Plant-wide disturbance assessment with an application on a paper making process Zhang Di, M.Sc, Cheng Hui, M.Sc, Jämsä-Jounela Sirkka-Liisa, Professor 29 Jan, 2009 15th Nordic Process Control Workshop Contents: 1 Introduction 2 Plant-wide disturbance detection 3 Root cause diagnosis 4 Methodology for plant-wide disturbance assessment 5 Case study on Paper making process 6 Results 2 1 Introduction: There are many pieces of process equiment and control loops in one typical industrial plant, and they interact with each other instead of isolating from each other. So disturbance may propagate through the plant and affect a large number of process variables, evolving into a plant-wide problem. The widespread nature of the disturbacne then makes it difficult to identify its orgin. 3 1 Introduction: A plant-wide approach means the distrbution of a distrubance is mapped out, and the location and nature of the cause of the disturbance are determined with a high probability of being right first time . The alternative is a time consuming procedure of testing each control loop in turn until the root cause is found. 4 Contents: 1 Introduction 2 Plant-wide disturbance detection 3 Root cause diagnosis 4 Methodology for plant-wide disturbance assessment 5 Case study on Paper making process 6 Results 5 2 Plant-wide disturbance detection More from the single loop disturbance detection, the plant-wide disturbance detection includes the identification of clusters of measurements having similar dynamic behaviour. Thornhill and Horch (2007) 6 Contents: 1 Introduction 2 Plant-wide disturbance detection 3 Root cause diagnosis 4 Methodology for plant-wide disturbance assessment 5 Case study on Paper making process 6 Results 7 3 Root cause diagnosis Sources of persistent dynamic plant-wide disturbance The non-linear sources include: For example: Control valves with excessive static friction On-off and split-range control Sensors faults Process non-linearities leading to limit cycles Hydrodynamic instability such as slugging flows The linear sources include: Poor controller tuning Controller interaction Structural problems involving recycles 8 3 Root cause diagnosis Diagnosis has two objectives, the identification and the isolation of the disturbance. 9 Thornhill and Horch (2007) Contents: 1 Introduction 2 Plant-wide disturbance detection 3 Root cause diagnosis 4 Methodology for plant-wide disturbance assessment 5 Case study on Paper making process 6 Results 10 4 Methodology for plant-wide disturbance assessment 11 Contents: 1 Introduction 2 Plant-wide disturbance detection 3 Root cause diagnosis 4 Methodology for plant-wide disturbance assessment 5 Case study on Paper making process 6 Results 12 Testing environment :APROS interface The basis weight valve is under concern because the poor performance caused by the malfunction of valves is quite common in industry. 13 V1 V2 5 0 -5 V3 5 0 -5 V4 5 0 -5 5 0 -5 V7 V6 5 0 -5 V5 5 Case study on Paper making process Measurement 5 0 -5 5 0 -5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 50 100 150 200 250 i 300 350 400 450 500 14 5 Case study on Paper making process Disturbance detection Power spectra 15 5 Case study on Paper making process Root cause Diagnosis 16 5 Case study on Paper making process In Choudhury et al. (2004), the existence of non-linearity in a system can be decided by the Gaussian test and the nonlinearity test. If the signal is non-Gaussian it goes through another test to determine its linearity. The nonlinearity index (NLI) is provided as shown 2 NLI | biˆcmax (biˆ c 2 2 bicˆ 2 ) | 17 5 Case study on Paper making process If the process is identified as linear, the root diagnosis path presented by Bauer and Thornhill (2007) is applied to find the disturbance propagation path and to build the causal diagraph. Basic idea: To get to know the cause-and-effect relationship through the time delays between process variables. Procedure: 1 Time delay estimation (cross-correlation function) 2 Build the causality matrix 3 Consistency check It is used to verify and ascertain the results. The limit is N-2. 18 Contents: 1 Introduction 2 Plant-wide disturbance detection 3 Root cause diagnosis 4 Methodology for plant-wide disturbance assessment 5 Case study on Paper making process 6 Results 19 6 Results Disturbance detection Process measurements after mean centering and unit deviation scaling 20 6 Results Disturbance detection ACF of time series for the seven variables 21 6 Results Disturbance detection Power spectra of the seven variables 22 6 Results linear identification V1 -6 x 10 2.5 2 NLI | biˆcmax (biˆ c 2 2 bicˆ 2 ) | Squared bicoherence 2 3.5 1.5 2 NLI | biˆcmax (biˆ c 2 2 bicˆ 2 ) | 3 2.5 1 2 0.5 -3 x 10 1.5 1 0 0.5 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 -3 x 10 0 0.5 f1 0 f2 Squared Bicoherence calculation for V1 - Basis weight valve opening 23 6 Results V3 V2 V4 -3 x 10 -3 x 10 0.04 8 7 0.03 6 0.025 0.02 6 5 4 3.5 0.015 7 Squared bioherence 0.035 Squared bicoherence Squared bicoherence 8 3 3 4 3.5 3.5 3 3 3 2.5 2 2.5 2 2 -3 x 10 1 2.5 0.01 5 2 1.5 -3 x 10 1 2 0 1.5 -3 0.005 x 10 1.5 1 3.5 3 1 0.5 2.5 2 0 1 0.5 3.5 0 3 2.5 0.5 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 0.5 1.5 1 -3 1 0.5 f1 0 0 f2 f1 0 0.5 0 x 10 f1 0 2 1.5 -3 x 10 f2 -3 x 10 f2 V6 V5 V7 -3 x 10 -3 -3 x 10 x 10 8 3.5 8 7 3 7 5 4 3.5 3 3 5 4 3.5 3 3 Squared bicoherence Squared bicoherence 6 Squared bicoherence 6 2.5 2 1.5 3.5 3 1 2.5 2.5 2 2 0.5 2.5 -3 2 x 10 -3 2 1.5 x 10 2 1 1.5 1 -3 x 10 1 1.5 0 3 0.5 3 2.5 3.5 3 2.5 0.5 2 1.5 1 -3 3.5 3.5 1 0.5 1 0 0 x 10 2.5 2 0 1.5 1 0.5 0 f1 0.5 0 0 f1 f2 -3 2 1.5 1 -3 0 0.5 f1 x 10 f2 0 x 10 f2 24 6 Results: propagation path 1 Causality matrix: 2 Consistency check: 3 Then: It is used to verify and ascertain the results. The limit is N-2. 25 6 Results: Propagation path 4 The causal map: The root cause is most likely close to the variable 1 - Basis weight valve opening 26 Thank you for your attention!
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz