Vectors in 2-Space and 3-Space : Properties of the determinant function 2. Verify that det(AB) = det(A) det(B) for A= 2 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 2 and B = 1 -1 3 7 1 2 5 0 1 Is det(A+B) = det(A) + det(B) ? Proof. First, we compute AB and A+B. 1 9 AB 31 1 10 0 8 3 17 and A B 10 5 2 0 5 0 3 2 3 So, we expand the |AB| along the 3rd row and get 1 8 9 1 +2 det( AB) 10 10*(-25)+2*40=-170 1 31 17 1 If we expand the |A+B| along the 2nd column, then we have 3 3 det( A B) 5 5(9 15) 30 . 5 3 Secondly, we calculate det(A) and det(B). Expanding det(A) along the 3rd row, we have 2 1 =2(2*4-3*1)=10 det( A) 2 4 3 and expanding det(B) along the 3rd row, we get 1 3 1 1 + det( B) 5 5*(-5)+8=-17 1 2 7 1 It is clear that det(A)*det(B)=10*(-17)=-17=det(AB). However, det(A+B)=-30 which is NOT equal to det(A)+det(B)=-7. 5. Let A = a b c d e f g h i Assuming that det(A) = -7, find b) det(A-1) e) det a g d b h e c i f Solution. b) As AA-1 =I, where I is the identity matrix, we have det(A)*det(A-1)=det(I)=1 So, det(A-1)=1/det(A)=1/(-7)= 17 e) We know that g a d AT b e h and det( AT ) det( A) 7 . c f i By the properties of the determinant, if we exchange the 2nd and 3rd columns, then we have a d a g g d b e b e h det( AT ) (7) 7 h c f i c f i So, a g d b h e 7 c i f 9. Prove the identity without evaluation the determinants. a1 + b1 a2 + b2 a3 + b3 a1 – b1 a2 – b2 a3 – b3 c1 c2 c3 = a1 b1 c1 a2 b2 c2 a3 b3 c3 -2 Proof. By the properties of the determinant, if we add the 2nd column onto the 1st column, then we have a1 b1 a1 b1 c1 2a1 a1 b1 c1 a 2 b2 a 2 b2 c 2 2a 2 a 2 b2 c2 a 3 b3 2a 3 a 3 b3 c3 a 3 b3 c3 Then we take out a factor 2 from the 1st column, we have a1 b1 a1 b1 c1 a1 a1 b1 c1 a 2 b2 a 2 b2 c2 2 a2 a 2 b2 c2 a 3 b3 a 3 a 3 b3 c3 a 3 b3 c3 st Now we multiply the 1 column by -1, then we add the 1st column onto the 2nd column, so we have a1 b1 a1 b1 c1 a1 b1 c1 a 2 b2 a 3 b3 a 2 b2 c2 2 a2 b2 c2 a 3 b3 c3 a 3 b3 c3 Finally, we take out a factor (-1) from the 2nd column, we have a1 b1 a1 b1 c1 a1 b1 c1 a 2 b2 a 2 b2 b2 c2 a 3 b3 a 3 b3 c 2 2 a 2 c3 a3 b3 c3 16. Let A and B be n x n matrices. Show that if A is invertible, then det(B) = det(A-1BA) Proof. We use a fact: For the square matrices A and B, det(AB)=det(A)*det(B). Hence, det(A-1BA)= det(A-1)*det(B)*det(A). …………………..(1) Note that det(A-1)* det(A)= det(A-1A)=det(I)=1 …………………..(2) Note: I is the identity matrix whose determinant is 1. So, by (1)(2), we have det(A-1BA)= det(B) as desired. 18. Prove that a square matrix A is invertible if and only if ATA is invertible. Proof. We use the following theorem (which can be found on any book of Linear Algebra): Theorem: A square matrix A is invertible if and only if |A| is non-zero. First, we prove that, if a square matrix A is invertible, then ATA is invertible. As A is invertible, by the above theorem, we know that | A | 0 . As | AT A || AT || A || A | 2 0 , we conclude by the above theorem that ATA is invertible. Secondly, we prove that, if ATA is invertible, then A is invertible. As ATA is invertible, by the above theorem, we know that | AT A | 0 . As | AT A || AT || A || A | 2 , we conclude that | A | 0 . So, by the above theorem, we know that A is invertible. 10. a) In the accompanying figure, the area of the triangle ABC can be expressed as area ABC = ½ x1 y1 1 x2 y2 1 x3 y3 1 Note: In the derivation of this formula, the vertices are labeled such that the triangle is traced counterclockwise proceeding from (x1, y1) to (x2, y2) to (x3, y3). For a clockwise orientation, the determinant above yields the negative of the area. Proof. We consider two vectors AB and AC. As AB=(x2 -x1, y2 -y1 ) and AC=(x3 -x1, y3 -y1 ), the cross product of these two vectors is AB AC (x2 -x1, y2 -y1 ) (x3 -x1, y3 -y1 ) =[( x2 -x1 )(y3 -y1 )- (x3 -x1 )(y2 -y1 )] k So, the area of the triangle ABC is 1 1 ( x2 -x1 )(y3 -y1 )- (x3 -x1 )(y2 -y1 )] ……………….(1) 2 | AB AC | 2 [ It is easy to prove the right hand side of (1) is equal to ½ | x1 | x2 | x3 We are done. y1 y2 y3 1| 1| 1| Note: Though the vectors AB and AC are 2-dimensional, we can think of them as three dimensional, namely, AB=(x2 -x1, y2 -y1, 0) and AC=(x3 -x1, y3 -y1, 0) b) Use the result in (a) to find the area of the triangle with vertices (3,3), (4,0), (-2, -1). C(x3, y3) · B(x2, y2) A(x1, y1) D E F Figure Ex-10 Solution. Use the formula in (a), we can get the area of this triangle as follows. 3 3 1 Area 12 4 0 1 1 1 1 We evaluate it by the properties of the determinant. Adding the 3rd column onto 1st and 2nd columns, we get 3 1 4 4 1 3 1 1 Area 2 4 1 2 5 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 Then we expand the last determinant along the 3rd row. We have 3 3 1 Area 12 4 0 1 12 1 1 1 4 4 5 1 8 Euclidean Vector Spaces: Euclidean n-Space 6. Let u = (4, 1, 2, 3), v = (0, 3, 8, -2), and w = (3, 1, 2, 2). Evaluate each expression. a) u + v b) u + v c) -2u + 2 u d) 3u – 5v + w e) 1 w w f) 1 w w Solution. a) As u+v=(4, 4, 10, 1), we have || u v || 4 2 4 2 10 2 12 133 ; b) || u || || v || 4 2 12 2 2 32 0 2 3 2 8 2 (2) 2 30 77 ; c) || 2u || 2 || u || 4 || u || 4 4 2 12 2 2 32 4 30 d) As 3u-5v+w=3(4, 1, 2, 3)-5(0, 3, 8, -2)+ (3, 1, 2, 2)=(15, -11, -32, 21), we have || 3u 5v w || 15 2 (11) 2 (32) 2 212 1811 e) As || w || 32 12 2 2 2 2 3 2 , we have 1 ||w|| w 3 1 2 (3,1,2,2) ( f) || ||w1 || w || 1 ||w|| 1 2 , 3 12 , 2 3 , 2 3 ) || w || 1 16. Find two vectors of norm 1 that are orthogonal to the tree vectors u = (2, 1, -4), v = (-1, -1, 2, 2), and w = (3, 2, 5, 4). The question is NOT well-defined, as u is 3-dimensional, but v and w are 4-dimensional vectors. Please check and give me the correct one so that I can help with it. Thanks. 20. Find u v given that u + v = 1 and u – v = 5 Solution. Note that || u v || 2 || u || 2 || v || 2 2u v and || u v || 2 || u || 2 || v || 2 2u v . Hence, || u v || 2 || u v || 2 4u v i.e., 12 5 2 4u v So, i.e., 24 4u v u v 24 / 4 6 24. Prove the following generalization of Theorem 4.1.7. If v1, v2, …, vr are pairwise orthogonal vectors in Rn, then v1 + v2 + … + vr 2 = v1 2 + v2 2 + … + vr 2 Proof. Note that || v1 v2 ... vr || 2 v1 v2 ... vr , v1 v2 ... vr . According to the properties of the inner product, we have v1 v2 ... vr , v1 v2 ... vr = v1 , v1 v2 ... vr + v2 , v1 v2 ... vr +…+ vr , v1 v2 ... vr …………………..(1) Now we evaluate the first term on the right hand side(RHS): v1 , v1 v2 ... vr v1 , v1 v2 ... vr = v1 , v1 + v1 , v2 +…+ v1 , vr As v1, v2, …, vr are pairwise orthogonal vectors, we have v1 , v2 =…= v1 , vr =0 Hence, v1 , v1 v2 ... vr = v1 , v1 || v1 || 2 . Similarly, the second term on RHS is v2 , v1 v2 ... vr = || v2 || 2 … and the last term equals vr , v1 v2 ... vr = || v r || 2 So, together with (1), we get v1 v2 ... vr , v1 v2 ... vr = ||v1 || 2 + ||v2 ||2 + … + ||vr||2 As || v1 v2 ... vr || 2 v1 v2 ... vr , v1 v2 ... vr , we complete our proof. 26. Use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to prove that for all real values of a, b, and , (a cos + b sin)2 a2 + b2 Proof. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality is | u, v ||| u || || v || ……………………………….(1) for any vectors u and v. Now letting u=(a,b) and v=(cos, sin), we have u, v a cos b sin , || u || a 2 b 2 , and || v || (cos ) 2 (sin ) 2 1 1. Hence, together with (1), we get | a cos b sin | a 2 b 2 Then squaring both sides, we get (a cos b sin ) 2 a 2 b 2
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz