OVERVIEW OF STUDENT EVALUATIONS
INQUIRY IN THE COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Washington University in St. Louis
Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program
Instructor
Spring 2015
Overall rating for the instructor
Overall rating for the course
6.75/7 (96%)
6.54/7(93%)
Selected Additional Comments
“Julia Haas is one of the best, if not the best instructors I have had at WashU. She is highly relatable
and makes the class material incredibly interesting, but she also manages to motive [motivate] the
students to go beyond what is required. I have learned more from this course than I have learned in
higher level courses.”
“From the first day of the course, it was obvious that Dr. Haas wanted to create a classroom
environment where everyone felt comfortable participating and working as a team. She made
everyone feel like they were an integral part of the class. She knew everyone’s name by the first week
of class and encouraged her students to get to know each other, as well. She broke down complex
concepts into smaller parts so that they could be understood, and she made sure everyone was on the
same page before moving on with her lectures. She not only taught me about cognitive science, but
also about study habits and writing strategies that I will use throughout the rest of my education. She
was always available for consultation outside of class, and always incredibly willing to help. It is
obvious that she truly cares about the success of her students, and that she will do anything to help
them success. Best professor I’ve had at WashU, hands down.”
INQUIRY IN THE COGNITIVE SCIENCES
Washington University in St. Louis
Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology Program
Instructor
Fall 2014
Overall rating for the instructor
Overall rating for the course
6.10/7 (87%)
5.86/7(84%)
“Professor Haas challenged us to thoroughly understand sometimes difficult material, but this was
very effective as a teaching method and she maintained a very positive and interested attitude as well
as concern for the students.”
“I really appreciated Dr. Haas's concern for the students' success and understanding. She came across
as being accessible and straightforward, and altered lecture formats or explanations for enhanced
clarity when necessary. If approached during office hours, she explains concepts and clears up
confusion effectively according to individual needs.”
ADVANCED TOPICS IN PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY: MORAL PSYCHOLOGY
Emory University
Philosophy Department, Psychology Department
Instructor, Spring 2014
Evaluation of the instructor
Evaluation of the course
Waiting
Waiting
Selected additional comments:
“This course and instructor strongly encouraged discussion + full class participation (Yes, I’m talking
about the cold calling)”
“One of the most enthusiastic and organized Profs I’ve had. The content of this course was
incredibly complex, and you managed to put it all in an understandable light”
BASIC PROBLEMS IN PHILOSOPHY: MORAL PSYCHOLOGY
Emory University
Philosophy Department
Instructor, Spring 2013
Evaluation of the instructor
(94%)
Evaluation of the course
(89%)
8.5/9
8.02/9
Selected additional comments:
“I feel that I’m very aware of current arguments and even managed to gain footing in more classic
arguments of philosophy through a modern lens. I appreciate that a lot. I feel like I can answer more
questions about philosophy and am not totally unaware of how to structure an argument.”
“I was very impressed with the feedback I got on my paper. Even in my freshman writing class, I did
not get this kind of feedback. I know it must’ve taken a long time to grade all those rough drafts and
since mine was among the last that you graded (since mine was somewhat late), I am very touched
that you still paid so much attention to make my paper better.”
INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS
Emory University
Philosophy Department
Instructor, Fall 2012
Evaluation of the instructor
(88%)
Evaluation of the course
(83%)
7.95/9
7.44/9
Selected additional comments: (N/A: lost by Emory Philosophy Department)
INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC
Emory University
Philosophy Department
Instructor, Spring 2011
Evaluation of the instructor
(98%)
Evaluation of the course
(96%)
8.79/9
8.65/9
Selected additional comments:
“In my entire school career of twelve years, I have not come across a teacher who understood her
students so well, taught the course so well, and was so committed to teaching.”
“The enthusiasm was great, especially the help outside of class, and the answering of questions in
class”
“You paid attention to everyone’s needs and were extremely helpful. Class discussion often had
funny, engaging examples. Only suggestion – maybe make the hypothetical problem set slightly
easier!”