Optical Simulation Report Template (Max. 5 pages) (Deadline 23:59

Optical Simulation Report Template
(Max. 5 pages) (Deadline 23:59, Nov. 23, 2016, 100%20%)
NEMS 5820
Your name
Your student ID
After the optimization of the simulation project, I used the following structures and
settings to achieve corresponding optical behaviors.
0. The reference for (n, k) sets bellow was from XXX reference. (2%)
(Attach the reference (figures, tables, links, …) here and summarize (n, k) here,
max. 5 sets. Failed to provide (n, k) will receive a 0% for this item.)
n
k
material
(name of your material,
ex. DITO)
1. The structure I used was Ag1/air/SiO2/Ag1 = 20/600/160/20 nm for red,
2. The structure I used was Ag1/air/SiO2/Ag1 = 20/600/325/20 nm for green,
3. The structure I used was Ag1/air/SiO2/Ag1 = 20/600/245/20 nm for blue,
4. The highest transmittance of red (must be 600-700 nm) is 80% at 650 nm, (10%)
5. The highest transmittance of green (must be 500-600 nm) is 80% at 543 nm,
(10%)
6. The highest transmittance of blue (must be 400-500 nm) is 80% at 432 nm, (10%)
7. The FWHM of red is 100 nm, (10%)
8. The FWHM of green is 100 nm, (10%)
9. The FWHM of blue is 100 nm, (10%)
10. The difference between the highest and the lowest peaks among red, green, or blue
is 5.6789% (please show four digits after decimal) when ON. (5%)
(Attach your integrated three transmittance spectrums figure here. Only one
figure. From this figure, I can understand your 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.)
11. The red-ON CIE (x, y) is (0.6543, 0.2789) and the CPD for red is 0.27. Show four
digits after decimal for (x, y). (3%)
12. The green-ON CIE (x, y) is (0.6543, 0.2789) and the CPD for green is 0.27. Show
four digits after decimal for (x, y). (3%)
13. The blue-ON CIE (x, y) is (0.6543, 0.2789) and the CPD for blue is 0.27. Show
four digits after decimal for (x, y). (3%)
(Mark your red/green/blue points on one CIE and attach it here. Only one figure.
From this figure, I can understand your 11, 12, and 13.)
14. The triangle area size of the ON state on CIE diagram is 0.2411 with the
calculation here. (4%)
15. The red-OFF CIE (x, y) is (0.6543, 0.2789) and the CPD for red is 0.27. Show
four digits after decimal for (x, y). (3%)
16. The green-OFF CIE (x, y) is (0.6543, 0.2789) and the CPD for green is 0.27.
Show four digits after decimal for (x, y). (3%)
17. The blue-OFF CIE (x, y) is (0.6543, 0.2789) and the CPD for blue is 0.27. Show
four digits after decimal for (x, y). (3%)
18. The triangle area size of the OFF state on CIE diagram is 0.0013 with the
calculation here. (4%)
(Mark your white points on one CIE and attach it here. Only one figure. When
necessary, enlarge the CIE diagram for distinguishable points.) Please include
your calculation.
(Write your own summary here. (7%))
19. During the simulation, I found that both the material and its thickness influenced
the transmittance a lot. The color spectrum shifted to red when I increased the
SiO2 thickness but it shifted to blue when I increased the metal thickness.
Furthermore, to take care of ON and OFF balance in the same time for all red,
green, and blue colors was very challenging because when I wanted to balance
ON for all red, green, and blue, the balance of OFF of those three structures
worsened.
As a result, I felt that a complete design to take care of both ON and OFF for all
red, green, and blue might require novel material development. For example, new
metal alloy to support specific (n, k) along wavelengths. Another possible solution
is to put more layers into the structure but the process complexity and cost become
concerns.
Also, …