Energy Carriers: Rate "Northeast" and Consolidation with Nuclear Power Technology (Power and Ecological Safety, Economy and Profitability) Alekseev P.N., Subbotin S.A., Schepetina T.D. development and arrangement of new deposits. Especially in conditions of the Far North and a shelf of the Arctic seas high installed power capacity per capita is necessary since there is a problem of maintenance electric and thermal energy of boreholes, watch settlements, communication centers, other systems, and also for sea water desalination. More and more actual there is also a problem of ecological influence of extracting branches to the nature. Attraction of a nuclear energy will allow to lower sharply adverse influences power sources to environment. Abstract - For development of sea and other remote oil and gas deposits and other resources it is offered to use "mobile" Small Nuclear Power Plants (floating, mobile or stationary basing) as starting (pioneering) power sources, providing field men by the electric power, household heat and industrial steam. 1 There has come time for consolidated "efforts" of traditional power technologies – oil-gas-coal and nuclear energy for optimization power production structure and hydrocarbonic raw materials (HCRM) export. In this case nuclear power sources can be considered as «a source of HCRM», which allow to receive HCRM in huge scales from regions which are simply not accessible to modern economy without nuclear power. Nuclear power plants of small power (SNPP) can be used as starting, pioneer power sources at development of new deposits of hydrocarbonic raw material (HCRM) for acceleration of their input to operation, together for operation of existing deposits HCRM. Index Terms - Mobile power sources; Nuclear power sources; Small Nuclear Power Plants; Development of sea oil and gas deposits; Hydrocarbonic raw materials export; Russian Arctic regions; Ecological safety; Liquid natural gas; Economy; Profitability. As power sources for power supply of oiland-gas deposits of the North and the remote areas of the Far East of Russia it is offered to use serial produced SNPP - ecologically clean power sources of industrial manufacture. They possess the increased safety on the basis of properties of inherent safety, are long worked without refueling and exclude the manipulation with the spent nuclear fuel on the site of atomic power station and have received the name «nuclear battery». At modern methods of design works there is an opportunity of a flexible combination of various types of the equipment with reference to needs and features of region and a kind of manufacture (mobile or stationary basing and ways of turbine waste heat removal). I. INTRODUCTION The northeast vector of Russia historical movement is obvious and clearly distinguished [1, 6]. The epoch of readily available deposits has almost ended, for energy carriers it is necessary to go to high breadthes, into regions with heavy and even extreme naturegeographical conditions, under ices of Arctic Ocean. The Russian North is the largest resource base of the world. Perspective on oil and gas are recognized 43 % of a land and 70 % of the area of a continental shelf of the Russian Arctic regions are. Independent (autonomous) power sources are necessary at oil-and-gas branch in The important economic advantage at use SNPP is replacement of the organic power resources burnt for own technological needs Authors employees RRC «Kurchatov institute», Moscow, Russia (e-mail: [email protected]). 87 extraction plants at the Arctic shelf will make up to 90 MW. (OTN) of extracting branches, by powerintensive nuclear fuel and an opportunity of export release fuel on a foreign market. Capacity of alternative SNPP will be used: • For direct industrial needs (extraction, processing, gas liquiation); • Household consumption; • At stationary settlements for improvement of quality of life - for manufactures of food stuffs in the greenhouses, fish culture, sea-foods farms; • And also for manufacture of, ecologically clean secondary fuels - hydrogen, diethyl ether, gasification of coal etc., which can be used for needs of local transport (automobile, small aircraft and small water transport); • At poor deposits for an intensification of extraction and for electron-beam processing of heavy mineral oil and nonconventional oils. II. CONSOLIDATION OF NUCLEAR AND OIL-GAS INDUSTRYES OF RUSSIA: WHAT DOES IT GIVE? The global purpose of the consolidated interaction of this power technologyes appears as follows. Near stage: • Release of natural gas volumes used to OTN for increase gas deliveries on internal and foreign markets. Due to introduction of the atomic power plant by capacity 1 GW (e) there can be released nearby 2 billion cube m of gas per year. • Following stage: Innovative development of nuclear technologies for: preparations for transportation and transport of HCRM, gas liquation, coal gasification, and also for use SNPP at extraction and oil refining; for replacement of natural gas in processes of hydrogen production by steam conversion of metane by production of hydrogen from water. Now the world market of liquid natural gas (LNG) became the dynamical developing market of hydrocarbonic energy carriers. In Russia, as well as abroad, it is supposed the most expedient to transport natural gas at a liquid condition from the deposits located in adverse for construction of gas pipelines areas (in XXI century all the basic Russian deposits will settle down in such areas: Barents sea, a shelf of Kara sea, i. Sakhalin, etc.). Result: harmonization of development in the country of raw sector and high technologies, nuclear-hydrogen economy. III. SPHERES OF THE SMALL NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS APPLICATION AT OIL AND GAS DEPOSITS By estimations of experts at use of natural gas as energy carrier for the liquafication purposes it is required to spend from 20 up to 30 % of initial fuel. Therefore it is necessary in the long term to consider manufacture LNG in a tandem with nuclear power source, that will allow to save burnt gas. Now for a gas liquation plant capacity 40 thousand t/year of LNG the charge of gas for the liquiation purposes makes approximately 10 thousand t/year. Under the modern prices sale of such volume of gas can provide nearby 2 million $. The estimation shows, that the economy of gas only on this process will allow to pay back SNPP for 10 years, and in view of a rise in prices to energy carriers and an opportunity of reduction in price of serial small NPP this term will still be reduced. As the North is the last resource pantry of a planet, first of all here it is necessary to pass to managing on principles of "sustainable development”. It provides economic activities which do not break stability of biosphere and keeps such volume of a habitat, which is able to self-reproduce. In any case, by development of a sea or ground deposit, in an initial stage of development for power sources with organic fuel the imported one is required. With its delivery there are significant difficulties and the prices for it steadily grows. By estimations [2] the installed power capacity of power stations for sea oil and gas 88 Application of atomic energy instead of burning organic fuels is itself not only convenience, reliability and an economic gain, but has also ecological advantages since the urgency of reduction of emissions nitrogen oxides and carbon oxide is highest. Burning of poorly cleared and frequently the crude hydrocarbonic raw material give negative consequences for an environment. Vulnerability of territories with a long-term frozen ground demands extra care at their development, especially at arrangement of an infrastructure at initial stages. infrastructure: for producing of energy, telecommunications, connection, navigation, automatics and a robotics. Therefore at the North the reactors with properties of increased safety possessing properties of inherent safety should be used. SNPP’s of new generation for powering of the removed and remote regions should meet following requirements [5]: 1. The highest level safety of operation, guaranteeing on a physical and technological level prevention of fission products and harmful substances exit for NPP boards in quantity, exceeding admissible norms; 2. The high ecological compatibility providing a minimum level of thermal, radiating and chemical environmental contamination; 3. High thermodynamic efficiency of heatto-electricity transformation (energy conversion rate more 30 %) and the minimal requirements of the power for own needs (~1 %); 4. Maneuverable operating mode of SNPP; 5. Continuous work of reactor without refueling more10 years; 6. Independence of water sources; 7. Assembly of reacror module at the matrix plant "on a turn-key basis" during 2-3 years; 8. Transportability of reacror module delivery by all types of transport and/or accommodation it on pneumowheel base; 9. Comprehensible specific capital costs (2 4 thousand $ per kW installed) and the minimal terms of input to operation (from 0,5 - 1 year); 10. Minimum quantity of technicians at the plant - an automatic or watch mode; 11. The minimal expenses for a decommissioning, which is designed as regular procedure. The big damage to an environment is brought also chisel installations: for example, for maintenance of work of one oil installation for a year it is burnt up to 1500 t of fuel, thus it is every day spent up to 30 t of chemically active chisel solutions. As a result in an atmosphere is thrown out one year prior to 2 t of hydrocarbons and soot, more than 30 t of nitrogen oxides, 8 t of carbon oxides, 5 t of sulphurous anhydride, a plenty of heavy metals and so forth [1]. Influence on an environment is great and at extraction of gas. Therefore now the design organizations very attentively concern to probable influence on an environment already at designing of gas crafts. Attraction of SNPP will allow to lower sharply influence of power supply objects on an environment. SNPP with reactors of type «nuclear battery» are ecologically clean sources of the electric power and heat since they do not have any operations with nuclear fuel on a operation site, and, hence, it is not formed firm and liquid radioactive wastes. At operation of the atomic power plant also it is not formed emissions of chemical or polluting substances in environment. For replacement of fuel the reactor or is transported on the central specialized service enterprise, or entirely replaced on new one (similarly to replacement or additional charge of a battery). There are a lot of spheres of SNPP application. The world market for development of branch of small capacity nuclear power units exists, also it quite difenitely both on a level of capacity {power}, and under requirements and approaches in a safety. IV. CHARACTERISTICS OF APPLIED SNPP Extreme conditions of the North demands introduction of the high technologies and an 89 underground or underwater accommodation, and also as mobile on caterpillar or as a pneumo-course (Figures 1, 2). The units gather completely and equipped with fuel at manufacturer. In the "undercritical" condition they are transported up to the consumer. Site preparation under their installation in comparison with stationary power units demands much smaller time and material inputs. Fig.1. The operated sample of transportable. The control and management of reactors can be as automated by satellite - centralized, and /or with watch mode service. Nuclear Safety of nuclear batteries is provided not only, and in basic not so much by any special systems of the equipment and devices, but mainly by special principles and designing methods. Creation of corresponding configurations of the equipment elements, a choice of structure and a composition of fuel, selection of constructional materials and working body at a level of physical natural processes and properties of materials create the conditions excluding occurrence catastrophic or fast uncontrollable processes in reactor. It became possible as a result of long scientific researches and the practical experience, saved up for all history of an atomic energy use (both in peace, and in the military purposes). Fig.2. Project SNPP ABV-6 of SNPP TEC-3 of 1,5 МW capacity (1961, FEI) 4-10 МW capacity (OKBM). It is necessary to emphasize, that now while perspective power sources projects are at a stage of development, there is all opportunities in the maximal image to consider requirements of these future users: on capacity level, on a ratio betwin of thermal and electric energy, by quantity of freshened water, on a maneuverability, service life and continuous operation before refueling, or an opportunity to carry out refueling at specilized plant, etc. Such ideology of SNPP inherent safety maintenance cannot be designated with what either concrete devices or engines, or in digital sizes is a field of interaction of physical laws with the means, having one purpose - minimization of influence the SNPP on an environment by determinally exceptions of dangerous incidents under reasonable cause and effect circumstances. Individual thermal capacity of nuclear power units are varies from 1 МW up to approximately 150 МW, designed electric capacity from 0,5 МW up to 50 МW. The variant of underwater SNPP accommodation essentially excludes such external influences from the list of possible accidents as falling of the plane, diversive and military acts, natural cataclysms, technogenic or transport accidents and explosions, etc. Such way of SNPP accommodation repeatedly increases security of the population and an environment from emergencies for the internal reasons. Service life of power units can make from 10 years till 20-30 years (an operating time without refueling) at general lifetime as 40 60 years. Such power units can be created as in floating mode and to be maintained in a coastal zone, and in the form of suitable for delivery by various types of transport (water, automobile, air) and the further ground or 90 The recoupment of the project investments of disel plant occurs for term in 1,4 times greater at internal rate of profitableness of the project by the end of service life of 0,78 %. At low capital expenses the project has very small (10-20 million rbl/year) positive monetary streams. In these conditions financial parameters of the project very strongly depend on cost of fuel and tariffs for energy. Even insignificant reduction of tariffs or increase of fuel cost makes the project unprofitable. V. ESTIMATIONS OF SNPP ECONOMIC COMPETITION For an estimation of economic comparison if use SNPP or traditional burnable power sourcesа (thermal power stations) for oil-andgas crafts, it is possible to take into account results of the research lead in RCC “Kurchatov institute” for conditions of site Ust-Kamchatsk at following parameters: • Two-unit floating ATEC of capacity 2*6 MWe. and 2*12 Gkal/hour (reactor ABV-6М), as the project of a high degree readiness, are sutablt for coastal and sea crafts; • Or equal capacity diesel power station with boiler-house with fuel charge of 264 g/kWh for of the electric power producing and of 108 kg/Gkal. Reduction in price of SNPP due to seriality is possible. So on an example of power sources for nuclear submarines it is established that manufacturing of a series from above 7 - 9 pieces conducts to deprecication at least on 30 %. By the norms of reservation standard in power industry and reliability of power supply at a site 2 power units should be maintained at least, as optimum - 3-4 power units [3]. At the comparative analysis identical external conditions are used: the volume of electric power and heat output, tariffs on thermal and electric energy, tax conditions, time horizon of the project, etc. Calculations are executed on the basis of data of the project developer about cost of ATEC construction, data about cost of energy carriers and tariffs at UstKamchatsk and the power consumption forecast. Any of opportunities of branches efforts consolidation – are the scheme "build-ownoperate"; tenancy, leasing and a number of other schemes of state-private partnership are possible. They should be studied in view of a developing conjuncture and changes in the legislation for most effective utilization of means. Main lack of ATEC is its rather high cost. Its advantages are shown in rather low operational expenses, small requirements for a employed capital and absence of large seasonal expenses for purchase of fuel. In case of SNPP leasing the "consumer" receives in the full order produced thermal and the electric power for all operation lifetime which is supposed not less than 10 years of continuous work without chage of nuclear fuel. And the company-owner will receive energy under the cost price, stable during all term of SNPP unit operation. After scheduled service life the unit is taken away from a site to recycling not creating complexities for "consumer". The small ATEC in comparison with a power complex on organic fuel shows results of an estimation of economic efficiency, that the project ATEC has time of investments outlay recovery on 30 % shorter (from the beginning of construction); the internal rate of profitableness by the end of service life (50 years) will make 3,33 %. Significant profitableness speaks about high financial stability of the project (about 35 % of the tariff) and high positive monetary streams (the order 100 million rbl/year) at high capital expenses (1257 million rbl.). Speed of SNPP recoupment will be determined by region of accommodation, considering that at the removed or remote areas 1 kWh cost is many times over above than in the centralized power supply systems is comprehensible. It is necessary to consider also profitableness of cogenerating 91 TABLE 1. production received by means of energy from SNPP which can exceed profitableness from actually electric power and heat. In particular, the plant of manufacture liquid natural gas can become such integrated, «cogenerating» manufacture, besides heat and the electric power which will accelerate SNPP recoupment and will bring the additional income [5]. THE BASIC ECONOMIC PARAMETERS OF FLOATING NUCLEAR POWER SUPPLAY PLANTS AND NUCLEAR HEAT SUPPLY PLANTS WITH REACTOR UNITS OF TYPE ABV Power unit characteristics Electric capacity, MW Displacement, tone Construction cost, million $ Term of realization, year The cost price: the electric power, cent/kWh Heat, $/Gkal Time of recovery of outlay, year Preliminary economic estimations show, that specific capital costs of SNPP at a serial production will be comprehensiv from the nuclear power plants of high capacity, i.e. the order 1000-2000 $ for installed kW [4]. Economic efficiency of floating SNPP is provided due to: the flexible scheme of construction in conditions of the shipbuilding plant, reduction in specific capital costs, simplicity of removal from operation, an opportunity of refueling of the floating power unit at the specialized plant, small metal consumption of used reactor units. Delivery to a site of floating power unit constructed industrially "on a turn-key basis", tested and handed over an industrially-developed zone, at the minimal volume of build and maintenance works on a site, allows to create autonomus nuclear plants of various capacity level with comprehensible economic efficiency. Floating ATEC with ABV-6 Floating ATEC and AST with ABV-3 Twoblock Oneblock 12 6 2,5 (AST) 3700 2300 1600 1500 63,9 36,4 27,2 22,4 (AST) 5 4 4 4 One-block 8,0 8,0 12,0 18,5 20,0 29,0 31,5 4-5 (unde tariff for the electric power - 20 cent/kWh, heat power 50-55 $/Gkal) VI. TECHNICAL PRACTICABILITY In Russia the big practical experience of SNPP designing and operation on a basis of ice breakers and submarines engines is saved up. There is a plenty of SNPP projects - up to 50 MWe. Among them are most known KLT40C, ABV-6 (pressurised water type); RUTA, ELENA (water with natural circulation); ANGSTREM, TES-M, SVBR75/100 and SVBR-10 (the lead-bismuth coolant), for which their is good readiness for practical realization. For use at SNPP, including a floating execution, developers of the reactor units (RU) the wide spectrum of projects with a various degree technologies development is offered. The basic technical and economic parameters of floating SNPP are presented in Table 1. Such projects of the floating SNPP already draw attention of the island states of Pacific region and the countries of the Near East, and also China and India. There they intend for use as sea water desalters. The export potential of this nuclear technology is great if to consider that now the basic consumers of the freshened water are concentrated at the Near East (70 %), in the Europe (10 %), in Africa (6,3 %) and the market in due course will extend only. At a number of projects the most studied both mastered constructive decisions and technology of VVER type reactors and nuclear ice breakers which service-ability is confirmed by long-term experience of successful operation (6 000 reactor-years) are used. In comparison with installationsprototypes of change in the mane equipment and systems do not carry basic character and RU creation is possible without additional 92 Small Nuclear power sources are the innovative hi-tech branch, combining capacity, long reliability, high nuclear, radiating and ecological safety. An investment in it now and, that so consolidation of petro-gas and nuclear branches, will allow to have in the future strong, divercified power basis of extracting branch. R&D, manufacturing and tests of the fullscale demonstration sample. The Russian operational experience with Pb+Bi coolant is most unique, its technology is well studied and mastered on reactors of nuclear submarines (about 30 years) and test facilities (more than 40 years). There is an extensive experience of development, creation and operation of reactors with liquid-metall collant Pb+Bi with reference to RU of nuclear submarines (about 80 reactoryears). VIII. [1] Golubchikov S.N., Yerokhin S.V. Russian North on crisis of epoch. М.: Publishing house "Pasva", 2003. - 240 p. [2] Prokopenko Ju.G. “Power supplying of objects of sea oil-and-gas deposits” in Proceedings of the Meeting “Condition and prospects development of sea oil-and-gas deposits”, М.: Open Company "VNIIGAZ". 2003. p. 183-186 [3] Krivitsky I.S. “A definition of the top border capacity range of small nuclear power plants”, Power construction №6, 1995г.- p. 53-56 [4] Ivanova I.J., Tuguzova T.F., Popov S.P., Petrov N.A. Small power industry of the North: Problems and ways of development. Novosibirsk: Science, 2002.-188 p. [5] Schepetina T.D., Stukalov V.A., Subbotin S.A. «About small nuclear power and its future », The bulletin on atomic energy, November, 11, 2003. [6] Krupnov Yu.V. Russia between the West and the East. A rate the Northeast. Neva, 2003. At Russia the potential of the machinebuilding industry and the nuclear fuel cycle was still kept, allowing to carry out all cycle of manufacture and operation of the SNPP. VII. REFERENCES CONCLUSION As a result it is possible to emphasize, that application SNPP for power supply of extracting complexes provides convenient power supplay during the starting period when traditional power units operate exclusively with imported fuel which price steadily grows. SNPP provide manufacture of the electric power, heat-power and fresh water in necessary quantities and proportions, and at constant costs for all time of its continuous work. Estimations show, that for conditions of northern and remote regions cost of energy from a nuclear source essentially below than from organic fuel, and below than purchased energy at Russian Open Society "RAO EES of Russia". IX. BIOGRAPHIES Pavel N. Alekseev, chief of department, was born in Millerovo, Rostov region, Russia, on March 3, 1949. He graduated Moscow State Engineering Physics Institute on 1972. (Email: [email protected]). At base operation SNPPs allows to liberate the gas spent for own technological needs for its export to foreign market. Stanislav Subbotin was born in Vladimir on April 09, 1949. He graduate from Moscow Physics Engineering Institute on 1972 year. After that he work in IPPE until 1976 and on Kurchatov Institute up now. (E-mail: [email protected]). SNPP are mobile power sourcess - floating or transportable, they can be transferred, if it is required, into those places where energy is required. SNPP are capable to work with one fuel loading of 10 and more years, their operation will be carried out by the special personnel of nuclear branch and upon termination of service life they will come back to the specialized plants for recycling. Tatyana D. Schepetina was born in Podolsk, Russia, on October 27, 1954. Graduated the Moscow Power Engineering Institute on 1977. (E-mail: [email protected]). 93
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz