CHAPTER 4 Inequalities on -idempotent matrices In this chapter, it is shown that all the standard partial orderings [2,7,24] such as Lowener, star and rank subtractivity are preserved under the fixed product of disjoint transpositions . That is all the partial orderings are preserved under -unitary similarity. Relation between -hermitian matrix and -idempotent matrix is derived here by means of Lowener partial order. It is proved that all the partial orderings are preserved for -idempotent matrices when they are squared. 62 4.1 -invariant partial orderings on matrices In this section, it is to be proved that all the standard partial orderings are preserved under -unitary similarity. The Lowener partial order, the star order and the minus order (rank subtractivity order) denoted by , and respectively are defined as follows: Definition 4.1.1 ℂ For iff iff iff rank , . and rank rank . Remark 4.1.2 The following useful result (cf.[25]) explains the relation partial order and the spectral radius of the transformation. For and where max between Lowener ℂ , , -an eigen value of is the spectral radius of . Lemma 4.1.3 If is the associated permutation matrix of , then for ℂ , Proof by remark 4.1.2 and and by theorem 1.2.9 and and by theorem 1.2.9 63 by remark 4.1.2 Similarly, and by remark 4.1.2 and by theorem 1.2.9 and and by theorem 1.2.9 by remark 4.1.2 Hence the proof. Result 4.1.4 It can be easily verified that Lowener ordering is preserved under unitary similarity. That is Theorem 4.1.5 Lowener ordering is preserved for -unitary similarity. Proof by lemma 4.1.3 by result 4.1.4 by lemma 4.1.3 If then is unitarily -similar to . If then is unitarily -similar to . 64 Therefore and hence Lowener ordering is preserved for -unitary similarity. Note 4.1.6 If in theorem 4.1.5, it reduces to result 4.1.4. Remark 4.1.7 The following result (see[24]) establishes a relation between star ordering and ℂ rank subtractivity. For , and Lemma 4.1.8 If is the associated permutation matrix of , then for ℂ , Proof and and and Similarly, and and and 65 Result 4.1.9 It can be easily verified that star ordering is preserved under unitary similarity. That is Theorem 4.1.10 Star ordering is preserved for -unitary similarity. Proof by lemma 4.1.8 by result 4.1.9 by lemma 4.1.8 If then is unitarily -similar to . If then is unitarily -similar to . Therefore and hence star ordering is preserved for -unitary similarity. Note 4.1.11 If in theorem 4.1.10, it reduces to result 4.1.9. Remark 4.1.12 The following result exhibits an equivalent condition for minus ordering of two matrices and . For ℂ , Lemma 4.1.13 If is the associated permutation matrix of , then for ℂ , 66 Proof rank rank rank rank rank rank rank rank rank Similarly, rank rank rank rank rank rank rank rank rank Result 4.1.14 It can be easily verified that rank subtractivity ordering is preserved under unitary similarity. That is Theorem 4.1.15 Rank subtractivity ordering is preserved for -unitary similarity. Proof by lemma 4.1.13 by result 4.1.14 by lemma 4.1.13 If then is unitarily -similar to . If then is unitarily -similar to . 67 Therefore and hence rank subtractivity ordering is preserved for -unitary similarity. Note 4.1.16 If in theorem 4.1.15, it reduces to result 4.1.14. 68 4.2 Partial orderings on -idempotent matrices In this section, partial orderings on -idempotent matrices is discussed and a relation between a square hermitian matrix and a -idempotent matrix through Lowener partial order is discovered. Lemma 4.2.1 If for matrices and then is -hermitian. Proof implies that Hence by lemma 4.1.3 is -hermitian positive semi definite. That is is -hermitian. Theorem 4.2.2 Let and . If is a -idempotent matrix then . Proof implies that Therefore Since Hence from , we have by lemma 4.2.1. , we have 69 That is Therefore Theorem 4.2.3 Let . If is -hermitian -idempotent then is -hermitian and vice versa. Proof Since , we have is -hermitian. by lemma 4.2.1 That is If is -hermitian -idempotent then is square hermitian by theorem 2.3.1. becomes Hence is -hermitian. On the other hand, if is -hermitian -idempotent then is square hermitian by theorem 2.3.1. becomes 70 Hence is -hermitian. Theorem 4.2.4 Let and are -idempotent matrices. Then if and only if Proof Assuming that Therefore Conversely, if we assume , then we have by what we have proved above and theorem 2.1.7 (b). That is . by theorem 2.1.7 (c) Hence the theorem is proved. Theorem 4.2.5 Let and are -idempotent matrices. Then if and only if Proof Assuming that then we have (i) From (i), by theorem 2.1.7 (a) 71 From (ii), From and , we have Conversely, if we assume that then we have by what we have proved above and theorem 2.1.7 (b). That is by theorem 2.1.7 (c) Hence the theorem is proved. Theorem 4.2.6 Let and are -idempotent matrices. Then if and only if Proof Assuming that by remark 4.1.12 Therefore Conversely, if we assume that by remark 4.1.12 then we have by what we have proved above and theorem 2.1.7 (b). That is by theorem 2.1.7 (c) Hence the theorem is proved. 72 Theorem 4.2.7 If and such that are two disjoint square hermitian and skew square hermitian matrices then is -idempotent. Proof Since , we have is -hermitian. by lemma 4.2.1 That is becomes, Hence is -idempotent. Note 4.2.8 The following theorem can be considered to be somehow a reverse of the above theorem 4.2.7 Theorem 4.2.9 If and are two disjoint -idempotent matrices such that then and are square hermitian matrices. Proof implies that is -hermitian by lemma 4.2.1 73 Squaring From That is , we have and and , solving for and we have and . are square hermitian matrices. 74
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz