Geographical analyses of wood chip potentials, costs and supply for sustainable energy production in Denmark Dr. Bernd Moeller, Aalborg University Denmark Dr. Per S. Nielsen, Forest Research Acknowledgement Bruce Talbot, Hans SkovPetersen and Niels Heding of the Danish Centre for Forest, Landscape and Planning – KVL Image goes here Introduction Determine the transport costs of wood chips from forest to location of energy plants in Denmark Spatial relation between supply transportation, and costs Spatial models with raster GIS Image goes here Biomass in the Danish system Wood covered 3.5% of primary fuel consumption in Denmark 2002 350,000 wet tons/year In 80 energy plants Very little un-used 9 US$/GJ Image goes here Biomass from forests Forests cover 11.3% of land area 20%<5 ha, 50%<50ha Chips are from either summer dried logs or thinnings with a required moisture content of 40-55% (wet basis) Image goes here Image goes here Image goes here Image goes here Transportation of wood chips Bin containers 40m3 maximum load assumed Costs includes in-forest transportation. Costs includes costs independent on location (loading, chipping etc) Does not include revenue a forest owner might receive. Which means that the final cost curves does not reflect the wood chips market price Image goes here How GIS are applied In-forest biomass, costs of transportation, possible plant locations and other issues are mapped in raster-GIS. Image goes here Using layers of raster data, each geographically distributed aspect is analysed using cell-to-cell maths, neighborhood statistics and zonal geometry. The results are intensity maps or distributions of site-specific costs. Biomass resource mapping LCP code 14 15 16 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 Description Shrub / forest Deciduous forest Coniferous forest Beech forest Young trees Spruce plantation Mixed forest Mountain pine woodland Larch forest Recently felled forest Thin coniferous forest Comments Total area [ha] % of forest area No wood chip production 83,534 16.8 Tops and large branches from felling 137,718 27.8 Tops and large branches from felling 71,404 14.4 Tops and large branches from felling 49,011 9.9 Thinning 14,688 3.0 Tops and large branches from felling 60,587 12.2 Assumed 35% deciduous, 65% coniferous 8,511 1.7 Wood chips from whole trees 32,433 6.5 Tops and large branches from felling 2,037 0.4 No wood chip production 2,394 0.5 No wood chip production 33,564 6.8 Image goes here Annual recoverable resources Image goes here Selected energy plants Plant name Hals Skørping Ensted Herning Plant type Composition of fuel consumption District heating District heating Power plant Cogeneration 64% wood, 31% straw, 5% oil 95% wood, 5% oil 93% coal, 5% straw, 1% wood, 1% oil 55% wood, 45% natural gas Image goes here Rated power and Annual wood chip heat output consumption 0 MW, 8 MJ/s 5,500 tons dry matter 0 MW, 7 MJ/s 9,000 tons dry matter 600 MW, 80 MJ/s 15,000 tons dry matter 89 MW, 174 MJ/s 50,000 tons dry matter Transport cost modeling Image goes here Average costs / accumulated supply Transport costs [US$/ton dm] 30 25 20 $20 Image goes here $19 $18 15 $14 10 5 0 0 5000 10000 Herning 15000 Hals 20000 25000 Skørping 30000 Ensted 35000 40000 45000 50000 Supply [tons dm] Interpretation of results Average fuel transport costs $21 $20 Ensted $19 Image goes here $18 Herning $17 $16 Hals $15 $14 -20% -10% 0% 10% Variation in fuel demand $13 20% Skørping Conclusions Forest owners can assess the value of un-used residues Hauling companies can use it for improve efficiency Energy plants can use it to assess resources availability for new investments or upgrades (cogen) Policy makers can use it to assess environmental and socio-economic aspects of local wood resources Image goes here Conclusions (continued) Although transportation cost is important other issues may be more important for the individual operator The reality does not always the most optimal solution Many players with different prices Harvesting intervals of many small forests - challenge long term fuel supply demand from energy plants. Image goes here
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz