The Department of Energy and Climate Change TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Title: Appraisal of policy options for domestic carbon efficiency 2011 Tender for the supply of services to model the take up and impacts of energy efficiency measures, for use in design of Green Deal policies Date: 21st December 2010 The Department of Energy and Climate Change 3 Whitehall Place London SW1A 2AW 1 Contents INTRODUCTION The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) was created in October 2008, to bring together: energy policy (previously with BERR, which is now BIS - the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills), and climate change mitigation policy (previously with Defra - the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). Climate change is not only a massive threat to the global environment, it is also perhaps the greatest economic challenge facing us in the twenty-first century. It demands an urgent and radical response across the developed and developing world. At the same time, the UK needs to secure clean, safe, affordable energy to heat and power our homes and businesses. Creating a low carbon and resource efficient world means making major structural changes to the way we work and live, including how we source, manage and use our energy. DECC exists to take the lead in tackling these challenges. To find out more about our work visit our "What we do" pages. 2 TENDER SPECIFICATION BACKGROUND The requirement is to provide a model that DECC can use to bring together data, evidence, assumptions and variable policy parameters from a range of sources, to provide estimates of the impacts of policy scenarios on the take up of household energy efficiency measures, energy usage and carbon emissions. DECC needs to understand the sensitivity of those impact estimates to uncertainty surrounding the input data and assumptions. This model will be used to support the design of policies that further specify the details of the Green Deal and future Energy Company obligation. Green Deal finance Put simply, the Government is establishing a framework to enable private firms to offer consumers energy efficiency improvements to their homes, community spaces and businesses at no upfront cost, and recoup payments through a charge in instalments on the energy bill. For more details see: http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/consumers/green_deal/green_d eal.aspx A future Energy Company Obligation Energy company obligations1 work by obliging the big energy companies (for example the ‘big six’ suppliers of domestic gas and electricity) to achieve a target through incentivising the installation of energy efficiency and heating measures in homes. Each measure that is installed with support from an energy company will deliver a points score to that energy company and each company will have an overall points target to meet by a specified date. Energy companies deliver measures by providing a subsidy to households: reducing the cost to the household of installing an improvement. Since energy companies try to deliver their obligations at least cost, they balance the level of subsidy they offer for a particular improvement against the points they will be awarded, and consumer responsiveness to subsidy. The future ECO will support the delivery of measures which have higher up-front costs and so cannot be fully funded through Green Deal finance, and measures for households on low incomes, or for households particularly vulnerable to high fuel prices. This may involve additional measures (e.g. heating improvements) that might not be contained in a green deal finance package. Additional constraints and incentives may be placed on ECO delivery to provide more certainty that energy companies deliver the policy intensions. Overview of Requirement Design of Green Deal finance and ECO policies requires data and a model to simulate consumer take up of energy efficiency measures Figure 1 illustrates the various inputs and outputs required from the model. 1 Such as the Energy Efficiency Commitment, the Carbon Emissions Reduction Target and the Community Energy Savings Programme. 3 Figure 1 : Stylised representation of inputs and outputs to the model Inputs Outputs House and household characteristics Measures opportunities, combinations costs Predicted take up trajectories of energy efficiency measures Temperature assumptions Consumer preferences Green Deal Model Predicted trajectory of energy efficiency measures delivered under ECO Predicted costs and benefits associated with take up trajectories Take up / required subsidies Impact of measures Δ C02, Δ£bill, ΔEPC, quality standards Green Deal finance and advice parameters ECO points system and constraints Policy levers Table 1 specifies the inputs to the model in more detail. This table should not be seen as definitive since we expect to have to trade off the complexity of the model with tractability and timeliness of delivery. Input Projected number of households in Great Britain The characteristics of homes (size, bedrooms, energy efficiency, Wall construction etc.) Characteristics of households (family size, income, age, benefit receipt etc. ) Units Number of households Source ONS data and projections Varies over . . . Time Number of homes English Housing Survey, Scottish Housing Survey, Living in Wales Survey Time, Housing stock segments Number of households English Housing Survey, Scottish Housing Survey, Living in Wales Survey , Family resources survey Time, Housing stock segments 4 Input Opportunities for energy efficiency measures Units % of housing stock segments / number of homes Source English Housing Survey, Scottish Housing Survey, Living in Wales Survey Assumptions to be varied Varies over . . . Time, Housing stock segments Heating behaviour of households – living area temperature before improvements Physical impacts of energy efficiency and heating measures On energy use On energy bills On CO2 emissions (desirable) On energy efficiency of home Behavioural impacts of energy efficiency measures Comfort taking / rebound Interest rate oC DECC assumptions Time, Housing stock segments, measures % of energy saving Assumptions to be varied Housing stock segments % per year Assumptions to be varied Assumptions to be varied Assumptions to be varied Fixed Period of repayment Year Type of advice/ assessment/ regulation Consumer response to advice / assessment / regulation Consumer response to subsidy Consumer response to cost/period of repayment Energy company obligation points scores Energy company points requirements Categories Stated Preference Survey Housing stock segments – as informed by survey points Policy assumptions to be varied Measures, Housing stock segments points Policy assumptions to be varied Time Housing stock segments KwH £ Tonnes EPC score % change to take up Fixed Fixed % change to take up % change to take up 5 Input ECO constraints Costs of delivering measures Supply chain constraints Capacity to deliver measures Maximum rate of expansions Baseline uptake of measures Hidden costs to households Units % of points score, or restriction on delivery £ Source Policy assumptions to be varied Varies over . . . Measures, housing stock segments DECC assumptions to be updated Time, housing stock segments, measures, (option total capacity/delivery) Number of measures Number of additional measures per year Number of measures £ DECC assumptions Measures DECC assumptions Measures DECC assumptions Measures, time DECC assumptions / ECOfys report Measures, housing stock segments The factors above represent required inputs for the model that will be specified by DECC either by evidence or assumption. The model must simulate the level of subsidies offered by suppliers according to an appropriate modelling assumption (i.e. costminimisation) and this subsidy level will then form an additional input to the modelling of take up. This model will take the inputs and provide a range of outputs so that DECC can design the detail of the Green Deal and ECO policies, these are outlined in the table below: Output Units Varies over . . . Number of additional Number of measures Time, measures measures installed Energy savings Kwh Fuel type, measures, time Energy savings £ Fuel type, measures, time 2 Carbon emissions savings Tonnes of CO measures, time Air quality improvements £ Time Total value of comfort £ Time taken We have separately invited tenders for the National Household Model (NHM) which we expect to provide these capabilities in the future. The specification for the NHM is available on request. We anticipate that we will be able to model Green Deal policy options using the Phase 1 NHM in the second half of 2011. However analysis of initial Green Deal policy options is required in April 2011. Bidders should therefore consider how the analysis required for development of the Green Deal model can be co6 ordinated with and utilised in development of the Phase 1 NHM. Phase 2 of the NHM is scheduled for delivery in 2012 and will incorporate more detailed analysis of behavioural impacts of energy efficiency and carbon reduction measures, changes in stock and distributional impacts. DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENTS Preamble The impacts of the various outputs that must also be generated by the model, using the input data and assumptions, must be assessed against a no-policy baseline DECC anticipates that data will be provided from a range of sources (detailed below) and the model will require the ability to easily incorporate updated data and assumptions (converting to a compatible structure). Where data is currently available (i.e. from the EHCS, SAP or BRE) contractors will be expected to work with DECC in loading data into the model. Where data or assumptions are not yet available or agreed, the contractors will be expected to work with DECC in loading dummy data or assumptions into the model. Description of required components of model The model must have a range of capabilities described by the following 5 components. Component 1: Housing stock segmentation The model is expected to operate by simulating energy consumption for heating and cooling in UK homes, segmented according to physical, economic and social characteristics of homes and households, and the segments’ evolution over time on an annual basis. The model must have the capability to accept several sets of input data (described below) that may each vary across some or all segments. Details on the characteristics of the housing stock should be drawn from the housing condition survey (HCS) data (comprising three existing databases including the English Housing Survey, the Living in Wales Survey and the Scottish Housing Condition Survey ). The optimal segmentation for the model is not yet clear as for some inputs some segmenting dimensions will be more or less relevant. There is a need to trade off detail (i.e. number of segments) with the tractability of the model and timescales for the project. DECC requires the input details that are most relevant with respect to policy design, and the costs and benefits to society, to be preserved in the segmentation. The appointed contractors must discuss this trade-off with DECC and with the parties that will be responsible for input data and assumptions (discussed below) at an early stage of the project. 7 The model will have the capacity to set out the counterfactual baseline (that is to say, the evolution of energy use within the housing stock in the absence of policy). Component 2: Energy efficiency and heating measures DECC requires the model to have the ability to simulate the costs and impact of installing a range of energy efficiency and heating measures, in isolation or in combination, on the housing stock by segment. Impacts should be quantified in terms of the housing stock’s thermal efficiency (EPC rating), energy consumption, carbon emissions and also the benefits of increased comfort for households. DECC also wishes to be able to adjust assumptions about heating behaviour to model energy bill savings for households that heat their home differently (this might be dealt with either by including categories of households heating behaviour as a dimension by which the housing stock is segmented, or by adjusting the estimated energy saving according to the thermal behaviour scenario). Assumptions about the installation and hidden costs2 the impact of measures on energy consumption, and the heating behaviour of households will be provided by DECC, either based on existing data/assumptions, or concurrent work to improve the evidence base. DECC requires the ability to adjust all assumptions in order to understand the sensitivity of the modelled outputs to those assumptions. DECC will provide a list of measures that must be included in the model, but the model must have the flexibility to allow DECC analysts to readily add or remove measures or adjust their availability as part of the Green Deal for individual scenarios. Component 3: Consumer behaviour A stated preference survey is being commissioned by DECC on potential consumer demand for the Green Deal. The survey design will commence in late December with a first draft questionnaire available in early January 2011. The successful contractor for this modelling would be expected to ensure that the data collected can be used for the model. Assumptions and evidence drawn from that survey will be provided as an input to this model. These inputs (in combination with additional assumptions agreed with DECC as necessary) will provide a capacity for the model to simulate consumer uptake of measures, dependent on the amount of finance available (see component 4), and the modelled level of subsidy expected to be offered by suppliers to meet their share of the Energy Company Obligation (see component 5). Component 4: Financial terms and conditions The annual fuel bill saving is the source of repayment of Green Deal Finance. The model needs to derive the amount of finance available from the expected bill savings and the interest rate. Such as make good costs and time spent researching, preparing and organising installation work. 2 8 Scenarios for interest rates will be determined by DECC Component 5: Optimisation of Energy Companies (EC) behaviour The model must include a representation of EC behaviour based on the assumption that ECs will deliver a mix of measures that delivers their obligation at least cost. The model will use information about the available opportunities, costs of installation, and consumers likely response to subsidies (taking the Green Deal Finance parameters as fixed) to establish the set of subsidies that deliver the ECO target (subject to constraints placed on ECO scores, and supply chain capacity) at least cost. Point scores might be based fundamentally on the expected carbon savings delivered by measures, or their expected contribution to thermal efficiency [as assumed under component 2]. Therefore the ECO target could be expressed in as a points total with each measure installed delivering a fixed number of points, or as a SAP improvement target (i.e. a company might be required to improve homes by a total of 1 million SAP points). Peer Review The model will be subject to a peer review exercise of their work. The peer reviewers’ assessment will be made available to the work stream developing the National Household Model. DECC will advise on the experts to be invited, in due course. Expenses for peer reviewers will be absorbed by DECC. Supporting documentation We expect to be provided with a user’s manual, documentation concerning input assumptions, and training sessions. Input data and underlying assumptions DECC research and data will be able to provide a default set of input assumptions however as further information is collected this input data will need to be updated. Therefore it will be crucial for the model to incorporate a simple system for updating input data. The consumer behaviour data (curves showing uptake at different subsidy levels for each housing stock segment) may well be under-specified for a large number of housing stock segments and so a tool to generate realistic uptake curves from a limited dataset is required. Contractors will need to share their work with the contractors for the NHM project and with our contractors for concurrent consumer behaviour research in order to ensure that, where appropriate, data used in the Green Deal model can also feed into the NHM 9 project. The NHM model project is expected to take over from the Green Deal model in the second half of 2011. Information on the NHM will be made available by DECC. Working Arrangements The successful supplier will be expected to identify one named point of contract through whom all enquiries can be filtered. If a consortium is awarded the contract, DECC may require it to form a separate legal entity as a condition of the contract. Suppliers must provide details as to how they will manage sub-contractors and what percentage of the tendered activity (in terms of monetary value) will be sub-contracted. A project manager and lead economist at DECC will provide the main points of contact with DECC, and will ensure two way communication with relevant officials in the department and the transfer of necessary knowledge. Regular contact and meetings/conference calls will be held with the project team to discuss progress. Further updates to a wider group of officials will be required at key milestones. We would also reserve the right to arrange for the project to be validated independently. DECC will provide meeting rooms, but the successful bidder will not be expected to work on a day to day basis on DECC premises. Period of Contract The contract shall run from the date of the contract award to the end of March 2011. DECC will retain an option to extend the contract for a further 1year beyond the original completion date. Quotations Tenders should be submitted on a fixed price basis and must be inclusive of all costs and overheads, including travel and expenses. Each individual requirement and subrequirement listed above must be costed separately. In submitting full tenders, suppliers confirm in writing that the price offered will be held for a minimum of 60 calendar days from the date of submission. Any payment conditions applicable to the prime contractor must also be replicated with subcontractors. DECC’s target is to pay all approved invoices within a maximum period of 10 days. 10 Evaluation of tenders Suppliers are invited to submit full tenders. Tenders will be evaluated by at least three DECC staff. In the case of a consortium tender, only one submission covering all of the partners is required but consortia are advised to make clear the proposed role that each partner will play in performing the contract as per the requirements of the technical specification. Suppliers are strongly advised to structure their tender submissions in the following way: Section 1 – Understanding requirements and adding value (25%) Suppliers must provide the following information: Evidence of their understanding of the tender requirements How they will add value in delivering against the requirements How risks will be identified, assessed, managed and monitored throughout performance of the contract Section 2 – Delivery plan (30%) With specific reference to the description of the requirement/s, working arrangements and expected outputs as stated above, suppliers must submit a detailed contract delivery plan containing the following information: A project plan detailing: o The tasks to be undertaken and suggested milestones for reporting o The personnel resources to be employed (including where specific tasks are to be undertaken by partners and/or sub-contractors) Section 3 – Skills and knowledge (10%) Suppliers must set out in detail how the relevant skills and knowledge of the delivery team members will be utilised in the performance of the contract; and/or outline job descriptions for posts not currently filled. Please do not submit CVs, as they will not be evaluated. Section 4 – Pricing (25%) Suppliers invited to tender are required to replicate and complete the applicable tables below as part of their response to this section. In addition, each individual project requirement and sub-requirement must be costed separately. Part A – Staff/project team charges 11 *Grade/level of staff Daily rate (ex VAT) No. days offered over course of contract £ £ £ £ £ Sub-total [*Suppliers should also include sub-contractors] Total price offered per staff member £ £ £ £ £ £ Part B – Non-staff/project team charges Item No. of items Price per item (ex VAT) £ £ £ £ £ Sub-total Total price per offered £ £ £ £ £ £ Part C – Full price offered Sub-total (Part A + Part B) VAT TOTAL (Sub-total + VAT) £ £ £ Section 5 – Requirement specific question/s (10%) Suppliers must also provide: Confirmation of acceptance of DECC’s terms and conditions Confirmation and acceptance of the procurement timetable Details of any additional issues they think should be addressed. Where suppliers are claiming a relevant system or standard adopted is equivalent to the ones referenced above, they should note that it is their responsibility to demonstrate how such systems are equivalent. 12 INSTRUCTIONS TO SUPPLIERS Suppliers are required to submit their tender and all documents listed above by email to [email protected] and to [email protected] by noon on 14 January 2011 You are also instructed to return three priced copies and two unpriced copies of your tender and all documents (one priced set should be clearly marked “original”) by post to the below address by Benedikt Koehler Department of Energy and Climate Change 3 Whitehall Place London SW1A 2AW Please ensure the outside of any packaging is clearly marked with the orange DECC tender return labels. DECC reserves the right to invite suppliers to discuss their tender proposal before a final decision is made. Suppliers must note that DECC reserves the right to withdraw this contract opportunity without notice and will not be liable for any costs incurred by suppliers during any stage of the process. Suppliers should also note that, in the event a tender is considered to be fundamentally unacceptable on a key issue, regardless of its other merits, that tender may be rejected. If you require further information concerning the tender process, or the nature of the proposed contract, please in the first instance email: [email protected]. Should questions arise during the tendering period, which in our judgement are of material significance, we will inform all suppliers to explain the nature of the question, and our formal reply. All suppliers should then take that reply into consideration when preparing their own bids, and we will evaluate bids on the assumption that they have done so. Procurement timetable DECC receipt of ITT Notification of Interview for shortlisted bidders Interviews Appoint contractor Main deliverables Further development work Ongoing support 14 January 2011 20th January 21st / 24th January Wednesday 26th January March 2011 April 2011 March 2012 13 CONDITIONS OF TENDER Representations A supplier may contact officers of DECC to obtain any further information about the requirements of the contract or the tendering procedures if these are not evident or clear from the documents supplied to suppliers. Specification For the avoidance of doubt, the contract specification shall include all requirements explicit or implied within the invitation to tender. It must be recognised that DECC reserve the right to withdraw this tender document and all funding contained within it without notice. Collusive Tendering In submitting a tender against this contract, the supplier confirms that they have not fixed or adjusted the amount of the tender by or under or in accordance with any agreement or arrangement with any other person. The supplier also certifies that at no time, before or following the submission of the tender, has the Supplier carried out any of the following acts: i) communicating to a person other than the person calling for the tenders the amount or approximate amount of the proposed tender, except where such disclosure is required for the purpose of obtaining insurance; ii) entering into any agreement or arrangement with any person that he shall refrain from tendering or as to the amount of any tender to be submitted; iii) offering or paying or giving or agreeing to give any sum of money or valuable consideration directly or indirectly to any person for doing or having done or causing or having caused to be done in relation to any other tender or proposed tender for the said work any act or thing of the sort described above. The context of this clause the word ‘person’ includes any persons and anybody or association, corporate or unincorporated; and ‘any agreement or arrangement’ includes any such transaction, formal or informal, and whether legally binding or not. Freedom of Information Information in relation to this tender may be made available on demand in accordance with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Suppliers should state if any of the information supplied by them is confidential or commercially sensitive or should not be disclosed in response to a request for 14 information under the Act. Suppliers should state why they consider the information to be confidential or commercially sensitive. This will not guarantee that the information will not be disclosed but will be examined in the light of the exemptions provided in the Act. It is important to note that information may be commercially sensitive for a time (e.g. during a tender process) but afterwards it may not be. The timing of any request for information may be extremely important in determining whether or not information is exempt. However Suppliers should note that no information is likely to be regarded as exempt forever. 15
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz