Minnesota Swimming Athlete Committee April 16th, 2015 Meeting Minutes A. Record Appearances The meeting was called to order by Chair Patrick Hunter at 8:07 PM. Those Present: Patrick Hunter, Jack Swanson, Megan Burrows, Aaron Olson, Lauren Harris, Ian Cooke, Tru Walor B. Committee Updates The USA Swimming Rules and Regulations will be proposing legislation at the USAS Convention in Kansas City to ensure 20% athlete vote at the zone level. The National Board of Review and FINA are looking into Michael Phelps’ reinstatement. The Technical Planning Committee is considering feedback for how to improve championship meets, especially for 11-12 swimmers. The Open Water Task Force met on March 25th and will hopefully be working on the State Championship meet this summer. $200,000 from Minnesota Swimming will be used towards renovating the Rochester pool. This is a $10 million project. We briefly reviewed the schedule for Saturday’s Swimposium and Sunday’s House of Delegates. C. Championship Meet Review i. C Finals C Finals is becoming the MAC. This should give it more of a “championship meet feel.” No committee members competed at C Finals. We should explore having a podium at C Finals, as the athletes would like this, and this would give the meet a “championship meet feel” and might help retain athletes. ii. Minnesota Regional Championship At the Hutchinson MRC, heat winners received a prize – would this be possible for the other MRCs? Also, we should announce the results of the top 8 qualifiers. We should announce the swimmers competing in the final heat prior to their race as well. We should also have a podium at the MRC. Are 6 sites for the MRC necessary? It is better to have “comfortably sized” meets, so that the facility is not to cramped. The Hutchinson MRC was too small, and lacked a championship meet atmosphere. Additionally, an MRC at St. Kates is not appealing, as there is not cool down pool. A motion was made by Swanson to recommend 5 MRC sites. Second Hunter. All in favor. iii. Senior State Committee members thought Senior State was run fairly smoothly. We discussed the number of relays that each club should be entitled to. The prevailing opinion was that clubs should have unlimited relays for 200 and 400 yard/meter relays, but the aggregate time must add up to 4x the champ time. Each club would be allocated at least one relay, should they have an athlete qualifying for the state meet. We also discussed having an age group senior state meet vs a “true” senior state meet. In the summer, many college athletes compete at the state meet, so the committee agreed that it is best to have age groups 15-16 and 17 and over at the Summer State Meet. However, beyond the state meet, age groups are irrelevant, according to Frank Busch from USA Swimming. What is most important is that we maximize opportunities for a second swim, according to committee members. iv. Age Group States Megan Burrows competed at Age Group State, but did not qualify for finals. The main complaint was that finals sessions were too long. We discussed moving the 13-14 swimmers to age group state, but we decided against this option, as it is best for 11-12 athletes to compete in a prelim final meet. v. NCSA and NASA meets How do we recreate the atmosphere at an LSC level, particularly for the Senior State Meet? The committee agreed that this will be very hard, as most teams do travel, which gets people excited. Also, NCSAs and NASAs are national level meets, which excites swimmers. We agreed that Senior State should have a more exciting announcer, and that we should continue to parade finalists, to give the Senior State Meet more of a “championship meet feel.” We also agreed that High School swimming detracts from the Senior State Meet. Swimmers feel as if they are competing for something bigger at the High School State Meet. However, it is alarming that many High School swimmers found their in-season invites to be more exciting than Senior State. Recognizing winners would help – we could use the Minnesota Swimming Athletes Twitter page to tweet pictures of event winners. D. Unique Role of the Athlete Voice Van Donkersgoed discussed the unique role that the athlete voice plays in USA Swimming and thanked committee members for being a part of the committee. He also thanked Swanson and Hunter for their service as the leaders of the committee. E. Adjournment A motion to adjourn was made by Patrick Hunter at 9:19 PM. Second Swanson. All in favor of adjournment. Respectfully Submitted, Jack Swanson Athlete Committee Vice Chair
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz