Open Science Journal of Statistics and Application 2015; 3(1): 1-4 Published online January 20, 2015 (http://www.openscienceonline.com/journal/osjsa) On some estimates of mean residual life function under random censoring from the right A. A. Abdushukurov1, R. S. Muradov2, K. S. Sagidullayev1 1 2 Dpt. of Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Dpt. of Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Institute of Mathematics & National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Email address [email protected] (A. A. Abdushukurov), [email protected] (R. S. Muradov), [email protected] (K. S. Sagidullayev) To cite this article A. A. Abdushukurov, R. S. Muradov, K. S. Sagidullayev. On Some Estimates of Mean Residual Life Function under Random Censoring from the Right. Open Science Journal of Statistics and Application. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1-4. Abstract The problem of analyzing time to event data arises in a number of applied fields, such as medicine, biology, public health, epidemiology, engineering, economics, and demography. Let X be the time until some specified event. More precisely, in this work, X is a nonnegative random variable (r. v.) from a homogeneous population. Four functions characterize the distribution of X, namely, the survival function, which is the probability of an individual surviving to time x; the hazard rate (function), sometimes termed risk function, which is the chance an individual of age x experiences the event in the next instant in time; the probability density (or probability mass) function, which is the unconditional probability of the event’s occurring at time x; and the mean residual life at time x, which is the mean time to the event of interest, given the event has not occurred at x. If we know any one of these four functions, then the other three can be uniquely determined. We prove asymptotic results for estimators of mean residual life function both in independent and dependent random right censoring models. Dependence is described by Archimedean copula function. Keywords Survival Function, Mean Residual Life Function, Random Censoring, Copulas 1. Introduction In survival analysis our interest focuses on a nonnegative r.v.-s denoting death times of biological organisms or failure times of mechanical systems. A difficulty in the analysis of survival data is the possibility that the survival times can be subjected to random censoring by other nonnegative r.v.-s and therefore we observe incomplete data. There are various types of censoring mechanisms. The estimation of distribution function (d.f.) of lifetime and its functionals from incomplete data is one of the main goals of statisticians in survival analysis. In this article we consider only right censoring model and problem of estimation of mean residual life function (MRLF) both in independent and dependent censoring cases assuming that the dependence structure is described by known copula function. For survival function we use relative-risk power estimator and its extension to dependent censoring case. 2. Estimates of MRLF and Its Properties 2.1. Independent Censoring Case Let , , ≥ 1 be a sequence of independent and identically distributed pairs of positive r.v.-s, where and are supposed to be independent with common continuous d.f.-s and = ≤ = ≤ , 0 = 0 = 0, ∈ = 0, ∞ . Here ’s denotes lifetimes and ’s are censoring times from the right. The observed data consist a sample of pairs = , , 1≤ ≤ , with and = , , = ≤ ! is the is the indicator of the event ! . Let " # = 1− survival function and the problem is consist in estimating of 2 A. A. Abdushukurov et al.: On Some Estimates of Mean Residual Life Function under Random Censoring from the Right the main functional of " # , i.e. MRLF of the object tested, assuming % = & ' < ∞ : % = )" # * +' 0 ,1 " # - .- , ∈ 0, 23 . / (2.1) Here % 0 = % and 23 = 4 ∈ ∶ "# = 0 ≤ ∞. It should be noted that the problem of estimating of functional (2.1) have been considered by many authors (see, references review in [1],[4]-[5]). The bootstrap kernel estimation of MRLF in lack of censoring is considered by recent article of authors [5]. In the censoring situation many authors used the product-limit estimator of Kaplan-Meier to estimate " # in (2.1). Here we use the relative-risk power estimator of survival function proposed in [1]-[3] and which have some peculiarities with respect to the product-limit estimator (for details, refer to [1],[3]). have common continuous d.f. 6 Note that r.v.-s = 1 − " # " 7 , ∈ , where " 7 = 1− . Author [1]-[3] proposed following estimator of " # of power type: 1− where AAAAA 1, , = "# = 89 ' = +: <= 1 ; ≤⋯≤ , : 0, ≤ < 1, < ≥ ' : ' , , 1≤>≤ , are the order statistics of = ∑:D' ∑:D' : ) : ≤ * −>+1 , ) : ≤ * −>+1 − 1 ,? (2.2) , = -relative-risk function estimator and : corresponds to : . In [1]-[3] for the estimator (2.2) have proved some asymptotic results (as → ∞). Let FG = , H/J 3 1 +3 1 = '+3 1 ∈ K, LM, ≥ 1N is a normed empirical processes sequence, where K > PQ = R-S L < PQ = 4 ∈ ∈ : 6 : 6 =0 , =1 . is clear that PQ = UV P3 , PW ≥ 0 and 2Q = 23 , 2W ≤ ∞. Let X K, LM is Skorokhod’s space of cádlág functions. Theorem 2.1[3]. Suppose following conditions are hold: (C1) 0 < ' ≤ ' < 1; (C2) )6 K , 1 − 6 L * ≥ Z for some Z ∈ 0,1 ; It (C3) Z Then as = ,] 1 →∞ G [3 \ J )'+3 \ * )'+W \ * ^ ⇒ ` < ∞, for in X K, LM, < 2Q . and Gaussian approximation results on weak and strong forms up to some large order statistics in the sample with the rates depending on the order of these statistics. In order to choose the order statistics we choose a sequence a of integers such that 1 ≤ a < and require the condition: (C4) a > bcd for all large enough and sequence is asymptotically nonincreasing. For example, a / a = e M and a = K M for some K ∈ 0,1 are satisfies (C4). Theorem 2.2 [3]. Assume conditions (C3) and (C4) are hold. Then |3= 1 +3 1 | fgh 1ij =kl= '+3 1 (A) =n op 9a +'/q o9 aq+' bcd (B) There exists a sequence r ∙ , processes such that sup wG 1ij =kl= =x op )a +' o9 '/q aq+' bcd *w +a ; , a.s. +q y/q y/q *, + a +q ;, a.s. ≥1 − r )Z bcd + a +q + a +q ;, ? (2.4) of Wiener ? (2.5) ` . Note that for each : r )Z * ^ D Using theorems 2.1 and 2.2 we investigate corresponding properties of following estimator of MRLF: % = )" # where as → ∞ (C5) L → ∞, '/q * +' ,z " # { % z . → 0. = Let’s introduce function | estimator | = ,1 " # - .- , = ,1 " # - .- and its { = ,1 " # - .-. Then { = )" # * +' 9− ,1 = .| - ;. z (2.6) The weak convergence results for MRLF estimator is contents of next theorem. Theorem 2.3. Let conditions (C1)-(C3) and (C5) are hold. Assume also condition { (C6) ,] | q .Z < ∞. Then as → ∞ } = &~ ~ R = )" # '/q )% −% ^ *⇒ ~ in X K, LM, (2.7) where ~ is mean zero Gaussian process with covariance function for , R ∈ K, LM: "# R * +' ,•€• { 1,‚ | q - .Z - . Proof of theorem 2.3. It is not difficult to get a representation (2.3) where ` is mean zero Gaussian process with covariance function &` ` R = Z) , R * for , R ∈ K, LM. In [3] have proved also more strong results on consistency } =G + '/q % )" # + )" # * +' * ! +' ,z " # - .-, { = + (2.8) Open Science Journal of Statistics and Application 2015; 3(1): 1-4 where ! = ,1 = G - .| - . Then the asymptotic distribution of sequence of process (2.8) is equivalent to asymptotic distribution of sequence z } =G ∗ % + )" * ! +' # ! = ,1 ` - .| - . { Hence by Slutsky’s theorem we see that process } ∗ weakly converges in X K, LM to the process ~ =` % + )" # * ,1 ` - .| - . +' { The covariance function of ~ evaluated in [7]. The proof is completed. Now we prove consistency result for MRLF estimator . % Theorem 2.4. Assume conditions (C4) and (C5) are hold. Then fgh 1ij =kl= |% | = op … −% z= ‡/J †= + { + ,z " # †= = Jz = †=‡ . ˆ. (2.9) Proof of theorem 2.4. We use representation (2.8) as % −% + + = | ' '+3 1 ' '+3 1 1− ,1 '+3 1 ,z )1 − { = 1− ≥1−6 *.- z z= )3= \ +3 \ * It is easy to see that for all 1− = | ,1 )1 − ∙ 1− − .| - : ≥1−6 = + *. . ∈ ' ∑ D' > +†= )1 − 6 . ≤ ≤ +†= ≤ )1 − sup +†= * +' 1−6 ‰ 1−6 ≤ = op 1 ∙ Š∙ †= ≤ sup sup )1 − 6 1ij =kl= = op 9 ;. †= * * +' +' (2.11) On the other hand, with probability 1 0 ≤ ,1 = )1 − z By (2.4), fgh 1ij =kl= ,1 - *.- ≤ 2L . z= )3= \ +3 \ * '+3 \ .| - (2.12) =kl= H J + )3= 1 +3 1 * '+3 1 + L a +q Š . (2.13) Now (2.9) follows from (2.10)-(2.13). The proof is completed. Estimation of MRFL under dependent right censored data consider in section 2.2. 2.2. Dependent Censoring Case Now we not require independence of sequences , ≥1 Œ ,R = and , ≥ 1 . Let 6 > , > R , ,R ∈ q = × - a joint survival function of the pairs , . Œ submitted the Then by Sklar’s theorem (see [8]), 6 representation through the survival copula -, • , -, • ∈ 0,1M, as Œ , R = )" # 6 , " 7 R *, ,R ∈ q . where " # and " 7 are marginal survival functions of and . Supposing that -, • is Archimedean copula, i.e. -, • = Ž +' Ž - + Ž • M, -, • ∈ 0,1Mq , where Ž: 0,1M → is strong generator function Ž 0 = ∞ and Ž +' is its inverse, the authors [6] proposed following generalization of estimator (2.2) for " # by dependent censoring data : = Ž +' •Ž)" j where Then by inequalities (1.9.12) and (2.3.25) in [3] we have sup = op ‰L a "• # (2.10) , ≤ 2L ∙ 1ijfgh , under condition (C5). By the theorem 2.1 and Cramer-Wold device the sequence of two dimensional processes weakly converges as → ∞ in Skorokhod G ,! space X K, LM × K, LM to the process ` , ! , where 3 1 Ž)" j * = −• Œ ¡ = ∑ D' "j ] ' * – – …+ ,— ‘ ž R > 0 ŸŽ ‰ = ∑ D' ' ≤ , ˜= ™ = ˜ ™ ”• 9 = = …+ ,— ‘ ’= \ “] ”• 9 ž R > ’= \ “] Š−މ , ž Œj =1 , ¡ ž R Œ= \ ˆ ;[š Œ=› \ ˆ ;[š œ, (2.14) 1 Œj R , − Š .¡ = "j − , = ∑ D' ' ≤ . Authors [6] showed that estimator (2.14) is generalization of (2.2), which follows from (2.14) under -, • = -•, -, • ∈ 0,1M, i.e. Ž - = −bcd-, - ∈ 0,1M. They proved the consistency result of estimator (2.14) and proposed the following estimator of MRLF % : %¢ =x 9"¢ ; +' 0, { ,1 "¢ - .-, ≥ ∈ £0, *. , ? Consider following conditions: (C7) Function Ž ∙ is strictly decreasing on (0,1] and first two derivatives of Ž and Ψ are bounded = − Ž¥ for ∈ ¦, 1M, where ¦ > 0 is arbitrary. Moreover, the first derivative Ž ¥ is bounded away from zero on 0,1M; ∗ ª (C8) 0 < ,/ £Ψ)S ¨ *© .Λ∗ = 1,2, < ∞, for ] where 4 A. A. Abdushukurov et al.: 2 ∗ = R-S Λ∗ On Some Estimates of Mean Residual Life Function under Random Censoring from the Right ∈ : S¨ denote both of Λ¬ t = −logS ¨ Λ = ,] 1 [± j² i‚,³² D' ´µ ‚ >0 , and ; (C9) ,/ wΨ ¥ )S ¨ *w.Λ∗ < ∞; ] In order to state result on consistency of %¢ with weight function ¶ ∙ : 0,1M → , we assume also conditions: (C10) Function ¶ ∶ 0,1M → 0, ∞M is measurable and for every · > 0, ∗ sup \∈ ],'+¸M ¶ - (C11) Function ¶ - 1 − neighborhood of - = 1; (C12) ,] 0 F)" # * < ∞; 0 ,1 ¶) +' / +' is nondecreasing in a R *.R N . / < ∞. Note that the conditions (C7)-(C9) satisfies, for example, for copula generators of Clayton and Frank. Theorem 2.5[6]. Let % = & ' < ∞, conditions (C7)-(C12) are hold. Then for → ∞, ε• F = sup ¶) *|%¢ 1»/ ∗ p | → 0. −% (for detailed proof, see [6]). 3. Conclusion In the case of dependent censoring Zeng & Klein (1995), Rivest & Wells (2001) investigated copula-graphic estimators: "¼ # "• # =Ž +' 1 ½,] ž - > 0 …Ž 9 = Ž +' ½− ,] ' 1 ’= \ +' ;−Ž9 ž - > 0 Ž¥ 9 ’= \ ’= \ Œ - , ;ˆ¾ .¡ = ¿VS À− • "• # 0 )ž - > 0 * ž - =  À1 − Œ - ¾, (3.2) ; .¡ 'ià Œ - Á, .¡ Œ .¡ Á. ž - Figure 2. Plots of estimates " # (thin-solid), "¼ # (medium one) and "• # (thick-solid) for copula generator Ž - = −bcd- q , - ∈ 0,1M. Acknowledgements The authors expressed their sincerely thanks to two anonymous reviewers and Associate Editor for theirs valuable comments and suggestions on a previous variant of manuscript, which drive to the present version of this article. This work was supported by the grant F4-01 Republic of Uzbekistan. References [1] Abdushukurov A.A. Nonparametric estimation of the distribution function based on relative risk function. Commun. Statist.: Theory & Methods. 1998. v. 27. № 8. pp. 1991-2012. [2] Abdushukurov A.A. On nonparametric estimation of reliability indices by censored samples. Theory. Probab. Appl. 1999. v. 43. № 1. pp. 3-11. [3] Abdushukurov A.A. Statistics of Incomplete Observations. Tashkent. University Press. 2009. (In Russian) [4] Abdushukurov A.A., Sagidullayev K.S. Asymptotical analysis of kernel estimates, connected with mean value. LAMBERT Academic Publishing. 2011. (In Russian) [5] Abdushukurov A.A., Sagidullayev K.S. Bootstrap kernel estimator of mean residual life function. J. Math. Sci. 2013. v. 189. № 6. pp. 884-888. [6] Abdushukurov A.A., Muradov R.S. Estimation of survival and mean residual life functions from dependent random censored data. New Trends in Math. Sci. 2014. v. 2. № 1. pp. 35-48. [7] Gill R.D. Large sample behaviour of the product limit estimator on the whole line. Ann. Statist. 1983. v. 11. № 3. pp. 49-58. [8] Nelsen R.B. An introduction to copulas.-Springer, New York. 2006. (3.1) and these estimators are shown to be uniformly consistent and asymptotical normal. In the case of independent censoring model these copula estimators are equivalent, consequently, to the exponential-hazard estimator of Altschuler-Breslow (1972), and product-limit estimator of Kaplan-Meier (1958): "¼ # Figure 1. Plots of estimates " # (thin-solid), "¼ # (medium one) and (thick-solid) for copula generator Ž - = −bcd-, - ∈ 0,1M. "• # It is easy to verify that from (2.14) we obtain relative-risk power estimator of Abdushukurov (1998) (see, (2.2)). In figures 1 and 2 below we demonstrate plots of estimators (3.2), (2.14) and (3.1) of " # using well-known Channing House data of size n=97 (see [3]). Here, thin-solid line stands for " # , medium-one for "¼ # and thick-solid line stands for estimator "• # . Note that estimate "• # is defined in whole line.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz