Search for pentaquarks: the experimental program at CLAS S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay for the CLAS collaboration •Epiphany Introduction Conference • Published CLAS results on Θ+ Krakov, 1-6-2005 • Pentaquark program at CLAS • Outlook What are pentaquarks? • New form of quark matter: baryons whose minimum quark content is 5 (qqqqq) d −1/3 u s +1/3 +2/3 u d −1/3 +2/3 • “Non-exotic” pentaquarks The antiquark has the same flavor as one of the other quarks Difficult to distinguish from 3-quark baryons • “Exotic” pentaquarks (qqqqQ) The antiquark has a different flavor from the other 4 quarks Quantum numbers different from any 3-quark baryon Example: uudds (exotic): Baryon number = 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 - 1/3 = 1 Strangeness = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 = +1 Baryons with S = +1 cannot be made by qqq !!!!! Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay • Existence of pentaquark is not forbidden by QCD • General idea of a five-quark states has been around since late 60’s (Jaffe, Lipkin, Strotteman…) However… 1986, Particle Data Group: “The general prejudice against baryons not made of three quarks and the lack of any experimental activity in this area make it likely that it will be another 15 years before the issue is decided” Almost 15 years later... • 10 experiments reported evidences for pentaquark states since 2003 • Over 200 theory papers published • Started series of dedicated international workshops: JLab (2003), SPring-8 (2004), Genova (2005) • Q+ listed in PDG 2004 (***)! • Research on pentaquarks is one of the central programs in many labs The pentaquark anti-decuplet Experimental searches were motivated by predictions of chiral soliton model Diakonov, Petrov, Polyakov, Z.Physics A359 (1997) uudds Q+ (1539) Baryon octets, decuplets and antidecuplets are seen as rotational excitations of the same soliton field S = +1 N(1650-1690) : exotic states S(1760-1810) X+(1862) ddssu I=-3/2 uussd I=-1 I=-1/2 I=0 I=1/2 I=1 I=3/2 S=0 S = -1 S = -2 The pentaquark anti-decuplet Experimental searches were motivated by predictions of chiral soliton model Diakonov, Petrov, Polyakov, Z.Physics A359 (1997) uudds Q+ (1539) decay modes nK+,pK0 narrow width (few MeV) S = +1 can be detected experimentally!! Jp=1/2+ N(1650-1690) : exotic states S(1760-1810) X+(1862) ddssu I=-3/2 uussd I=-1 I=-1/2 I=0 I=1/2 I=1 I=3/2 S=0 S = -1 S = -2 First observation: LEPS/SPring-8 n→K+K-(n) T. Nakano et al., PRL91, 012002 (2003) (the neutron is bound inside 12C) Q+ The Jefferson Lab electron accelerator Newport News, USA Emax ~ 6 GeV Imax ~ 200 mA Duty Factor ~ 100% sE/E ~ 2.5 10-5 Beam Pol ~ 80% The CLAS detector at JLAB Bremsstrahlung photon tagger Krakow, 1-6-2005 • Toroidal magnetic field (6 supercond. coils) • Drift chambers (argon/CO2 gas, 35,000 cells) • Time-of-flight scintillators (684 PMTs) • Electromagnetic calorimeters (lead/scintillator, 1296 PMTs) • Cherenkov Counters S. Niccolai, (e/p separation, 216 PMTs) IPN Orsay The CLAS detector at JLAB Performances: Bremsstrahlung photon tagger Krakow, 1-6-2005 • large acceptance for charged particles 8°<q<142°, 0.2< pp<4 GeV/c, 0.1<pp<4 GeV/c • good momentum and angular resolution Dp/p ≤ 1.5%, Dq, Df ≤ 1 mrad S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay The CLAS detector at JLAB Bremsstrahlung photon tagger Krakow, 1-6-2005 CLAS is designed to measure exclusive reactions with multi-particle final states S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay The bremsstrahlung photon tagger E = E0 – Ee (E0 known, Ee measured)Tagging range: (20% - 95%)E0 CLAS-d: first Q+ exclusive measurement d → K-pK+(n) • Experimental data from 1999 run • Tagged photons with Eγmax = 3 GeV • Target: 10 cm long liquid deuterium Exclusivity: • No Fermi motion corrections • Final state identified with less background Possible reaction mechanism non-spectator proton: pK- rescattering required to detect p in CLAS (pmin(p) = 300 MeV/c) CLAS-d: pK+K- event selection Main background: pp+p- pp+p- ppp- pK+K- m Krakow, 1-6-2005 p c DtK t R ; c c c p p 2 + mK2 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay d → p K+K─ (n) in CLAS p K- Kp K+ K+ CLAS-d: neutron ID d → K-pK+(n) The neutron is detected by missing mass • 15% of non pK+K- events within ±3s of the peak • Almost no background under the neutron peak with tight timing cut, DtK Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS-d : cut on known resonances • Several other known processes can contribute to the pK+K-(n) final state: d→fp(n), f→K+Kd→L(1520)K+(n), L(1520)→pK• Both reactions proceed predominantly on the proton (neutron is a spectator) • Kinematics of both reactions are not a good match for Q+ production. Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS-d: background reduction • Cut on the missing neutron momentum, pn>0.08 GeV/c • Cut on the K+ momentum, pK+<1 GeV/c, based on the 3-body phase space Monte Carlo (d→Q+K-p, Q+→nK+) Before pK+ cut Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS-d: result S. Stepanyan et al., PRL91, 252001 (2003) M = (1.542 ± 0.005) GeV/c2 = 21 MeV/c2 • Only ~40 events in the Q+ peak • Statistical significance: 4.6s - 5.8s, depending on the background shape. • No significant Q+ signal was found in the spectator analysis (like SPring-8) due to not optimal torus field settings (limited forward acceptance for K-). d → K-pK+(n) Gaussian background Simulated background • No Q++ peak observed in M(pK+) Distribution of L(1520) events Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay Is “Θ+” a kinematical reflection? High mass mesons (a2(1320), f2(1270)) decaying to K+K- can produce structures in M(NK) at low mass (A. Dzierba et al., hep-ph/0311125) Is “Θ+” a kinematical reflection? K. Hicks et al., hep-ph/0411265, found inconsistencies in Djerba’s approach Is “Θ+” a kinematical reflection? Open issue: needed measurements of Θ+ in different final states (no K+K-) First observation on the proton: CLAS-p After PID: neutron identified by missing mass p→K-p+K+(n) E = 3.0 – 5.47 GeV Cut on f: M(K+K-)<1.06 GeV/c2 No clear Θ+ signal!! Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay First observation on the proton: CLAS-p p→K-p+K+(n) V. Kubarovski et al., PRL92, 032001 (2004) M = (1.555 ± 0.010) GeV/c2 Statistical significance: (7.8 ± 1.0) σ 26 MeV/c2 t-channel process a) selected and background processes eliminated with the cuts (c.m.): cosθ*p+ > 0.8 and cosθ*K+ < 0.6 First observation on the proton: CLAS-p p→K-p+K+(n) V. Kubarovski et al., PRL92, 032001 (2004) Q+ production through N* resonance decays? cut to understand production mechanism look at M(nK+K-) First observation on the proton: CLAS-p p→K-p+K+(n) outside Q+ region Cut on M(nK+) in Q+ region • intermediate baryon state? • p-p cross section data in PDG have a gap in the mass range 2.3–2.43 GeV Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay Summary on Θ+: positive results • 10 observations • different reaction mechanisms Krakow, 1-6-2005 IHEP ZEUS COSY HERMES ITEP SAPHIR CLAS-p CLAS-d DIANA Spring-8 BUT: • ~ 10 MeV gap between measured masses • statistical significance between 4 and 7.8 σ • often heavy cuts • backgrounds not well understood S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay Summary on Θ+: negative results HERA _ B: pA→pK0X CDF: pp→pK0X _ Phenix: Au+Au→nK-X _ 0X _ BaBar: e+e-→pK 0 Belle: e+e-→B0B0→ppK _ BES:e+e-→J/Ψ→ΘΘ • high statistics • clearly see some of the known resonances BUT: • in e+e- : there are no quarks in initial state _ no theoretical predictions on QQ production • in the other cases: fragmentation processes, Q+ could be suppressed (Titov et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 042202 (2004)) high multiplicity in the final state, combinatorial backgrounds NEEDED DEDICATED, HIGH-STATISTICS, EXCLUSIVE MEASUREMENTS!!!!! Decuplet partners of Θ+: search for X3/2−−, X3/20 uudds ddssu Exotic, S = -2, Q = -2 uussd Non exotic, S = -2, Q = 0 Decuplet partners of Θ+: search for X3/2−−, X3/20 NA49 pp Ecm = 17.2 GeV C. Alt, et al., Phys.Rev.Lett.92, 042003 (2004) HERA-B p+A 920 GeV/c hep-ex/0403020 Combined spectra Xp + Xp+ M=1.862± 0.002 GeV Statistical significance = 5.6σ 18 MeV/c2 No peaks observed! Ξ0 also observed No Ξ0 Pentaquark today: open issues • confirmation of existence of Θ+ with high statistics • precise determination of the mass of Θ+ • properties of Θ+: spin, isospin, parity • production mechanisms • possible excited states of Θ+ • coupling N* to Θ+ • confirmation existence of other exotic members of decuplet An experimental program is currently underway at CLAS to address these issues Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay Pentaquark Searches at CLAS Experimental program approved and underway at CLAS Search for Q+ on deuterium - G10 run d→K-K+p(n) and other final states (data taking completed) Search for Q+, Q*+, Q*++ on the proton - G11 run p → various final states (data taking completed) Search for X pentaquarks - EG3 run vd→X5--, X5 X Exotic hadron spectroscopy - G12 run p at 6 GeV, high luminosity Krakow, 1-6-2005 (data taking just finished) (to run in 2005/6) S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS G10: search for Θ+ on deuterium tagged photons in the energy range 0.8 GeV to 3.59 GeV target: 24 cm long liquid deuterium data were taken at 2 settings of CLAS toroidal magnet (2250 A and 3375 A), lower field to increase acceptance for K- (Spring-8) at each setting integrated luminosity (2.5pb-1) is about 10 times higher than in published deuterium data Reactions channels to study: • data taking finished end of May • 10 billion of events collected • data processing almost done • results in the spring d→pK-K+n Θ+→nK+ d→ΛK+(0)n(p); Θ+→nK+,pK0 d→pK- K0 (p) Θ+→pK0 ”n”→K-K+n Θ+→nK+ (with Fermi momentum corrections, to compare with SPring-8) Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS G10: how to avoid a fake signal • Consider only signals with statistical uncertainty <10%, and statistical significance greater than 7s • Study of the NK system: – for pK0 and nK+ final states – in both the missing mass and invariant mass distributions • Production of NK system together with a hyperon (L, S) • Divide data set into two independent sets. Analyze one set, then apply the same analysis (cuts, etc) to the second set • Inspect Q+ candidates in CLAS event display • Full simulation of possible background final states Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS G10: data quality n d → K-pK+(n) non-spectator neutron events f L(1520) 50% of the high-field data CLAS G10: γd→ΛΘ+ L p d K+ Q+ Reaction already studied on 3He CLAS data, but statistics were too low n • No possibility of kinematical reflections (only one K, from Θ+ decay, in the final state) • S=+1 both for nK+ and pK0, thanks to Λ • No background channels to remove Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS G10: γd→ΛΘ+ p p L p d K+ Decay modes under study: • Λ→pπ- Θ+→K+n n Q+ n K+ • No possibility of kinematical reflections (only one K, from Θ+ decay, in the final state) • S=+1 both for nK+ and pK0, thanks to Λ • No background channels to remove Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS G10: γd→ΛΘ+ p p L p d K+ Decay modes under study: p Q+ n K0 • Λ→pπ- Θ+→K+n • Λ→pπ- Θ+→K0p K0 → π+π- p+ p • No possibility of kinematical reflections (only one K, from Θ+ decay, in the final state) • S=+1 both for nK+ and pK0, thanks to Λ • No background channels to remove Krakow, 1-6-2005 S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS G10: γd→ΛΘ+ p p L p d K+ Decay mode: • Λ→pπ- Θ+→K+n n Q+ n K+ n L CLAS G10: γd→ΛΘ+ p p L p d K+ Decay mode: • Λ→pπ- Θ+→K0p p Q+ n K0 p+ p L K0 K0 → π+π- CLAS G11: search for Θ+ on proton • data taking finished end of July • 10 times more statistics than old p • Eγ = 0.8 – 3.59 GeV • search for ground and first excited states of Q+ • search for Q++ • data are being processed Reaction channels to study: p→K0K+(n) Θ+→nK+ p→K0K0p Θ+→pK0 p→K-K+p+(n) Θ+→nK+ p→pK- K+ Krakow, 1-6-2005 Θ++→pK+ S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS G11: data quality 6% of statistics p p + pX p p +p X p p- p K + ( pp ) X p ( K + K ) p L Krakow, 1-6-2005 f S. Niccolai, IPN Orsay CLAS G11: data quality 6% of statistics p p + K +p n p p +p K + n p p +p K + X n p p K +p + n p K +p +p n S+ S K0 L(1520) p K + pX L S0 Summary and outlook possible existence of pentaquarks gave new boost to hadronic physics and QCD spectroscopy 10 Θ+ signals published so far, but: • low statistics • discrepancies in measured masses several reports of non-observations need of high-statistics dedicated experiments to: • establish existence of Θ+ • study its properties • find possible other pentaquarks (X5’s ?) the new CLAS experimental program should solve these issues, with: • two experiments completed (G10, G11), results coming soon • one experiment finishing in these days (EG3) • one experiment to run later on in 2005
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz