Risk Management Case Study agenda Firm Overview Case Study – Risk Management Q&A Sonik Consulting Group Management / IT Consulting Active since March 1999; based in Vancouver, BC 3 full-time employees Client Track record includes case study Discussion Framework • • • • • • Client / Project Overview Project Objectives The Challenge The Environment The Solution Key Learnings case study The Client • Client is a private, services-based firm; one of the main incumbents in its industry • ~ $50 M in annual revenue; 6 main product lines • Key business drivers: • client looking to expand into a service bureau model, processing transactions for other service-based companies • increase existing product line revenue by accepting ‘riskier’ transactions Project Structure • Project roles • Sponsor: CEO • Client team: CFO, Controller, LOB manager, Product Manager, Development Team Lead. • Sonik - PM and Business Analyst roles case study Some Definitions • Merchant Accounts • Chargebacks / thresholds • First-time customer • Negative data • ‘Friendly fraud’ • Card not present transactions The Objectives • Improve fraud detection across all product offerings • Support the development / expansion and management of new product areas (Internet, self-service, pay-percall) • Reduce call center costs by optimizing business processes, reducing unnecessary traffic • Retain all merchant accounts case study The Challenge • Assess risk associated to a credit card transaction (realtime basis) • Optimize credit card chargeback thresholds by merchant account based on this risk assessment case study The Environment • Sales Channels • project focus on IVR and Live Agent • Payment Methods Sales channels Web IVR Live Agent (Call Centre) • project focus on credit cards Payment methods Bill-to-phone Online Debit Cheque Credit Card Money Order case study The Environment • Vantive CRM • profiling, transaction history • Acxiom • ANI verification • Equifax ePORT • address verification • PaylinX • payment gateway Before State case study Some Definitions • • • • • ‘Risk Management’ Treatment Transaction Limits Verified by VISA Address Verification Service • AVS • Card verification • CVC2/CVV2 Risk Management Architecture case study The Solution 1. Project Charter • Capture the strategic long term vision and short term goals. • Interviews / workshops with key stakeholders, managers, employees • Determine objectives / targets • Evaluate / determine strategies, tactics case study The Solution 2. Vendor Selections • Conducted Vendor Selections for: • Risk Scoring services • Risk Management platform • Assessed 20+ vendor solutions case study The Solution 3. Process Re-design • Identified key business processes and reporting needs • Identified areas of opportunity (areas where current business rules too restrictive) • New process design to allow processing of transactions that would have normally been either denied or sent to the Call Centre -- based partly on ‘risk score’ as well as internal rules (minimize costs and improve order conversion) Sonik Process Swimlane Methodology case study The Solution 4. Phased Development • Phased approach based on business priorities and building block approach • Risk Scoring • Payment gateways • Automated Transaction / Merchant Account Routing Phase 1 Risk Management Architecture case study The Solution 5. Risk Scoring Analysis • Conducted test run on 1 month of credit card transaction using 3rd party risk scoring engine • Determined internal thresholds to either ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ a transaction based on its score • Cross-referenced to internal business rules to determine correct score threshold • Cross-referenced score thresholds to actual chargeback data collected over a 3-month period Score Threshold Analysis Next Page case study Score Threshold Analysis case study The Results The Results • Process: • Re-organized internal fraud check sequence (preauthorizations conducted only after transaction approved internally) • added additional fraud check process involving 3rd party risk scoring vendor • Merchant Account Reports • track chargebacks down to the indivudual transaction level (by product line, cc issuer, merchant account) • Risk Scoring Interface • Developed, tested and implemented interface to 3rd party risk scoring engine; launched May 28, 2002. • Effect on Processed Transactions • Early indications show more transactions being processed overall, which will have a net positive effect to revenue • Follow-up review regarding chargeback since launch (set for 8 weeks postlaunch) case study The Results • Next Steps • Tracking stats daily over next 3 months to watch chargebacks • Phase 2 to proceed within 6 – 8 months (complete Risk Management system) Risk Management Architecture case study Key Learnings • Trusted 3rd Party information • Timeliness of chargeback information varies greatly • Hurdles faced when prompting for CVV/CVN • Real-time transaction processing based on configurable business rules • Need dedicated in-house risk management analysts for daily operations Web Related Items • • • • • Use of negative/blocking databases for CC, Addresses, Phone, IP, & Email. Positive databases for "good" customers Geographic location checks Threshold checks - Email, IP, CC, etc Use of the new which provides chargeback protection. Q&A www.sonikgroup.com
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz