POSTGRADUATE AWARD TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION Improve Teach Plan Learn Reflect Analyse HANDBOOK FOR PARTICIPANTS 2015-2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 COURSE TEAM 3 KEY WEBSITES 3 COURSE OVERVIEW Entry Requirements Aims of the Programme Learning Outcomes Assessment HEA Recognition Teaching Lens 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES AND SUPPORT Workshops: Indicative Content Your Departmental Mentor 5 5 7 BUILDING YOUR PORTFOLIO Portfolio Development Plan Portfolio Tasks Guidance on Portfolio Tasks 7 7 8 8 ASSESSMENT Presentation of Assessed Work raising issues on the course Holding of assessed work feedback, External examination and appeals 10 10 11 11 12 RESOURCES Indicative Reading Online Resources 12 12 13 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Dimensions of the HEA Framework Appendix 2 HEA Descriptor 1 – Associate Fellowship of the Higher Education Academy Appendix 3 Mapping of the course against the dimensions of the HEA Framework Appendix 4 Teaching lens on the Vitae Researcher Development Framework and the UK Professional Standards Framework (UKPSF) Appendix 5 Portfolio Development Plan Appendix 6 Observation form Appendix 7 Teaching Observation Reflections APPENDIX 8: aSSESSMENT CRITERIA APPENDIX 9: PROGRESS TRACKING PAGE 14 14 15 16 Page 2 of 28 18 19 21 26 27 28 COURSE TEAM Sara Hattersley/Jess Humphreys Course Lead/Tutor Tel: 75761 Sarah Packwood Course Secretary Tel: 24698 Find out more about the LDC team here http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/teaching_learning/meettheteam All email enquiries should be addressed to [email protected] KEY WEBSITES Course website - http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/teaching_learning/pgr Participants’ area - http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/teaching_learning/pgr/pga-he/ Course Moodle - http://moodle.warwick.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=12700 COURSE OVERVIEW The course provides formal accreditation for your teaching and learning activities in Higher Education and is worth 30 M-level credits. The programme is accredited by the Higher Education Academy (HEA); following successful completion of the course, participants will become an Associate Fellow of the HEA. The course should be completed within twelve months. ENTRY REQUIREMENTS Completion of the ‘Introduction to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education’ or ‘Preparing to Teaching in Higher Education’ (or equivalent) is a prerequisite for enrolment. You need to complete a reflective account following attendance at these workshops. To be eligible to take part on the course you must have a minimum of 10 hours teaching experience at Warwick over the duration of the course. By teaching we mean, working with students and supporting their learning; this may include lab demonstrating, lectures, seminars or tutorial work, running problem classes and supervision of projects. AIMS OF THE PROGRAMME This programme aims to meet the needs of postgraduates with teaching responsibilities. This course is aligned to descriptor 1 of the UK Professional Standards Framework and subsequently upon completion you be awarded with the Associate Fellowship status of the Higher Education Academy. Further information about the UKPSF and descriptor 1 can be found here https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/recognition-accreditation/uk-professional-standards-framework-ukpsf and in appendix 1 and 2. Page 3 of 28 The main aims of the programme are to equip you with: 1. A broad conceptual and practical understanding of the nature of learning in Higher Education, based on relevant educational theory. 2. Skills and competencies in the planning, delivery and evaluation of teaching and learning activities. 3. Open and positive attitudes towards continuing professional development. 4. An understanding of how educational and disciplinary literature can inform your academic and professional development. LEARNING OUTCOMES By the end of the programme you should be able to: 1. Plan and deliver teaching sessions informed by relevant principles of teaching and learning. (A1) 2. Demonstrate how your academic and teaching practice can be informed by relevant educational and disciplinary research. (A2) 3. Demonstrate appropriate application of principles of inclusive education. (A2) 4. Exercise initiative, professional responsibility and informed judgement in response to the range of situations encountered in your academic and professional role. (A1 and A2) 5. Evaluate your practice in response to your own reflections and analysis, feedback from students and colleagues, and relevant educational and disciplinary research. (A1, A2 and A5) 6. Review, plan and undertake actions relating to the continuing development of your own teaching and learning practice. (A5) Throughout the programme you will be expected to demonstrate clear and effective written and oral communication skills. *The learning outcomes address the following areas of activity as outlined in the UKPSF including A1, A2 and A5. Participants will be introduced to A3 and A4. Further details about these areas of activity including definitions can be found in Appendix 1. ASSESSMENT Assessment is in the form of a portfolio of evidence to demonstrate how you have fulfilled the requirements listed above. Key elements of the portfolio are teaching observations, feedback activities, session planning and reflections on your developing understanding of teaching and learning. For full details, see page 7. The portfolio of evidence is to be presented using MyPortfolio, the University’s e-portfolio system. A template e-portfolio is provided and guidance on how to use it is available on the course Moodle. Page 4 of 28 After the first workshop you will be asked to complete a portfolio development plan identifying when you will complete the required teaching and learning activities. At the end of the twelve-month programme you should submit your completed portfolio. HEA RECOGNITION The programme content is mapped against the Higher Education Academy’s (HEA) UK Professional Standards Framework (PSF) for teaching and supporting learning in Higher Education. By the end of the programme you will have engaged with three areas of activity and been introduced to the remaining two areas, 4 areas of core knowledge and 3 areas of professional values. The dimensions of the Professional Standards Framework are included in Appendix 1 The mapping of the programme against the framework is shown in Appendix 3 The full framework and descriptors are available from the HEA website http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ukpsf Following successful completion of the programme you will gain automatic recognition as an Associate Fellow of the HEA (AFHEA). TEACHING LENS The programme covers many areas that are discussed in the ‘Teaching Lens on the Vitae Researcher Development Framework as well as the UKPSF. Further details about the ‘Teaching Lens’ can be found in appendix 4. PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES AND SUPPORT The programme involves two 5 hour workshops, two shorter workshops (2 hours duration), an online workshop and an optional portfolio consultancy. All the workshops are compulsory. Dates for the programme activities can be found on the PGA website. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/teaching_learning/pgr/pga-he/2015-16/dates/ WORKSHOPS: INDICATIVE CONTENT The programme involves 4 core workshops (2 x 5hrs, 2 x 2 hours) and three free choice workshops (1.5-2 hours). These workshops are supported with online resources available in Moodle. There is also the opportunity to book a portfolio consultancy with a member of the team by emailing [email protected]. Enhancing skills in small group teaching (5 hours) (A1, A2, K1, K2, K3, V1, V2, V3) Enhancing skills for small group teaching Small group teaching innovative approaches Teaching philosophy statement Introduction to MyPortfolio Page 5 of 28 Large group teaching, assessment and research-based learning (5 hours) (A1, A2, A3, K1, K2, K3, V1, V3, V4) Large group teaching Bringing your research into your teaching Assessment and feedback Feedback From Students Reflecting on your teaching and reflective writing (2 hours) (A1, A2, A5, K1, K6, V1, V2) Becoming a reflective practitioner Reflective writing Inclusive Teaching (A1, A2, K1, K2, K3, K4, V1, V2) This is an independent online activity followed by a face-to-face group discussion (2 hours). Free Choice Workshops You are required to attend three free choice workshops. The free choice workshops have been introduced to allow you to tailor the programme to meet your needs and interests. We offer a range of free choice workshops – a full list can be found in the participants’ area on our website http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/teaching_learning/pgr/pga-he/2015-16/workshops15-16/ If you wish to opt for a substitution select ‘Other’ on the online booking form and include a letter of attendance in your final portfolio. Indicative free choice workshops: Engaging your students in critical thinking Teaching for creativity Introduction to e-learning Motivating students beyond the classroom Classroom Technologies Teaching spaces and learning design You may also choose to substitute TWO of the free choice workshops with a relevant activity or event such as presenting at a Café Academique or at the Research Postgraduate Poster Showcase, attending a Windows on Teaching session, Teaching and Learning showcase, forum or with one of the following workshops offered by the Research Student Skills Programme. Please note that you will have to book onto any RSSP workshops or other teaching and learning activities separately. Page 6 of 28 YOUR DEPARTMENTAL MENTOR Your departmental mentor will provide disciplinary-focused guidance and support. Who should be my departmental mentor? Your mentor should be someone you feel comfortable with and who you feel able to talk to openly about your teaching. Your mentor will be required to support you through this programme. You will need to ask them if they would be willing to be your mentor and check that they have the time required to provide you with the necessary support and guidance. If you have any concerns regarding mentorship, please contact [email protected]. What does my departmental mentor do? In general mentors are expected to: Have relevant experience of teaching which is compatible with your subject area. Provide support, advice and encouragement for the development of your teaching practice maintaining your confidentiality and trust. Departmental mentors normally provide specific support by: Provide on-going informal feedback as you develop your Teaching Philosophy Statement. Observing your teaching and completing the observation form to provide formative feedback. Provide regular guidance (we suggest meeting once a term), advice and support within a disciplinefocused, departmental context. Second marking your portfolio (at your request for your portfolio otherwise it will be second marked by a member of the course team). BUILDING YOUR PORTFOLIO PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT PLAN A portfolio development plan should be completed after the first workshop and posted on your eportfolio. In this plan you will identify when and how you plan to complete the portfolio tasks. An outline of this plan can be found in Appendix 5. Page 7 of 28 PORTFOLIO TASKS Your portfolio will include: A teaching philosophy statement (the format is flexible so can include notes, mindmap etc.) – 500 words Two teaching observations with reflective comments – 700 words each Evidence of giving feedback to students and collecting feedback from students, with reflective comments – 700 words A session plan with reflective comments – 700 words A reflective account addressing two areas of activity from the UKPSF – 1400 words Please note that all of these tasks should be completed while you are enrolled on the programme. GUIDANCE ON PORTFOLIO TASKS It is important that throughout the portfolio you engage with the relevant educational literature to support your discussions and arguments. Teaching Philosophy Statement A Teaching Philosophy Statement is a short (500 words) reflective statement of your beliefs about teaching, your educational goals, and preferred educational practices/approach(es). It should include reasons for your teaching approaches and critical self-reflection. Your Teaching Philosophy should inform all of the subsequent materials in your portfolio. Guidance on producing your teaching philosophy statement will be given in the first workshop. Your mentor should offer feedback on your Teaching Philosophy Statement drafts and a revised statement or notes must be included in your e-portfolio. It is important to remember that the development of a teaching philosophy is an iterative process and you will be asked to revisit this over the duration of the course. 1. Teaching Observations (700 words x2) You will need to be observed teaching by your departmental mentor or an experienced colleague .You also need to observe an experienced colleague teaching. In your e-portfolio, you should include: Completed forms for both observations – signed by observer and observee (see appendix 6). These will then be uploaded to your e-portfolio. Hand-outs/support materials used in the sessions observed (also scanned and uploaded, where possible). Short reflective summary (around 700 words) on each teaching observation experience (See appendix 7 for key questions to help formulate your reflections). It is important that you engage with the literature to support your discussions. 2. Feedback to and from Students (700 words) You need to demonstrate that you have engaged in the feedback process whilst on the programme. Feedback to students on their performance Page 8 of 28 You may have marked students’ work, or you may have given feedback on presentations, laboratory work or seminar contributions. You could also have given verbal feedback in your teaching sessions. You’ll need to provide evidence of the feedback you have given. Your reflections on feedback given by you should: Set the context for the feedback (in terms of the student group, module, etc.). Explain how it was provided (written comments, checklist, verbal, etc.). Explain why you made the decisions you did (the wording/phrasing of the feedback, marks awarded, etc.). Outline any areas where you feel you could improve your feedback to students and consider how you could make these improvements. It is important that you engage with the literature to support your reflections. Feedback from students about your performance You need to show how you have gathered feedback on your teaching from your students. You may have collected this feedback in a number of ways such as via a standard module questionnaire; a feedback questionnaire you have designed yourself; a feedback exercise; focus group; discussions with students, etc. Your reflections on feedback received from students should: Set the feedback in context in terms of who the students were, how the feedback was collected and why you chose to use that approach. Summarise the feedback provided. Critically discuss how you might develop or change your practice as a result. Overall, your reflective summary should demonstrate that you are able to effectively evaluate your own performance and plan your further development. It is important that you use the literature to support your discussions. Reflections on both examples of feedback should total 700 words. 3. Session Plan You need to include a session plan that you have produced for one of your teaching sessions, and write a short (around 700 words) reflective commentary about it. This summary should: Describe how you planned and prepared for the session, and explain the decisions you made, regarding learning outcomes, resources, timing, activities and student engagement. Offer a review of your plan having delivered the session. Were the planned learning outcomes met? How did the plan work in practice – what were the successes and/or were there any issues? What might you change if you were to run a similar session in the future? Would you make any changes to the planning process and how could you do this? Choose a session where you think you are able to demonstrate the most variety and skill in planning and delivery, to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding. Page 9 of 28 You should include a copy of your session plan (uploaded to your e-portfolio) in whatever format you would usually write it for your subject discipline. Your mentor should be able to advise you about session planning but there is also guidance available on the course Moodle. It is important that you use the literature to support your discussions. 4. A reflective account addressing two areas of activity This is a personal account and its focus throughout should be on your own professional practice and decision making. You should address two areas of activity (700 words per activity) and should draw together reflections and experiences from your teaching and learning practice over the duration of this course, in relation to the available literature. This section should reflect upon the process of continuing professional development and draw upon evidence to address the two areas of activity. (See appendix 1 for these areas of activity). They should also refer to the core knowledge and professional values. Further information about the type of information to include in your account can be found in the AFHEA guidance notes p.4-8. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/professional-recognition/hea-fellowships/becomeassociate-fellow-hea It is essential that you underpin your discussions illustrating that you have read around the issues and developed an understanding of educational theory relevant to your practice. Any citations will be in addition to the overall word count. ASSESSMENT The PGA assessment results in a ‘Distinction’, ‘Merit’, ‘Pass’ or ‘Refer’. Deadlines for submission portfolios can be found on the PGA website http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/teaching_learning/pgr/pga-he/2015-16/ If you wish to submit a draft portfolio beforehand please contact the PGA team – [email protected] Assessment of the programme operates in accordance with the University of Warwick’s Social Studies assessment criteria. The assessment criteria can be found in Appendix 8. PRESENTATION OF ASSESSED WORK E-Portfolio Students on the course should use an e-portfolio for their course work, records and reflections. A portfolio template is provided in MyPortfolio and full instructions on how to use this are available on the course Moodle. In addition, practical workshops on e-portfolio skills will be offered. At the course deadline, students will be required to submit their e-portfolio through the course Moodle and instructions on how to do this will be provided. Format Page 10 of 28 Work submitted should be written in standard English and word-processed. It is acceptable for teaching materials and elements of session plans to be handwritten, but these should be clearly legible, and scanned and uploaded to the e-portfolio. Cover sheets The first page of the e-portfolio contains a ‘cover sheet’, which is required to indicate that all of the evidence is there. This should be signed, using an electronic signature, or else a word-processed/scanned version of this should be uploaded to the page. A copy of the cover sheet is available in the course Moodle. Anonymity References to observations or other investigations should not identify students by name. RAISING ISSUES ON THE COURSE Please contact the PGA team if any of the following situations arise: If, having enrolled on the programme, you find that you do not have enough teaching to complete the portfolio tasks please contact the course team who will be able to talk you through the available options. If for any reason you take a break from your studies at the University please ensure that you inform the course team as soon as possible. If you have any concerns about meeting the submission dates please contact a member of the course team to discuss your options. Any extension required should be negotiated before the set date for submission. HOLDING OF ASSESSED WORK Participants must keep all assessed work until after the final Examination Board. We encourage you to keep hard copies of all documentation wherever possible. Normally, a copy of submitted portfolios is retained indefinitely by the Learning & Development Centre for the purposes of assessment moderation and the monitoring of course development and impact. Your e-portfolio, built in MyPortfolio, will be available to you after the close of the course, as long as you remain a member of staff or student at the University of Warwick. It can also be exported into other formats, should you wish. However, you are advised to retain a copy of all documents contained within the portfolio for your own records, if required. Confidentiality is strictly maintained and no access to copies of assessed work is permitted to any persons without your permission, other than those directly involved in assessment procedures and those undertaking course review under quality assurance arrangements recognised by the University. If you do not want copies of your work retained beyond the minimum period required by the University procedures, please inform the Course Secretary. Page 11 of 28 FEEDBACK, EXTERNAL EXAMINATION AND APPEALS The PGA in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education is subject to the normal arrangements and procedures for external examination of postgraduate awards in the Faculty of Social Studies. Candidates must be available for interview by an External Examiner if required. Feedback and exam board Wherever possible, the team will provide written feedback no later than one month after the Exam Board following the submission date. Official feedback and formal confirmation of distinction/merit/pass/refer can only be made after the meeting of the Board of Examiners has taken place. You will be informed when you submit your portfolio when the next Exam Board is due to take place. Holding of assessed work for development purposes A copy of assessed work will be retained by the Learning and Development Centre for the purposes of assessment moderation and the monitoring of course development and impact. Confidentiality is strictly maintained and no access to copies of assessed work is permitted to any persons other than those directly involved in assessment procedures and those undertaking course review under quality assurance arrangements recognised by the University. However, we may ask your permission to use anonymised samples of your work for future training sessions. Appeal In the event of a participant disagreeing with an assessment outcome, the following procedure will be adopted: i. ii. The participant will be required to submit a written statement of the grounds for complaint to the Course Leader. The statement, the submitted work, the assessor's decision and comments, assessment guidelines and any other relevant information will be sent to an External Examiner, who will adjudicate. RESOURCES INDICATIVE READING The following list offers a sample of the growing body of literature focused around academic and professional practice in higher education. Below are some possible core textbooks with additional resources being available on the course Moodle: Exley, K. and Dennick, R. (2004) Small group teaching: Tutorials, seminars and beyond. London: Routledge Fry, H., Letteridge, S. Marshall, S., eds (2014) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. 4th Edition. London: Kogan Page. Harland, T. (2012) University Teaching - An introductory guide. Oxon: Routledge Gibbs. G. & Habeshaw, T. (1992) Preparing to teach : An introduction to effective teaching in Higher Education. 2nd Edition. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services. Page 12 of 28 Huddleston, Prue and Unwin, Lorna (2013) Teaching and learning in further education: diversity and change. London; New York: Routledge, 4th ed. Huston, T.(2009) Teaching What You Don’t Know. London: Harvard University Press. Light, G; Cox, R. and Calkins, S. (2014) Learning and Teaching in Higher Education - The Reflective Professional. London: Sage Morss, K. & Murray, R. (2005) Teaching at University: A Guide for Postgraduates and Researchers. London: Sage. Race, P. (2014) The Lecturer's Toolkit: A practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching. 4 th Edition. London: Kogan Page. Race, P. (2014) Making Learning Happen - A guide for post-compulsory education. London: Sage Ramsden, P. (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London, Routeledge. ONLINE RESOURCES Electronic copies of the all the forms and this handbook are available on the Moodle site http://moodle.warwick.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=12700 You are strongly recommended to refer to the Library resources for more examples of literature including subject specific literature. Resources (including links to databases and further help) can be found on the Library website - http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/subjects/social-sciences/education/ Higher Education Academy (HEA) http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ SEDA (Staff Educational Development Association) SEDA is the professional association for staff and educational developers in the UK, promoting innovation and good practice in higher education. http://www.seda.ac.uk?index.htm The Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) The QAA aims to safeguard and help to improve the academic standards and quality of higher education in the UK. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/default.asp Page 13 of 28 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 DIMENSIONS OF THE HEA FRAMEWORK Areas of Activity A1 Design and plan learning activities and/or programmes of study A2 Teach and/or support learning A3 Assess and give feedback to learners A4 Develop effective learning environments and approaches to student support and guidance A5 Engage in continuing professional development in subjects/disciplines and their pedagogy, incorporating research, scholarship and the evaluation of professional practices Core Knowledge Professional Values K1 The subject material V1 K2 Appropriate methods for teaching and learning in the subject area and at the level of the academic programme Respect individual learners and diverse learning communities V2 Promote participation in higher education and equality of opportunity for learners V3 Use evidence-informed approaches and the outcomes from research, scholarship and continuing professional development V4 Acknowledge the wider context in which higher education operates recognising the implications for professional practice K3 How students learn, both generally and within their subject/disciplinary area(s) K4 The use and value of appropriate learning technologies K5 Methods for evaluating the effectiveness of teaching K6 The implications of quality assurance and quality enhancement for academic and professional practice with a particular focus on teaching Page 14 of 28 APPENDIX 2 HEA DESCRIPTOR 1 – ASSOCIATE FELLOWSHIP OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION ACADEMY Page 15 of 28 APPENDIX 3 MAPPING OF THE COURSE AGAINST THE DIMENSIONS OF THE HEA FRAMEWORK Page 16 of 28 By the end of the course participants will be able to align their practice to Descriptor 1 of the UKPSF. Page 17 of 28 APPENDIX 4 TEACHING LENS ON THE VITAE RESEARCHER DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND THE UK PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FRAMEWORK (UKPSF) Page 18 of 28 APPENDIX 5 PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT PLAN The following plan covers all the assessment requirements for this module. The first requirement is to submit a portfolio development plan to your mentor and to the module leader at the Learning and Development Centre. Ultimately, this plan should be uploaded to or completed in your e-portfolio. The deadline for submission of this document can be found on the PGA website. Email your plan to: [email protected] or upload it directly to your e-portfolio. Name……………………………………………….… Department and contact details……………………………………………………………………... .................................................................................................................................................. Mentor name and contact details………………………………………………………………..…. It is important that this person is experienced with a number of teaching approaches and has taught for several years in higher education, and is based in your department (or related discipline) at Warwick 1. Observations Observing an experienced colleague I anticipate observing……………………………………….…….………on…………………..…… (Identify a teaching event you are able to observe – you will need to provide reflective comments on this event – around 700 words) Being observed by your mentor I anticipate being observed by ……………………………....………….on…………………..…… (You will need to provide reflective comments on this event – around 700 words) Note: There are forms for planning an observation and for carrying one out at the back of this guide. You will find guidance notes on observations on the PGA website. If your department provides observation forms, you may prefer to use those. 2. Feedback I will collect student feedback on my teaching on (specify the module and session) ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………… You will need to accompany this feedback with reflective comments (around 700 words). You will find guidance notes on student evaluation on the PGA website. Page 19 of 28 I will present feedback I have given to students on their work/performance on (specify the module and session) ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………… 3. Session Plan I will provide a session plan on (specify module and session) ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………… You will need to accompany this plan with reflective comments (around 700 words) 4. Reflective Overview of your Academic and Professional Practice This will draw together your reflections and experiences in relation to two areas, and be underpinned by educational theory - around 1400 words. Guidance on writing reflectively will be provided in the workshops. 6. Action plan for future development Produce an action plan at the end to summarise areas for further development. Page 20 of 28 APPENDIX 6 OBSERVATION FORM Is this observation: You being observed by your mentor? You observing an experienced colleague? Part 1 Pre Observation To be completed by the observee Observee’s name Observee’s department Observer’s name Observer’s department Mentor Module Title Peer Date Time Session Title Venue Level Nature of session Lecture Seminar Year Tutorial Practical Demonstration Lab work Other Please provide details Page 21 of 28 Adviser Learning outcomes Please detail the learning outcomes for the session What areas of your teaching would you find most useful to receive feedback on for this session? Part 2 Post observation To be completed by the observee What went well during the observation? Page 22 of 28 Were there any issues/challenges? How did you manage them? Part 3 Post observation To be completed by the observer Please provide feedback on the areas identified by the observee (see above) Please comment on the following aspects of the session Planning, organisation and structure. Consider aspects such as; clarity of structure, context, links with previous sessions, learning outcomes and how these were communicated to the students. Delivery Consider aspects such as; selection of appropriate methods and approaches, presentation, engagement, pace, timing, use of language and the choice of learning resources. Page 23 of 28 Content (if suitably qualified to comment) Consider aspects such as; content pitched at correct level, currency, accuracy use of examples. Student engagement and interaction Consider aspects such as; use of questioning, determining student comprehension, management of student interactions/questions, rapport, consideration of student diversity. Overall style and ambience Consider aspects such as; creating an appropriate learning environment, enthusiasm, confidence. Part 4 Identifying next steps for the postgraduate student To be completed jointly by the observer and observee Recommendations and agreed actions Consider the ways in which you can build on the strengths of this session and learn from any challenges that arose. Page 24 of 28 Support Is any additional support needed to address these recommendations? Where you will that support come from? (Consider more experienced colleagues, peers and the educational literature.) Observee Observer Name Name Signature Signature Date Date Page 25 of 28 APPENDIX 7 TEACHING OBSERVATION REFLECTIONS This document provides ideas about capturing your reflections on the teaching observations. Teaching Observation Reflections You should reflect on your teaching observations after you have undertaken the required observations (i.e. 1 x observation of an experienced member of your department and 1 x being observed) What are the key learning points from the teaching observations? This could include: How learning outcomes were planned and met or where they were not and why. How far were students engaged in the session and what techniques were used to achieve this. What activities were planned during the session and how did they relate to the learning outcomes? Was there enough variety and/or could some activities have been delivered differently? How was learning assessed during the session? How prepared were students coming to the session and was there anything more than could have been done to facilitate that? Were teaching materials and resources used well? Were they accessible and in an appropriate format? What teaching approaches were used and how successful were they? How do the observed sessions relate to the available literature on good practice in teaching and learning? What will you do as a result? Are there any key messages that you will take away from the observation for consideration in your future teaching? Were there any ‘trigger incidents’ (moments of significance) that made you stop and think about teaching and learning and your own practice. Do you plan to make any changes based on what you observed? Might you need to read more about a particular area to expand your own understanding and enhance your practice? Page 26 of 28 APPENDIX 8: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Comprehension Analysis Critique Presentation Distinction Use of wide range of relevant sources, well understood and fully appreciated. Excellent answer to question. Locates suitable concepts and makes comprehensive assessment of issues involved. Understands the relevant theories and applies them to answering the question. Distinctive personal perspective on the problems in the question. Ability to set sources and viewpoints in context and evaluate contributions. Methodological awareness and theoretical appreciation. Well-structured and planned. Clear, articulate style (with good spelling, grammar and syntax). Proper referencing and bibliography. Confident presentation and appropriate length Merit Good understanding of main sources, well summarised and used in a relevant way. Competent answers to the question bringing out useful points and substantiating them. Use of theoretical models in a relevant way to answer to the question. Presentation of arguments and intelligent comments relevant to the question. Appreciation of main issues and ability to make appropriate critical points. Sensible commentary on evidence and materials used Competent structure. Clear presentation (including good spelling, grammar and syntax). Proper referencing and bibliography. Control of length Pass Understanding of the literature and fair range of source material consulted. Limited use and understanding of theoretical models. Presentation of arguments and intelligent comment relevant to the question. Sensible commentary on evidence and materials used. Coherent presentation. Satisfactory spelling, grammar and syntax. Satisfactory referencing and bibliography Refer Some or limited evidence of reading and understanding. Introduction of basic concepts and effort made to relate them to the question. Mainly descriptive unsubstantiated points. Attempt made at coherent presentation. Lack of analytical approach. Page 27 of 28 Lack of a clear critical or appreciative framework. APPENDIX 9: PROGRESS TRACKING PAGE Use this page to plan your attendance on the essential course components. Your final tracking sheet should be maintained in your e-portfolio. Workshop ENHANCING SKILLS IN SMALL GROUP TEACHING REFLECTIVE WRITING LECTURING. ASSESSMENT and RESEARCH-BASED LEARNING TEACHING INCLUSIVELY Online activities TEACHING INCLUSIVELY workshop Free choice workshop 1: Free choice workshop 2: Free choice workshop 3: Substitution: Page 28 of 28 Date booked Attended Rescheduled
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz