Hold Your Nose and Vote 'Yes' for State Transportation Bonds | Alaska D...
1 of 3
November 6, 2012
NEWS
Today's News
Most Read
POLITICS
BLOGS
Email
Like
4
Tweet
Best of Dispatch
ARCTIC
0
Nation/World
CULTURE
0
Print
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/hold-your-nose-and-vote-yes-state...
Advertise
Legals
MULTIMEDIA
PROJECTS
Search...
Single Page
Commentary
Hold your nose and vote 'yes' for state transportation bonds
Matt Claman | Nov 05, 2012
RELATED
Anchorage port study won't be
public until after $50-million bond
vote
Rescuing Anchorage's port
expansion
ALASKA NEWS & FEATURES
Photos: Election Day in Alaska
Election Day: Alaskans head to the
voting booths
MOST READ
Who's winning? Obama or
Romney?
Hold your nose and vote 'yes' for
state transportation bonds
In Alaska elections, candidates
may change but energy problem
remains the same
Bond Proposition A asks voters to approve $453 million in general obligation
bonds for transportation projects across our state. The biggest project on the
list is a $50-million Port of Anchorage expansion that has been dogged by
poor management, a potentially flawed design, and unanswered questions.
The veil of secrecy that now pervades this project has no place in open,
democratic government. If Proposition A only asked to fund the Port of
Anchorage, voters should reject the proposition. We should support this
innovative proposition because the remaining projects -- 89 percent of the
funding -- do not share the troubles of the Port.
The bond proposition offers a sound economic opportunity for Alaska. We will
earn more money by investing state savings than we will pay to borrow the
money. The Alaska Permanent Fund, our best-known savings account, has a
28-year average return of 8.8 percent, and its rolling 10-year average return is
over 6 percent. Earning 6 to 8 percent on our investment is better than
savings banks offer today. On the borrowing side of the equation, the interest
rate that AA-rated governments pay for tax-exempt municipal bonds is under
3.5 percent for a 20-year note. And for AAA-rated governments, like the state
of Alaska, the current rate for a 10-year note is below 2 percent.
So even before adding inflation to the arithmetic, history shows that the state
could be netting 4 percent or more by borrowing funds for the transportation
projects and continuing to invest its assets. Add in the current inflation rate
reflected in the Consumer Price Index of 2 percent, and the benefits of
bonding increase even more because the state would make bond payments in
future years with inflation-adjusted dollars. The math adds up: the state does
not spend its principal, the state earns more interest on the money it keeps in
the bank than it pays in interest on the bonds, and we gain the benefit of
much-needed infrastructure improvements and repairs.
Americans use the same arithmetic every day as they pursue the dream of
owning a home. With mortgage interest rates at an all-time low, the benefit of future payments in
inflation-adjusted dollars, and the federal tax deduction for mortgage interest, we see the benefits of
homeownership. By providing the tax deduction for homeowners' mortgage interest, Congress and
the President encourage people across the country to own their home.
Sitting at the top of the list for the bond funding is $50 million for the Port of Anchorage expansion.
Other projects have a smaller price tag: harbor dredging in Bethel ($4 million), harbor improvements
in Haines ($15 million), road work in Sand Point ($2.5 million), road construction on the Glenn
Highway ($35 million), highway improvements in Juneau ($5.5 million), and road construction in the
Mat-Su ($15 million). None of the other projects have the history of problems that we read about
every week regarding the Port of Anchorage Expansion.
Starting with a price tag of $360 million, which may soon exceed $1 billion, the port chose an “open
cell” design that involved filling land behind interlocking steel sheets instead of the traditional
11/6/2012 4:00 PM
Hold Your Nose and Vote 'Yes' for State Transportation Bonds | Alaska D...
2 of 3
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/hold-your-nose-and-vote-yes-state...
dock-on-piling design seen throughout the world. Problems with the port expansion project first began
to get public attention when many of the massive steel sheets failed. Then a bulldozer operator,
working to inspect and repair the damaged steel sheets, died in August 2011 when ground collapsed
underneath the bulldozer. The bulldozer slid into Cook Inlet and rolled on top of the operator.
The costs get higher and the news gets worse. There are questions about whether the municipality
will need to scrap the entire open cell design and return to a dock-on-piling design. In an effort to gain
a better understanding of the problems and the potential solutions, the municipality hired a local
engineering firm to perform a comprehensive review of the entire project, including whether the open
cell design is appropriate for the location in Cook Inlet. The $2-million study is complete, and the
engineers delivered a 2,200-page draft report in October, but it remains hidden from the public. The
municipality is claiming that a confidentiality agreement prevents it from releasing the report until 3
days after the Nov. 6 general election, but there is no evidence that the mayor asked the federal
government to waive the confidentiality agreement. Confidentiality provisions are routinely waived or
modified when circumstances change.
The Legislature had not approved the 2012 bond proposition that includes funding for the port
expansion when the municipality contracted for the port study. The bond proposition is a changed
circumstance that is a good reason to allow release of the report before the election. Indeed, the U.S.
Maritime Administration recently released a summary of the study and explained its preliminary
finding that the open cell design is not appropriate because the cell may not survive a major
earthquake. Even after the federal agency reported the preliminary findings, the mayor continued his
refusal to release the report because of the professed confidentiality concerns.
In the summer of 2012, the municipality hired an Outside law firm -- with no offices in Anchorage -- to
look at legal issues and look for parties that may bear some responsibility for the problems. After
paying the Outside law firm $500,000, the mayor recently asked the Assembly for an additional $2
million to pay the lawyers. The Assembly wisely limited the additional expenditure to $250,000.
The current status of the Port of Anchorage expansion raises questions that should be answered
before Election Day. Do we need to start over with a dock-on-piling design? Why hasn't the mayor
negotiated a voters-need-to-know exception to the confidentiality agreement? What is the likely cost
of finishing the expansion project—whether with the open cell design or starting over with dock-onpiling design? Who will pay for the project? And what are we getting for $50 million?
But we will not have answers to any of the important questions about the port before November 6.
Does the secrecy and uncertainty about the port expansion mean we should reject the bond
proposal? Can we trust the government to properly manage this project in the future?
If Port of Anchorage Expansion was the only project in the proposal, it would be an easy “no” vote.
But should one flawed project doom the remaining 89 percent of the projects? There are three
reasons to support Proposition A despite the flaws. First, the cost to complete the work on the port -whether finishing the open cell design or changing to dock-on-piling -- will exceed $50 million.
Second, the economic benefits to the state from issuing bonds and protecting its assets may not be
available in later years if interest rates rise. And third, state investment in a project that had relied
primarily on federal funds will give our public officials even more reasons to give the project the
scrutiny it needs -- with an open and public process that has been missing for many years.
The remaining 89 percent of the statewide projects justify taking a risk on the 11 percent allocated to
the Port of Anchorage. With misgivings and many questions, and a renewed commitment to an open
and transparent process after the election, Alaskans should vote “yes” on Proposition A.
Matt Claman is an attorney with Lane Powell, is a former Anchorage Assembly member, and served
as mayor of Anchorage in 2009.
The views expressed here are the writer's own and are not necessarily endorsed by Alaska Dispatch.
Alaska Dispatch welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, e-mail
commentary(at)alaskadispatch.com.
11/6/2012 4:00 PM
Hold Your Nose and Vote 'Yes' for State Transportation Bonds | Alaska D...
3 of 3
Email
Like
4
Tweet
0
0
Romney, Obama lawyer
up for Election Day vote
disputes
Print
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/hold-your-nose-and-vote-yes-state...
Single Page
Arctic ice rebounding
quickly after recordshattering summer low
Will anyone show up for
NPR-A lease sale?
Copyright © 2012 Alaska Dispatch. All Rights Reserved.
11/6/2012 4:00 PM