802-11 PAR Review - July 2014

June 2015
doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00
IEEE 802.15.4q - Conditional Approval to
Start Sponsor Ballot
Submission
Slide 1
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00
802.15.4q Letter Ballot History
Initial Ballot closed on 17 October 2014
• Vote results (pool of 102 voters)
• 86 responses (84.3 response ratio)
• 75 yes, 12 no (85.31 approval ratio)
• 6 abstain (6.98% abstain ratio)
301 total comments received, 124 “Must Be
Satisfied” (35 accepted, 51 rejected, 38 revised)
Submission
Slide 2
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00
802.15.4q Ballot History (cont’d)
Recirculation Ballot 1 -closed on 10 January, 2015
• Vote results (pool of 102 voters)
•
•
•
91 responses (89.22% response ratio)
72 yes, 13 no (84.71% approval ratio)
6 abstain (6.59% abstain ratio)
120 total comments received, 63 “Must Be Satisfied”
(20 accepted, 33 rejected, 10 revised)
Submission
Slide 3
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00
802.15.4q Ballot History (cont’d)
Recirculation Ballot 2 closed on 5 March, 2015
• Vote results (pool of 102 voters)
• 94 responses (92.16% response ratio)
• 77 yes, 11 no (87.5% approval ratio)
• 6 abstain (6.38% abstain ratio)
217 total comments received, 158 “Must Be
Satisfied” (23 accepted, 11 rejected, 124 revised)
Submission
Slide 4
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00
802.15.4q Ballot History (cont’d)
Recirculation Ballot 3 closed on 25 April, 2015
• Vote results (pool of 102 voters)
• 94 responses (92.16% response ratio)
• 80 yes, 9 no (89.89% approval ratio)
• 5 abstain (5.32% abstain ratio)
93 total comments received, 59 “Must Be Satisfied”
(17 accepted, 26 rejected, 16 revised)
Submission
Slide 5
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 15-15-0458-00
802.15.4q Ballot History (cont’d)
Recirculation Ballot 4 closed on 26 May, 2015
• Vote results (pool of 102 voters)
• 94 responses (92.16 % response ratio)
• 80 yes, 8 no (90.91 % approval ratio)
• 6 abstain (6.38 % abstain ratio)
67 total comments received, 58 “Must Be Satisfied”
(0 accepted, 58 rejected and/or invalid, 0 revised)
Submission
Slide 6
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000
802.15.4q Comment from
Editorial Coordination Staff
• MEC requested
• Approved on April 12, 2015
Submission
Slide 7
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000
Remaining NO Voter Comment Summary
• 288 total “Must Be Satisfied”comments received from the 8
remaining NO voters (includes repeat, duplicate, and invalid votes)
– 150 were accepted or revised
– 138 were rejected (including repeats and dups)
• Excluding repeats (same comment from the same voter), there are
106 unsatisfied comments
• Excluding duplicates (same comment from more than on voter),
there are 94 unique unsatisfied comments
• Of the 94 comments, 10 comments (received on the first 3 ballots),
relate to a section (ALN) that was removed on the 4th ballot,
reducing the number of active unsatisfied unique comments to 84
• Of the 84 comments, 20 comments received on the last
recirculation were invalid (comments on text that had not been
changed or been affected by a change) reducing the total number
of valid active unsatisfied unique comments to 64
•
•
The138 unsatisfied comments and resolutions (including repeats, dups, and invalids) have been copied to doc (15-15-045702-004q-p802-15-4q-remaining-no-voters-unsatisifed-comments-upto-lb107.xlsx) for easy reference with filters
The full Consolidated Comment Resolution Spreadsheet for all ballots can be found at:
– 15-15-0455-00-004q-p802-15-4q-aggregated-comment-resolution-up-to-lb107.xlsx
Submission
Slide 8
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000
Comment Summary by Ballot by No Voter
1
2
3
4
5
Total with
dups &
repeats
3
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
3
3
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
Ballot Number
No Voter
Benjamin A. Rolfe
Assyncronous Link
Networking (ALN)
Editorial
PHY Header (PHR)
Billy Verso
1
1
1
0
PAR and 5C
James Gilb
ALN
Editorial
FEC
Frame Format
Naming of ULP PHYs
PAR and 5C
satisfaction
PHR
Rate Switch
RF
Sync
Transmit
HeaderPower
(SHR)
Control (TPC)
3
0
16
13
6
2
3
3
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
65
65
59
42
2
1
1
2
31
1
1
2
6
35
4
4
10
6
31
2
3
2
6
31
2
3
2
0
31
2
3
2
0
26
1
2
2
2
2
2
6
1
5
1
6
2
6
1
5
1
6
2
6
1
5
1
6
2
1
1
0
1
6
1
1
10
7
2
5
2
8
6
3
9
9
8
8
5
1
2
1
5
1
2
1
5
1
2
1
5
1
2
0
5
1
2
0
5
0
0
0
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
3
3
3
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
Michael Lynch
Editorial
PAR and 5C
TPC
FEC
PAR and 5C
satisfaction
2
2
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Tero Kivinen
9
ALN
Editorial
Information Element
TPC
Grand Total
Submission
2
6
1
5
5
Michael McLaughlin
Total
minus
invalids
93
1
4
Total
minus
inactive
50
Editorial
FEC
RF
TPC
PAR and 5C
0
Total
minus
dups
8
Jeritt Kent
Steve JILLINGS
0
3
Total
minus
repeats
8
5
22
18
16
13
13
7
1
3
1
1
3
10
3
6
3
7
3
5
3
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
0
5
3
5
26
58
138
106
94
84
64
3
2
4
20
28
6
Slide 9
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000
Unsatisfied Comment Summary by Category
Comment Category
ALN
Editorial
FEC
Frame Format
Information Element
Naming of ULP PHYs
PAR and 5C satisfaction
PHR
Rate Switch
RF
SHR
TPC
Totals
Ballot Number:
1
2
3
6
4
1
3
2
2
2
2
3
7
2
3
1
2
2
4
5
5
(valid only)
13
1
1
34
2
1
1
2
2
6
1
7
29
0
0
1
2
2
1
1
0
2
58
2
38
2
4
1
4
20
1
6
28
1
6
4
26
Total (all) Total (unique/valid)
10
10
52
38
6
1
4
2
3
3
10
2
18
3
8
2
2
1
7
0
2
1
16
11
138
74
The138 unsatisfied comments and resolutions (including repeats, dups, and invalids) have been copied to doc
(15-15-0457-02-004q-p802-15-4q-remaining-no-voters-unsatisifed-comments-upto-lb107.xlsx) for easy
reference with filters
.
Submission
Slide 10
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000
Recirc 4 (LB107) Drill Down
• Currently there are 8 outstanding NO Voters
• 5 of the outstanding 8 NO Voters did not respond to
Recirc4
– Of those 5, 4 have not responded since Recirc2.
• On Recirc4, there were 37 valid comments received and
of those:
– 29 were editorial with the proposed resolution being to
defer action until Sponsor Ballot
– 8 were in the more technical categories and of those”
• 7 were repeat comments from earlier rounds
• 1 was new where the commentor had changed his mind
on what he had asked for on the last recirc.
• Bottom line: we are not seeing substantive new
comments and need to move this along.
• Next Steps– Make no further changes to the draft,
ensure all unsatisfied comments/resolutions have been
recirculated and move to Sponsor Ballot
Submission
Slide 11
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000
802.15.4q Balloting & Meeting Schedule
• 6th recirculation
– 17 June 2015 to 2 July 2015
• BRC comment resolution teleconference
– 3 July 2015
Submission
Slide 12
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance
June 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.15-15-0xxx-00-0000
802.15.4q EC motion
802.15 requests the EC to authorize
conditional approval to submit 802.15.4q
draft D5.0 or current revision to Sponsor
Ballot.
(WG 29/7/2)
– Moved: Heile
– Seconded: Mody
– Yes: , No: , Abstain:
Submission
Slide 13
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN Alliance