1 2000, W. E. Haisler Chapter 14 - Fluid Mechanics Fluid mechanics problems, like solid mechanics problems, must satisfy all the conservation principles. The major differences are that in fluid mechanics problems: 1. The continuum (the fluid) generally has a velocity. 2. The constitutive relations relate stress to velocity gradients [instead of stress to displacement gradients (strain) as in a solid]. 3. The final solution of the problem (after combining all applicable principles) is in terms of velocities [instead of displacements as in a solid]. 2 2000, W. E. Haisler Conservation of Mass (v ) t Conservation of Linear Momentum [v v v ] g T t S T PI where P 1 (Txx Tyy Tzz) 1/ 3tr(T ) 3 [v v v ] g S P t 3 2000, W. E. Haisler Incompressible Fluids (=constant in time and space). Conservation of mass (continuity equation) becomes v 0 Continuity equation for =constant Constitutive equations for Newtonian Fluids The strain tensor has been defined as 1 [(u ) (u )T ] . We 2 can define the rate of deformation tensor by taking the time derivative of the strain tensor to obtain D 1 [(v ) (v )T ] = 2 v x x u 1 v y x ( 2 y x v u 1 x z ( 2 z x ) 1 v y v x ( ) 2 x y v y y ) 1 v y uz ( ) 2 z y 1 v z v x ( ) 2 x z 1 v z v y ( ) 2 y z v z z 4 2000, W. E. Haisler Fluids are generally isotropic and we can observe experimentally the following linear relation between stress and velocity gradients <-- defined to be a Newtonian fluid. S tr(D)I 2D <-- defined to be a Newtonian fluid where and are 2 experimentally observed material constants (similar to E and in isotropic solids). The above can also be written as T S PI PI tr(D)I 2D 5 2000, W. E. Haisler Meaning of and Consider the case where all velocity gradients are zero except that in the x-y plane (as might occur with steady flow between two parallel plates with vx vx (y) only). y fluid flow x dv x 1 where vx vx ( y) Dxy 2 dy Dxx Dyy Dzz Dxz Dyz 0 (flow only in x direction) Substituting above into the constitutive equation gives 6 2000, W. E. Haisler Txx T yy Tzz P Txz T yz 0 , , Txy dv x dy The material constant relates the shearing stress to the velocity gradient in the y direction. is called the coefficient of viscosity. Txy units of MPa sec psi sec dvx/dy 2000, W. E. Haisler 7 Stokes proposed a relation between and based on the following argument (and physical observation). First take the sum of the diagonal terms of the stress tensor [S] tr(S ) tr(tr(D)I 2D) tr(D)tr( I ) 2tr(D) note tr(S ) Sxx Syy Szz ; tr( I ) 3 ; tr(D) Dxx Dyy Dzz Thus Sxx Syy Szz 3(Dxx Dyy Dzz ) 2(Dxx Dyy Dzz ) or (1/ 3)(Sxx Syy Szz ) 0 ( 2 / 3)(Dxx Dyy Dzz ) tr(S ) Sxx Syy Szz 0 and thus ( 2 / 3) 0. ( / ) is called the coefficient of bulk viscosity. Thus 2 / 3 . 2000, W. E. Haisler Substitute Stokes’ assumption back into the constitutive relation (stress-velocity gradient relation) to obtain S 2[D (1/ 3)tr(D)I ] But tr(D) vx / x v y / y vz / z v 0 from S 2D [(v ) (v )T ] conservation of mass. Thus Note, we need S in linear momentum equation: T S (2 )D 2 ( 1 [(v ) (v ) ]) 2 2 2 [ v ( v )] v 8 2000, W. E. Haisler 9 Note: ( v ) 0 from incompressibility. Substitute for S into Linear Momentum equation to obtain the Navier-Stokes Equation (constant density and viscosity): [v v v ] g 2v P t For body forces which are conservative, it convenient to rewrite the body force term in terms of a potential function (means the force is the gradient of a potential function). The body force due to gravity can be written as g gh and h is the distance above a reference in the direction of the gravitational vector. If we assume g is a constant, then g gh (gh). Thus the two terms g P can be 2000, W. E. Haisler combined and written (gh)P (P gh) where P gh is called the modified pressure potential function. With this the Navier-Stokes equation becomes [v v v ] g 2v P t or [v v v ] 2v t 10 11 2000, W. E. Haisler Summary - Navier-Stokes Equations for Newtonian Fluid Constant Mass (), Constant Viscosity () Continuity: ( v ) 0 Deformation Gradient: D 1 [(v ) (v )T ] 2 Constitutive (Stress-Velocity): S 2D [(v ) (v )T ] Linear Momentum: [v v v ] g 2v P t or [v v v ] 2v where P gh t 12 2000, W. E. Haisler Cylindrical (r, , z) coordinates. y v v r v z r x Recall 1 er e r ez r z 2 2 2 2 r1 1 2 r 2 2 2 r r z 13 2000, W. E. Haisler 1. Steady-State, Laminar Flow in a Tube of radius R. axial flow z r Continuity: ( v ) 0 Assume no radial flow and that flow is axisymmetric (velocity is independent of ), ie, vr v 0 . Continuity vz 0 . Thus vz vz (r ) C . reduces to z Linear Momentum: [v v v ] g 2v P t 2000, W. E. Haisler v 0. Neglect body forces: g 0. For steady-state: t In cylindrical coordinates, components of v [vr ,v ,vz]. 14 From continuity, vr v 0. Components of gradient operator are er e r1 ez . Thus [v v ] becomes r z in matrix notation v z 0 0 r r 1 vr v vz r vr v vz 0 0 vz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z The two remaining terms on the right side of L.M. become: 15 2000, W. E. Haisler P 0 r 0 2v P 0 r1 P 2 P d v dv z1 z z 2 dr r dr Thus we have 3 equations: P 0 r 1P 0 r 2 --> Implies that P=P(z) d v z 1 dv z dP r dr dz 2 dr 16 2000, W. E. Haisler To solve the last equation for vz(r), we assume that dP/dz is a given value (and not a function of r). Integrating the above differential equation twice gives dv z 1 dP r C1 r dr dz 2 2 and vz 1 dP r C lnr C dz 4 1 2 C1 must be zero since at r=0, the velocity gradient must be finite (not infinity). Assume BC that axial flow velocity is 2 zero at the outer wall: vz(r=R) = 0. Thus C 1 dP R . 2 dz 4 2 2 r 1 dP R 1 . The axial velocity solution is thus vz(r) dz 4 R 2 The velocity distribution is parabolic and the maximum 17 2000, W. E. Haisler 2 dP R . The shear stress dz 4 max distribution (from constitutive equation) is given by dv z Srz (dP r ) r dP . The shear stress varies dr dz 2 2 dz linearly with the radius, is zero at r=0, and is a maximum at the wall where r=R. The volumetric flow rate is given by value occurs as r=0: vz R R 2 2 4 r dP R R dP Q v dA v 2rdr 1 2 rdr z z dz 8 dz 4 R2 A 0 0 Note: Both flow rate Q and velocity vz are proportional to axial pressure gradient, dP/dz. 18 2000, W. E. Haisler 2. Plane Couette Flow Between Two Parallel Plates y d z Continuity: ( v ) 0 Assume fluid flow is only in the z direction, ie, vx vy 0 . vz 0 . Thus vz vz ( y) C . Continuity reduces to z Linear Momentum: [v v v ] g 2v P t 2000, W. E. Haisler 19 vx vx vx vx 2vx 2vx 2vx P ( vx vy vz ) gx ( ) 2 2 2 x t x y z x y z v y v y v y v y 2v y 2v y 2v y P ( vx vy vz ) g y ( ) t x y z x 2 y 2 z 2 y vz vz vz vz 2vz 2vz 2vz P ( vx vy vz ) gz ( ) t x y z x 2 y 2 z 2 z v 0. Neglect body forces: g 0. For steady-state: t Linear Momentum reduces to 20 2000, W. E. Haisler 0 P x 0 P y d 2vz dP 0 dy 2 dz The first two equations imply that P=P(z). Solving the third equation for vz(y) and taking dP/dz as a given (and not a function of y), then 2 dP ) d vz ( 1 dP ) y C y C B.C.: v z(0)= vz(d)=0 --> C ( 1 dz 2 1 dz 2 2 1 2 2 y y dP 1 d Thus vz ( y) ( ) which is parabolic in y. The dz 2 d d 2 max velocity occurs at the center: vz vz (d / 2) d ( dP ). 8 dz max 21 2000, W. E. Haisler 3 The flow rate (vol/time) is Q vz dA 0dvzWdy Wd (dP ) 12 dz A where W is the width in the x direction of the plates. The dv z dP ( )( y d / 2) . shear stress is Syz dy dz It should be kept in mind that the definition of P is given by P = -(1/3) tr[T] = -(1/3) (Txx+Tyy+Tzz) = - average hydrostatic stress. Thus, a negative dP/dz causes flow in the positive z direction. Some units: force: 1 N = 1 kg m/s2 pressure or stress: 1 Pa = 1 N/m2 = 1 kg/(m s2), 1 psi = 6,894.76 Pa, 1 Mpa = 145.04 psi viscosity, : 1 Pa s = 1 N s/ m2 = 1 kg/(m s) 22 2000, W. E. Haisler 3. Annular Flow between two pipes of radius R2 and R1. flow R 1 z r solid (no flow) R 2 flow The general solution for this problem is identical to the first example (laminar flow in a tube) except for geometry and boundary conditions. 2 vz 1 dP r C lnr C . dz 4 1 2 B.C.: vz(R1)= vz(R2)=0 2000, W. E. Haisler R2 vz (R ) 0 1 dP 1 C ln R C dz 4 1 1 1 2 R 2 vz (R ) 0 1 dP 2 C ln R C dz 4 2 1 2 2 Solving for C1 and C2 gives R 2 R 2 1 ) 1 C 1 dP ( 2 1 dz 4 ln(R / R ) 2 1 R2 R 2 R 2 ln R 1 ) 1 C 1 dP ( 1 ) 1 dP ( 2 dz 2 dz 4 4 ln(R / R ) 2 1 23 24 2000, W. E. Haisler Substituting the constants of integration back into vz gives 2 2 R2 vz dP ( 1 ) 1 r ( 1)ln(r / R ) where R / R 2 1 R dz 4 ln 1 1 This is the same as equation (13-80) except that (13-80) is written in terms of the pressure potential where dP L 0 = change in potential (pressure) from z=0 L dz to z=L. Note: ln()=-ln(1/). Note also that as 1 (thin annulus), the ln term goes to zero and the above solution is similar to plane couette flow.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz