INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Light’s Labour’s Lost: Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Scenarios & Strategies to 2050 LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting © OECD/IEA - 2007 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY How important is lighting? 2650 TWh of electricity consumption some 19% of global electricity use (15-17% greater than nuclear or hydro power) equivalent to production of all gas-fired power generation, or 1265 power plants LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Lighting CO2 emissions in 2005 All lighting = 1889 MtCO2 ¾ Grid based = 1528 MtCO2 ¾ Fuel-based lighting = 200 MtCO2 ¾ Vehicle lighting = 161 MtCO2 Equivalent to 70% of world passenger vehicle emissions LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Lighting electricity consumption shares by sector in 2005 8% 18% 43% 31% LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Commercial Residential Industrial Outdoor stationary INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The cost of lighting in 2005 Total cost of lighting is US$460 billion per annum Equivalent to >1% of global GDP or the total GDP of the Former Soviet Union Two thirds of the cost is for the energy used LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Cost of residential lighting in 2005 Total cost of residential electric lighting is US$136 billion Equivalent to US$7.1 per Mlm-hr The cost of electricity is ¾ of the total LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Most energy is for incandescent lighting but this only provides 44% of the delivered light in this sector INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Artificial source-lumens: residential sector in 2005 Global average consumption of 3 Megalumens of residential electric-light per capita/year Average North American uses 13.2 Mega-lmhrs; average Chinese 1.5 Mega-lm-hrs But that’s still 300 times average artificial per capita light use in England in C19th Yet average Japanese uses 18.5 Mlmh and the average European or Australian uses 2.7Mlmh LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Global light consumption = 19.2 Peta-lm-hrs in 2005 "These lovely lamps, these windows of the soul." z Incandescent z Fluorescent z HID INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Large differences in lamp efficacy INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Total delivered light in 2005 ((Teralumen Teralumen hours) Residential LFL CFL Halogen HID Incandescent LED Outdoor Stationary Industrial Commercial 0 20000 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY 40000 60000 Light output (Tlm-hours) 80000 100000 AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Light output by lamp type in 2005 (global res. total 19.2 Peta -lumen hrs) Peta-lumen 18.9% 41.3% 21.2% T12 T8 T5 CFL b-i CFL b-o Halogen LED Sodium HID Metal halide Mercury HID Incan-ref Incan 2.4% 2.5% 5.6% INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY 8.0% AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Estimated share of res. light provided by major lighting technologies in 2005 China Russia LFL CFL Halogen Incandescent USA Japan Europe 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Share of residential light AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Large differences in residential sector efficacy by region Global average residential electric lighting system efficacy was: 23.7 lm/W in 2005 Greater than a factor of five variation between regions 11.5 lm/W in FSU to 64 lm/W in Japan LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Important differences in OECD Country UK Sw eden Germany Denmark Greece Italy France USA Japan Lighting electricity consumption per household kWh/year 720 760 775 426 381 375 465 1946 939 Lamps per household Lamps 20.1 40.4 30.3 23.7 10.4 14.0 18.5 43.0 17.0 Average lamp efficacy lm/W 25 24 27 32 26 27 18 18 64 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Light consumption per unit floor area Installed lighting pow er density Lighting electricity consumption per unit floor area Lamp operating time Household floor area M-lmhrs/m2/year 0.21 0.16 0.22 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.22 0.27 0.49 W/m2 14.7 14.0 15.6 5.7 7.8 10.6 16.1 21.5 8.1 kWh/m2/yr 8.6 6.9 9.3 3.3 3.7 4.0 5.7 15.1 10.0 hours/day 1.60 1.35 1.48 1.59 1.30 1.03 0.97 1.92 3.38 m2 84 110 83 134 113 108 81 132 94 AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE 800 600 550 400 283 214 209 200 148 53 127 83 No rth INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY or ld W er ic a Eu ro Au Ja pe pa st ra n/ li a K or /N ea ew Ze al Tr an an d si tio Ch n in Ec a on om Re ie st s of W or ld 0 Am Electricity consumption (kWh/capita) Res. lighting electricity consumption per capita in 2005 (kWh/year) AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Electricity consumption (TWh/yr) 800 Residential lighting electricity consumption in 2005 OECD = 372 TWh non-OECD = 439 TWh 600 400 296 238 200 79 50 70 74 5 Ja pa Au n/ st K ra or lia ea /N ew Ze al an d Tr an Ch si tio in a n Ec on om ie Re s st of W or ld -E ur op e EC D O No rth Am er ic a 0 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Annual average residential electric light consumption vs. GDP/capita Lighting cons. (M-lm-hrs/Capita/year) 18 16 0.0602x y = 1.4125e 2 R = 0.8588 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 GDP per capita (2000US$ thousands) INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Residential light output by lamp type in 2030 (global total 49 Peta -lumen hrs) Peta-lumen 10.5% 28.5% T12 18.0% T8 T5 CFL b-i CFL b-o Halogen LED Sodium HID 4.5% 9.3% Metal halide Mercury HID Incan-ref Incan 8.8% 20.5% INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Consider use of CFLs in homes Incandescent CFL Initial cost of bulb Efficacy US$0.5 12lm/W US$10 60 lm/W Lifespan For 10000 hours use 1000 hours 10000 hours Electricity cost Cost of lamps US$75 US$5 US$15 US$10 Total cost of ownership US$80 US$25 IRR = 186% LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Assumptions under least-life cycle cost from 2008 scenario In majority of cases when the operating hours exceed an economic threshold assume: ¾ CFLs replace incandescent lamps (75% of cases) ¾ T12s and halo-phosphor T8s are replaced by triphosphor T8s and T5s ¾ Proportion of halogens replaced by LEDs (from medium term onwards) ¾ Halogen torchieres are phased out ¾ Electronic ballasts ¾ In line with natural replacement cycles for lamps, ballasts and fixtures LLCC Light output by lamp type in 2030 (global res. total 49 Peta -lumen hrs) Peta-lumen 0.8% 5.5% 2.3% 3.0% 13.0% 16.9% T12 T8 T5 CFL b-i CFL b-o Halogen LED Sodium HID Metal halide Mercury HID Incan-ref Incan 58.5% INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Res. energy consumption: no -policies, no-policies, current -policies and LLCC -scenarios current-policies LLCC-scenarios 2500 Lighting electricity consumption (TWh) No Policies Current Policies 2000 181 TWh = 9% LLCC from 2008 610 TWh = 35% 1500 1000 500 0 1995 2000 2005 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Residential lighting cost savings compared to Current Policies Lighting cost savings (billion US$) 80 70 LLCC from 2008 60 No Policies 50 40 30 20 10 0 -101990 2000 2010 2020 2030 -20 -30 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Benefits from residential LLCC scenario compared to Current Policies scenario The least life cycle cost from 2008 results in global savings of: ¾ US$69 billion and 356 Mt CO2 in 2030 ¾ US$1.3 trillion and 6.4 Gt CO2 of cumulative savings to 2030 ¾ Net cost of avoided CO2 is negative (-US$205/tonne) LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Lighting energy consumption scenarios for all grid-electric end-use sectors Lighting electricity consumption (TWh) 6000 LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting No Policies 5000 Current Policies 745 TWh = 17.5% LLCC from 2008 4000 1635 TWh = 38.4% 3000 2000 1000 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Cumulative benefits of the LLCC from 2008 scenario to 2030 Avoids 28000 TWh of electricity use (almost 6% of all electricity demand over the same timeframe) LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Total costs of lighting are US$2.6 trillion (1000 billion) lower Avoids 16 Gt of CO2 emissions Net cost of avoided CO2 emissions are negative i.e. -US$161/tonne of CO2 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Cumulative benefits from phasing-out incandescent lighting Globally incandescent lamps are estimated to have accounted for 970 TWh of final electricity consumption and 560 Mt of CO2 in 2005 About 61% of this demand was in the residential sector with most of the rest in commercial and public buildings With current trends incandescent lamps could use 1610 TWh of final electricity by 2030 In the hypothetical case that all these lamps were to be replaced by CFLs it would save roughly 800 TWh and 470 Mt CO2 emissions in 2010 rising to 1200 TWh and 700 Mt CO2 in 2030 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Barriers to efficient lighting LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Lack of user awareness Lack of information Customers don’t look at total ownership cost – just initial price Split incentives Low priority Some product labelling/quality issues INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Some policies to bring it about LIGHT’S LABOUR’S LOST Policies for Energy-efficient Lighting Minimum energy performance standards and labelling for lamps, ballasts & luminaires Police CFL quality and provide incentives to adopt good CFLs in place of incandescent lamps Building codes setting performance requirements for lighting Fiscal incentives Increase public awareness and market transformation efforts But what is the right blend? "It is not in the stars to hold our destiny, but in ourselves” --William Shakespeare [email protected] INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz