Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions Zweck – Blyth, SA. These figures have been calculated using the Dairy Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategy or DGAS. The DGAS calculator was developed to estimate the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for Australian dairy farms, by using methodologies and emission factors that are reflective of Australian conditions. The calculator can be downloaded at www.dairyingfortomorrow.com A great deal of research is underway within the Australian dairy industry to decrease the release of methane and nitrous oxide from farming systems. Baseline Contributors to Total Em issions 4% 29% 11% 56% What does DGAS estimate? DGAS estimates four sources of GHGs. These are: Methane (CH4) respired by stock as part of the digestive process (enteric fermentation) and through manure management; Nitrous oxide (N2O) is emitted with the management of animal waste and from nitrogen fertilisers. These nitrous oxide emissions are further broken down into direct (occurring on your farm) and indirect (loss to the environment through leaching/runoff and volatilisation); Carbon dioxide (CO2) from the consumption of electricity and fuels; Carbon dioxide (CO2) associated with the production of key farm inputs such as grains/concentrates, hay and silage, and fertilisers (pre-farm embedded) P re-farm On-farm CO2 On-farm CH4 On-farm N2O Total farm emissions Pre-farm (t/t MS) On-farm CO2 (t/t MS) On-farm CH4 (t/t MS) On-farm N2O (t/t MS) 1894 .65 1.77 8.7 4.58 Tree Plantings (t/t MS) -0.0 Total Farm (t/t MS) 15.7 (t CO2e/farm) Emissions per cow eq. (394) Emissions per ha (669) 4.8 2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 9 8 What can we do to reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions on dairy farms? Production improvement options and best management practices are most often linked to greenhouse gas emissions reduction. At present, well managed farms have few options to reduce emissions without significant changes to their farming or feeding system. With no formal incentive in place to reduce GHG emissions, Australian farmers should consider emissions reduction options that lead to productivity gains or have cost benefits. Any option should be looked at within the whole farm system. 5 4 3 2 1 O th er f ee d G ra i n so ur Fu ce el s pr od uc tio CO n 2 -E ne rg CH y 4 CH -E 4 nt -E er ffl ic ue N2 nt O p -E on ds ffl ue nt N2 N2 po O O nd -D -N s un Fe g, rti Ur lis er in e & Sp re N2 ad O -I nd ir e Tr ct ee pl an t in gs 0 -1 lis er Recent data from DPI Victoria indicates that GHG emissions on Victorian dairy farms range between 7.2 T CO2e per tonne of milk solids to 15.4T with the average being 10.2T CO2e per tonnes of milk solids (DPI Farm Monitor Project 2009/10). Only a limited numbers of farms in SA have participated in DGAS at this time but emissions have ranged from 12.2 – 15.9 tonnes CO2e per tonne of milk solids with an average of 14.1 tonnes CO2e per tonne of milk solids. 6 Fe r ti What sort of Greenhouse Gas emissions can we expect on Australian dairy farms? t CO2-e/t MS 7 CH4 and N2O have a higher potential to warm the environment, compared to CO2, all emissions are converted into carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). DGAS estimates the CO2e emissions both as a total figure (tonnes of CO2e) and as a milk intensity figure by dividing total emissions by annual milk production (t CO2e per tonne of milksolids). This allows results to be compared between farms, irrespective of differences between farms such as milking herd size and level of milk production. This information sheet was prepared by Monique White, Dairying for Tomorrow SA, based on data collected by Sam Acheson and the original sheet by Gillian Hayman, Dairying for Tomorrow Coordinator Gippsland. It was prepared for the Future Ready Dairy Systems project funded by The Australian Department of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries and Dairy Australia. April 2011.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz