Action Plan 2011-2015 Inner South Belfast Neighbourhood Partnership Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Area Context............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Context of Report ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 People and Place: A Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal, Department for Social Development, June 2003 ...................................................................... 2 2. Statement of Needs / Priorities ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Building Strong, Safe, Attractive and Sustainable Communities ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Building a Broad Based Economy and Helping People Move Towards and into Work as Well as Increasing their Skills Levels ............................................. 7 Improving Community Relations.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Raising Education Attainment and Engaging Young People .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Improving Health and Well-Being .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 3. Action Plan ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 4. Governance, Accountability and Delivery .............................................................................................................................................................. 42 Governance of Partnership and Sub Groups.......................................................................................................................................................................... 42 Role of the Chairperson and Accountability .......................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Strategy for Engaging with Statutory Agencies ...................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Engagement with Politicians .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 45 Membership of the Neighbourhood Partnership .................................................................................................................................................................. 45 Membership of the Sub Groups ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 46 Financial Overview and Delivery ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 5. Summary and Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................................... Published as a separate document 1. Introduction Background Inner South Belfast Neighbourhood Partnership (ISBNP) was established in June 2005 to oversee the implementation of the Government’s Neighbourhood Renewal Programme in the three inner city communities of Donegall Pass, Lower Ormeau and the Markets. The Partnership has membership drawn from the Community and Voluntary Sector, Public Sector and Private Sector, as well as elected members of Belfast City Council. This Action Plan outlines a series of actions to be implemented up to March 2015 to bring about social, economic, physical and community renewal in the Inner South Belfast Neighbourhood Renewal Area (NRA). Area Context Inner South Belfast NRA includes Donegall Pass, Lower Ormeau and the Market. The areas are located within the Shaftesbury and Botanic wards of Belfast. The area has suffered from the decline in traditional manufacturing industries and the resulting job losses, and coupled with population movements out of the area, local people have suffered the composite effects of urban decline. In recent years there has been much development and regeneration work taking place in Inner South Belfast, most notably the large scale redevelopment of the Gas Works site and Laganside. This redevelopment has brought some economic and social benefits to those living in Donegall Pass, Lower Ormeau and the Market. Page 1 of 48 Context of Report The Department of Social Development are currently drafting and finalising their Neighbourhood Renewal Budget across Northern Ireland and have asked each of the Neighbourhood Renewal Partnerships to identify their local priorities and formalise this in an action plan through to March 2015. This report will highlight and present the following: A revised area context supported by up to date Statistics A 3.5 year action plan (October 2011 – March 2015) across 5 agreed thematic work areas Details on proposed governance and accountability structure Membership Details of the Partnership and its Constituent Sub Groups Approximate Financial Information / Budget Requirements Across Each Thematic Area of Work Short / Medium / Long Term Action Analysis People and Place: A Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal, Department for Social Development, June 2003 In June 2003, Government launched ‘People and Place: A Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal’. This long term (7–10 year) Strategy targets those communities throughout Northern Ireland suffering the highest levels of deprivation. It is a cross-departmental Strategy aiming to bring together the work of all Government Departments, in partnership with local people, to tackle disadvantage and deprivation in all aspects of everyday life. The Strategy re-iterates the Government’s commitment to tackling poverty, social inequalities and deprivation experienced by individuals, areas and groups. Where people live is a major determinant of their risk of experiencing poverty and a number of areas have been identified in which concentrations of persons experiencing high levels of deprivation reside. Thirty-three areas have therefore been identified for priority treatment as part of the Programme, including 14 in Belfast, where the implementation of the programme is being facilitated by the Belfast Area Partnership Boards. The Inner South Belfast Neighbourhood is one of the areas identified as one of the top 10% of most deprived wards measured by the Multiple Deprivation Measures. These Neighbourhoods have reached their current position because of a combination of factors, including higher than average rates of unemployment, low levels of literacy and numeracy, low educational attainment, physical and mental ill health, crime and problems with quality and maintenance of the physical environment, to name a few. The concentration of these problems into relatively small geographical areas permits the design and implementation of interventions to address problems of both individuals and place. The purpose of the Neighbourhood Renewal Programme is to reduce the social and economic inequalities which characterise the most deprived areas. It does so by making a long term commitment to communities to work in partnership with them to identify and prioritise needs and co-ordinate interventions designed to address the underlying causes of poverty. Page 2 of 48 The Strategy is informed by two over-arching goals: To ensure that people living in the most deprived Neighbourhoods have access to the best possible services and to the opportunities which make for a better quality of life for themselves and their families. To improve the environment and image of our most deprived neighbourhoods so that they become more attractive places to live and work in. The strategy is based on four interlinked themes: Community renewal – to develop consistent communities that are able and committed to improving the quality of life in their areas; Economic renewal – to develop economic activity in the most deprived neighbourhoods and connect them to the wider urban economy; Social renewal – to improve social conditions for the people who live in the most deprived neighbourhoods through better coordinated public services and the creation of safer environments; and Physical renewal – to help create attractive, safe, sustainable environments in the most deprived neighbourhoods. Page 3 of 48 2. Statement of Needs / Priorities The June 2007 Action Plan contained a number of recommended actions for Neighbourhood Renewal that sought to achieve for the Inner South Belfast area the primary goal of ensuring that people living in the most deprived neighbourhoods have access to the best possible services and opportunities which make for a better quality of life. This Action Plan has maintained the same structure as the original plan, and is based around the following strategic themes: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Building Strong, Safe, Attractive and Sustainable Communities Building a Broad Based Economy and helping people move towards and into work as well as increasing their skills levels. Improving Community Relations Raising Education Attainment and Engaging Young People1 Improving Health and Well-Being The following sections provide a brief overview of the context for each of these thematic areas. A detailed breakdown of the available statistics contained at Appendix B. It should be noted when viewing statistical information that the results and findings of the 2011 Census are not due for publication until autumn 2012. The statistics therefore rely on the 2001 Census as a baseline figure, but have been updated wherever possible with annual monitoring data, estimates and anecdotal evidence. Building Strong, Safe, Attractive and Sustainable Communities The Small Population Estimates (2008) show a total population in the Inner South Neighbourhood Partnership area of 6,809. There has been sustained population growth from 2001-2006 (1.6%), and further growth is expected to 2010/11 as a result of around 180 new houses recently built in the Lower Ormeau area. This compares to an average fall in population across Neighbourhood Renewal Areas (NRAs) in Belfast (-1.2%) and all NRAs (-0.9%). Sex Female Male Total Age Bands 0-15 16-39 40-59 60+ Females 0-15 16-39 40-64 65+ Males Total Population Estimates 2008 472 3,372 1,854 3,437 % Population Change 2001-2008 -17 1,774 622 504 -3.5 +8.2 -6.8 -4.2 1 502 -14.8 +15.2 801 280 +11.6 +4.5 +8.0 6,809 1.6 Please note that the original 2007 Action Plan separated ‘Raising Education Attainment’ and ‘Engaging Young People’ into two thematic groups. This Action Plan merges these issues into a single theme. Page 4 of 48 Violent Crime Offences Against the Person Offences Against the State Theft Fraud &Forgery Criminal Damage Drug Offences The population growth in Inner South relates primarily to the working age population (16-59), which constitutes 69% of the total population. Again this is higher than the Northern Ireland average. This also results in a correspondingly low proportion of under-16s and over-65s. Although statistics are not readily attainable, anecdotal evidence confirms a disproportionately high percentage of people in the 18-30 age groups, relating primarily to students who choose to live in the area. It should also be noted that variations exist within the Inner South area, with the Lower Ormeau, for example being a relatively young population due to the construction of new housing attracting younger people to the area. The 2001 Census indicated that 24.8% of housing in the area is owner-occupied, with on 10.8% of houses owned outright. These figures are lower than the equivalent averages across all of the Belfast NRAs and the NI averages. Consequently, over three quarters of housing in the area is rented, which is very high compared to averages across NRAs, Belfast and NI as a whole. The high level of private-rented accommodation relating to the high proportion of students partly accounts for this, although there are 1,515 housing benefit claimants compared to 3,025 total households, suggesting that social-rented housing is also high. Although the quality of social-rented housing seems to be relatively good, it is notable that some of the communal areas are not always well maintained. 88 4500 4000 79 175 689 641 587 86 744 57 86 1444 1440 1310 226 2500 1408 38 2000 42 1381 946 1000 48 88 500 1033 47 70 1080 1500 1218 992 878 1068 995 1129 2007 2008 2009 0 2005 Page 5 of 48 91 76 3000 103 764 3500 No. Of Offences 64% of persons over 16 are single / never married, which is very high compared to both the average for all NRAs (41.1%) and the Northern Ireland average (15.8%). This will inevitably place more pressure on housing stock in the area. Anecdotal evidence suggests that younger, single residents move into the area due to lack of larger housing suitable for families. The supply of family housing is therefore a major issue in the Markets and Donegall Pass, but perhaps less so in the Lower Ormeau due to the new houses recently completed. Although a number of housing sites have been identified within the area, past tendencies have result in the development of social apartments, rather than family accommodation. Not only has this failed to address housing demand for the area, particularly the shortage of suitable family accommodation, but apartments often have a negative impact on the local area both in terms of appearance and in terms of connectivity to existing communities. For example, in many cases new apartments are designed to back onto existing housing area. The new-build housing in the Lower Ormeau was meant to address the shortage of family housing, but given that phase three is almost complete and shortage continues to exist, there is concern that this problem remains acute and housing waiting lists are still chronic. 5000 2006 In relation to crime, the total number of notifiable offences recorded in Inner South Belfast has remained relatively static from 2005 to 2009. Although the number has fallen to 3,720 in 2009 from 3,826 in 2005, it has risen in last two years and the recorded crime rate remains very high in comparison to the Belfast NRAs average and the NI average. In particular, the number of assaults has risen since 2005 to 802 in 2009. The number of incidents of criminal Damage remains very high (587 in 2009), but has fallen slightly since 2005. The recorded rate of drug offences is relatively low, but has risen steadily since 2005 and is anecdotally considered to be one of the top issues facing Inner South, with implication for improving community relations and improving health and well-being. The rate of Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB) per 10,000 population has fallen since 2005, but still significant. Anecdotally, reducing the availability of alcohol to young people would have a major impact on the number of incidents of ASB. The Northern Ireland Omnibus Survey 2006 provided a comparison of the perception residents have of their local neighbourhood in Neighbourhood Renewal areas and non-Neighbourhood Renewal areas. In relation to community safety, the Survey found that, whilst the majority of local residents feel ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ safe in their homes (98% during the day and 92% at night), many would feel ‘a bit’ or ‘very’ unsafe walking around there area at night (44%). Issues identified as being important to the safety of communities within Neighbourhood Renewal areas, which anecdotally are also important in Inner South Belfast, included graffiti (both sectarian and non-sectarian), murals, paramilitary flags and emblems, bonfires and criminal damage. The presence of a high proportion of hostel-type accommodation – including backpacker hostels, homeless accommodation and bail hostels, etc. – in the Inner South area is closely related to the issues of crime and ASB. For example, research indicates that increases in car crime and sexual offences can be closely linked to the presence of bail hostels. It is also thought that hostel-type accommodation exacerbates problems within the rental sector. Anecdotally, there is a sense in the communities that South Belfast is often chosen as an easy location for such accommodation because of the ‘patchwork’ nature of the communities, with some small pockets not well engaged. This raises a number of broader concerns including engagement with the planning system and the need for a sustainable balance in types of accommodation. In relation to the physical fabric and infrastructure of the Inner South area, a number of issues can be identified: Firstly, due to close proximity to the City Hospital, Ormeau Road services and the City Centre, access to key services – such as GP Premises, an Accident and Emergency Hospital, Dentist, Pharmacist, Optician, Post Office, etc. – is considered relatively good in the area. However, although access in terms of distance is better than average, other physical and social barriers remain, such as a shortage of NHS dentists, services located in the wrong ‘area’ and poor physical connectivity, particularly with the Markets area, which is disconnected by the Gasworks and railway to the South and East and major road infrastructure to the North and West. Secondly, and related to the first point above, is the DRD Road Service plans to complete the southern section of the Inner City Ring Road through a new ‘Bankmore’ Link to Ormeau Road and Cromac Street. This infrastructure is required to facilitate long-term improvements to the City Centre, by reducing the level of through traffic using the City Centre, but there are concerns that the scheme, as originally proposed, could sever the South Belfast communities from the City Centre, thereby further reducing access to services and employment opportunities. Thirdly, acute problems are regularly experienced for residents in the Inner South area relating to commuter parking. DRD Roads Service had proposed the implementation of a pilot residents’ parking scheme in a number of locations in the Inner South area, but the proposals were later dropped due to a lack of support from the local residents on cost grounds. However, parking continues to be an issue and it is hoped that this scheme can be re-visited. Page 6 of 48 Building a Broad Based Economy and Helping People Move Towards and into Work as Well as Increasing their Skills Levels As outlined briefly above, 2008 population estimates indicate that 69% of the resident population in Inner South are of working age, i.e. 16-59. This equates to fewer than 4,700 people. According to the Biennial Census of Employment, the total number of employee jobs in the Inner South area in 2007 was 43,554, an increase of around 7,400 since 2001. However, despite the high level of employment opportunities, many of the local population are unable to access these jobs. This is evidenced in the findings of the 2001 Census, which shows that 47.6% of the population are economically inactive. 6.9% are unemployed, almost half of which are classified as long-term unemployment. These figures are high in comparison to the NI and non-NRA averages, but generally slightly lower than the Belfast NRA average. Although the 2001 Census is now over 10 years old, the same conclusion can be seen in more up-todate statistics relating to benefit claimants. Percentage of Total Population At 7.4%, the number of Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) claimants in 2010 in the Inner South area is higher than the Belfast NRA average, the all NRA average and the Northern Ireland average (3.9%). Within the Inner South area, this figure has risen from 6.7% in 2001 and saw steep increases between 2008 and 2009 (from 3.1% to 5.2%). This sharp rise may be partly explained by changes to the benefits system in October 2008, which saw many recipients of the Employment Support Allowance (ESA) transferring to JSA; however, it should also be noted that the full impact of the economic downturn may not be reflected in statistics until a couple of years later 30 (i.e. 2011 onwards). 16.1% are in receipt of Inner South Income Support, which is a fall of around 8% Belfast since 2001, although this could be partially 25 Belfast accounted for through changes to the benefit NRAs system to transfer many Income Support recipients to Pension Credits in 2003, the latter 20 of which has been steadily rising since then. A snapshot taken of benefits in June 2010 shows that Botanic and Shaftesbury wards, both of 15 which cover part of the Inner South area, continue to be high in comparison to the rest of 10 South Belfast, but are broadly comparable to other wards within Belfast NRAs. Linked to the high levels of economic inactivity is the finding, again through the 2001 Census, that 39% of Inner South’s working age population (1674) have no qualifications. There are significant variations between age groups, with an increase in the proportion of people with no qualifications 5 0 Job Seekers Income Support Housing Benefit Allowance (2010) (2010) (2009) Page 7 of 48 Incapacity Disablity Living Benefit (2010) Allowance (2010) moving from younger to older age groups. For example, only 10.2% of 20-29 year olds have no qualifications, whilst 75.4% 45-59s and 89.9% 60-74s have no qualifications. With the exception of 16-19 and 20-29 year olds, these figures are broadly comparable to other NRAs, but remain consistently lower than non-NRAs. The numbers of 16-19 and 20-29 year olds with no qualifications (24.2% and 10.2% respectively) are much lower than the NRA average (32% and 23% respectively). This can be attributed primarily to the high proportion of students living within the area, which is reflected in the 2001 Census’ socioeconomic classifications, which shows that the number of full-time students in the area (22.6%) is over three times the NI average (7.9%). Likewise, the proportion of people with degree level or higher qualifications in the Inner South area (21%) is significantly above both the NRA average (8.1%) and the NI average (15.8%). However, very few of these residents would have originated in the area, but have rather moved into the area to study and often leave the area following completion of studies. The available evidence therefore suggests that reducing the level of economic inactivity, helping people into employment, particularly those who are longterm unemployed, and improving the skills level and qualifications in adults, particularly in the older age groups, are all top priorities for the economic renewal of the Inner South area. A number of actions can be considered to contribute toward the achievement of these goals, including the provision of flexible learning, training and education programmes to re-skill and up-skill older people. This should focus on growth areas in the local economy, which is likely to be service based, including business administration and clerical work, retail and hospitality. There are also a number of barriers to work that can be addressed, such as the lack of affordable childcare and an absence of registered childcare providers in the area. Supporting small businesses and promoting social enterprise is also seen as important, although there very few small units for business start-ups available and commercial rents are often high due to the close proximity to the city centre. It is thought that the traditional trades – plumbing, electrician, carpentry – offer good opportunities for both self employment and apprenticeship opportunities, although the availability of commercial clients is likely to be limited in the short- to medium-term given the current economic context. Improving Community Relations The 2008 Small Area population Estimates indicate that almost 70% of the Inner South community are from a ‘Catholic’ community background and 24.8% are from a ‘Protestant and Other Christian (including Christian related)’ community background. Traditionally, local community representatives have undertaken ‘community relations’ work across the three traditional communities, but it is now recognised that work is also need within individual communities. Anecdotally, there remain significant internal and underlying tensions as legacy of the Troubles that have never been resolved. To date, very little work has been undertaken to address such issues and it is recognised that community relations work with ex-prisoners and paramilitaries in both loyalists and republican communities need to be engaged By default, we can ascertain that just under 7% are form other, black and minority ethnic (BME) backgrounds. Although statistics relating specifically to ethnic minorities in the Inner South NRA are difficult to obtain, it is clear that the number of ethnic minorities living in the area has risen significantly in recent years. Clearly this has major implications for the delivery of services in the Inner South area. Across the province as a whole, the number of European in-migrants and asylum seekers has risen significantly, with many being houses, albeit often temporarily, in South Belfast. Despite this transient nature of some of these groups, it is notable that a number of minority ethnic groupings are strongly established in the area. The Neighbourhood Page 8 of 48 Partnership and community groups locally have often found it difficult to engage effectively. It should be noted that, although a number of ethnic minority community and voluntary organisations are established within South Belfast and the Inner South Neighbourhood, many of these groups have a city-wide or province-wide remit and therefore are not resourced sufficiently to engage at a local neighbourhood level. Although the members of the Neighbourhood Partnership have developed a number of good initiatives to work across sectarian divides in all three areas, such as the Gasworks Interface Network (GIN), Cromac Regeneration Initiative (CRI) and Inner South Local Area Network (ISLAN), it is notable that connections and collaboration, particularly regarding the involvement of ethnic minority groupings, is more difficult within the three communities – the Markets, Donegall Pass and the Lower Ormeau. Anecdotal evidence suggests that many of these communities are within the private rented sector, which means they are inherently transient in nature and often don’t see themselves as part of the wider community. Integration can often be viewed as assimilation and work is required to break down the existing barriers and secure involvement of all local residents, regardless of ethnicity, within the local communities. NRA (%) Non-NR (%) Major Problem Minor Problem Not a Problem Don’t Know Major Problem Minor Problem Not a Problem Don’t Know Sectarian Graffiti 17 37 44 1 8 25 67 1 Non-sectarian Graffiti 18 31 50 1 4 23 72 1 Sectarian Murals 14 22 63 1 6 11 82 1 Non-sectarian Murals 4 21 74 1 1 9 89 1 Paramilitary Flags / Emblems 16 29 54 1 11 21 67 1 Bonfires 19 19 61 1 7 15 78 0 Criminal Damage to Homes 31 31 37 1 9 24 66 1 Criminal Damage to Public Buildings 26 29 44 1 11 22 66 2 Harassment of Ethnic Minorities 11 17 71 2 6 14 77 3 Harassment of Migrant Workers 10 15 72 3 6 13 78 3 Page 9 of 48 However, despite these concerns, some positive activity continues, with many ethnic minorities and groupings regularly using community facilities, in particular Shaftesbury Community and Recreation Centre. It is also notable that many of the community groups and organisations working with ethnic minorities across Northern Ireland and South Belfast are involved in the South Belfast Roundtable. Moving forward, it is hoped that such initiatives can be expanded and that the work will continue to change attitudes towards and perceptions of ethnic minorities. Education aimed at younger people is thought to have been particularly successful in the past, although funding for such work through the Community Relations Council has no ceased and needs to be replaced. In addition to the crime statistics outlined above, the Northern Ireland Omnibus Survey 2006 found that the harassment of ethnic minorities and migrant workers is more of an issue within NRAs than non-NRAs. This is likely to be particularly pertinent within the Inner South area given the high proportion of ethnic minorities. This is supported in the Inner South area by crime statistics relating to offences with a racist or sectarian motivation. Although the recorded figures are still relatively low, it is notable that they been steadily rising year on year since 2004/05. Anecdotally, it is suggested that such figures would be much higher without the community relations work already taking place in the area and existing cross-community structures that are in place. The Omnibus Survey also outlines a number of additional statistics with particular relevance to improving community relations. Although not Inner South specific, this does flag up some general issues to be considered alongside anecdotal evidence. Pride in NRAs is low compared to non-NRAs, with 22% stated that they feel ‘slightly’ or ‘very’ ashamed when asked whether they feel proud or ashamed of the general image of their neighbourhood. Only 15% within NRAs stated they were ‘Very Proud’, compared to 41% in non-NRA areas. Although not relating directly to the Inner South area, it is clear that this has implications for communicating the positive stories from the area. The main problems identified in NRAs include graffiti (both sectarian and none), sectarian murals, paramilitary flag/emblems, bonfires, etc. which all have implications for improving community relations. Harassment of Ethnic Minorities and Migrant Workers is also seen as more of an issue in NRAs than non-NRAs. Raising Education Attainment and Engaging Young People As we have seen, the demographic data indicates a lower than average proportion of under-16s in the area. However, at 17.2% this is still a significant section of the community. Furthermore, it is suggested that the 2008 estimates may not accurately reflect the number of young people in the area now, given the construction of new housing and continued high birth rate. In relation to education, the School Leavers Survey from 2005-2009 shows that on average only 29.7% of young people leave school with 5 or more GCSEs, which is very low when compared to NI average (70.1%) and the Belfast NRA average (50.1%). Only 12.2% of these included Maths and English in 2008/09, which is again very low compared to Belfast NRA average (34.7%) and non-NRA averages (37.4%). Likewise, only 17.7% of school leavers in the Inner South area achieved 2 or more A-Levels, which is again low compared to the Belfast NRA average (27.3%) and the NI average (46.1). 11.1% failed to achieve any qualifications, which is again very high when compared to the NI average of 4%. Educational underachievement is therefore one of the top issues facing the Inner South Belfast Neighbourhood Partnership. Anecdotal evidence suggests that people are seeking to move out of the area if their children are able to perform academically to improve ‘life-chances’ which suggests that Neighbourhood Partnership must ensure the Inner South is an area where people want to stay and bring up their children. We have seen that the Page 10 of 48 proportion of the population with degree or other higher qualifications is well above average as a result of students studying at Queen’s University, but it is notable that the close proximity to Queen’s has failed to date to bring any benefit to local educational attainment. Administrative Data Rate Comparisons for Inner South Belfast Inner South Belfast Belfast NRAs ALL NRAs NON-NRAs N.Ireland School Leavers (2005-2009) No Qualifications 11.1 8.7 8.5 3.1 4.0 School Leavers (2005-2009) 5+ GCSE (A-C) 29.7 50.1 52.0 73.5 70.1 School Leavers (2009) 5+ GCSE (A-C) Inc. Eng & Maths 12.2 34.7 37.4 62.3 58.4 School Leavers (2005-2009) 2+ A-Levels 17.7 27.3 29.9 49.3 46.1 KS2 - % Achieving level 4 or above Maths 2009 (School Location) 80 67.1 73.8 84.4 82.5 KS2 - % Achieving level 4 or above English 2009 (School Location) 82.9 63.4 72.2 83.4 81.4 Discussions during the Action Plan development workshop on raising educational attainment highlighted the need for early interventions (i.e. during Primary education rather than Secondary) to bring about the greatest improvements in educational attainment. However, age-weighted pupil subsidies remain far lower for primary schools that the first year of post-primary education. Evidence proves that children who struggle with education can be identified at nursery school age and that if issues are identified early they are easier to address; however Government funding policy does not reflect this. Statistics relating to free school meals are also a good measure of this, as they are closely related to the availability of additional funding for schools. The proportion of pupils entitled to free school meals has fallen from 56.6% in 2004/05 to 49.7% in 2008/09. This is primarily as a result of changes to the qualifying criteria, rather than a fall in the number of pupils requiring additional support. For comparison, the number of pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN) has remained relatively static at around 25% during the same period. There are also additional challenges facing the Inner South area as a result of the higher than average proportions of ethnic minorities in the area. This also has implications for the resourcing of primary education as many new people coming into the community require additional language support to ensure they can achieve their potential. For example, in Botanic Primary there is now a special class for Roma pupils, who often have both educational difficulties and language barriers. It is estimated that the class costs approximately £7,000 per pupil per year, but the School are only able to access an additional £4,000 per pupil. It is generally though that the primary level teaching in the area is very good and that educational outcomes are often affected by external factors, such as resourcing for support services, such as educational psychologist hours, low aspirations in young people and poor parental input. In relation to non-compulsory youth services, the Lower Ormeau is generally thought to have good facilities, including the St. John Vianney Youth Centre and dedicated youth facilities and workers at Shaftesbury Community and Recreation Centre. However, in the Markets and Donegall Pass, youth services Page 11 of 48 are not as good. In the Markets, St. Malachy’s Youth Club has had no permanent home for almost 15years, since the old Youth Centre was condemned but never replaced. Recently, they have operated out of the Council’s Markets Community Centre, but this has limited their capacity due to the size of premises. It is thought that existing youth provision is therefore failing to meet estimated demand for the area. A new dedicated youth facility is due to be constructed on part of St. Malachy’s Primary School grounds and the Neighbourhood Partnership would seek to support this project and help to plan the services to be provided as a result. In Donegall Pass, there are only 6 hours per week of youth work provision, based in the Council’s Community Centre. There are no plans for this to be expanded, despite on-going demand for an improved service. It should also be noted that there are a number of sports clubs that help to address some of this latent demand for youth work, including Albion Star, St. Malachy’s GAC and St. George’s Boxing Club. These groups have grown in number of the last few years, due primarily to improvements in local sports facilities. It is suggested that future development of sports facilities should ensure greater provision for Gaelic sports. Improving Health and Well-Being The ward of Shaftesbury (which includes the Markets and Donegall Pass) falls within the top 10% of wards across Northern Ireland in terms of health deprivation. Furthermore, Shaftesbury is the most deprived ward within the whole of South Belfast (15th in Northern Ireland) in relation to health. The Lower Ormeau area falls within the Botanic ward, which does not as a whole feature in the top 10% of most deprived wards. However, when broken down into smaller areas, the Botanic 5 ‘Super Output Areas’ (SOAs), which relates to much of the Lower Ormeau are included within the formal Inner South Belfast Neighbourhood Renewal Area boundary, features in the top 10% most deprived SOAs in NI relation to Health. So, whilst the wards do not marry exactly with the Inner South Belfast neighbourhood boundaries, they do reveal a number of indicators of health deprivation that are relevant across the Inner South area. For example, the life expectancy from 2005-07 is below 70 for men and below 75 for women in Shaftesbury. In Botanic, the life expectancy is greater than 70 and 75 respectively for men and women, but below the NI average of 76.2 of men and 81.2 for women. Likewise, both wards have higher than average number of incidents of babies with a low birth weight, both have above average rates of teenage pregnancies and both have lower than average rates of dental registrations for 3-5 year olds. Shaftesbury also has a higher than average rate of births to lone parents. Page 12 of 48 The scale of the significant health deprivation is also supported by data collated across the Inner South area. Between 2005 and 2009, the death rate per 1,000 of the population was 7.8 in the Inner South area. In 2009, almost 30% of the 40 deaths in the area were due to cancer, 22.5% were due to circulatory disease and 20.0% were due to respiratory disease. GP data collated from 2010 demonstrates that the most common causes of early death were heart disease, stroke and cancer. A number of contributing factors are recorded as above average within the Inner South area when compared to the Eastern Health and Social Services Board (EHSSB) averages, including obesity, Arterial Fibrillation, Blood Pressure, Coronary Heart Disease, Cardiovascular Disease, and Heart Failure – all of which can contribute to Heart Disease. There are also high incidents of Stroke. Across the Inner South area, 52.5% of deaths from 2004-2008 were to those under the age of 75, with a higher proportion relating to men (5.1%) than women (2.9%). The GP data for the area therefore demonstrates above EHSSB average incidence of lifestyle related issues (such as heart disease) and mental health issues. In addition to the available statistics, a number of pieces of qualitative research has been undertaken to consider health issues in the Inner South area. For example, the Markets Men’s Health Profile in 2006 found that the average age at death was only 59 and that damaging health behaviours were particularly evident, including poor diet, high alcohol consumption and lack of physical activity. Mental health was also highlighted as a major issue. Alongside this, anecdotal evidence suggests there is a much higher proportion of residents who are ‘unhappy’, particularly in the 18-35 age group, but are not classified as having mental health problems and so are difficult for GPs to address. Good quality services are available within the area to improve physical activity, including Shaftesbury Community and Recreation Centre, but facilities and programmes are needed to address emotional well-being. Page 13 of 48 3. Action Plan Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 1. Building Strong, Safe, Attractive and Sustainable Communities 1A Reduction in the number 1. Establish a quarterly Anti-social of incidents of crime and Inner South Community Behaviour and anti-social behaviour Safety Forum to allow Crime: inner south Recorded number of communities to input incidents of crime into statutory and anti-social Community Safety behaviour is high. Partnerships Community Lead Sub Group (SBPB) Statutory Responsibility Timescale BCC (Partner), NIHE PSNI DSD OFMDFM Short Term (March 2012) BCC PBNI DOJ PSNI OFMDFM DSD Medium Term Completion (by March of 2013) NIHE BCC PSNI OFMDFM DOJ Ongoing Resource Implications Annual costs for meetings and refreshments (Programme Budget) *Please note that this should focus on adding value rather than creating a new forum for the sake of creating a forum 2.Develop an Anti-Social Sub Group Behaviour and Crime (SBPB) Strategy across the NRA Costs for development of strategy Annual costs for meetings and refreshments (Programme Budget) 3. The Neighbourhood Partnership will continue to support cross-community structures, including the CRI, GIN, ISLAN, and Belfast Tension Monitoring groups. Sub Group (MDA lead) Page 14 of 48 No additional resource costs other than that associated with Action 3A1 Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Well managed, safe and attractive park and sport facilities Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 4. Ensure local open space and playgrounds are well maintained and managed. BCC Resources should ensure delivery of this action. 5. Improved sports provision across the Inner South area Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group (An Droichead) BCC Short Term (by March 2012) and ongoing No Additional Resources Required Sub Group (LORAG) BCC Sport NI DCAL OFMDFM DHSPSS PHA BELB Medium Term (by March 2013) Initial costs for researching/exploring the potential BCC Sport NI DCAL OFMDFM DHSPSS PHA BELB Medium Term PSNI NIHE BCC Medium Term (by March 2012) Additional costs required across the areas to improve programme provision annually (Programme Budget) 6. Improve sports provision for Gaelic sports across the Inner South Area Reduction in the availability of drugs and alcohol to minors. 7. Work with PSNI to ensure tighter control on the sale of alcohol to minors Sub Group (LORAG) Sub Group Page 15 of 48 Additional costs required for programme budget per annum across area (Programme Budget) Possible capital investment costs to improve facilities No additional resources required. Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Increased enforcement by NIHE and BCC 1B Housing – Rented Accommodation and Hostels: A number of issues have arisen as a result of high concentrations of rented accommodation and hostels. Greater balance in the concentration of nonstandard residential accommodation Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 8. Provide appropriate information and training for businesses and off-licences. 9. Ensure relevant agencies challenge housing tenants responsible for antisocial behaviour and crime in the area (under developing legislation). 1. Address the overconcentration of hostel accommodation in South Belfast. 2. Build a robust evidence base (supported through a Mapping Study) to aid lobbying in relation to the location of future hostel-type accommodation in South Belfast. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group BCC Short Term (by March 2012) No additional resources required providing BCC will deliver the training Sub Group NIHE Housing Ass BCC PSNI PBNI Queens UU NIHE BCC PSNI DHSSPS NIHE BCC PSNI DHSSPS Long Term (By March 2014) No additional resources required Medium Term (By March 2013) Annual costs for meetings and refreshments DPCF SBPB Page 16 of 48 (Programme Budget) Medium Term (By March 2013) Annual costs for data collection and research (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Landlords and hostel management more responsible and accountable 1C Housing – Planning and Development: Waiting lists for social housing are still chronic within the area and a number of potential development sites are available to help meet the recognised need. Housing supply meets the recognised needs in the area. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 3. Develop an appropriate mechanism – such as the agreement of a Landlord’s Charter – to support the work of good landlords. 1. Work with NIHE to ensure that Posnett Street site is developed including the provision of social and private housing. 2. Markets Regenerations Strategy to be adopted and implemented by statutory bodies. 3. Develop a strategy to use long-term vacant properties locally as family-type social housing. Community Lead Sub Group (MDA) Statutory Responsibility Timescale BCC NIHE Housing Associations Medium Term (by March 2013) NIHE BCC DSD OFMDFM Medium term (By March 2013) and then ongoing MDA All statutory agencies Short Term (by March 2012) MDA NIHE Housing Ass BCC DSD OFMDFM Long Term (begin by March 2014) DPCF Page 17 of 48 Resource Implications Annual costs for implementation of resulting initiatives (Programme Budget) No revenue resources are required. Capital Funding / Budget will be required for the development No additional resources required No revenue resources required although capital funding will be required to deliver on the action. Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Improved mechanisms for community input in to planning decisions, including increased consultation by the authorities when locating new accommodation units. Increased engagement with Housing Associations. 1D Connectivity and Infrastructure: Need to build greater connections between the three areas and ensure appropriate infrastructure is in place to meet community needs. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 4. Identify and raise community awareness of forthcoming development plans and planning applications. Community responses will be coordinated. 5. Ensure that Housing Associations are involved in the Neighbourhood Partnership’s thematic sub-groups. Improved access to city’s 1. MDA Physical commercial and Regeneration Ambitions employment centre (inc. Tunnels Project to Gasworks and Lanyon provide a pedestrian place) link to Lanyon Place; A footbridge over the railway to open up access to the River Lagan; and Provision of a path through the Gasworks to better connect the three communities. Vacant land at the Northern Fringes of the Gasworks Community Lead SBPB Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications NIHE DOE BCC Housing Associations Invest NI Short Term (begin by March 2012) Sub Group (SBPB) Housing Associations DSD NIHE Short Term (By March 2012) No additional resources are required MDA All statutory agencies Medium – Long Term (Started by March 2013 and Delivered by end of Action Plan) Costs for planning application and professional services Page 18 of 48 Annual costs required to print and distribute plans accordingly (Programme Budget) (programme budget) Capital budget required for the Tunnels Project and the Footbridge Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome The area plays host to some significant city wide regeneration projects. The Lagan Waterway becomes an integral component of the Inner South Belfast Community Development Infrastructure Implementation of workable parking arrangements in the three areas. Good linkages maintained to the City Centre from South Belfast. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 2. To start and realise the potential of An Droichead’s capital development ambitions; The UTV and DSD sites; Cultural and Social Economy Centre on Ormeau Road 3. The Neighbourhood Partnership develop a community led physical regeneration plan for the Lagan River and Waterway 4. Commencement of at least two pilot residents’ parking schemes in the area. 5. Promote the 2011 Summer Schools Alternative Transport Plans for the area Community Lead An Droichead Sub Group (LORAG) MDA / DPCF Statutory Responsibility All statutory agencies All Statutory Agencies DRD BCC NIHE Timescale Resource Implications Medium – Long Term (Started by March 2013 and Delivered by end of Action Plan) Costs for planning application and professional services Longer Term (process started by March 2014) Costs for planning application and professional services Medium Term (Started by March 2013) Costs for developing and running both pilot projects (programme budget) (programme budget) (Programme Budget) SBPB Page 19 of 48 BCC NIHE DRD DSD FAB Long term (started by March 2014) Costs required for events, venue hire and refreshments (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome 1E Regeneration: Need to ensure that ‘Flagship’ regeneration projects have statutory sector and community support and are delivered across the Inner South area. 1F Community Assets: Need to ensure that community assets are supported and developed to meet community needs. Local environment improved and more attractive, with improved community assets developed to help tackle social needs. Support for existing community assets and BELB/BCC facilities managed/developed by the community. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 1. Secure government revenue and capital funding for key regeneration projects in the Inner South Belfast area. 1. Ensure that existing community facilities and assets are available to the community when they are needed (e.g. after school, during School Holidays, evening and weekends). 2. Belfast City Council to transfer responsibility for management of the Markets and Donegall Pass Community Centres to the local community. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group All statutory agencies and funding organisations Medium / Long Term Overall capital facility forecasts for community led initiatives. Sub Group (LORAG) BCC BELB PHA DE OFMDFM DSD Short Term (by March 2012) Annual support costs MDA / DPCF BCC DSD OFMDFM Long-term (Started by March 2014) Costs required for professional, legal and financial advice and support Page 20 of 48 (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome Community need 3. Ensure that prioritised in all local community use is given community facilities priority over private use of community facilities, such as Community Centres. 2. Economic Development, Worklessness and Skills 2A Adequate and 1. Complete mapping Access to appropriate study on locally Employment: programmes that available training The long –term encourage people to opportunities and unemployed require access employment ensure better cosupport and training opportunities. ordination of those to access services in the locale. employment This should consider opportunities. employment opportunities associated with vacant land / development sites in the area. 2. Re-engage those furthest from the Labour Market in a variety of government and community led training initiatives. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group BCC DSD Medium Term (started by March 2013) No additional resources are required. Sub Group (DPCF lead) BMC DEL DHSSPS Invest NI DE OFMDFM Short Term (completed by March 2012) Costs for mapping study DEL Invest NI DE OFMDFM Already ongoing GEMS Page 21 of 48 Costs for publicity for training opportunities required annually (Programme Budget) Annual running costs Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Meaningful relationships established with local businesses to help identify employment and training opportunities. 2B Training and Young People: There is a need to ensure that adequate training opportunities are Training programmes provided to help improve literacy and numeracy skills. Training opportunities available within the local area. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 3. Support the establishment of and ensure continual engagement with a local Traders’ Association(s) 4. Invite major Employers in the area to participate in the Economic Sub-group and formalise how local people can take advantage of their employment opportunities. 5. Work with local schools to ensure that ‘essential skills’ training is provided for parents. 1. Complete a research exercise on Best Practice Programmes that work specifically with young people that are categorised as being NEET’s Community Lead SBPB Statutory Responsibility Invest NI BCC DEL Timescale Short – Medium Term (By March 2013) Resource Implications An annual facilitation budget required to support the Traders Association (Programme Budget) Sub Group (SBPB Lead) Invest NI DEL BCC Medium Term (started by March 2013) Annual facilitation, refreshment and venue hire costs required (Programme Budget) Sub Group (3 Local Primary Schools) BELB DEL DE Medium Term (started by March 2013) Annual facilitation, tutor refreshment and venue hire costs required (Programme Budget) Sub Group (DPCF lead) Page 22 of 48 DEL Invest NI BCC BELB DE IFI BMC Medium Term (started by March 2013) Costs for one year research and pilot programme (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome available for young people (16-24) who are no longer engaged in education or employment. A regular forum exists to enable businesses in the area to engage with young people looking for employment. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 2. Explore the potential of using schools and other public buildings as venues for community-based training / education – the BCC Leisure ‘Out of Hours Use’ Policy should be considered as precedent. 3. Establish a Bi-Annual Community Employment and Training Week (and Jobs Fair) to enable young people to engage with local businesses and training providers. Community Lead DPCF Sub Group (DPCF) Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications BCC BELB BMC Invest NI DEL DSD Short Term (started by March 2012) Annual facilitation, specialist advice, refreshment and venue hire costs required BCC (Econ Dev) Invest NI DSD OFMDFM BELB DE Already Ongoing BCC DEL Invest NI Already Ongoing (Programme Budget) Annual Budget required for Jobs Fair, Publicity, Venue Hire and Refreshments (Programme Budget) *Please note that this is being done by South West NRP – a Joint approach between both NRA’s should be considered 2C Re-skilling: Over 75% of 45-59 year olds and almost 90% of 60-74 year Pre-employment training opportunities available for older people (50+). 1. Actively support recruitment to appropriate training opportunities for older people (50+). DCPF and GEMS Annual Budget required for Publicity, Community Events, Venue Hire and Refreshments (Programme Budget) Page 23 of 48 Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome olds have no formal qualifications. Traditional barriers to women engaging in employment or training are identified and removed. 2D Enterprise and Social Economy: Support is needed to encourage local business start-ups and the establishment of social economy projects. Programme of activities and advice provided to encourage enterprise and business start-up. Affordable work space and appropriate advice is available to support local enterprise and business. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 2. Explore opportunities to train / re-skill local residents in Childcare to help address childcare inequalities in Inner South Belfast. 3. Ensure adequate provision of affordable childcare spaces and facilities across the Inner South Area. 1. Ongoing promotion, programmes and advice on ‘Starting a Business’ will be provided across the Inner South Area. 2. An audit of the number and type of vacant business premises in Inner South Belfast will be undertaken. 3. Appropriate and affordable business start-up and incubation units will be developed in Inner South Belfast. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group (GEMS and SureStart) DEL BCC Invest NI PHA DE Short Term (started by March 2012) A one off programme budget required to train at least 30 women. Sub Group DEL BCC Invest NI PHA DE Invest NI DEL BCC Medium Term (started by March 2013) Costs for 125 new childcare spaces Ormeau Business Park Ongoing Capital costs of new facilities Annual Promotional and programme budget for local promotion and programmes (Programme Budget) SBPB Sub Group Page 24 of 48 Invest NI BCC VLA Short Term (started by March 2012) Costs for research audit Invest NI BCC DSD IFI DETI NIHE OFMDFM Long term (started by March 2014) Costs for 12,000 sq ft of new incubation units and land acquisition (Programme Budget) (Capital Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Appropriate support provided for Social Economy participants and Community Interest Companies. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 4. Establish a new area wide social enterprise based on models of best practice and success stories from across the UK Community Lead SBPB to lead research process Statutory Responsibility Invest NI BCC OFMDFM Timescale Resource Implications Medium Long Term (started by March 2013) Costs for research on benchmark and models of best practice Sub Group (Ormeau Business Park to lead) Costs for feasibility study and legal business start up costs (Programme Budget) Additional business start up costs will be required when social enterprise has been established. 5. Continue to support Shaftesbury Community and Recreation Centre as a social economy project and its capital development plans to develop a Watersports Centre at the River Lagan. The Promotion of Fishing in the Lagan should be considered as part of this process. 6. Provide support to the Cromac Regeneration Initiative (CRI) to be established as a sustainable social economy project. LORAG All statutory agencies Ongoing An annual social economy support budget would be required to help them grow and expand their business. (Programme Budget) CRI Page 25 of 48 OFMDFM IFI BCC DSD INVEST NI DEL Ongoing Revenue costs (Programme Budget) Capital budget is required to complete project (Capital Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Appropriate support for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) who wish to bid for public sector contracts to deliver services. 2E Economic Development: Work is needed to help support local businesses and to develop the local economy as a means Growth in the tourism economy in Inner South Belfast, particularly relating to the development of the River Lagan. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 7. Support mechanisms, including training will be provided to community organisations, social economy projects and SMEs to ensure they develop the capacity to bid for public service contracts. 8. Lobby for social clauses to be included in public sector contracts to require major contractors to sub-contract locally where possible. 1. Explore best practice examples of river-front development and tourism from other cities in the UK, to help promote the River Lagan as a community and tourism asset. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group Invest NI BCC DEL Medium Term (Started by March 2013) An annual training and promotional budget of required to support this capacity development (Programme Budget) Sub Group Invest NI BCC DEL DFPNI Medium Term (Started by March 2013) No additional resources required. Sub Group (SBPB lead) BCC Waterways Ireland Invest NI DSD DRD DCAL Medium Term (Started by March 2013) No additional resources required Page 26 of 48 (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome to create and sustain employment opportunities. 2F Connectivity: Need to build stronger relationships and gain on-going support from key statutory bodies. Key stakeholders are involved in the Neighbourhood Partnership’s Economic Sub-group and support the delivery of economic renewal actions. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 2. Engage with the Lagan River Forum to discuss potential for development of leisure opportunities in the Inner South area. 3. Engage relevant agencies with a tourism responsibility to ensure better forward planning in relation to tourism initiatives / budget. 1. Ensure that Sub Group is representative of key community and statutory agencies to ensure delivery, accountability and responsibility. Community Lead LORAG Sub Group (SBPB lead) Sub Group (SBPB lead) Page 27 of 48 Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications LRF Waterways Ireland BCC DRD Invest NI DCAL BCC BVCB NI Tourist Board Medium Term (started by March 2013) No additional revenue resources required. Medium Term (started by March 2013) No additional revenue resources required. All relevant statutory agencies Continuous No additional resources required. A capital cost for resulting facilities will be required. Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome 3. Improving Community Relations 3A All people are Cross-community encouraged and enabled Relations: to participate in the Ongoing resourcing community in positive support is required ways, regardless of age, to ensure effective sex, or ethnicity. work between all three communities in the Inner South Belfast area – i.e. Donegall Pass, the Markets and the Lower Ormeau Communities. The community has a forum in which the views of all people and groups of interest are sought and acted upon. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 1. Local community development workers (funded under DSD) will provide support to local community forums and participation structures across the area. *NB Community Lead Sub Group Statutory Responsibility DSD BCC OFMDFM Timescale Ongoing Resource Implications Annual running costs (resource budget from DSD every year) (Core Budget) Every DSD funded post will have a CR content central to their work* 2. Develop an arts Sub Group project to build on the ‘Re-imaging Communities’ programme in examining the history of the three communities and providing positive gateway art installations. 3. Identify alternative Sub Group funding sources for programmes not funded under NR/DSD contracts, including the Social Investment Fund and BCC’s Community Investment Fund. Page 28 of 48 BCC Arts Council OFMDFM Medium Term OFMDFM Short Term Costs for development and running of project (Programme Budget) Costs for meeting space and refreshments (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem 3B Ethnic Minorities: All sectors of the community, including ethnic minorities, need to be fully engaged in the planning and delivery of services in the area Desired Outcome Greater engagement and involvement within local communities of ethnic minority groups located in the Inner South area. New residents / communities moving to area invited to participate in their local community. Positive attitudes towards and perceptions of different cultures and ethnic backgrounds fostered. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 1. Engage local minority ethnic groups and map their local / regional responsibilities to ensure best use of their resources across the NRA 2. A multi-lingual welcome pack will be developed to provide information about the work of the Neighbourhood Partnership and services available in the area. 3. Delivery of an intercultural education programme in local schools particularly for the growing foreign national population 4. Carry out a local educational pilot programme to positively address the growing ethnicity and language barriers within local primary schools. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications SBPB NICEM OFMDFM Short Term No additional resources required LORAG NIHE BCC Short term (March 2012) Costs for design, print and circulation over next 4 years (Programme Budget) 3 Local Primary Schools Sub Group (3 Local Primary Schools) Page 29 of 48 BCC BELB NICEM Medium Term (March 2013) BELB DE Medium Term and Ongoing (March 2013) Annual programme costs (Programme Budget) Annual programme costs (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome 3C Cultural Diversity: The need to foster greater respect and understanding of cultural diversity. 2. Positive examples of cultural diversity celebrated through workshop, events and communications. 3D Legacy of Conflict: There are important underlying issues remaining from the Troubles – both within communities and acrosscommunities – that need to be addressed. Programmes available to ex-offenders, victims and their wider families within all sectors of the community. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 1. Deliver a programme of events, festivals and activities, focussed on intercultural dialogue and cultural awareness across the Inner South Belfast area. 1. Research to be completed on addressing the legacy of conflict across the 3 areas, particularly with ex-combatants and those currently not engaged. 2. A programme focussed on addressing the long term impact of the troubles across the 3 areas will be delivered 3. Trauma counselling and resources will be made available to support individuals affected by the conflict. Community Lead An Droichead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications BCC CRC OFMDFM NIHE Short Term (March 2012) and Ongoing Annual programme costs Sub Group (MDA) Local exprisoners groups DOJ DHSSPS CRC SEUPB BCC OFMDFM PBNI Medium Term (March 2013) Cost for carrying out research Sub Group (MDA) DOJ DHSSPS PSNI CRC SEUPB BCC OFMDFM PBNI DHSSPS BCC NIHE Longer Term (March 2014) Sub Group (LORAG) Page 30 of 48 (Programme budget) (Programme Budget) Annual programme costs (Programme Budget) Medium Term (March 2013) Annual costs required for counselling sessions (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome The Partnership has developed a common space /environment where significant discussions, initiatives and events can be delivered relating to the legacy of the conflict 3E Communication and Image: The work of the Neighbourhood Partnership is not well known by communities within the area and press coverage does not always portray the area in a positive light Communications by the Neighbourhood Partnership well managed to give a positive perception of the area and the work undertaken. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 4.A series of programmes and initiatives will be debated within the sub group relating to the following key areas; Consolidating the Peace Process Bill of Rights Civic Policing Peace Building Summer Intervention Initiatives Historic Centuries Territory and Space 1. A communication policy should be developed for all groups supported through the Neighbourhood Partnership. This should support communication between all 3 areas. 2. Further develop the positive relationship the Partnership (and its member groups) has with local media. Community Lead Sub Group Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications OFMDFM BCC CRC Medium Term (started by March 2013) Annual programme costs SBPB lead and needs to feed into the wider NRA BCC DSD Short Term No additional resources have been identified at this stage, but some costs may be needed if a policy / strategy is to be developed. Sub Group BCC DSD Short Term No additional resources required Page 31 of 48 (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem 3F Relationships and Interaction: The Neighbourhood Partnership needs to develop greater connectivity and stronger relationships within communities, across communities, with the City Centre and the surrounding areas. Desired Outcome Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome Local communities have 3. A quarterly a positive perception of newsletter / e-news will the area and the work of be produced and the Neighbourhood circulated to all Partnership. residents in the Inner South Area 4. An internet presence will be re-established for the Neighbourhood Partnership. Meaningful relationships 1. The Neighbourhood established with local Partnership will stakeholders, statutory establish formal bodies and agencies, relationships and a businesses and memorandum of employers, to enable the understanding with implementation of this statutory agencies and Neighbourhood Renewal local community groups Action Plan. that are delivering across the NRA – Discussions about the establishment of a legally constituted NRP should be undertaken also. Community Lead SBPB Statutory Responsibility BCC NIHE DSD Timescale Resource Implications Medium Term (March 2013) Annual costs required for design, development and circulation (Programme Budget) SBPB BCC DSD Short Term (March 2012) Annual costs required to review and update. (Programme Budget) Wider Neighbourhood Partnership Page 32 of 48 All Statutory Agencies Medium Term (March 2013) No additional resources are required. Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 2. The Neighbourhood Partnership will host meetings with locally elected representatives and councillors every six months 4. Engaging Young People and Raising Educational Attainment 4A An effective Youth 1. The Youth Sub Group Youth Strategy: Strategy for the area in the NRP will be There is a need for a that facilitates a multirecognised as the comprehensive agency approach, Steering / Strategy Youth strategy for including better Group to oversee the the area to map out engagement from development of a coresources available. statutory bodies, to ordinated Youth youth services and Strategy for the area. education. Priorities for Youth and The Integrated Services Programme in West Belfast should be considered as part of the strategy. 4B The education system is 1. Schools will be Primary Education: adapted to meet the actively encouraged to Local Primary needs of inner city attend Neighbourhood Schools require communities, including Partnership Education support and greater the provision of Sub-group meetings. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications SBPB All Statutory Agencies Short Term (by March 2012) No additional resources are required. LORAG BELB DSD DE BCC Youth Council NI Medium Term (established by March 2013) Costs for development of strategy (Programme Budget) Annual programme costs are required (Programme Budget) Sub Group (SBPB) Page 33 of 48 BELB Ongoing but Urgent Action Required from Local Schools No Additional Resources are Required Brief Description of Issue / Problem resources to address the educational needs to inner city communities. Desired Outcome resources in relation to need rather than as a quota based on enrolment. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 2. Lobby key agencies and elected representatives to recognise the importance of early intervention and the need for a policy change to redress balance in funding between Primary Schools compared and Secondary Schools 3. Ensure provision of the following additional resources in local schools: Educational psychologist / counselling hours in Primary Schools; Support with growing migrant population in local schools; Extra resources for those with Special Educational Needs (SENs). Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group (SBPB) DE BELB Longer Term (Started by March 2014) No Additional Resources are Required Local Primary Schools BELB DE Medium Term (started by March 2013) Annual costs required for the 3 local primary schools Page 34 of 48 (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 4. Deliver a coordinated sport and physical education programme in local schools. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications LORAG BELB DE Sport NI BCC Ongoing Annual costs required to deliver the Active Communities Programme locally Sub Group (LORAG) DENI BELB Longer Term (Started by March 2014) Programme Budget to be Agreed when content is agreed. Sub Group (Local Primary Schools) BELB YCNI DENI Longer Term (Started by March 2014) Programme Budget to be Agreed when content is agreed. Sub Group (Local Primary Schools) BELB YCNI DENI OFMDFM Longer Term (Started by March 2014) Costs for one year pilot project (Programme Budget) 4C Informal Education: Need to better align the formal education provided through Schools and the ‘informal’ education provided at home and within communities. Children and young people encouraged to make the most of their educational process. Parents have greater responsibility for their children’s education. Improved relations exist between schools, community based organisations and Government Departments/ Agencies. 1. Develop a coordinated programme between youth providers and local schools to encourage children and young people to engage fully in education. 2. Youth workers will support mainstream educational programmes designed aimed at improving parental involvement in local schooling 3. A community liaison pilot project will be developed between local schools, families, statutory agencies and local community organisations Similar to that of Integrated Services for Children and Young People Project in West Belfast. Page 35 of 48 Brief Description of Issue / Problem 4D Youth Facilities: There is a need to provide youth facilities within the Markets and Donegall Pass and to better support existing provision in the Lower Ormeau. Desired Outcome Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome Reduction in the number 4. Community Sector of young offenders from will be appropriately the Inner South Belfast resourced to work with area. Local Young Offenders and those at risk of offending and also have a more involved role in the delivery of Community Service Orders. Youth services exist to 1. Complete an audit of train and build areas’ existing youth confidence in young resources and people through arts, equipment. A resource sports and cultural strategy will be activities. completed to maximise usage and opportunities for sharing. 2. The Inner South Area will have access to additional pool of Detached Youth Work resources – this should be linked to the local Youth Strategy and Identified Need Across the 3 Geographic Areas. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group (Local Primary Schools) BELB YCNI DENI OFMDFM DOJ PBNI Longer Term (Started by March 2014) Programme Budget to be Agreed when content is agreed. Sub Group (LORAG) All Statutory Agencies Short Term (completed by March 2012) Costs for research and professional services Short Term (Started by March 2012) An annual detached youth work budget will be required across the NRA Sub Group Page 36 of 48 BELB DOJ PBNI PSNI YCNI DE (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome Dedicated youth 3. Continue to support facilities will be the development of developed and improved improved youth in the inner south area. facilities (Watersports Centre and St John Vianney) and human resources in the Lower Ormeau Area 4. Continue to support the development of improved youth facilities (Inclusion Zone and School of Music Site) and human resources in the Donegall Pass Area 5. Continue to support the development of improved youth facilities (St Malachy’s PS Site) and human resources in Markets Area. Community Lead LORAG Statutory Responsibility All statutory agencies Timescale Ongoing Resource Implications Annual revenue costs (Programme Budget) Capital budget required to realise the capital development ambitions of the area (Capital Budget) DPCF All statutory agencies Ongoing Annual revenue costs (Programme Budget) Capital budget required to realise the capital development ambitions of the area (Capital Budget) MDA Page 37 of 48 All statutory agencies Ongoing Annual revenue costs (Programme Budget) A capital budget will be required to realise this facility. (Capital Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem 4E Intervention and Development work: There is a need to better engage young people in the work of the Neighbourhood Partnership. Desired Outcome Support local sports clubs/groups in developing their facilities and in providing youth services. An effective mechanism that enables young people to become actively involved in decision making processes. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 6. A local sports facility strategy will be produced 1. The Local NP will establish a mechanism for placing children and young people at the heart of any decision making that will have a direct impact on their lives Community Lead Sub Group (BCSDN + LOCAL SPORTS CLUBS) Sub Group (LORAG) *NB Likely to be the establishment of a local young people led youth forum* Page 38 of 48 Statutory Responsibility DCAL BCC Sport NI IFI DSD NIHE OFMDFM BCC BELB YCNI DE OFMDFM Timescale Resource Implications Medium Term Strategy to be completed by March 2013 Costs for professional services required to complete strategy Longer Term Facility Development Process to be started by March 2014 Medium Term (completed by March 2013) Capital budget required to realise the capital development ambitions of the area (Programme Budget) (Capital Budget) Annual costs required to facilitate and work with a local Youth Forum. Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome 5. Improving Health and Well-Being 5A Well co-ordinated and Local Health and effective communityWell-being Services: based approaches to Need to secure the improving health and continued provision well-being. of targeted health and well-being services in the Inner South Belfast Area. 5B Local Facilities: Need to ensure the provision of adequate community facilities to enable local delivery of health and advice services. Facilities developed to enable the delivery of local emotional health and well-being services. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 1. A local Health Action Plan will be developed, agreed and delivered throughout the Inner South area. An effective cross sectoral and multi-disciplinary delivery structure will need to be established. The delivery body will meet every 2 months. 2. Community representatives will participate actively in the South Belfast Health and Well-being Forum. 1. Improve local facilities and provide appropriate resources to deliver counselling and therapies within local communities. Community Lead Sub Group (LORAG) Statutory Responsibility PHA BHSCT DHSSPS Timescale Resource Implications Short Term (To be started by March 2012) Annual programme costs required to deliver the Health Action Plan (Programme Budget) SBPB DHSSPS PHA BHSCT DSD On-going No additional resources are required. Sub Group (LORAG) DHSSPS PHA BHSCT DSD BCC NIHE Medium Term (process started by March 2013) Annual revenue costs required to help deliver the services (Programme Budget) Capital budget to support the upgrading of already existing local facilities (Capital Budget) Page 39 of 48 Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome 5C Engagement with Health Professionals: General lack of direct engagement with local GPs and Pharmacists. Stronger linkages built between community sector and statutory health services and providers. 5D Health Advice: Need to provide local advice and information relating to health, well-being and lifestyle choices. Local health advice and services delivered to promote improved ‘Lifestyle Choices’. Effective working relationships established with local community organisations, GPs and Pharmacists. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 1. Community to actively participate in the Primary Care Partnership (PCP) and Local Commissioning Group (LCG). 2. Local Health Workers will support the Integrated Working of local community organisations, GPs and Pharmacists. 1. Build capacity of local community to deliver a range of mentoring and advice services. Community Lead Statutory Responsibility Timescale Resource Implications Sub Group (LORAG) BHSCT PHA DHSSPS Ongoing No additional resources are required Sub Group (LORAG) BHSCT PHA DHSSPS Ongoing No additional resources are required Sub Group (LORAG) PHA BHSCT DHSSPS Medium term (Process started by march 2013) Annual costs required to help deliver the capacity building and subsequent services Sub Group (LORAG) PHA BHSCT DHSSPS Short term (Process completed by march 2012) Costs for research required PHA BHSCT DHSSPS Short term (Process completed by march 2012) Costs for design, collation and print required (Programme Budget) Comprehensive health advice and support provided to young people. 2. Complete a mapping exercise of current resources available to engage young people on Health and Wellbeing issues. 3. Publish a directory of services to signpost parents to relevant health and advice services. Sub Group (LORAG) Page 40 of 48 (Programme Budget) (Programme Budget) Brief Description of Issue / Problem Desired Outcome Men’s Health follow-up work undertaken in the Markets area. 5E Dental Health: Poor dental health and lack of registrations with dental practices, particularly from children and young people. Increased number of dental registrations for children. Recommended Action(s) to Deliver Outcome 4. Design, develop and work in partnership with a range of regional organisations to deliver a sexual health and relationship guidance programme to local teenagers 5. Deliver a coordinated programme of men’s health and wellbeing programmes emanating from the Men’s Health Strategy in the Markets. 1. A coordinated dental health awareness programmes will be delivered in all local primary schools. Community Lead Sub Group (LORAG) Statutory Responsibility PHA BHSCT DHSSPS Timescale Resource Implications Medium term (Process started by march 2013) Annual revenue costs required to help deliver and coordinate the programme (Programme Budget) Sub Group (MDA) Sub Group (LORAG) Page 41 of 48 PHA BHSCT DHSSPS NIHE OFMDFM Medium term (Process started by march 2013) BHSCT PHA DHSSPS BELB DE Medium term (Process started by march 2013) Annual revenue costs required to help deliver and coordinate the programme (Programme Budget) Annual revenue costs required to help deliver and coordinate the programme (Programme Budget) 4. Governance, Accountability and Delivery Following a review of the existing accountability and governance structures, it has been recommended that a new, fit for purpose and streamlined governance process by adopted. A Neighbourhood Area Partnership supported with 5 Sub Groups (Directly linked to the Delivery of an Associated Action Plan) will embed ‘delivery and accountability’ at the heart of the Inner South Neighbourhood Partnership. The majority of the work and decision making would be undertaken at the sub group level on a monthly basis and the Overall Partnership will confirm and ratify decisions taken at the sub group level on a Bi-Monthly basis. The diagram below shows the new delivery structure for the Neighbourhood Partnership. It should also be noted that whilst there is an ‘Improving Community Relations’ Sub Group in place, it was agreed that Community Relations should be a common theme across all of the sub groups; Inner South Neighbourhood Partnership Politicians / Elected Member Information Exchange Group Chairpersons Group (Chair of Partnership + 5 Chairs of Sub Groups) Building Strong, Safe, Attractive and Sustainable Communities Sub Group Economic Development, Worklessness and Skills Sub Group Improving Community Relations Sub Group Engaging Young People and Raising Educational Attainment Sub Group Improving Health and Well-Being Sub Group Governance of Partnership and Sub Groups With the emphasis of this new Neighbourhood Renewal Action Plan being ‘Delivery’, the Neighbourhood Chairperson should devolved decision making authority to the Sub Groups for decisions / actions relating specifically to the relevant thematic area. With efficiency and effectiveness at the heart of this restructuring process, the table below outlines the intended role and function of each group. Page 42 of 48 Group Neighbourhood Partnership Working Groups Membership and Chairperson Frequency of Meeting Level / Type of Decision Full Board Membership (as agreed in Neighbourhood Renewal Terms of Reference) Bi-Monthly Meetings with a view to moving to quarterly meetings around April of 2012 Decisions should be focussed on strategic themes and plans. Members specifically identified to serve on the working groups Monthly (at least 10 meetings per annum) Decisions should be focussed on actions and delivery of the agreed action plan. Chaired by member of the Neighbourhood Partnership (Chair should have specialist subject expertise) Wider partnership issues should be addressed at this audience. Additional Comments Should streamline the decision making process Private Sector Representatives should be considered Will ensure partnership is focussed on achieving actions Local issues specific to Working Group to be addressed Chairperson(s) Group Made up of the 5 chairs of the Working Groups and the overall chairperson of the Neighbourhood Partnership Monthly – but informal Used as a mechanism for sharing information and keeping each Working Group up to date with developments, issues and opportunities for joint up working Will ensure delivery against each of the working groups and identify working groups that may need more support than others Politicians / Elected Member Information Exchange 1 Representative from Each Geographic Area + the Chair of the Partnership will meet with the Elected Members Every Six Months The Elected Members Will be presented with a maximum of 5 Key Actions that are required in the area or across the Neighbourhood Partnership. The focussed request should yield more pro-activity amongst elected members and promote better exchange of information. Page 43 of 48 Role of the Chairperson and Accountability With the delivery and activity of the Inner South Belfast Neighbourhood Partnership shifts to the 5 identified sub groups, the role and responsibility of the Chairperson in each of those groups will be of paramount importance. In a bid to streamline and standardise the reporting mechanisms and focussed delivery of the action plan, a number of delivery templates (monthly agenda, monthly report and minutes of meetings) have been presented in the appendices. These templates will be embedded across all of the sub groups and will support the decision making ability and communication process at the wider Neighbourhood Partnership. Given the importance of the role of sub group chairs, the following responsibilities have been agreed; Responsibility of a Sub Group Chairperson Principles for appointing Sub Group Chairs 1. To set meeting dates 12 months in advance 2. To communicate directly with the Chair of the Overall Partnership about the progress of Sub Group Actions 3. To engage with relevant statutory agencies 4. To hold active sub group members to account on actions only presented and agreed in the current NR Plan 5. To utilise the template agendas, minutes and reports 6. To drive the delivery of the thematic area of work and associated actions 7. As Chair, to act in the best interests of the NRP and the Sub Group, as opposed to the organisation that you represent at the Neighbourhood Partnership 1. It is widely accepted that at least one representative from each of the 3 geographic areas takes on the responsibility of chair in at least 1 of the sub groups 2. The Neighbourhood Partnership is committed to the ‘Equality Agenda’ and will ensure that the Chairs / Election process are completed with Equality in mind. 3. It is widely recognised that the Chair of each Sub Group will be a key driver in ensuring that the action plan is delivered – it is therefore a requirement that the Chair of Each Sub Group should have skills and experience in that field. 4. It has been the experience of the Neighbourhood Renewal that the community sector plays a key role in helping to coordinate and ensure its delivery. It is therefore accepted that the Chair of Each Sub group should come from the community sector. Strategy for Engaging with Statutory Agencies One of the largest criticisms of the wider Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy was that ‘bend to spend’ concept and buy in from Statutory Agencies never really was achieved through the People and Place Strategy. As opposed to just accepting that that may continue to be the case, the Inner South Neighbourhood Partnership have agreed that each Statutory Agency that has been mentioned throughout the action plan will be formally written to and asked to take up their role as members of the Neighbourhood Partnership or as members of a specific sub group. The letter will be accompanied with a list of key actions that they can have a positive impact on. The Neighbourhood Partnership intends to spell out and make clear exactly what support they need from Government Departments and Statutory agencies and detail when they need that support (short term, medium term and long term). This will therefore facilitate budget planning and resource allocations within each of those Departments over the next 4 years. A list of key actions associated with Page 44 of 48 identified statutory agencies has been presented in the appendices. The letter will also ask the senior decision makers within each statutory agency to nominate a key individual to engage with the local Neighbourhood Renewal Partnership and similar requests to have key individuals participating at the Sub Group level. Engagement with Politicians The Neighbourhood Partnership agreed that its engagement with elected members and politicians could be improved dramatically. Given the commitment and daily work schedule of local politicians and elected members, it was widely accepted that it would be futile to expect political representatives to attend every sub group meeting and every Neighbourhood Partnership Meeting. The Inner South Neighbourhood Partnership believes that it is better to have a formal information exchange with the areas elected representatives twice per annum. Dates would be set a year in advance and all of the local councillors elected for the Balmoral and Laganbank wards, as well as MLA’s for South Belfast would be invited. At this meeting the Neighbourhood Partnership will present the elected members with a request for practical support (limited to 5 key actions) and also request an update about future developments in the local authority / regional landscape. Membership of the Neighbourhood Partnership For the avoidance of any doubt, the following statutory organisations / agencies will be requested to attend the wider Neighbourhood Partnership meeting on a bi monthly / quarterly basis. Community sector membership of the Neighbourhood Partnership should be secured through an open, transparent and inclusive election process. The following parameters are recommended for the election of community representatives: Paramaters for Election Process Statutory Agencies / Elected Members 1. Elections to the Neighbourhood Partnership should take place every 3 years 2. Each of the Geographic communities shall have 3 individuals represented on the full Neighbourhood Partnership (9 community reps) 3. The nomination process will be open to all groups / organisations in the area and will be presided by the Chair in usual formal circumstances. 4. Groups will be in a position to seek representation if they are legally constituted and have been in existence for a period not shorter than 6 months 5. Following the election / re-election process of the Neighbourhood Partnership, there will be a reappointment of chairs of each of the sub groups. 1. Belfast City Council 2. NI Housing Executive 3. Dept of Justice (Justice Agency Rep) 4. Dept of Social Development 5. Office of First Minister and Deputy First Minister 6. Belfast Education and Library Board 7. Department of Employment and Learning 8. Belfast Health and Social Care Trust 9. Department of Culture Arts and Leisure Page 45 of 48 Membership of the Sub Groups Given the changing dynamic and needs of each of the Sub Groups, membership may change at any time and a decision can be taken by the Chair of Each Sub Group to accept / request a key agency or representative to join the said Sub Group. At this minute in time (October 2011), the Sub Groups are made up of / should be made up of the following key organisations; Building Strong, Safe, Attractive and Sustainable Communities Sub Group 1. 2. 3. Economic Development, Worklessness and Skills Sub Group An Droichead Donegall Pass Community Forum Belfast City Council Neighbourhood Renewal Team and Estates Department 4. Groundwork NI 5. Clanmil Housing Association 6. Ormeau Business Park 7. South Belfast Partnership Board 8. Lower Ormeau Residents’ Action Group 9. BRO/DSD 10. Markets Development Association 11. NIHE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Donegall Pass Community Forum DEL/BELB Belfast GEMS NI People First North City Training Belfast Met College Gingerbread NI Ormeau Business Park Register of Local Employers An Droichead Barclay Communications South Belfast Partnership Board Markets Development Association Lower Ormeau Residents’ Action Group Belfast City Council Economic Development BRO/DSD Local Business Representatives Bryson Group Engaging Young People and Raising Educational Attainment Sub Group 1. 2. 3. St. John Vianney YC An Droichead Primary Schools – Scoil An Droichead, St. Malachy’s, Botanic 4. Donegall Pass Festival 5. Lower Ormeau Resident’s Action Group 6. Markets Hip-Hop Dance Group 7. St Malachy’s Youth Centre 8. Albion Star Football Club 9. Inner City South Belfast Sure Start 10. Sporting Cromac Albion 11. St Malachy’s GAC Improving Community Relations Sub Group 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Markets Development Association Chinese Welfare Association Donegall Pass Community Forum An Droichead NIHE Belfast City Council Good Relations Department NI Muslim Families Association GEMS NI NI Community Refugees and Asylum Seekers Multicultural Resource Centre South Belfast Partnership Board Lower Ormeau Residents’ Action Group BRO/DSD NIHE South Belfast Roundtable Improving Health Sub Group 1. Lower Ormeau Residents’ Action Group 2. Markets Development Association 3. Donegall Pass Community Forum 4. Local GP’s 5. Local Dentist 6. Primary Schools – St. Malachy’s, Botanic 7. Local Youth Clubs 8. Sports Clubs 9. Local Hostels 10. ‘5’ Area Advice Worker 11. Local Folds 12. Local Commissioning Group 13. Donegall Pass Community Centre Page 46 of 14.48South Belfast Partnership Board 12. Donegall Pass YC 13. Donegall Pass Community Forum 14. Donegall Pass Community Centre 15. Markets Community Centre 16. South Belfast Partnership Board 17. Belfast City Council Youth Engagement Project 18. BELB 15. Belfast Health and Social Care Trust 16. Aware 17. Women’s Forum 18. Engage With Age 19. CODA 20. Opportunity Youth 21. Sure Start 22. Belfast City Council Sports Development Team 23. PHA 24. FASA/EDACT 25. BRO/DSD 26. An Droichead Financial Overview and Delivery To solidify the action planning process and to support the engagement of the Neighbourhood Partnership with their engagement ambitions with key statutory agencies, a draft and approximate budget has been identified as part of the process. Whilst many of the actions relate to the development of capital development projects, specific costs will be identified for each development project in due course. The other key staffing and programme costs will require funding from a range of agencies. There has been no funding confirmed for the delivery of any aspect of this Neighbourhood Action Plan at time of print (October 2011), but it is hopeful that DSD will provide some core funding for key staff over the next 3.5 years. It is widely accepted that these key staff will then be tasked with trying to secure additional financial resources from key statutory agencies, and funding organisations to help deliver on this new, refined and reviewed Neighbourhood Action Plan. Page 47 of 48 5. Summary and Conclusions This action plan has been prepared following extensive consultation and planning the locality. The local community representatives, key statutory agencies and Belfast Regeneration Office were keen to develop a robust plan that met with local priorities and concerns. The NRP were also keen to avoid developing a series of actions that they could not deliver on, an experience that typified many Neighbourhood Renewal Plans across the country in times gone by. The action plan is supported with a core underlying principle of accountability, responsibility and delivery. The development and shifting to a governance structure of 5 sub groups will add to the potential of the area to achieve this action plan and make a change to the residents of the 3 geographic areas. The plan has been refined to identify short, medium and longer term actions and the associated budget and financial resources have been estimated at this stage to allow the decision makers and chairs of the sub groups to begin processing opportunities that will enable them to deliver on their priority actions. The Inner South Belfast Neighbourhood Partnership has identified 95 key actions and estimated that approximately £16.4 million will be required to deliver on the Neighbourhood Renewal Agenda over the next 3.5 years. *It should be noted that this is a rough estimate and that this has not been secured by the partnership or any partners associated with Neighbourhood Renewal – this is an indicative amount and should be considered as a figure that is used for internal planning processes only* Page 48 of 48
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz