Optimal Retention Levels in Dynamic (Re)insurance Markets

Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Optimal Retention Levels
in
Dynamic (Re)insurance Markets
Enrico Biffis
Faculty of Actuarial Science and Insurance
Cass Business School, London
Montreal, 10th August 2006
1/12
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
Outline
2/12
1. Introduction
2. Setup
3. Dynamic constrained MV problem
4. Examples
5. Conclusion
MV problem
Examples
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Intro & Motivation
3/12
General problem statement:
optimal dynamic insurance strategy for given risk exposure,
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Intro & Motivation
3/12
General problem statement:
optimal dynamic insurance strategy for given risk exposure,
where:
- optimality: maximize expected utility from terminal wealth/dividend
payouts, minimize ruin probability...
my setup:
◦ (re)insurance decision in a MV setting (De Finetti, 1940)
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Intro & Motivation
3/12
General problem statement:
optimal dynamic insurance strategy for given risk exposure,
where:
- optimality: maximize expected utility from terminal wealth/dividend
payouts, minimize ruin probability...
my setup:
◦ (re)insurance decision in a MV setting (De Finetti, 1940)
- setting: sources of randomness, financial market...
my setup:
◦ Brownian filtration
◦ financial market
◦ randomness in claims/market parameters
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
The model
4/12
. B
(Ω, F , F, P), with F = F (B Brownian motion)
Wealth and shocks:
◦ Wealth/exposure process: X (t) $
◦ Proportional wealth shocks: dX (t) = −X (t) [δ(t)dt + σ(t) · dB(t)]
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Conclusion
The model
. B
(Ω, F , F, P), with F = F (B Brownian motion)
Wealth and shocks:
◦ Wealth/exposure process: X (t) $
◦ Proportional wealth shocks: dX (t) = −X (t) [δ(t)dt + σ(t) · dB(t)]
Insurance market:
◦ Exposure: w (t) $ covered by insurance, v (t) = X (t) − w (t) $ retained.
◦ Premium rate per unit of insured capital/wealth: π(t)
w (t)π(t)dt = premium paid to instantaneously insure exposure w (t)
4/12
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Conclusion
The model
4/12
. B
(Ω, F , F, P), with F = F (B Brownian motion)
Wealth and shocks:
◦ Wealth/exposure process: X (t) $
◦ Proportional wealth shocks: dX (t) = −X (t) [δ(t)dt + σ(t) · dB(t)]
Insurance market:
◦ Exposure: w (t) $ covered by insurance, v (t) = X (t) − w (t) $ retained.
◦ Premium rate per unit of insured capital/wealth: π(t)
w (t)π(t)dt = premium paid to instantaneously insure exposure w (t)
Financial market:
◦ money market account: r (t) risk-free rate
◦ risky stocks: dSi (t) = Si (t) [µi (t)dt + σ i (t) · dB(t)]
◦ δ, σ, µ, σ are F-adapted
(i = 1, . . . , m)
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Insurance-investment strategies
Insurance/investment strategy: u(t) = (v (t), v 1 (t), . . . , v m (t))T .
5/12
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Insurance-investment strategies
Insurance/investment strategy: u(t) = (v (t), v 1 (t), . . . , v m (t))T .
Wealth dynamics:
dX (t) =X (t)(r (t) − π(t))dt + v (t) [(π(t) − δ(t))dt − σ(t) · dB(t)]
+
m
X
i=1
5/12
v i (t) [(µi (t) − r (t))dt + σ i (t) · dB(t)]
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Insurance-investment strategies
Insurance/investment strategy: u(t) = (v (t), v 1 (t), . . . , v m (t))T .
Wealth dynamics:
dX (t) =X (t)(r (t) − π(t))dt + v (t) [(π(t) − δ(t))dt − σ(t) · dB(t)]
+
m
X
v i (t) [(µi (t) − r (t))dt + σ i (t) · dB(t)]
i=1
Constraints: v (t) ≥ 0 and. . .
5/12
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Insurance-investment strategies
5/12
Insurance/investment strategy: u(t) = (v (t), v 1 (t), . . . , v m (t))T .
Wealth dynamics:
dX (t) =X (t)(r (t) − π(t))dt + v (t) [(π(t) − δ(t))dt − σ(t) · dB(t)]
+
m
X
v i (t) [(µi (t) − r (t))dt + σ i (t) · dB(t)]
i=1
Constraints: v (t) ≥ 0 and. . .
◦ no shorting: 0 ≤ v k+1 (t), . . . , v m (t) (k = 0, . . . , m + 1);
Pk
◦ ‘safer’ assets S1 , . . . , Sk , ‘riskier’ assets Sk+1 , . . . , Sm :
i=1 v i (t) ≥ v (t);
◦ combinations of the above.
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
MV problem and solution
The Optimization Problem
6/12
• Constrained dynamic MV problem:

min V [X (T )]



sub



E [X (T )] = z ∗
(X , u) admissible
.
u ∈ C = constraints set
Examples
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
MV problem and solution
The Optimization Problem
• Constrained dynamic MV problem:

min V [X (T )]



sub



E [X (T )] = z ∗
(X , u) admissible
.
u ∈ C = constraints set
• Stochastic LQ control and BSDE theory: Hu-Zhou (2005).
• Efficient strategy:
∗
u (t) =

[X (t) − A(t)] ξ1∗ (t)

[A(t) − X (t)] ξ2∗ (t)
X (t) > A(t)
X (t) ≤ A(t)
...and mean-variance frontier:
E [X (T )] = f
6/12
³p
´
V [X (T )]; A(0), X (0)
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Key BSDEs
A(·) depends on the solutions to the following BSDEs:

∗ )dt + Λ
 dP1,2 (t) = f (t, P1,2 , Λ1,2 , H1,2
1,2 (t) · dB(t)

P1,2 (T ) = 1
P1,2 (t) > 0 a.s.t ∈ [0, T ]
.
∗
H1,2
(t, ω) = min H1,2 (t, ω, u, P1,2 , Λ1,2 )
u∈C
7/12
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Key BSDEs
A(·) depends on the solutions to the following BSDEs:

∗ )dt + Λ
 dP1,2 (t) = f (t, P1,2 , Λ1,2 , H1,2
1,2 (t) · dB(t)

P1,2 (T ) = 1
P1,2 (t) > 0 a.s.t ∈ [0, T ]
.
∗
H1,2
(t, ω) = min H1,2 (t, ω, u, P1,2 , Λ1,2 )
u∈C
Look to H1 when X (t) > A(t), to H2 when X (t) ≤ A(t).
7/12
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Key BSDEs
A(·) depends on the solutions to the following BSDEs:

∗ )dt + Λ
 dP1,2 (t) = f (t, P1,2 , Λ1,2 , H1,2
1,2 (t) · dB(t)

P1,2 (T ) = 1
P1,2 (t) > 0 a.s.t ∈ [0, T ]
.
∗
H1,2
(t, ω) = min H1,2 (t, ω, u, P1,2 , Λ1,2 )
u∈C
Look to H1 when X (t) > A(t), to H2 when X (t) ≤ A(t).
ξ1,2 (·) are given by:
.
ξ1,2 (t, ω, P1,2 , Λ1,2 ) = arg min H1,2 (t, ω, u, P1,2 , Λ1,2 )
u∈C
7/12
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Conclusion
Insurance and financial market example
Example: u(t) = (v (t), v (t))T
8/12
3
retention
2
1
0
stock
−1
H2
−2
H1
−2
−1
0
1
2
3
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Conclusion
Insurance and financial market example
Example: v (t) ≥ 0, v (t) unrestricted
9/12
3
retention
2
1
ξ
2
ξ
1
0
stock
−1
H2
−2
H1
−2
−1
0
1
2
3
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Conclusion
Insurance and financial market example
Example: v (t), v (t) ≥ 0
10/12
3
retention
2
1
ξ
2
0
ξ
stock
1
−1
H2
−2
H1
−2
−1
0
1
2
3
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Conclusion
11/12
• De Finetti’s result in continuous-time:
- Insurance market only:
v ∗ (t) =
π(t) − δ(t)
(A(t) − X ∗ (t))
σ 2 (t)
Examples
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Conclusion
• De Finetti’s result in continuous-time:
- Insurance market only:
v ∗ (t) =
π(t) − δ(t)
(A(t) − X ∗ (t))
σ 2 (t)
• De Finetti & Markowitz:
- efficient frontier
→ for fixed ǫ ∈ (0, 1), x ∗ ≥ 0 choose z ∗ such that P (X (T ) < x ∗ ) ≤ ǫ
- constant retention levels are inefficient
→ market portfolio inefficient
11/12
Conclusion
Agenda
Intro
Setup
MV problem
Examples
Conclusion
Some references
Some references
12/12
◦ Bäuerle N. (2005), Benchmark and mean-variance problems for insurers, MMOR.
◦ Briys E. (1986), Insurance and consumption: the continuous-time case, JRI.
• De Finetti B. (1940), Il problema dei pieni, GIIA.
◦ Gollier C. (1994), Insurance and precautionary capital accumulation in a continuous-time
model, JRI.
◦ Hipp C. (2003), Stochastic control with application in insurance, LNM, Springer.
◦ Hojgaard B. and M. Taksar (1998), Optimal proportional reinsurance policies for diffusion
models with transaction costs, IME.
• Hu Y. and X.Y. Zhou (2005), Constrained LQ control with random coefficients, and
application to portfolio selection, SIAM JCO.
◦ Mnif M. (2002), Optimal risk control under proportional reinsurance contract: a dynamic
programming duality approach, WP.
◦ Schmidli, H. (2001), Optimal Proportional Reinsurance Policies in a Dynamic Setting, SAJ.
◦ Touzi N. (2000), Optimal Insurance Demand Under Marked Point Process Shocks, AAP.