7 Important Reasons to go Smoke-Free in workplaces 1. Protects the health and safety of staff and service users There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). SHS poses the same health dangers to those exposed to it as smoking does to the smoker. The National (Australian) Occupational Health and Safety Commissioni says this is the fundamental reason for its elimination in the workplace. Even in outdoor environments, designated smoking areas are rarely far enough away to protect other non-smoking people from SHS. Studies of air quality around smoking areas demonstrate that even in outdoor areas the levels of SHS can be dangerously highii. SHS has particular dangers because the side-stream smoke from cigarettes contains much higher levels of the carcinogens as smoke inhaled by the smokeriii. Therefore 100% smoke-free workplaces represents best practice. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recognises that partial bans with designated smoking areas are not effective in achieving protection from SHS and don’t encourage quitting. 2. Supports quitting The sight and smell of others smoking particularly colleagues, friends etc, is a major trigger to resuming smoking for those trying to quit or cut down. Smoke-free workplaces support people by not creating additional barriers for staff and service users to quit/cut down smoking. Best practice in smoke-free workplace environments includes offering a range of evidence-based quit smoking supports to interested staff and service users to promote quitting. 3. Prevents the uptake of smoking • The normalisation of smoking in a range of workplace and service environments can encourage the uptake of smoking particularly by young people. Mental health facilities and prisons are good examples of settings where people take up smoking as a result of being incarcerated or hospitalised. Other work sectors such as hospitality and community services are further examples of work environments which foster the uptake of smoking through workplace norms i.e. ‘only break you get is the smoko’. 4. Good health promotion practice Environments have a key role to play in shaping and influencing the behaviours of individuals. Health enhancing and risk behaviours are not simply about individual choice but are shaped by the social settings, workplaces and communities in which people live and work. Creating supportive environments in which people can maximise their health and wellbeing is an essential component of a health promoting approach within workplaces. 5. Promoting smoke –free environments de-normalises smoking without demonising smokers. Smoke-free cinemas and public transport are great examples where smoking has been de-normalised, arguably with universal support. Smoke-free environments cater for the majority of people who don’t smoke, (more than 80% Australians don’t smoke). People are still free to exercise their individual choice to continue smoking but simply asked not to smoke in certain environments i.e. workplaces or public areas where their smoking could affect others. In smoke-free workplaces, smokers are restricted to smoking only in their personal time such as unpaid breaks. This further de-normalises smoking by identifying smoking as a personal behavior that is not compatible with the workplace. 6. Saves costs for the organisation Workplace productivity is improved in smoke-free workplaces. There is less absenteeism as the health of staff improves, and reduced wasted time when staff are restricted to smoking only on unpaid time (lunch breaks). Staff morale is also improved when the perceived inequity of smoking staff taking additional breaks to smoke is removed. Workplace safety is enhanced because the risks of accidents and injury are reduced when smoking is no longer permitted. Cleaning and maintenance costs associated with smoking are also less. 7. Smoke-free aligns with social justice values Smoking is a social justice issue because rates of smoking among people living with disadvantage are much higher than for other members of the Australian community. People with multiple disadvantages have the highest rates of all. Smoking is a major reason for the disparity in health between less advantaged and more advantaged citizens. People from disadvantaged groups who smoke also face more barriers in quitting and receive less interest and support from health and community services workers to quit. Smoking is still commonly seen as a matter of personal choice for people from disadvantaged groups, as the ‘least of their problems’ and secondary to the ‘bigger’ issues that underpin disadvantage. When smoking is de-prioritised and is perceived as ‘a small pleasure’ or a ‘crutch’, smoking among disadvantaged groups can be inadvertently reinforced, and the belief that quitting is desirable and possible for disadvantaged groups eroded. i National Occupational Health & Safety Commission (2003) Guidance Note on the Elimination of Environmental Tobacco Smoke in the Workplace [NOHSC:3019(2003)], Commonwealth of Australia ii Repace, James L. 2007. “FACT SHEET: Outdoor Air Pollution From Second-hand Smoke.” Tufts University School of Medicine and Repace Associates, Inc. iii IARC Monograph, volume 83. Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking. 2002
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz