Roman Battisti Anthony Garcia Lori Sandberg Liz VanHoosen Background Information First Lunar Lander used by Apollo 15 in 1971 For the past 17 years, NASA has held a competition to design, build and compete with a human powered moon buggy Project Description Collapsible into a 4x4x4 foot box Maximum 15 foot turning radius Brakes must be on the vehicle Simulated electronics A 2 foot diameter antenna must be included A flag signifying its origin must be carried on vehicle All riders must sit 15 or more inches above the ground Team Criteria Low center of gravity Lightweight-less than 180 pounds High Stability-no flipping Comfort and safety of the riders High top speed Maintain low assembly time Design Frame Design Preliminary frame design Strength in vertical direction Improvements Needed Two major problems from previous year: Failure of central hinge Stability of back rider Other Concerns: Decrease weight Replacing worn/damaged parts Hinge Design Telescoping Back Wheels Axle Finite Element Analysis Hub Addition Wheel Hub Impact Load Analysis Systems model developed in Matlab Assumed 600 pound mass k empirically measured Resulting force reactions found for step function . . .. Fy k ( x0 xi ) b( x 0 xi ) m x0 Visual Analysis Impact load reactions applied to system Crank Lever Analysis Rider impact load applied to crank shaft lever Crank Shaft Cable Support Pin Attachments Main Frame Steering A 15 foot turn radius is required to compete. An articulated steering system has been selected. Using the left figure we can solve for x: 26 ft x 180 2 tan 1 L Gear Analysis Shimano Nexus 8 speed Enclosed Cost: ~$260 Previously used Crank Sram 2 speed crank Previously used http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/shimano-nexus.html Gear Analysis Cont. Front Gear Design D3 n1 D2 D1 (GR) min D4 n4 N2 P sin 1 D 2 •Rear Gear Design D n D2 D1 3 GRmin 1 D4 n4 N2 P sin 1 D2 Machine Design pg. 678 and 888 respectively Brakes Disk Brake Analysis Brake force determined by assumed friction coefficient Brake force divided evenly for each wheel Brake force determined for each disk break (rotor) F mt v tb F f mt g 1 R Fb F w 4 Rr Fabrication Tubing cutting and welding Nexus Replacement Hinge Assembly and welding Grinding Extending Back Axle Back Axle Assembly Testing Power Testing •Dr. Mathew Bundle •Velotron Ergometer Off-Road Testing Rough terrain tests NASA specifications met Practice Assembly Competition First Run: Assembly time: 9.88 seconds Raw run time: 3:56 Two penalties: +2:00 Hay bale “avoiding obstacle” Second Run: Crash and Burn! Project Schedule Spring Semester Milestones Milestone Completion Date Frame Fabrication February 11, 2010 Hinge Fabrication February 1, 2010 Competition Registration Deadline February 1, 2010 Gear Assembly March 1, 2010 Brake Assembly March 1, 2010 Final Assembly March 16, 2010 Testing and Improvements April 2, 2010 Competition April 8-10, 2010 Senior Design Symposium April 24, 2010 Budget Supply Nexus Gear Box Chromoly Steel tubing Axle Hinge Seat Belts Other Supplies Plane Tickets Shipping Motel Car Gas Subtotal Estimated Cost Actual Costs Difference $265.00 $284.50 -$19.50 $800 $258.70 $541.30 $300 $72.67 $227.33 $500 $144.50 $355.50 $30 $23.21 $6.79 $122 $554.03 -$432.03 $1,500 $1,700.00 -$200.00 $700 $650.00 $50.00 $426.00 $425.20 $0.80 $330.00 $221.51 $108.49 $37.00 $6.00 $31.00 $5,010.00 $4,340.32 $669.68 Conclusions Performed as expected- design had both speed and adaptability No design Failures-no weld breaks, hinge and telescoping wheels survived actual impact loads Crash and Burn not due to design flaws Suggestions: Composite Frame Reduce weight of differential Replace center rotator cuff with suspension Adjust front Nexus angle and replace cranks Gears (number and ratio) specific to ability of riders Special Thanks To: Dr. David Walrath Mr. Scott Morton Ken Battisti UW Engineering Machine Shop Pedal House Bike Shop 2009 Moon Buggy Team Wyoming NASA Space Grant Consortium Precision Air Cargo
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz