Dispute Management Plan
January 2015
Dispute Management Plan
1. What is the Plan? What are its Objectives?
The Dispute Management Plan (the Plan) has been prepared to enable the Murray–Darling
Basin Authority (the MDBA) to efficiently and proactively manage disputes arising from the
MDBA’s role as a statutory agency. The MDBA undertakes to manage all disputes in
accordance with this Plan and will endeavour to review the Plan on an annual basis.
The Plan presents a recommended approach to dispute management based around the three
key Objectives:
1. Identify and manage complaints in a timely fashion.
2. Promote a culture of active dispute management that involves engaging with
disputants.
3. Record and use information about disputes in an appropriate manner.
Dispute management in the MDBA plays a critical role in improving the MDBA’s ability to meet its
organisational objectives effectively and to productively engage with stakeholders and the
general community. The MDBA is committed to making transparent and accountable decision
making when performing its functions. It also encourages feedback from individuals and parties
affected by the decisions it makes.
The Water Act 2007 (Cth) prescribes a number of functions for the MDBA, including
disseminating information about the Basin's water resources, and engaging and educating the
Australian community about the Basin’s water resources. The MDBA must always ensure that its
interaction with stakeholders and the general community fulfills legislative requirements and
delivers a level of satisfaction to the Murray–Darling Basin community.
Furthermore, the MDBA has a legal obligation to engage with disputants in ways which uphold
the Australian Public Service (APS) Values and Code of Conduct, and implement the Plan in
accordance with the Legal Services Directions 2005 (Cth).
The MDBA is committed to meeting a high standard of service delivery to the Australian public.
The Plan sets out the MDBA’s objectives in the management of disputes and provides for options
with regards to the resolution of disputes. More detail about these Objectives can be found in
Section 6 of this Plan.
2. What is the context for this Plan?
This Plan is consistent with the guide developed by the National Alternative Dispute Resolution
Advisory Council (NADRAC), which aims to assist Commonwealth agencies to develop and
regularly review the way we manage disputes.
The Plan also supports the MDBA’s Strategic Plan 2012-2015, which has the strategic goal of
‘managing, coordinating and sustaining long-term strategic relationships with agencies, industry
Page 1
Dispute Management Plan
groups, scientists and local communities’. It also supports the MDBA’s guiding principles of
adhering to the APS Values and Code of Conduct, supporting collaboration by dealing with
others with courtesy, and making our decisions and processes transparent.
3. What are common disputes arising at the MDBA?
The MDBA acknowledges that disputes may arise in a variety of circumstances. The most
common and recurring concerns that can drive disputes in the MDBA include:

where information or a process is not communicated or is incorrectly explained, e.g. on the
MDBA’s website, in a community consultation process, or to or by staff;

where staff are not responsive to queries, or are not appropriately trained or resourced to
deal with people, particularly those from diverse backgrounds;

where a procurement process is unsuccessful for a tenderer and the tenderer states their
dissatisfaction;

where decisions have been made, but not communicated or explained well. Typical
examples of this are adverse outcomes in a Statement of Reasons; or

where a privacy complaint arises, where personal information is used for purposes other
than for which it was collected.
4. What are the types of disputes covered by this Plan?
The following are types of disputes that may be covered by this Plan:

Decision disputes: For example, these disputes arise where a person disputes or
challenges an MDBA decision, e.g. a decision made under the Freedom of Information
Act 1982 (Cth), a decision under the Water Act 2007 (Cth) or Basin Plan 2012 (Cth).

Procedural disputes: For example, these disputes arise where a person argues that the
MDBA has failed to act in accordance with procedures prescribed in legislation or in
accordance with its own policies and procedures or failed to put in place an appropriate
process for undertaking its functions e.g. privacy breaches.

Corporate disputes: For example, these disputes arise in relation to matters including
employment and procurement.
5. What are the key principles of resolving disputes?
The MDBA acknowledges the following principles are guides to shape dispute management
within the agency. These form the basis for guiding how the MDBA can approach a dispute.
Page 2
Dispute Management Plan
Merits of the dispute should be assessed in a timely fashion
The merits of each dispute, including the risks for the MDBA, should be assessed in a timely
fashion, and considered as soon as reasonably practicable.
Resolution should be respectful
Disputes should be managed in an honest and respectful manner, which upholds the highest
ethical standards of public governance, in line with the APS Values and Code of Conduct.
Disputes should be acted upon diligently
MDBA staff have a responsibility to take genuine steps to resolve or clarify disputes and should
be supported to meet this responsibility by the MDBA. This principle will be upheld by MDBA staff
showing their commitment to dispute resolution processes by listening to all viewpoints, and by
putting forward and considering options in resolving the dispute. Additionally, MDBA staff should
have access to information that enables them to choose suitable dispute resolution processes.
Investing in the capacity of communication and dispute resolution skills of MDBA staff will also
help uphold these principles.
6. How should we prevent and manage disputes?
Our Dispute Management Strategy
The key purpose of this Plan is to ensure a consistent and effective approach to managing
disputes. We can achieve this by structuring our strategy to managing disputes around three key
Objectives.
The approach we take at the MDBA will be most useful when it is proportionate (in terms of time,
effort and cost) to the issues raised in the complaint or dispute.
Objective 1
Identify and manage complaints in a timely fashion
At the MDBA, we have a responsibility to minimise issues and complaints escalating into
disputes by being:

interested, courteous and an active listener; and

fair and flexible, and engaging with concerns as early as possible.
This can be achieved by:
-
valuing and building capacity in communication and dispute resolution
-
providing and communicating appropriate information to people both verbally and in
writing to ensure transparency;
-
providing opportunities for feedback to be given;
-
applying the MDBA’s complaints management process; and
-
ensuring timely responses to complaints.
Page 3
Dispute Management Plan
Objective 2
Promote a culture of active dispute management that involves engaging with disputants
At the MDBA, we have a responsibility to:

assess each dispute on an individual basis (including risks for the MDBA), and identify the
most appropriate way to manage it; and

take genuine steps to resolve or clarify disputes in the simplest, most appropriate and
cost-effective way.
This can be achieved by:
-
listening to alternate views and putting forward options to resolve a dispute. This
promotes collaborative problem solving. An example of this is to investigate the dispute by
discussing with the respondent as to his/her version of the issue as well as listening to the
complainant;
-
ensure responses to complaints are dealt with diligently and by providing a response and
follow-up to the complainant;
-
providing training opportunities to staff for dispute management, and ensuring all new and
current employees are aware of this Plan and related policies;
-
seeking out information to enable staff to choose the most appropriate form of dispute
resolution processes.
Objective 3
Record and use information about disputes in an appropriate manner
At the MDBA, we have a responsibility to:

accurately record and report information about disputes; and

analyse information collected about disputes to assist in improving policies and practices
about dispute management.
This can be achieved by:
-
using the MDBA’s complaints management process;
-
recording the risk rating as well as other important factors about the dispute;
-
informing the Executive of the occurrence of disputes; and
-
using information recorded to inform future reviews for improvement of the Plan.
7. Roles and responsibilities
The success of this Plan is a shared responsibility across all areas of the MDBA.
The MDBA is responsible for supporting the objectives and key principles of the Plan through
compliance with applicable regulatory requirements (Section 9), the key principles (Section 5)
and the key objectives (Section 6).
Page 4
Dispute Management Plan
Executive Directors
Executive Directors and their staff are responsible for implementing this Plan and actively
promoting a culture of dispute management within the MDBA. Each Division is responsible for
ensuring that appropriate training, skills and processes exist.
The relevant Executive Director involved in each dispute must ultimately be satisfied that
disputes are being dealt with appropriately.
MDBA Staff
All MDBA staff and contractors have a responsibility to acknowledge and respond to a dispute in
a timely fashion. The Legal Section can provide guidance on appropriate measures of recording
disputes.
Corporate and Business Services Division
The Corporate and Business Services Division, through the Legal Section and the Complaints
Officer where appropriate, will provide support and guidance on dispute management.
The Corporate and Business Services Division will also report to the Executive on a quarterly
basis. The report will cover statistics, trends and any systemic issues arising from disputes within
or involving Divisions.
8. How will the Plan be reviewed?
It is envisaged the Plan will be reviewed on an annual basis, with results from this review being
the basis for revision of all aspects of the Plan. The results will also provide the MDBA with
opportunities to identify specific areas within our agency where disputes are the most common,
and assist with the analysis of existing mechanisms and the formulation of proactive strategies
for addressing recurring issues, including the prevention of disputes.
9. What is the regulatory framework of this Plan?
The following legislation and resources are applicable to disputes covered by this Plan and
may potentially provide further guidance to enable the dispute to be resolved:

Australian Public Service Values and Code of Conduct, which provide ethical and
professional standards that Australian Public Servants must follow;

Legal Services Directions 2005 (Cth), which place obligations on the Commonwealth
to act as a model litigant;

Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth), which encourages people to take ‘genuine
steps’ before commencing certain proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia and
the Federal Circuit Court of Australia;

Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth) and Public
Governance, Performance and Accountability Rule 2014 (Cth), which provide a
system of governance and accountability for public resources.
Page 5
Dispute Management Plan

Basin Plan 2012 (Cth)

Water Act 2007 (Cth)

Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth)

Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and the MDBA’s APP Privacy Policy

Public Interest Disclosure Act 2011 (Cth)

Commonwealth Comcover Scheme, which ensures better risk management in the
Australian Government;

Administrative Review Council’s Guides to Best Practice in Decision Making on
Lawfulness, Natural Justice, Reasons and Accountability;

‘NADRAC – Your Guide to Dispute Resolution’, a resource to help ordinary
Australians understand Alternative Dispute Resolution in a comprehensive form.
Disputes Arising from Court Proceedings
Disputes that have resulted in the commencement of Court proceedings will be managed in
accordance with the Legal Services Directions 2005 (Cth), and the ‘Litigation Involving the
Commonwealth’ guidelines which apply to all Australian Government agencies.
10. Awareness and Promotion
The MDBA will be proactive in promoting and increasing awareness of the Plan both within the
MDBA and to external parties.
All members of staff are required to understand their roles and responsibilities and the Executive
will be responsible for ensuring the objectives of the dispute management plan are achieved.
Rhondda Dickson
Chief Executive
Murray-Darling Basin Authority
January 2015
Page 6