INPEX Busin ness Strategy and d Two LNG Project T LNG P j ts ‐ t Ichthys and Abadi I hth d Ab di INPEX COR RPORATION July 3, 2009 Ageenda Mid‐to‐long Term B Business Strategies Gas Market Ichthys LNG Projec Ichthys LNG Projecct Abadi LNG Project Ab d t 1 Cautionary y Statement y Statement This presentation includes forward‐looking This presentation includes forward looking g information that reflects the plan and g information that reflects the plan and expectations of the Company. Such forward d‐looking information is based on the current assumptions and judgments of the Company in light of the information currently available to it, and involves know tl il bl t it di l k wn and unknown risk, uncertainties, and d k i k t i ti d other factors. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the Company’s performance, achievements or financial position to be materially different from any future results, performance, achievements or financial position expressed or implied by such forward‐looking information. Such h risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: include, without limitation: Price volatility and change in demand in crude oil and natural gas Foreign exchange rate volatility Change in costs and other expenses perrtaining to the exploration, development and production The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise the disclosure The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise the disclosure of information in this presentation (includiing forward‐looking information) after the date of this presentation. 2 Mid‐to‐long Term B i o o g e Business Strategies u i e a egie Katsujirro Kida Director Executiv Director, Executiv ve Vice President ve Vice President Awareness of The Bu Awareness of The Bu usiness Environment usiness Environment Recent international financial crisis an nd a decrease in energy demand gy Risks of rapidly and drastically fluctu uating oil and gas prices Increasing priority of natural gas in reesponse to environmental issues Increasingly intense competition for r I i l i t titi f resources, mainly, among the major i l th j international oil and gas companies aand the state enterprises in China and India Rising technical and economic hurdlees as project sites shift towards frontier areas To replace reserves is necessary, but d difficult to implement Escalated exploration and production Escalated exploration and production n costs and increased risks of production n costs and increased risks of production schedule delay The international business environ nment surrounding the upstream industry has been increasingly sev vere and uncertain Stable demand for natural gas/LN Stable demand for natural gas/LN NG in the long term NG in the long term 4 Our Strength Our St Strong reserve/resource ba ase Large‐scale LNG projects a as an operator Gas supply chain Strong financial position Strong financial position Financial scheme by gover Financial scheme by governmental financial nmental financial institutions in Japan 5 Strong Reserve//Resource Base Strong Reserve/ /Resource Base 3,348 Reserve Life** (RP Ratio) 5,000 4,774 4,500 Gas 1,823 (44%) 4,000 3,500 3,176 MMBOE 3,000 Possible Reserves + Contingent Resources 3,176 32.3 years 2,500 2,000 1 598 1,598 1,500 484 484 484 1,000 1 114 1,114 500 10.8 years 1 114 1,114 Liquids 2,651 (56%) 1 114 1,114 0 Proved Developed Reserves * 6 ** Proved Undeveloped Reserves Proved Reserves Probable Reserves Proved + Probable Reserves Proved reserve volumes are based on the reserves report (preliminary) by DeGolyeer and MacNaughton applying SEC regulations. Probable reserve volumes are based on the reserves report (preliminary) by DeGolyer and MacNaughton applying SPE/WPC/A AAPG/SPEE guideline (SPE‐PRMS) approved in March 2007. The volumes are the sum of proved reserves and probable reserves by SPE‐PRMS after deduction of proved reserves by SEC regulations. Volumes attributable to the equity method affiliates are included. Reserve Life = Proved (+Probable) Reserves as of March 31, 2009 / Production for thee year ended March 31, 2009 (RP Ratio: Reserve Production Ratio) Mid‐to‐Long Term Objectiives for Corporate Growth and