ATR Bonito

ATR Bonito
A Top Performer
ATR Bonito is a highly adaptable early-mid season variety that has done exceptionally well in National
Variety Trials. Similar to ATR Cobbler, ATR Bonito is comparible to a F1 hybrid and represents a classic
plant model for future varieties.An EPR (End Point Royalty) of $5 per tonne (ex GST) applies to ATR Bonito.
Variety
Blackleg
Rating
Oil
Average
Yield
Average
Trial Mean Yield
Average (MT/HA)
Gross Income
($/HA)
ATR Cobbler
MS-S
41.29
1.50
1.64
$742
92%
11
Crusher TT
MR-MS
40.38
1.78
1.64
$868
108%
11
ATR Stingray
MR
42.56
1.79
1.64
$903
109%
11
ATR Bonito
MR (P)
1.64
$918
110%
11
43.33
1.80
120%
50%
100%
48%
80%
46%
60%
44%
Oil
40%
Average
20%
42%
ATR Cobbler
Crusher TT
ATR Stingray
40%
ob
bl
er
ATR Bonito
Average Oil and Yield Results By State*
$0
$1
00
$2
00
$3
00
$4
00
$5
00
$6
00
$7
00
$8
00
$9
0
$1 0
,0
00
C
TT
AT
R
ru
sh
er
C
AT
R
St
in
gr
ay
38%
Bo
ni
to
0%
AT
R
# Trials
Variety Gross Incom e ($/HA)
Variety Trial Yield vs Trial Mean Yield
% Trial
Mean
Yield
Yield vs Trial
Mean Yield
Trial Site Information
CETA12CALI6
Sowing
Date
13/05/2012
CV
LSD
Intake in Furrow
Trial Mean
Yield
1.17
11.23
0.23
Jerramungup
CETA12JERR6
17/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
1.37
8.63
0.2
2012
Katanning
CMTA12KATA6
10/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
1.62
7.57
0.21
NVT
2012
Kendenup
CMTA12KEND6
18/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
2.23
5.29
0.2
NVT
2012
Kojonup
CMTA12KOJO6
16/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
2.30
6.03
0.23
NVT
2012
Mingenew
CETA12MING6
12/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
0.41
10.82
0.08
NVT
2012
Munglinup
CMTA12MUNG6
13/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
1.65
4.99
0.13
NVT
2012
Scaddan
CETA12SCAD6
10/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
1.13
8.27
0.16
NVT
2012
Stirlings South
CMTA12ST.S6
25/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
2.23
5.50
0.2
NVT
2012
Wagin
CMTA12WAGI6
9/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
1.11
8.09
0.15
NVT
2012
Williams
CMTA12WILL6
12/05/2012
Intake in Furrow
2.82
5.53
0.26
Source
Year
Nearest Town
Trial Code
NVT
2012
Calingiri
NVT
2012
NVT
Treatment
Filter Parameters
State: WA,
Variety: ATR Bonito, ATR Cobbler, ATR Stingray, Crusher TT
Trials Compared: CETA12CALI6, CETA12JERR6, CETA12MING6, CETA12SCAD6,
CMTA12KATA6, CMTA12KEND6, CMTA12KOJO6, CMTA12MUNG6,
CMTA12ST.S6, CMTA12WAGI6, CMTA12WILL6
Information based on data available as at 24/09/2013
*Source: Nuseed Yield and Oil Comparative Trials Report, based on State NVT data for 2011 and 2012
This publication is for information purposes only. Nuseed and its agents or employees shall not be liable for any loss or
damage suffered by any person as a result of any reliance on any of the contents hereof, whether such loss or damage
arises from the negligence or misrepresentation or any act or omission of Nuseed or its agents or employees.
All material appearing in this publication is copyright. All or part of this publication may not be reproduced in any way
without the consent of Nuseed.