HOT TOPICS IN AMBLYOPIA SRC 2008 LIONEL KOWAL When to worry [and when not to worry] about strabismus and amblyopia NOT TO WORRY… When it all ‘fits’ Right age / anisohyperopia / glasses help vision and alignment…. 4 year old ET L D: 25∆, N: 35 ∆ R 6/8, L 6/24 R +3, L +4 Glasses L 6/24 6/18 6/12 Patching 6/10 6/9 ET 25/35 phoria 12 / ET’ 25 Bifocals orthotropia WHEN TO WORRY…. Lateral incomitance ET or XT greater to L or R gaze ET greater on lateral gaze 6th XT …. Brainstem / INO WHEN TO WORRY…. Resistant amblyopia Check the pupil for afferent defect Re-examine the disc and retina WHEN TO WORRY…. ET Distance > Near Raised intra cranial pressure 6th nerve palsy WHEN TO WORRY…. Abnormal morphology Is the disc / macula normal? ..size …shape ...pigmentation If you find it difficult to be sure it’s OK or not, others probably will too Best test for a suspicious disc: show to someone else Abnormal morphology 2008: Hi- tech imaging helps BUT Sub - expert HRT OFTEN misleading When to operate in strabismus and when not to operate in strabismus. …& ‘why wasn’t this done years ago?’ When to operate in strabismus… WHY DO I OPERATE? TO MAKE THIS PATIENT’S LIFE BETTER Better visual system Stabilise/ improve amblyopia Better peripheral field [ET] Better binocularity AND… Normal appearance and improved psychosocial development Better motor co-ordination When to operate in strabismus… Better outcome if Constantly misaligned < 4 mo [child] or < 12 mo [adult] Angle ≤ 50 ∆ ET, ≤ 35 ∆ XT When NOT to operate in strabismus… Very variable strabismus Patient expectations ≠ mine +4DS, ET 30∆. Straight forever sc not realistic When NOT to operate … Despite adequate education, parents remain opposed. Anti - surgery websites - death rates & complications exaggerated DON GETZ “The best "cure" rate is 11%” USA >20 deaths per year for strabismus surgery When NOT to operate … ?Under- trained surgeon. Clearly a factor in other surgical areas ~20 ophthalmologists are Fellowship trained in peds or strabismus >20% of private strabismus surgeries in Australia [billed through Medicare] are done by 2 ophthalmologists ?reason for declining numbers [fewer repeat surgeries because so many are done by experts] ‘Why wasn’t this done years ago?’ 20 yo with 30∆ ET or XT dating back to childhood more likely to have PERMANENT paradoxical diplopia after alignment surgery than the same surgery in a 5 yo Childhood visual system more flexible - ARC less likely to be profound / persistent in a child than an adult Delaying surgery ‘till s/he’s old enough to decide for him/her- self’ can mean deferring it to a time when a good cosmetic and functional result is no longer possible Is full time occlusion dead? Factors that influence outcome of amblyopia treatment fall into two categories: those that relate to the underlying conditions (condition factors) and those that relate to its treatment (treatment factors). Treatment factors 1. Optimal refraction - regularly re-checked 2. Occlusion method & dose 3. Accuracy of alignment Occlusion method / dose PEDIG: 75+% get better with 2h/d [<6/24] or 6h/d [<6/120] CAN MORE OCCLUSION GET EVEN BETTER RESULTS? Is full time occlusion dead? MOTAS Lines of residual amblyopia @ end of treatment 0 % 0-1 57 0-2 69 0-4 83 30 IS MORE EVEN BETTER? THE IOWA STUDIES Amblyopia Treatment Outcomes. WE. Scott.. JAAPOS April 2005 Retrospective review of patients who had fulltime occlusion [24 h/d or all waking hours]. 600 pts followed for av. 7 y after the cessation of full-time patching. 90% ≥ 1 year. Success : ≥ 20/30 or better or equal VA by fixation pattern - seen in 96% 60% attained equal visual acuity. Amblyopia Treatment Outcomes. WE. Scott.. Younger patients required less occlusion time to endpoint and had a better visual outcome (P < 0.0001). Initial VA related to best VA attained (P < 0.0001). Incidence of occlusion amblyopia 25.8%. Amblyopia Treatment Outcomes. WE. Scott.. Looks like more = better BUT > 2ce risk of occlusion amblyopia Assume equal fixation = equal acuity < 100% followup PEDIG - RECRUITING…. •Treatment of residual amblyopia 6/9 to 6/15. •Compare intensive treatment [8 h/d of patching + daily atropine] with glasses alone IS MORE EVEN BETTER? For most children with amblyopia - probably not For some - maybe …….stay tuned!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz