here - Tibucon

14 March 2012
Workshop on Impact of the
Energy-efficient buildings PPP
Session 5:
Standardisation
Project Acronym: TIBUCON
Project Title: Self Powered Wireless Sensor
Network for HVAC System Energy Improvement
• TOwards Integral BUilding CONnectivity
Project Coordinator: Piotr Dymarski
Author of this presentation: Jorge Berzosa and
Jon Mabe
How to contribute to common data models and
interoperability standardisation?
How is/could your project contribute to common data models? What should the subcategories be for these models? (e.g. architectural tools, construction tools, facility
management, …) How is your project contributing to interoperability standardisation?
NOTE: FREE ANSWER, please feel free to indicate whatever you regard as relevant
Contribution
Description
1. Feasibility of data models in
very constrained systems*
(WSN)
2. Proposals for application of
Standard Data Models to
constrained environments
*In terms of energy, computing and communication resources
Effectiveness
1. Data Model vs Watts
2. Power aware Data Models
List three factors that are making it difficult for a project to contribute to
common data models and interoperability standardization.
List what you perceive as the three main barriers/obstacles that your project has/might
encounter.
NOTE: FREE ANSWER, please feel free to indicate whatever you regard as relevant.
Barriers/Obstacles
Description
Importance
1. There is not a leading standard for all
domains
1. Medium
2. Lack of presence in the standardization
forums
3. High
3. Excessive focus in the resolution of
specific technological paradigms
2. Medium
Who can do what?
Write down three possible actions that might help with arriving at
common data models and interoperability standardisation.
List the three actions that could help you most with arriving at common data models and
interoperability standardisation.
NOTE: FREE ANSWER, please feel free to indicate whatever you think is relevant
Actions
Who
What
1. Technicians
1. Solve the Data Model vs Watt problem
2. Technical commites
2. Submit Data Model vs Watt paradigm
to the standardization bodies.
3. Standardization body
3. Include Data Model vs Watt solution in
the standard portfolio