Fundamen dF d ntal Strategies t l St t i Mid‐to‐Long Term Objectiv g j ves for Corporate Growth p Raise the daily production level up p to 800,000 to 1 million barrels (crude oil equivalent) by 2020, and establish a a firm position as a global independent upstream company with global com upstream company with global com mpetitiveness Maintain RRR to be over 100% in m mid‐to‐long term E Establish a gas supply chain with t bli h l h i i h the upstream business of oil and natural h b i f il d l gas remaining as our core businesss, as well as evolve into a company with other fortes besides oil and naturall gas, supplying diversified energies g pp y g g Maintain financial health, empoweer corporate vitality, and increase corporate value Fundamentaal Strategies 7 Sustainable expansion of our upst p p tream business Establishment of a gas supply cha ain and proactive expansion of the gas business Evolvement into a company that o offers diversified forms of energy Net Production* V Net Production V Volume Volume Projection Projection Frade Oil Field Long term production target +4 Thousand BOED (Started in Jun. 2009) (800‐1 000 thousand BOED) (800‐1,000 thousand BOED) Tangguh LNG h G +6 Thousand BOED (Started LNG producction in Jun. 2009 and expected to ship 1st cargo soon) Van Gogh Oil Field +4 Thousand BOED (Expected to start in O Oct.‐Dec. 2009) New Projects 1000 900 800 (Thousa and BOED) 700 Year ended March 31, 2009‐2011 CAGR: 6.9% 600 500 462 405 424 454 452 454 5% Kashagan Oil Field (Expected to start in 2012) 400 4% 300 36% 200 6% 11% Abadi LNG Project 100 46% 35% (Expected to start in 2016) 0 43% Ichthys LNG Project Existing Projects (Expected to start in 2015) (Expected to start in 2015) 8% Mar. '09 6% Mar. '10(E) Japan Mar. '11(E) Mar. '12(E) Asia/Oceania Mar. '13(E) Eurasia 2020 Mar. '14(E) Miiddle East/Africa Americas Note: Assuming oil prices (Brent) of $52.5 in the year ending March 31, 2010 and $660 in the March 31, 2011 or later in the light of the recent market conditions. 8 * The production volume of crude oil and natural gas under the production sharing ccontracts entered into by INPEX Group corresponds to the net economic take of our group. Gas M a Market a e Katsujirro Kida Director Executiv Director, Executiv ve Vice President ve Vice President World Natural Gas Demand Projection World Natural Gas Demand Projection Projection TCF 180 World Naturral Gas Demand Growth CAGR(2006~2030): 1.59% Asia/Oceaniia Natural Gas Demand CAGR(2006~2030): 3.17% 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1990 2005 2006 Asia/Oceania Europe (w/o Russia) 2010 North America 2015 Middlee East 2020 Russia Latin America 2025 2030 Africa Source: EIA International Energy Outlook 2009 10 LNG Demand Prrojection in Asia LNG Demand Pr rojection in Asia mtpa 200 Sup pply & Demand Gap (apprrox. 75mtpa in 2020) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2007 11 Japan Demand Korea Demand Taiwan Demand China Demand India Demand D Others Demand Contractual Supply 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: Wood Mackenzie Asia Pacific New & Expa Asia Pacific New & Expa anded LNG Projects anded LNG Projects Startup from mid-2010s onward Area < Australia > Project Capacity (mtpa) ( ) Australia-Pacific LNG Gorgon GLNG Gladstone LNG Ichthys Pluto Expansion QC LNG 7.0 15.0 3.5 15 1.5 8.4 4.8 74 7.4 < Other Asia Pacific Area> Abadi Donggi Senoro LNG PNG LNG Sakhalin Expansion 4.5 2.0 63 6.3 4.8 Total 65 2 65.2 Source: Wood Mackenzie 12 LNG M Market i th Middl East & the Atlantic in the Middle Ea t & th Atl ti New LNG Supply for European & North America an Market Shtokman Kitimat LNG Skikda Rebuild Arzew LNG (GL3-Z) Damietta Exp. Libya a Exp. Qatargas-3 Qatargas-4 Venezuela LNG Rasgas-3 Bra ass LNG NLN NG VII Plus Eq quatorial Guinea LNG 2 A Angola LNG Peru LNG LNG Market 13 LNG Flow New & expanded LNG Projects in the Middle East & the Atlantic LNG Supply & Demand in Japan LNG Supply & D Demand D in Japan mtpa 90 Supply & Demand Gap (approxx. 25mtpa in 2020) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Contracted Supply (assumption) 10 LNG Demand 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Source: Wood Mackenzie 14 LNG Pricee Formula LNG Price e Formula Asian LNG Prices are generally li g y inked to JCC (Japan Crude Cocktail) ( p ) Indonesian LNG Prices are linked d to ICP (Indonesian Crude Price) There There is a time lag between the m is a time lag between the m movement of crude oil and LNG movement of crude oil and LNG prices: LNG prices are normally llinked to JCC a few months before the date of LNG sale. LNG Price LNG Price Crude Oil Paritty Crude Oil Price LNG Pric ce Formula P(LNG Price) = A(Slope)×IIndex(ex. JCC) + B(constant) 15 Gas Ma Gas Ma arketing Japanese Electric and City Ga El d C G s Companies are favorable C f bl buyers because of their longsttanding track records as LNG users and stable financial statu d t bl fi i l t tus. In addition, supply to I dditi l t Japanese domestic gas markett by utilizing our gas infrastructures consisting of Naoetsu LNG Receiving infrastructures consisting of N Naoetsu N LNG Receiving Terminal and pipeline networrks and other Asian markets are also taken into consideration also taken into consideration. Long‐term LNG SPAs still hav ve been predominant in Asia‐ Pacific LNG Market. f k IINPEX leads the marketing ac E ea e a e i g activities for its operator LNG i i ie o i ope a o projects. Generally LNG is maarketed to buyers jointly by project partners, unlike equity p j p q y y lifting in oil sales. g 16 I Ichthys LN y NG Project oje Seiya Ito Director Managiing Executive Officer Director, Managi ing Executive Officer Senior General Manageer, Ichthys Project Division Ichthys Projeect Location Ichthys Proje ect Location Abadi WA‐285‐P Ichthys Field WA 285 P Ichthys Field WA‐285‐P Ichthys Field and Adjacent Area 18 Extent of Icchthys Field Extent of Ic chthys Field Long side: approx. 40km Short side: approx. 15km+ Area: approx. 600km2 Omiya M Minamikoshigaya Kashiwa M t d Matsudo Fussa Ichikawa Ikebukuro Mitaka T Tachikawa hik Nakano Hachioji Ueno S Shinjuku Tokyo Tsudanuma Shibuya Noborito Chiba Machida Kawasaki Yokohama k h 0 10km 19 Brief Summa Brief Summa ary of Permit ary of Permit Permit Holders: Permit Holders: INPEX Brow INPEX Brow wse Ltd wse, Ltd. (76%) TOTAL E&P Australia (24%) y y ((Currently in y n 1st Extension Sep.6, 2004 ‐ p Sep.5, 2009) p ) Term: 6 years + 5 years * Primary Term was 6 years from 19988. Plan is to apply for 2nd Extension for 5 years. Location Block: 11 graticular blockss May 25, 2004 – May 24, 2008 (Retention Lease ap (Retention Lease ap pplication is currently under pplication is currently under government evaluaation.) Permit Area: 3,041km2(5,049km2 att commencement in 1998) Minimum Work Obligations: 1st Extension Period Extension Period Primary Term Primary Term Year Minimum Work O Obligations Year Minimum Work Obligations 1 4500km 2D Seismic/G G&G 1 G&G 2 2 wells/G&G 2 G&G 3 1 well/G&G 3 250km2 3D Seismic/G&G 2 4 Seismic/G&G 1 well/1,200km 3D S 4 G&G 5 1 well/G&G 5 1 Well/G&G 6 G&G G&G: Geological and Geophysical Studies 20 Exploratio on History on History 1998 Mar.: WA‐285‐P offered in the Australian Government’s 1997 Offshore Exploration acreage gazette. WA‐285‐P (Share 100%). Aug.: Obtained Exploration Permit for the W Dec.: Acquired 2D seismic with line length approx. 4,700km. Mar. 2000 – Feb. 2001 1st Drilling Campaign of 3 wells (Dinichthys‐ Drilling Campaign of 3 wells (Dinichthys‐‐1, Gorgonichthys‐1, Titanichthys‐1) ‐1 Gorgonichthys‐1 Titanichthys‐1) encountered gas and condensate pools in eacch well. May‐Oct. 2001: Th The structure was named ‘ICHTHYS GAS A d ‘ICHTHYS GAS AND CONDENSATE FIELD’ after the 3D Seismic AND A CONDENSATE FIELD’ f h 3D S i i data acquisition / processing / interpretation n. Jun. 2003 ‐ Feb. 2004: 2nd Drilling Campaign, 3 wells (Ichthys‐1A, Ichthys Deep‐1, Ichthys‐2A/ST1) confirmed areal extension of the reservoir and its hydro ocarbon pool. Apr.2007 ‐ Jun. 2008: Apr.2007 Jun. 2008: Drilled Dinichthys North‐1、Ichthys West‐1 aand examined further areal extension of the Ichthys Gas and Condensate pool. Note: Current reserve volume of Ichthys Fielld is estimated to be 12.8TCF Gas and 527 MM Note: Current reserve volume of Ichthys ld is estimated to be 12 8TCF Gas and 527 MM barrels of Condensate 21 Outline for Devellopment Concept Outline for Devel lopment Concept LNG Production: approx. 8.4 millio on ton per year Condensate Production: approx. 1000,000 barrel per day LPG Production: approx. 1.6 million n ton per year Subsea Production Wells: 30 wells Subsea Production Wells: 30 wells at Brewster, 20 wellls at Plover at Brewster 20 wellls at Plover 4 Reservoir Depth: approx. 3,900m ‐ 4,600m Subsea Production Facilities: Flow L Subsea Production Facilities: Flow L Line, Flexible Riser Line, Flexible Riser Offshore Production Facilities: CPF F (Semi‐submersible Type) + FPSO (Condensate Storage and shipping)) Gas Export Pipeline: 42 inch Design Life: 40 years At Darwin Onshore Facilities produce, storage, and ship LPG and LNG At Darwin Onshore Facilities, prod uce storage and ship LPG and LNG Storage Tank capacity: LNG Tank :2 x 175,000m :2 x 175,000m m3(approx. 160,000 ton) (approx. 160,000 ton) – LNG Tank – C3 Tank :1 x 90,000m3 (approx. 40,000 ton) – C4 Tank :1 x 90,000m3 (approx. 50,000 ton) – Condensate Tank :2 x 60,000m3 (approx. 760,000 barrel) 22 Overall Develo Overall Develo opment Image opment Image Condensa ate 85,000 bpd d (peak) CPF FPSO LNG 8.4 million ton/year LPG 1.6 million ton/year y Condensate 15,000 bpd 15,000 bd (peak) Flexible Risers L Future Plover Future Plover Subsea Wells 23 Brewster Subsea Wells N G Gas Export Pipeline Gas Export Pipeline Darwin Onshore Plant O h l 42” x approx. 885km Inage Offshore Faccility Layout Offshore Fac cility Layout CPF OFFTAKE TANKER FPSO SUBSEA CONDENS SUBSEA CONDENS SATE TRANSFER LIN NE Image 24 Subsea Well and Infield Flowline Subsea Well and Infield Flowline CPF FPSO Drill Cen nter Flow Line Development Well 25 Water Depth: approx. 250m Image CPF/F FPSO Flare Stack Flexible Riser Image • 100m x 1 100m x 100m. One of the biggest size in the world (similar size 100m 1 One of the biggest size in the world (similar size to GOM Thunder Horse) • Living Q Quarter (150 personnel capacity) will be installed in South sid de • Flexible Riser will be installed in North side. • 3500mx58m • Liq quid from CPF will be transferred through Turret • Sto orage Capacity : 1.2 million barrel • Gaas will be backed to CPF upon re‐pressurized • Liv ving Quarter (150 capacity) will be installed ving Quarter (150 capacity) will be installed Turret Image 26 Gas Exporrt Pipeline Gas Expor rt Pipeline Specification – – – – – – Size and Thickness Si d Thi k Length Allowable Pressure Material Total Weight Wate Depth at Routee Water Depth at Route : 42”x33.5 mm 42” 33 5 : approx. 885 km : 200 Bara : X65 : approx. 800,000 ton : approx. 250m ‐ app o 250 0 0m Image 27 LNG Plant Siite Location I LNG Plant Si ite Location I Decided Onshore LNG Plant Site at D Darwin – – Announcement was issued at Darwin dat Announcement was issued at Darwin datte of 26 te of 26th Sep. 2008 Sep 2008 Messrs. Martin Ferguson, Minister for Ressources and Energy CW, Minister for Tourism and Paul Henderson Chief Minisster NT attended 28 LNG Plant Site Location II LNG Plant Si te Location II D Darwin Airport Darwin East Arm Port East Arm Port Darwin LNG Channel Island Power Station Plant Site Blaydin Point 5km 29 LNG Plan LNG Plan nt Layout nt Layout Image 30 Module Offloading Facility Module Offlo ading Facility Image 31 GHG (Greenhouse Gas) Management I GHG (Greenhouse G Gas) G Management I Situation Situation in Australia in Australia ‐ Carbon Capture and Storage (CC CS) Law (Offshore Petroleum Amendment (Greenhouse Gas Storage)) became effective in Nov. 2008 Amendment (Greenhouse Gas S Storage)) S became effective in Nov. 2008 ‐ CCS acreages released in Mar. 2009 heme (CPRS: emissions trading scheme) ( g ) ‐ Carbon Pollution Reduction Sch bill passed House of Representaatives on Jun. 4, 2009 and sent to Senate. ‐ CPRS bill to be voted in Senate iin Aug. 2009 ‐ Government expects CPRS to co ommence in Jul. 2011 INPEX Efforts ‐ Reduce GHG emissions from On nshore Liquefaction Plant ‐ Study measures to offset GHG eemissions • Biosequestration, Geosequestration, Australian Emissions Units A E U (emission permits) etc. 32 GHG (Greenhouse Gas) Management II GHG (Greenhouse G Gas) G Management II Total emission of GHG : 280MMt///40years, 7MMt/year y , /y Below shows CO2 emission in kg per 1MWh electric generation 33 * H Historical Aus LNG : NWS, Darwin LNG Contribution to Local Community Contribution to L Local L Community Fred’s Pass Rural Show (May 2009) y Djarindjin Signing Ceremony (April 2009) 34 Developmen nt Schedule nt Schedule Application of A l f Environmental Approval Government Approval Submission of additional information Public Comments Public Comments Application of Production Licence FID To obtain Environm To obtain Environm ment Approval ment Approval To obtain Productiion Licence FEED Onshore & Onshore & Offshore Facilities Gas Marketing D Detailed Engineering EPC D i i Decision Procurement Construction LNG purchase commitmeent from buyers 2010 35 First LNG 2015 Project Organ Project Organ nization Chart nization Chart 24% TOTAL E&P Australia TOTAL E&P Australia WA‐285‐P Joint Venture 76% INPEX Brow wse, Ltd. (Operato or) Perth Tokyo Head Office Ichthys Project Committee Managing Director H d fP j t Head of Project Deputy Head of Project Offshore Coordination Onshore Coordination Project Coordination Corporate Coordination Onshore Facility QHSE External Affairs & JV Subsurface Civil Environment HR Drilling & Completion Yokohama Office GHG Fi Finance & & Administration Project Services Commercial & Legal Contracts & Procurement IT Logistics Darwin Office E l ti Exploration Offshore Facility London / Oslo Office O Operations ti 36 A a i NG Project Abadi LN oje Shunich hiro Sugaya Director Managin Director, Managin ng Executive Officer ng Executive Officer Senior General Manageer, Masela Project Division Masela PSC Block Masela P PSC P Block Banda Banda Sea 0 Kai Islands Seaa 200km Tanimbar Islands Saumlaki Masela Is Indonesia Massela PSC Block Dili East Timor Abadi Timor Barossa Caldita C ldit E Evans Shoal South Evaans Shoal Sunrise Kupang Laminaria Corallina Buffalo Elang-Kakatua Timor Sea BayuーUndan Jabiru Challis Cassini Skua Aru Islands Talbot Petrel Crux Australia Darwin Tern Cornea Ichthys WA 285P Blacktip 38 Exploration n Milestones n Milestones Nov. 16, 1998 Feb. – Mar. 1999 Oct. – Dec. 2000 Jul. – Sep. 2001 Mar. – Oct. 2002 2003 – 2007 May 2007 – Jul. 2008 Sep 2007 – Nov. 2008 Sep. 2007 Nov 2008 PSC signed SC d 2D seismic survey (2,9948km) by Marine Vessel Geco Rho Drilling of Abadi‐1 by y rig Energy Searcher 3D seismic survey (2,0060km2) by Marine Vessel PGS Ramform Challenger 1st appraisal drilling b pp g by rig Energy Searcher (2 wells) y g gy ( ) Subsurface studies and d development concept selection studies 2nd appraisal drilling by rig Ocean General (4 wells) Pre‐FEED Pre FEED of Floating of Floating LNG M/V Geco Rho M/V PGS Ramform Challenger Energy Searcher 39 Ocean General Abadi Gaas Field I Abadi Ga as Field I Abadi Gas/Condensate Field d North - Water Depth: Water Depth: 400 400 ‐ 800m m 4 5 West - Reservoir Depth: 3,700 ‐‐ 3,900m 6 2 7 SW - Areal closure: more than Areal closure: more than n 1 000km2 n 1,000km 3 1 South Discovered gas and condenssate in Abadi‐1 exploration well in 2000 Drilled 6 additional appraisaal wells, and confirmed the extension of gas and conden g nsate in the Abadi structure The gas reservoir pressures are plotted on the same line in the pressure vs depth plot w p p p which demonstrate the communication of the pressu ure between wells 40 Abadi Gaas Field II Abadi Ga as Field II Omiya Minamikoshigaya Kashiwa North Matsudo Fussa Ikebukuro Mitaka Tachikawa Hachioji Ichikawa Ueno Nakano Tsudanuma Shinjuku West Shibuya Tokyo South Noborito Chiba South West Machida Kaw wasaki Yokohama 0 41 10km Production Sha Production Sha aring Contract aring Contract Contractor: Effective Date: Contract Period: Exploration Period: INPEX Masella, Ltd. (100%) Nov. 16, 19988 30 years oceed to Development and Production 10 years (pro Period in case of commercial discovery) Contract Area : 3,221.3km2 (aalready had done twice partial relinquishmeent from 5,725km ent from 5 725km2) Indonesian Participation: Obligation to Obligation to o propose the transfer of 10% interest to o propose the transfer of 10% interest to Indonesian co ompany, which Indonesian Government designates after the discovery of commercial o oil and gas field 42 Plan of Dev Plan of Dev velopment In Sep. 2008, INPEX submitted the POD of the A Abadi gas field, and BPMigas approved it in principle gas field, and BPMigas approved it in principlee. e. Approved Development Concept ‐ Floating LNG ‐ Initial development focusing on the North block ‐ The LNG production of 4.5MTPA for moree than 30 years y ‐ Condensate production of 13,000 bpd ‐ Subsea production System Advantages of the FLNG development Option FLNG 3D Imaga Hull Size: 500m length × 82m width ‐ Minimum Environmental Impact ‐ Reduction Reduction in CAPEX, OPEX and abandonm in CAPEX OPEX and abandonm ment ment work & cost ‐ Possibility to reduce project lead time Schedule ‐ Currently, working on the preparation for FEED ‐ Production start‐up expected in 2016 43 SUBSEA Image Floatin ng LNG ng LNG Development Facilities p : Development Scheme Development Well : Floating LNG : Subsea Production System + Floating LNG y g 18 production wellls (Directional Wells from 5 Drilling Center) Loading LNG Plan nt, LNG Storage Tank, and Loading facility on conventional FPSO ti l FPSO O Flare Stack Accommodation Utility Process Stern Swivel Bow LNG Loading Arm Turret Tank 44 FLNG Layout FLNG L L Living Quarter Utility Area Process Area Flare St k Stack Turret Stern 500m Bow 82m 45 Condensate Offloading Hose Reel LNG Loading g Arm Developmen nt Schedule nt Schedule Final Investment Decisio on(FID) First LNG Public Announcement Local hearing Environmental & Environmental & Environmental Environmental Social Impact Permit Assessment Government Go ernment Approval Detailed Engineering l dE FEED Procurement EPC Decision Floating LNG oa i g NG Subsea Production System Construction LNG purchase commitmeent from buyers Gas Marketing g 2016 2011 46 Organization of Projject Implementation Organization of Proj ject Implementation Old Organization (Jun. 2009) (Jun. 2009) ADM FIN GM G&O EXPL PE New Organization ((FEED phase) p ) OPE Total Manpower Total Manpower (as of Jun. 2009) (as of Jun 2009) Expat: 27 (16) National: 64 (36) Figure in parenthesis is current manpower * Figure in parenthesis is current manpower President Director Indonesia Assets Director GA&HR Legal & Insurance Finance G&O Masela Asset Director PE Supporting function & Non Operator Project 47 EXPL HSE Project Service Masela Project Subsurface Drilling Facility Engineering Pre-Pro O&M Strategic Planning Appe endix i Cost Calculattion Accuracy Cost Calculat tion Accuracy From FEED Phase to Development Phase Phase/Class and Cost Calculation Accuracy Estimate Accuracy vs Phase/Class 90/10 Concept Select CS Class 1 Assess (S (Screening) i ) Final Investment Final Investment Decision EED Decision FE FID FEED FEED Engineering Accuracy +40% Class 2 Select (Study) Accuraccy +30% Class 3 Develop (Budget) A Accuracy +15% Detailed Engineering Class 4 Execute (Control) Accuracy +10% Allowance & Contingency Accuracy ‐10% 10% 50/50 Allowance & Contingency Accuracy ‐40% Allowance & Contingency 25% Accuraccy ‐30% Allowance & Contingency A Accuracy ‐15% 30% 10/90 49 Base Base Estimate Base Estimate Base Estimate Base Estimate Price Trends of Mateerials & Machineries Price Trends of Mate erials & Machineries Monitoring price trends of materials d f ls, machineries, labor wages and h l b d various services based on the analyssis of various cost data. Development budget which reflects D l t b d t hi h fl t the characteristics of the Project th h t i ti f th P j t (statutory requirements, environmen ntal requirements, etc.) will be calculated based on the optimization n of the plant specification in line with the o e of ba i de i (FEED) , and, efficient tendering process of the progress of basic design (FEED) a d effi ie t te de i o e of machineries, materials and services u utilizing the contract strategy which matches the fixed specification. The international prices for engineerring, materials, machineries, labor, steel, logistics, pipeline construction n vessels, rigs and so on, are showing a declining trend since 3Q of last year up to now. Nonferrous metal prices declining trend since 3Q of last year up to now Nonferrous metal prices declined by the end of last year but aare currently showing a tendency to rise from the beginning of this year. According to CERA’s statistics, the u upstream development costs in the Asia‐Pacific region for 1Q of 2009 haas reduced 11% compared with half a year ago. year ago. 50 Price Trends of Materiaals & Machineries, Rigs , g <Prices for Materials & Machineries, Labor W Wages> g ((1Q/2009)) Engineering, Machineries, Bulk Materialss, Logistics: fallen 4 to 10% compared with 4Q/2008. On the other hand, lack of skilled labor in , n Australia is continuing and labor wages g g are on a rising trend. <Steel Prices> (Spot price for 1Q/2009. Approx. 30% of Jappanese steel mill products are dealt in the spot market.) All kinds of steel: fallen 30 to 40% compa All ki d f t l f ll 30 t 40% ared with 3Q/2008. d ith 3Q/2008 Hot Rolled Plates required for the Ichthys Pipeline: fallen over 40% from the peak period. <Nonferrous Metal Prices> (LME forward price for 22Q/2009) Nonferrous metal prices have reached prrice bottom around the end of 2008 and come back to recovery trend to some exteent now. Nickel, Copper, Aluminum are half come back to recovery trend to some exte ent now. Nickel, Copper, Aluminum are half of price range of 3Q/2008. <Rig Rates> (1Q/2009) Rig rates are maintained in a high level p d h hl l position or rising trend . Especially, it is d E ll remarkable for floaters in West African sh hallow waters (0 ‐ 3000ft) and mid/deep water. On the other hand, floater rates for Asia‐P O th th h d fl t t f A i Pacific shallow waters (0 ‐ P ifi h ll t (0 3000ft) which will 3000ft) hi h ill be related to Ichthys, are exceptionally po ositioned in declining trend. 51 Markett Trend t Trend M a r k e t Tr rend ( 2 0 0 6 / 3 Q - 2 0 09 0 /1Q) Price Ind dex (2006/3 3Q = 100) 140 135 130 125 120 Engineering 115 110 105 100 95 Materials & Machineries Bulk Materials Logistics Expenses Labour Rates 2009-1Q 2008-4Q 2008-3Q 2008-2Q 2008-1Q 2007-4Q 2007-3Q 2007-2Q 2007-1Q 2006-4Q 2006-3Q 90 52 Condensatee Marketing e Marketing Market: – Condensate production of 1.85 milllion barrels per day and consumption of 1.07 million barrels per day in total Asia (Year 2007) – Condensate production of 670 thou usand barrels per day and consumption of 450 th 450 thousand barrels per day in As db l d i Asia except the Middle East (Year 2007) i t th Middl E t (Y 2007) – 200 thousand barrels per day impo orted to Japan (Year 2008) – Surplus condensate is mainly expo orted to U.S.A and Europe. Buyers: Japan, South Korea, China, Taiiwan, Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia etc. Use: Petrochemical material, Refinery m material Price: Price: Linked to price of Dated Brent, D Linked to price of Dated Brent Dubai, and similar crude producing in the Dubai D and similar crude producing in the surrounding area Contract Type: FOB or CFR Contract Type: FOB or CFR Contract Term: Annual term and Spot 53 LPG Ma LPG Ma arketing Market – U.S. is the largest LPG consumer in U S i the la e t LPG o u e in the world, while in Asia‐Pacific, China, the o ld hile i A ia Pa ifi Chi a Japan and India are the main consu umers in the order of consumption. – Japan is the world largest LPG imp porter importing with about 14 million ton per year It accounts for approx ton per year. It accounts for approx ximately 80% of total consumption in ximately 80% of total consumption in Japan. (2008) – Main exporters are countries in thee Middle East, while main importers are countries in the East Asia including countries in the East Asia including g Japan. About 30 million ton of LPG is g Japan. About 30 million ton of LPG is supplied to East Asian countries, w which corresponds to a half of world sea traded LPG volumes. (2008) Buyers – LPG wholesalers and some of Electric/City Gas companies are directly i po i g importing LPG in Japan. i Japa Price – Saudi CP (Contract Price) is the ext Saudi CP (Contract Price) is the exttensively‐used benchmark for world tensively‐used benchmark for world exported LPG Prices, made availab ble in the beginning of each month by Saudi Aramco, national oil compan ny of Saudi Arabia. Argus FEI (Far East Index, the averaged spot price in F g p p Far East) monthly announced by Argus is ) y y g becoming another benchmark price for LPG in East‐Asian market. Source: Poten & Partners 54 Taxation Schem Taxation Schem me in Australia me in Australia Sales Cost of Goods Sold ⇒(Oil/Gas sales price)×(Salles volume) ⇒OPEX incurred in relevant years(+Exploration cost)+CAPEX depreciation ・・・・・・・・・・・① ・・・・・・・・・・② ・Depreciation ⇒ Straight‐line Meth hod (effective life: 15 years for Production Facilities; 20 years for Pipelines) The majority of the expenditu The majority of the expenditu ure constitute PRRT(Petroleum Resource Rent Tax) payments ure constitute PRRT(Petroleum Resource Rent Tax) payments Selling, General and Administrative Expenses A i is a i e E pe ses Corporate Tax (In Australia) 55 PRRT=(Upstream Revenue-Upsttream Capex & Opex- Expl. Cost-Abandonment Cost- undeducted carried forward PRRT expenditure e)×40% ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・③ ・PRRT deductions are made in n the following order: Upstream Capex, Opex, Expl. Cost, Ab d Abandonment Cost. tC t Note: Exploration cost is subjecct to mandatory transfer between Projects/members of same group of entities. ・Upstream Revenue = Revenu p ue from Oil and Gas sales or GTP×Sales volume ※GTP (Gas Transfer Price) →Aveerage of “Cost Plus Price” and “Net Back Price” ※Cost Plus Price → identify valu ue based on Upstream costs ※Net Back Price → identify valuee based on LNG FOB sales price less Downstream costs ・Undeducted Undeducted PRRT Expenditure: PRRT Expenditure: non‐utilised PRRT deductible expenditure can be carried forward to the non‐utilised PRRT deductible expenditure can be carried forward to the following year(s), which is subject to augmentation at the rates set out below; Development cost: LTBR+5%; Exp pl. Cost: LTBR+15%; Abandonment cost: LTBR *GDP Factor applies to all expend diture incurred more than 5 years before the Production Licence application is made. app i a io i a e *LTBR = Long Term Bond Rate ustralia *GDP Factor = GDP Deflator of Au = (①-②-③-Interest paiid)×30% Note: Gas Transfer Price “Gas Transfer Pricing” rules prevent taxpayers from setting arbiitrary upstream gas sales price where both upstream and downstream interests are held by the same entity (or entities). Ichthys Projject History Ichthys Proj ject History INPEX Browse, Ltd. 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 20 003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Contract Year Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 1RY1 1RY2 1RY3 1RY4 1RY5 2RY1 WA‐285‐P / Ichthys Permit Effective Date (1998/8/19) Geophysics Activities Location Blo ock Approval 2D seismic data acquisition 1st renewal , partial relinquishment 2nd renewal, partial relinquishment 3D seismic data acquiisition (multi‐client data: Dinichthys 1 Dinichthys‐1 Drilling (Ichthys/WA‐285‐P) Dinichthys North 1 Dinichthys North‐1 Ichthys 1A Ichthys‐1A Ichthys Deep‐1 Gorgonichthys‐1 Ichthys West‐1 Ichthys‐2A/ST2 Titanichthys‐1 Commencement Onshore FEED Development Engineering Commencement Offshore FEED 56 Abadi Projeect History ect History PSC Sign: Nov. 16, 98 2 25% Partial Relinquishment PSC Area Enlargement (362km2) 25% Partial Relinquishment Seismic Geco Rho PGS Ramform Challenge er 3D 2 2,060km 060km2 2D 2 2,948km 948km Site Survey Drilling g Abadi-1 Rig Energy Searcher 57 Site Survey Abadi-2 Ab b di 3 badi-3 Abadi-4 Ab di 5 Abadi-5 Abadi-7 Abadi-6 Rig Ocean General 2 Current Status of otheer Companies Current Status of othe er Companies’ FLNG FLEX LNG: LNG Producer (LNG EX G G d ( GP) G ) (1.7 ‐ (1 1 1.95 MTPA) A) – Awarded Samsung a contract to build 4 Hulls – Complete FEED of Generic Design o p e e EE o e e i e ig LNGP in the Q1 of 2009 i eQ o – Reviewing the projects in Nigeria, P PNG, Trinidad and Tobago, Brazil etc. Shell: Generic LNG‐FPSO (3.5 MT Shell: Generic LNG FPSO (3 5 MT TPA) – Reviewing to apply FLNG in Prelud de Gas Field and Greater Sunrise Gas Fields SBM: SBM’s FLNG (2.5 MTPA) – Complete FEED of Generic LNG‐FP PSO in the 2H of 2008 Höegh LNG: Höegh LNG FPSO (1.6 MTPA) – FEED (May, 2008 – March, 2009), reeviewing applicable gas field 58
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz