INFO3600
Major Development Project (Adv)
2015
Literature review group presentation – Week 5
Group name and room: _____________________________________________
Description
Clear description of core topics to explore: clearly described and clear how
they contribute to the client’s stated and inferred needs.
Seminal academic work: summary of key academic work, the means you used
to assess its importance, explain its relevance. Each student should provide ~2
such papers.
Important very recent academic work: this is based on the strength of the
venue or your assessment of the paper, in terms of quality of the work (well
grounded in literature, tested validity, well supported outcomes) and
relevance to your project.
Commercial work found: explain how it is relevant to the project.
Mark
/20
/20
/20
/20
Summary of the overall results of the research: positioning of this project in
relation to research reported.
/10
Presentation quality: talk is well structured, clear, well planned, makes good
use of presentation tools, involves effective use of multiple group members
well co-ordinated and rehearsed, pleasing, within 15 minute time limit.
/10
Grand Total
/100
I will grade all of these presentations.
All groups earning an initial grade >80 will be invited to present to the class in Week 6 and that
presentation will determine the final grade.
Professor Judy Kay
CHAI, Computer Human Adaptive Interaction Research Group
School of Information Technologies
Human Centred technology Cluster,
Faculty of Engineering and IT