Between Tensions and Opportunities: Strengthening Partnerships Among Civil Society and Sex Worker-led Organizations in Kenya and Ethiopia. Naomi van stapele, Getnet Tadele, Ida Sabelis, Bisrate Markos , Emmy Kageha and Lorraine Nencel ICASA 2015, Harare, Zimbabwe Introduction Part of larger project on economic empowerment of sex workers in Kenya and Ethiopia. A comparative analysis of two stakeholder mappings in Kenya and Ethiopia. Identify interactions between government agencies, NGOs and sex worker-led organizations as strategic actors in combating HIV/AIDS. All groups consider more horizontal partnerships between them as a crucial step for effective response to HIV/AIDS In practice, such partnerships have yet to become fully established. Methods The analysis is based on review of secondary sources and primary data gathered from 30 government organizations, NGOs and sex worker-led organizations in Kenya and Ethiopia from December 2014-February 2015. The comparative analysis looks at possible tensions between different positions of sex work by government, NGOs and sex worker-led organizations and how these shape power relationships between them. Sex work is illegal in both Kenya and grey area in Ethiopia and is regulated in completely different ways. Hence, comparing both countries allows a better understanding of the way different governance regimes of sex work enable or obstruct potential partnerships. CASE 1:KENYA UNAIDS USAID GATES Government: NACC and NASCOP NGO/HR: LVCT, ICRH-K, SWOP, UHAI etc. SW-led: KESWA, HOYMAS, BHESP etc. SACCO/CHAMA Figure 1: Hierarchy of relationships and flow of funds between different (levels of) organizations that engage with sex workers in Kenya. Envisioned partnerships: a gap between theory and practice current strategic aim of government interventions is to move away from topdown approach to key population-driven (i.e. bottom-up) interventions. Discrepancy between strategic directions and narratives and lack of veritable change through action. Barriers and their effects One of the barriers is the divide within government on sex work. Tokenism: Sex workers are invited at the decision-making table by government, but when it is too late and they are not fully involved. This negatively affects health interventions aimed to reach them. Ethiopia The 2009 CSO law prohibits Resident and foreign NGOs not to work on human rights or advocacy issues. Ethiopia: Partnerships and barriers Both the state and non-state actors take sex work as a by-product of poverty, as victims of social problems, and sex workers need to be rehabilitated. The abolitionist view of SW dominates among government and NGO actors engaging with SWs Creates challenges on the way to initiating meaningful dialogue and partnerships among these actors and sex workers Ethiopia: Partnerships and barriers There is clearly little or no room in this line of thinking for a notion of empowerment of sex workers who continue to do sex work. There is also little room for equal partnerships, for victims are to be saved and not to be approached as equal partners. there are very few sex workers led organizations and those that do exist are to a large extent invisible. Sex workers-led organisations do not seem to be represented in high level fora a that deal with HIV or other related issues. Conclusions and Recommendations In Ethiopia, partnerships between government agencies, NGOs and SWs are not aspired even in theory, let alone in action. This has to do with the way sex work is considered in government and Church discourses. These two narratives take sex workers both as victims and sex work as highly immoral. SW in Kenya is considered immoral and criminal and SWs are often arrested by the police In Ethiopia victims are to be rescued and should not be arrested In Kenya, there is more political space for donor-backed advocacy challenging the current status quo Conclusions and Recommendations In both countries dominant framings of sex work prevented meaningful partnerships that are highly needed to develop and implement more effective health interventions. One possible recommendation to solve such tensions is a counter-narrative project, adapted to the different contexts of Kenya and Ethiopia that would engage all relevant stakeholders in a series of meetings to discuss : ◦ dominant notions of sex work, ◦ make implicit and explicit assumptions about sex work ◦ where possible, make space for new notions of sex work based on human rights.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz