Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
Ignition delay simulations for methane oxygen stoichiometric mixture in PSR at initial temperature of 1000 K. (a) Time variation of
temperature and (b) percentage of relative difference between the RCCE and DKM prediction of temperature. Solid and dashed lines
denote the constraint potential and constraint results, respectively. The symbol (○) denotes DKM predictions.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
Constraints in ignition delay calculations for stoichiometric methane oxygen mixture at initial temperature of 1000 K in PSR. Solid
and dashed lines denote the constraint potential and constraint results, respectively. The symbol (○) denotes DKM predictions.
Constraints are listed in Table 1.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
Mass fractions in ignition delay calculations for stoichiometric methane oxygen combustion at initial temperature of 1000 K in PSR.
Solid and dashed lines denote the constraint potential and constraint results, respectively. The symbol (○) denotes DKM
predictions.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
Performance of RCCE in ignition delay calculations for stoichiometric methane oxygen combustion in PSR at initial temperature of
1000 K. (a) Average CPU time in seconds and (b) number of function evaluations. The symbols (□) and (△) denote constraint
potential and constraint results, respectively.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
The percentage of relative difference in prediction of (a) temperature and (b) ignition delay time. Constraint potential (right set) and
constraint (left set) forms are compared with DKM in stoichiometric methane oxygen combustion simulations in PSR for initial
temperatures of 1000–1400 K.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
The percentage of relative difference in prediction of (a) CH 4 and (b) O2 mass fractions. Constraint potential (right set) and
constraint (left set) forms are compared to DKM in stoichiometric methane oxygen combustion simulations in PSR for initial
temperatures of 1000–1400 K.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
Performance of RCCE in stoichiometric methane oxygen combustion simulations in PSR for initial temperatures of 1000–1400 K. (a)
Average CPU time in seconds and (b) number of function evaluations. The symbols (□) and (△) denote constraint potential and
constraint results, respectively.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
The percentage of relative difference in prediction of temperature. The RCCE is compared with DKM in lean (Φ = 0.6, 0.9) and rich
(Φ = 1.2, 1.6, 2.0) mixtures at initial temperature of 1400 K. Constraint potential and constraint forms are the right and left sets,
respectively.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
The percentage of relative difference in prediction of (a) CH 4 and (b) O2 mass fractions in comparison with DKM. Nonstoichiometric
methane oxygen combustion simulations are performed in PSR for lean (Φ = 0.6, 0.9) and rich (Φ = 1.2, 1.6, 2.0) mixtures at initial
temperature of 1400 K. Constraint potential and constraint forms are the right and left sets, respectively.
Date of download: 7/31/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Comparison of Constraint and Constraint Potential Forms of the Rate-Controlled ConstraintEquilibrium Method
J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;138(2):022202-022202-9. doi:10.1115/1.4031614
Figure Legend:
Performance of RCCE forms in nonstoichiometric methane oxygen combustion simulations in PSR for lean (Φ = 0.6, 0.9) and rich
(Φ = 1.2, 1.6, 2.0) mixtures at initial temperature of 1400 K. (a) Average CPU time in seconds and (b) number of function evaluations.
The symbols (□) and (△) denote constraint potential and constraint results, respectively.