gravity of 1.0. Selection of Artificial Lift Systems for Deliquifying Gas Wells Page 3 Selection of Artificial Lift Systems for Deliquifying Gas Wells Page 4 Injection of Liquids in a Gas Well, Continued: The above injection example for liquids, is for a reflection of the reservoir PI = 1.0 bpd/psi, into the into reservoir injection deliverability curve. At 100 psi surface pressure, the bottom hole pressure is about 1500 psi and the injection rate is about 600 bpd. At a surface pressure of 500 and 1000 psi, the injection rates calculated are respectively about950 and 1400 bpd. J If injection of water is to be achieved in a gas well, some sort of injectivity relationship needs to be established and the system must achieve the needed injection pressure for the needed rate as shown above. The injection pressure can be below, but often is above the fracture gradient for the reservoir. The pressure for injection can be generated by gravity or pumping action. There are several methods of injecting the water in a gas well. Among them is use of: 1. A bypass-seating nipple. Selection of Artificial Lift Systems for Deliquifying Gas Wells Page 5 This device sits under the pump. The pump raises the fluid level in the tubing and then the hydrostatic pressure from the fluid level is allowed to pressure the injection zone below the packer and below the producing zone. When the tubing level is high enough, injection begins. If a larger pressure is required, the tubing level is pumped to the surface and a backpressure regulator is installed on the tubing at the surface to be sure of injection. Contact Harbison Fischer, Benny J. Williams [[email protected]]. Another variation of the bypass-seating nipple is shown below where the pump is bypassed by the tube from above the pump to below the pump, allowing hydrostatic pressure to build on the underlying injection zone. The hydrostatic pressure is from the fluid level in the tubing that is built by the pump that pumps the level to a height sufficient to inject fluids. ESP’s for Injection: Selection of Artificial Lift Systems for Deliquifying Gas Wells Page 6 Above figure shows ESP system with downhole sensor. When sensor indicates pressure building with water accumulating, then unit turns on and injects water below a packer. Case Histories using the ESP for Injection: 4 Inch casing 375 Series motor adapted for bottom drive No pressure-sensing element (no casing room) 385 Series seal section Same internal components as 400 Series 85 Series pump Same internal components as 400 Series Well History #1 In this case, the customer was looking for an incremental gas production rate. The unit was sized for 120 to 180 BFPD. Disposal costs had made previous production uneconomical. An FC 320 pump stage with a 20 HP motor was used. Producing perforation was at 3200 feet and disposal was at 3600 feet. A packer was set at 3600 feet with a sheer sub through which to produce. Installation was successfully completed June and production and draw down were as expected. A previous production history had been established on rods. The customer has realized an increase in production of 200 Mscf/D and no disposal costs Selection of Artificial Lift Systems for Deliquifying Gas Wells Page 7 References: for Injection of Water to allow Gas to Flow: 1. Williams, R., Vahedian, S., and Lea, J. F. “Gas Well Liquids Injection using Beam Lift Systems”, presented at the Southwestern Petroleum Course, April, 1997, Lubbock, Texas. 2. Grubb, A. D. & Duvall, D. K., “ Disposal Tool Technology Extends Gas Well Life and Enhances Profits”, SPE 24796, presented at the 67th Annual SPE Conference in Washington, DC, October 4-7, 1992.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz