Professorial Review 2009/10
1.
This report examines the outcome of the decisions taken in the 2010 Professorial
Review, in relation to gender, race, disability, age, nationality and religion/belief.
2.
The decision to award or not to award staff is made by a group comprising the
Principal, Senior Vice Principal, Warden, and the Vice-Principals for Science and
Engineering, Humanities and Social Sciences, Teaching and Learning and
Research and International.
3.
It is noted that the report focuses solely on reward and quantifiable aspects of
Professorial Review. It is accepted that the Professorial Review process also
addresses matters relating to other aspects of the development of these staff and
their contribution.
4.
Awards include an increase in basic salary, a one-off bonus, or both an increase
in salary and a bonus. An increase in allowances may also be awarded to Heads
of Department.
Where data is displayed by percentage only, it is to avoid compromising sensitive
individual information,
Gender
Professors eligible to apply by gender
Gender
Science and
Engineering
Female
Male
Total
5%
95%
100%
Sector
Humanities,
Social
Sciences
and Law
36 (47%)
77 (53%)
113 (100%)
Barts and
the London
School of
Medicine
and
Dentistry
19 (29%)
46 (71%)
65 (100%)
Whole
College
Barts and
the London
School of
Medicine
and
Dentistry
0%
100%
100%
Whole
College
(23%)
(77%)
253 (100%)
Professors who did not apply
Gender
Science and
Engineering
Female
Male
Total
1
25%
75%
100%
Sector
Humanities,
Social
Sciences
and Law
17%
83%
100%
18%
82%
17 (100)%
Successful applications by gender
Gender
Science and
Engineering
Female
Male
Total
8%
92%
100%
Sector
Humanities,
Social
Sciences
and Law
Barts and
the London
School of
Medicine
and
Dentistry
32%
68%
100%
Whole
College
Whole
College
24 (50%)
47 (50%)
71 (100%)
Barts and
the London
School of
Medicine
and
Dentistry
13 (29%)
32 (71%)
45 (100%)
Female
17 (27%)
59 (23%)
Male
45 (73%)
194 (77%)
10 (33%)
20 (67%)
30 (100%)
17 (27%)
45 (73%)
62 (100%)
Unsuccessful applications by gender
Gender
Science and
Engineering
Female
Male
Total
3%
97%
100%
Sector
Humanities,
Social
Sciences
and Law
39 (22%)
135 (78%)
174 (100%)
Summary
Gender
Total Received an award
Total Eligible
2
Total
62 (100%)
253 (100%)
Ethnicity
Professors eligible to apply by ethnicity
Ethnicity
White
Black, Asian and
Minority Ethnic
Mixed Race
Info refused, unknown
or not yet sought
Total
Sector
Science and Humanities, Social Barts and the London
Engineering Sciences and Law
School of Medicine and
Dentistry
85%
96%
91%
11%
2%
9%
0%
2%
0%
4%
0%
0%
75 (100%)
113 (100%)
65 (100%)
Whole
College
92%
6%
0%
2%
253
100%)
Professors who did not applied by ethnicity
Ethnicity
White
Black, Asian and
Minority Ethnic
Mixed Race
Info refused, unknown
or not yet sought
Total
Sector
Science and Humanities, Social
Barts and the London
Engineering Sciences and Law
School of Medicine and
Dentistry
75%
92%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
25%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
Whole
College
88%
0%
6%
6%
100%
Successful applications by ethnicity
Ethnicity
Sector
Whole
Humanities, Social
Barts and the London
Sciences and Law
School of Medicine and College
Dentistry
92%
100%
89%
95%
Science and
Engineering
White
Black, Asian and
Minority Ethnic
Mixed Race
Info refused, unknown
or not yet sought
Total
3
8%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
13 (100%)
30 (100%)
19 (99%)
5%
0%
0%
62
(100%)
Unsuccessful applications by ethnicity
Ethnicity
White
Black, Asian and
Minority Ethnic
Mixed Race
Info refused, unknown
or not yet sought
Total
Sector
Whole
Science and Humanities, Social
Barts and the London
Engineering Sciences and Law
School of Medicine and College
Dentistry
85%
96%
91%)
91%
12%
3%
9%
7%
0%
1%
0%
0%
3%
8%
0%
1%
58 (100%)
71 (100%)
45 (100%)
174
99%)
Summary
Ethnicity
White
Total Received an award
Total Eligible
4
95%
92%
Black,
Asian and
Minority
Ethnic
5%
6%
Mixed
Race
Info refused,
unknown or
not yet
sought
0%
0%
1%
1%
Total
62 (100%)
253 (100%)
Age
Professors eligible to apply by age1
Age Category
35-50
51 and over
Total
Sector
Science and
Humanities, Social Barts and the London School Whole
College
Engineering
Sciences and Law of Medicine and Dentistry
32 (43%)
51 (45%)
21 (32%)
104 (41%)
43 (57%)
62 (55%)
44 (68%)
149 (59%)
75 (100%)
113 (100%)
65 (100%)
253 (100%)
Professors who did not applied by age
Age Category
35-50
51 and over
Total
Sector
Whole
Science and
Humanities, Social Barts and the London School
College
Engineering
Sciences and Law of Medicine and Dentistry
50%
17%
0%
23%
50%
83%
100%
77%
100%
100%
100% 17 (100%)
Successful applications by age
Age Category
35-50
51 and over
Total
Sector
Science and
Humanities, Social Barts and the London School Whole
College
Engineering
Sciences and Law of Medicine and Dentistry
62%
18 (60%)
42% 34 (55%)
38%
12 (40%)
58% 28 (45%)
13 (100%)
30 (100%)
19 (100%) 62 (100%)
Unsuccessful applications by age
Age Category
35-50
51 and over 2
Total
Whole
College
Sector
Science and
Humanities, Social Barts and the London School
Engineering
Sciences and Law of Medicine and Dentistry
22 (38%)
31 (44%)
13 (29%)
36 (62%)
40 (56%)
32 (71%)
58 (100%)
71 (100%)
45 (100%)
66 (38%)
108 (62%)
174(100%)
Summary
Age
Total Received an award
Total Eligible
1
35-50
34 (55%)
104 (23%)
51 and over
28 (73%)
149 (77%)
Total
62 (100%)
253 (100%)
Academic staff over the age of 65 have been grouped together with staff aged between 51 and 65. This
is because individual applications could be tracked.
5
Disability
Professors eligible to apply by disability3
Disabled summary
Known disability
No known disability
Total
Total
2 %
98 %
253 (100%)
Professors who did not applied by disability
Disabled summary
Known disability
No known disability
Total
Total
0 (0%)
17 (100%)
17 (100%)
Successful applications by disability
Disabled summary
Known disability
No known disability
Total
Total
2%
98 %
62 (100%)
Unsuccessful applications by disability
Disabled summary
Known disability
No known disability
Total
Total
2%
98%
174 (100%)
Summary
Disability
Total Received an award
Total Eligible
3
Known
disability
2%
2%
No known
disability
Total
98%
98%
62 (100%)
253 (100%)
No known Disability data refers to those 'not known to be disabled', and includes those for whom we do
not yet hold data.
The provisions of the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Human Rights Act 1998, are designed to prevent
the disclosure of personal or sensitive information about any individual. The numbers of disabled
professors is too small to disclose by sector within this report. This is because individual applications
could readily be tracked.
6
Religion and Belief
Professors eligible to apply by religion and belief
Religion or Belief
Christian
Jewish
Muslim
Hindu
Other religion
No Religion
Information refused or not known
Total
Sector
Science and
Engineering
25%
5%
1%
0%
4%
57%
7%
75 (100%)
Whole
Humanities,
Barts and the
Social Sciences London School College
and Law
of Medicine
and Dentistry
42%
37%
36%
2%
6%
4%
0%
3%
2%
1%
2%
1%
1%
3%
2%
44%
43%
48%
10%
6%
9%
113 (100%)
65 (100%) 253 (100%)
Professors who did not applied by religion and belief4
Religion or Belief
Christian
Jewish
Muslim
Hindu
Other religion
No Religion
Information refused or not known
Total
Whole College
47%
6%
0%
0%
0%
41%
6%
17 (100%)
Successful applications by religion and belief
Religion or Belief
Christian
Jewish
Muslim
Other religion
No Religion
Info refused or not known
Total
4
Whole College
34%
4%
2%
8%
44%
8%
62 (100%)
The provisions of the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Human Rights Act 1998, are designed to
prevent the disclosure of personal or sensitive information about any individual. The numbers of
professors who were eligible to apply to the review from some faith backgrounds is too small to
disclose by sector within this report. This is because individual applications could readily be tracked.
7
Unsuccessful applications by religion and belief
Whole College
Religion or Belief
Christian
Jewish
Muslim
Hindu
Other
No Religion
Info refused or not known
Total
35 %
4%
1%
1%
0%
50%
8%
174 (100%)
Summary
Religion
or Belief
Total
Received
an award
Total
Eligible
8
Christian
Jewish
Muslim
Hindu
Other
No
Religion
Info refused
or not known
Total
34%
4%
2%
0%
8%
44%
8% 62 (100%)
36%
4%
2%
1%
2%
48%
9% 253 (100%)
Nationality5
Professors eligible to apply by Nationality
Nationality
Science and
Engineering
UK
EU (non UK)
Non EU
Not known
Total
Sector
Humanities, Social
Barts and the London School
Sciences and Law
of Medicine and Dentistry
73%
83%
83%
15%
9%
3%
8%
8%
0%
14%
2%
2%
100%
12 (100%)
65 (100%)
Whole
College
186
(73%)
41 (16%)
23 (9%)
3 (2%)
253
(100%)
Professors who did not applied by Nationality
Nationality
UK
EU (non UK)
Non EU
Not known
Total
Science and
Engineering
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Sector
Humanities, Social
Barts and the London School Whole
College
Sciences and Law
of Medicine and Dentistry
96%
100%
88%
2%
0%
6%
2%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
113 (100%)
100% 17(100%)
Successful applications by Nationality
Nationality
UK
EU (non UK)
Non EU
Not known
Total
Science and
Engineering
77%
8%
8%
8%
13 (100%)
Sector
Humanities, Social
Barts and the London School Whole
College
Sciences and Law
of Medicine and Dentistry
60%
84%
71%
17%
11%
13%
23%
5%
14%
0%
0%
2%
30 (100%)
19 (100%) 62(100%)
Unsuccessful applications by Nationality
Nationality
UK
EU (non UK)
Non EU
Not known
Total
5
Science and
Engineering
71%
17%
10%
2%
75 (100%)
Sector
Humanities, Social
Barts and the London School Whole
College
Sciences and Law
of Medicine and Dentistry
69%
82%
73%
21%
16%
19%
10%
2%
7%
0%
0%
1%
113 (100%)
65 (100%) 174(100%)
Nationality is included for the first time in this report.
9
Summary
Religion or Belief
UK
Total Received an award
Total Eligible
10
71%
73%
EU (non UK)
13%
16%
Non EU
Not known
14%
9%
2%
2%
Whole
College
62 (100%)
253 (100%)