Conventional and alternative technologies for the extraction of algal

14
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Conventional and alternative technologies
for the extraction of algal polysaccharides
G. Hernández-Carmona, Instituto Politécnico
Nacional, México, Y. Freile-Pelegrín, CINVESTAV-IPN,
Unidad Mérida, México and E. Hernández-Garibay,
Centro Regional de Investigación Pesquera de Ensenada,
INAPESCA, México
DOI: 10.1533/9780857098689.3.475
Abstract: Alginates, agar and carrageenan are the main commercial
water-extracted polysaccharides sourced from brown and red marine algae. These
phycocolloids exhibit high viscosity, and stabilizing, emulsifying and unique gelling
properties. Agar and carrageenan form thermoreversible gels while alginates form
ionic non-thermoreversible gels; therefore they play an irreplaceable role in foods,
pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. The phycocolloid industry uses seaweeds
from different parts of the world, and phycocolloid production amounts to 86
100 tons annually; equivalent to US$ 1018 million. In this chapter we describe the
conventional processes adopted in most factories for extracting and processing
alginates, agar and carrageenan, and discuss the use of new eco-friendly extraction
processes.
Key words: seaweeds polysaccharides, alginate, agar, carrageenan, phycocolloid
process.
14.1 Introduction
The phycocolloids alginate, agar and carrageenan are the main commercial
polysaccharides derived from seaweeds. These three hydrocolloids are widely
used in the food industry, pharmaceutical industry and in biotechnology,
among other applications, because of their ability to produce highly viscous
solutions and/or gels. As the first phycocolloid used, agar was one of the first
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
476 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
food ingredients approved as GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) by the
FDA (Food and Drug Administration).
The use of phycocolloids in the food industry as functional food products
is largely based on their ability to form gels, and the unique properties of
these gels. Agar and carrageenans produce thermoreversible gels, where agar
melts at a higher temperature than carrageenans. Carrageenans further have
the ability to bind proteins in milk and meat products, while the gels rendered
by alginates are ionic non-thermoreversibles. The main commercial sources
for alginate production are the brown seaweeds Laminaria (Europe and Asia),
Ascophyllum (Europe) and Lessonia (Chile and Peru). For agar, Gracilaria
and Gelidium are the preferred seaweeds, while Kappaphycus, Eucheuma and
Chondrus are used for carrageenans. Agar is the most expensive colloid, at
US$18 per kg, followed by alginates and carrageenan at US$12 per kg and
US$10.5 per kg, respectively. The total volume of phycocolloid production
in 2009 was 86 100 tons; equivalent to US$1018 million. Of this total, carrageenans accounted for 50 000 tons (58%), producing an income of 527 million US$ (52%), alginates accounted for 26 500 tons and agar for 9600 tons,
representing 32% and 17%, respectively, of the total sales. The process of
producing alginate involves pre-treatment of the seaweeds with HCl (pH 4),
extraction of the alginate with Na2CO3 solution (pH 10, 80ºC, 2 h), and dilution and filtration in a vacuum rotary filter. The recovery of the alginates is
then carried out as the insoluble calcium-alginate. Conversion of the insoluble
alginate to soluble is achieved by treating the fiber, first with acid, then with
Na2CO3 to obtain sodium alginate. Quality control for alginates is focused on
particle size distribution, viscosity, pH, ash and calcium content.
For agar, the conventional production process includes pre-treatment,
extraction, filtration, concentration and dehydration. However, depending
on the genus used, there are some differences in the pre-treatment step. For
Gelidium, this stage consists of a corrective treatment with a mild alkaline
solution. This eliminates phycoerythrine and prepares the seaweed for a more
efficient extraction. For Gracilaria, the alkali treatment is performed before
extraction to increase gel strength. However, the effluents produced by this
conventional method constitute a pollution problem. In response to these
problems, the use of ‘green’ technology to produce large quantities of agarophytes as Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture (IMTA) systems, together
with the use of eco-friendly agar extraction methods, are proposed as the key
to the future of the agar industry.
In carrageenans the process is rather more complicated, and largely depends
on the species used. There are two basic processing lines, one for the production of refined carrageenan, in which an extraction at high temperature is
followed by filtration and precipitation with alcohol or potassium chloride
(KCl), and the other is for the production of semi-refined carrageenan, in
which the carrageenan is not actually extracted. In this process, the seaweeds
are generally alkali treated and the gel strength increased by concomitant
desulfation. Some impurities, such as proteins, pigments and minerals are
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 477
eliminated, and the seaweed are then dried and milled. There are some other
mixed procedures available and, as previously mentioned, in order to diminish the environmental impact, the use of eco-friendly extraction techniques
are necessary.
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
14.2 Alginates
Alginate is a structural phycocolloid of brown seaweeds. Alginate has the
ability to form heat stable gels with some divalent metals. It is an ionic polysaccharide comprising salts of two residues: β-D- mannuronic acid (M) and
α-L-guluronic acid (G). These units are randomly distributed in a linear chain,
where they can be arranged as homogeneous blocks MM or GG and alternates as MG. The physical properties of alginates depend on the proportion
of the three types of blocks and are related to the seaweed source. Alginates
with high G have higher gelling properties, whereas those with high M have
higher viscosity. Alginates are obtained by acid pre-treatment, followed by an
alkaline extraction. The extract is clarified by vacuum filtration in order to
remove seaweed particles, and the alginate is recovered from the solution as
insoluble fiber by precipitation with calcium salts. The insoluble calcium alginate is converted to soluble sodium alginate by treating it with acid first, followed by a sodium carbonate–ethanol treatment. The final product is dried,
milled, and sold as powders of different mesh size. Alginates are widely used
in industries to give consistency (viscosity) or to form gels. For example, it is
used in baked foods, textile prints, beer foam stabilizers, welding rods, pill disintegrators, bandages and dental impression material, among many others.
14.2.1 Historical background
Alginate was discovered by Stanford in 1881, but it was not until 1923 that
exploration of its potential really began when Thornley established a briquette
business using alginate as a binder of anthracite dust. In 1927 he moved his
company to San Diego, California, to produce alginate to seal cans. After
some difficulties, the company changed its name to Kelp Products Corp and
in 1929 it was reorganized as Kelco Company. Alginate production then
started on a large scale in San Diego, California. Production in the United
Kingdom was established in the period 1934–1939 and in Norway some years
later, after World War II (McHugh, 1987).
14.2.2 Sources of alginophytes
The main commercial sources and amounts harvested per year (dry tons) up
to 2009, in order of quantity, were: Laminaria spp. (30 500 t from: France,
Ireland, United Kingdom, Norway); Lessonia spp. (27 000 t from Chile
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Alginophytes Agarophytes Carrageenophytes
Phycocolloids production (2009)
ate
Alg
in
C
26500
ate
527
50000
9600
Ton
ga
A
ar
C
318
173
ageenan
arr
Betaphycus gelatinum
Chondrus crispus
Eucheuma denticulatum
Kappaphycus alvarezii
Gigartina
Alg
in
Gelidium
Gracilaria
Pterocladia
ageenan
arr
Ascophyllum
Ecklonia
Durvillaea
Laminaria spp.
Lessonia spp.
Lessonia flavicans
Macrocystis
Ag
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
478 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
r
million USd
Fig. 14.1 Geographical distribution of commercial seaweeds used for phycocolloids
production. Production and cost of phycocolloids in 2009. Data from Bixler and
Porse (2011).
and Peru); Laminaria spp. (20 000 t from China and Japan); Macrocystis
pyrifera (5000 t from USA, Mexico and Chile); Durvillaea antarctica (4500
t from Australia), Lessonia flavicans (4000 t from Chile and Peru), Ecklonia
maxima (2000 t from South Africa); Ascophyllum nodosum (from France,
Iceland, Ireland, United Kingdom) (Fig. 14.1). A drastic reduction in
the harvest of Macrocystis pyrifera has recently occurred. This was originally harvested on the west coast of North America, from the Monterey
Peninsula in central California to the middle West coast of the Peninsula of
Baja California (Mexico). The harvest was reduced from 35 000 t (1999) to
5000 t (2009), after the closure of the International Specialty Products facility in San Diego. Another dramatic case relates to Ascophyllum, production
of which decreased from 13 500 t (1999) to 2000 t (2009), mainly because
its alginate produces low strength gel (low G blocks) whilst the market is
demanding high G alginate (Bixler and Porse, 2011). At present, the main
alginate producers are: China (Bright Moon), Norway (FMC BioPolymer,
previously Kelco and Pronova); France (Cargill, previously Degussa, and
Danisco); Japan (Kimica and Chemifa Food), and Chile (Kimica). Only
China, Japan and Chile are producing propylene glycol alginate (PGA). Total
alginate sales for 2009 were 26 500 t, with a total value of US$318 million
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 479
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
(US$12/kg) (Fig. 14.1). The current price (2012) of sodium alginate
increased to about US$17–19/kg and PGA is US$25–26/kg (Dennis Seisun,
written communication; www.hydrocolloid.com).
14.2.3 Chemistry of alginate
The chemical compounds extracted from seaweeds which facilitate the formation of viscous solutions or gels are polysaccharides named phycocolloids.
The main commercial phycocolloids are alginate from brown seaweeds, and
agar and carrageenan from red seaweeds (McHugh, 1987). Alginates form
part of the cell wall and inter-cellular matrix of all the brown seaweeds. In
the seaweed, the alginate provides the flexibility and the mechanical strength
required by the plant to survive in the sea. In their natural state, alginates are
bonded with all of the salts present in the seawater, particularly Ca2+, Na+,
Mg2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+ ions (Haug, 1964).
Alginate is a linear polysaccharide co-polymer of (1–4)- linked β-Dmannuronic acid (M), and α-L-guluronic acid (G). The two residues are
arranged in an aleatory way within the alginate molecule. Three types of segment or blocks can be distinguished within the alginate: two homopolymeric,
MM and GG, and one heterogeneous or alternating MG. (Haug, 1964; Haug
et al., 1966; Smidsrod and Draget, 1996; Draget et al., 2005; Murillo-Álvarez
and Hernández-Carmona, 2007). Different raw materials feature different M
and G content, and the alginate properties of a particular seaweed are dependent on both the M/G ratio and the block distribution within an alginate
molecule (Haug et al., 1966).
14.2.4 Alginate in food applications and other uses
Alginates are widely used across a number of different industries. They give
consistency and an appropriate appearance to dairy products and canned
foods, help retain moisture, thus improving the texture of baked foods, and
ensure a smooth texture and uniform dewatering in frozen foods. Alginates
are used as ink paste thickeners for textile prints, whilst in the paper industry
they provide a smooth surface with less fluff. More usual applications are as
beer foam stabilizers, and as a material in welding rods. In medicine, alginates
are used as pill disintegrators and for bandages that are absorbed by the body
(and thus do not have to be removed). Alginates are also used as a component of dental impression material (McPeak and Glanz, 1984; Reyes-Tisnado
et al., 2004).
14.2.5 New insights into alginate uses
Alginates are now used to treat gastric ulcers, lower cholesterol levels and
inhibit the granulation of mast cells, which are involved in allergic reactions
(Nagaoka et al., 2000). Alginates find novel applications in the immobilization
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
480 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
of beneficial microorganisms for waste water treatment, and as a plant growth
promoter, (Iwasaki and Matsubara 2000; Yabur et al., 2007). More recent
applications are as proteins carriers (Coppi et al., 2001), metal interchangers (Davis et al., 2004; De Stefano et al., 2005), new textiles (Gorenšek and
Bukošek, 2006), yeast immobilization (Pajic-Lijakovic et al., 2007), micro
beads (Schuldt and Hunkeler, 2007; Mørc 2008), UV ray absorption (TavaresSalgado 2007) and control of ulcerative colitis (Alireza-Razavi et al., 2008).
Indirect uses are also found in the transformation of residuals from the alginate extraction for use as fertilizers, because the bacterium Gracilibacilus
(A7) degrades the alginate to oligosaccharides during the composting process
(Tang et al., 2009). These residues can also be used for bioethanol production,
since they are rich in sugars such as manitol and laminaran, drastically reducing the cost of production (Moen et al., 1997; Horn et al., 2000).
14.3 Conventional alginate extraction methods
The foundation of alginate extraction from seaweeds is the conversion of all
alginate salts into soluble sodium alginate, dissolution of the alginate in water
and the removal of insoluble residues. Following this, a calcium salt is added
to form calcium alginate, which is an insoluble fiber and can be easily removed
from the residual water. The fibers are converted to alginic acid by treatment
with a hydrochloric acid solution. The fibers are then separated and blended
with alcohol and sodium carbonate to convert them to sodium alginate. Other
salts like potassium can be used to obtain potassium alginate. The sodium alginate is pressed, dried and milled (McHugh, 2003) (Fig. 14.2). The extraction
processes used by many authors employ chemical preparations at fixed concentrations (normal or percent), for example sodium carbonate at 1% for the
extraction step (Nishigawa, 1985; Istini and Kusunose, 1994; Calumpong et al.,
1999; Younis et al., 2000; Fenoradosoa et al., 2010). However, it has been found
that it is better to control the process by controlling the pH in the different steps,
to prevent the yield and quality of the alginate being produced.
14.3.1 Reduction of the seaweeds
In order to facilitate the transport of the seaweeds and to speed up the chemical reactions, it is necessary to reduce the size of the raw material. The seaweeds
must contain 83% dried matter (17% moisture), and less than 3% sand. Milling
is usually carried out in a hammer mill, and is generally conducted when the dry
seaweeds arrive at the factory. The milled product must meet the following size
distribution: 100% less than 6 mm; 95% less than 3.3 mm; 2% less than 0.3 mm.
14.3.2 Rehydrating the seaweeds
In order to soften the seaweed tissue and avoid alginate pigmentation, the seaweeds are rehydrated with 0.1% formaldehyde solution (37.5% purity), for 1 to
12 h, depending on the species. The solution reacts with phenolic compounds,
polymerizing and making the coloring substances insoluble. The ratio is one part
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 481
Rehydrating the seaweeds
Acid pre-treatment
HCl, pH 4
Extraction
Na2CO3, pH 10, 80°C
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Dilution and filtration
Precipitation of calcium
alginate
Conversion of calcium
alginate to alginic acid
Pressing and coversion of
alginic acid to sodium
alginate
Drying, milling, and
blending
Sodium alginate
Fig. 14.2
Flow diagram for alginate production.
seaweeds to nine parts water. This proportion should be minimized to the point
that all water is absorbed by the seaweed and no water is left at the end of the
hydration. The increase of alginate yield using formaldehyde treatment has been
previously documented (Hernández-Carmona et al., 1999a; Davis et al., 2004).
14.3.3 Acid pre-extraction
Some authors mention that acid treatment is necessary to convert the alginate salts (Ca2+, Na+, K+, etc.) to insoluble alginic acid. This ionic exchange
is not necessary for most species and the acid washing is useful only for the
removal of external salts and residual formaldehyde. On the contrary, acid
treatment at a pH lower than 4, as recommended by other authors (Haug,
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
482 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
1964; Myklestad, 1968; Hernández-Carmona and Aguirre-Vilchis, 1987),
may produce depolymerization of the alginate and reduce the viscosity
(Hernández-Carmona et al., 1999a). The hydrated seaweeds are placed in a
tank with water, at a ratio of one part dried (starting weight) seaweeds to ten
parts water. This amount of water should be enough to allow free agitation.
Industrial hydrochloric acid (28% purity) is then added until pH 4 is reached
in the solution. The seaweeds are stirred for 15 min at room temperature, and
the residual solution is then drained. For best results, the seaweeds are washed
with water (1:10) for 15 min (McHugh, 1987; Arvizu-Higuera et al., 1995;
Hernández-Carmona et al., 1999a).
14.3.4 Extraction
To extract the alginate from the seaweeds, they are transported to an extraction tank (kettle with steam jacket), and water is added in the proportion
of one part of the initial dried seaweeds to 16.6 of water. This volume may
change depending on the species. For seaweeds that produce low viscosity
alginates (i.e. Sargassum) less water is required (Rodríguez-Montesinos et al.,
2008). The seaweed-water mixture is heated to 80°C, and enough sodium carbonate powder is added to reach pH 10. The amount of water may be adjusted
to obtain a paste that can be mixed, but is still thick enough to produce high
friction between the solution and the seaweeds, to favor the alginate extraction. It is useful to monitor the increase of the ‘process viscosity’ (HernándezCarmona et al., 1999b) with a viscometer, as an indirect measurement of
the reaction progress. The maximum viscosity will determine the maximum
alginate yield to be obtained. A final viscosity value for some species, like
M. pyrifera, would be 3000–4000 mPa·s after two hours. The pH may be
reduced during this process, which should be counteracted by the addition of
more sodium carbonate to maintain pH 10. This step can be used to control
the required viscosity of the alginate. High temperatures and longer processing times will produce alginates with lower viscosity, because of depolymerization of the polymeric chain of the alginate (Truus et al., 2001). At the end
of the extraction, the seaweed must be practically disintegrated (McHugh,
1987; Arvizu-Higuera et al., 1996; Hernández-Carmona et al., 1999b). The
extraction time (2 h) was confirmed for Laminaria digitata (Vauchel et al.,
2008b), and the increase of alginate yield using a temperature of 80°C has
also been demonstrated for the genus Sargassum (Davis et al., 2004).
14.3.5 Dilution and filtration
The paste obtained after the extraction step is pumped into a heated tank
fitted with an agitation device. To allow the filtration process to occur,
water is added to reduce the viscosity to 45 mPa·s (at 75°C). For species like
M. pyrifera, the volume of water needed to reach 45 mPa·s corresponds to
one part of the initial dried seaweeds to 55 parts of water. After the viscosity
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 483
and temperature have been adjusted, the solution is pumped to a rotary
vacuum drum filter (http://www.alarcorp.com/equipment/auto-vac) that
effectively removes solid particles from the sludge, producing dewatered, dry
seaweed residue and a clear alginate solution. The filter consists of a hollow
cloth-covered drum rotating on a hollow shaft, while partially immersed in a
pan. The shaft is connected to a vacuum pump, and the filter is pre-coated by
feeding a suspension of filter aid in water into the pan. The vacuum pulls the
filter aid onto the cloth, building up a layer of filter aid. The alginate solution is then fed into the pan, pulled through the filter aid by the vacuum, and
fed out via the hollow shaft. As the solution is pulled through this layer of
filter aid, the fine solid particles in the solution are deposited on the surface.
A knife blade is arranged to move slowly and automatically on the surface
of the filter aid, shaving off a thin layer as the drum rotates and leaving a
clean surface for rapid filtration (modified from Alar, 1991). Some of the
best filter aids are the diatomaceous earth (Celite 545) and the expanded lava
(perlite), which is more economical (McHugh, 1987; Hernández-Carmona
et al., 1999b).
14.3.6 Calcium alginate precipitation
The clarified alginate solution is pumped from the filter into the precipitation tank. A shower nozzle should be installed at the end of the pipe to
spray-discharge the solution in drops. At the same time, a 10% calcium chloride (CaCl2) solution is added. The total amount of calcium to be added
corresponds to two times the total alginate in solution to be precipitated.
Both solutions are added simultaneously at a synchronized speed, so both
solutions are programmed to finish at the same time. The agitation speed
is important; a speed that is too slow will produce a clot-type precipitation, while a speed that is too fast will produce small fibers, increasing the
difficulty of separating the alginate from the solution. The agitation speed
should be increased as the solution volume in the tank increases. It is therefore necessary to be equipped with a variable speed agitator. The calcium
alginate fibers are left in the tank for 15 minutes to allow the reaction to
proceed. The fibrous calcium alginate can then be recovered by passing the
suspension through a stainless steel screen (McHugh, 1987; HernándezCarmona and Casas-Valdez, 1985; Arvizu-Higuera et al., 1997; McHugh
et al., 2001).
14.3.7 Conversion of calcium alginate to alginic acid
The fibers of calcium alginate are transformed into alginic acid via acid treatment. This step is carried out in three counter-current steps, using three square
tanks with stirrers. The calcium alginate is transported to the first tank, which
contains acid previously used in the second tank. After stirring for 15 min, the
solids are transported to the second tank using an endless screw with mesh at
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
484 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
the bottom. This second tank contains acid previously used in the third tank.
The stirring and transportation are repeated, and the solids are fed to the
third tank which contains new, diluted hydrochloric acid. The pH is adjusted
to 2 in the first tank, and pH 1.8 in the second and the third tanks (McHugh,
1987). If water is not limited, the alginic acid fibers could then be washed
with water for 15 min. The alginic acid must be almost free of calcium ions.
However, if calcium is required in the final product (to increase the viscosity
of the alginate solution), the pH in the tanks should be increased to pH 2, 2
and 1.8, respectively, limiting the ionic exchange. The alginate viscosity of
a 1% solution is measured during quality control testing, before and after
adding a calcium-sequestering agent (sodium hexametaphosphate). Viscosity
will be reduced after adding the salt, but the reduction should not be more
than 40%, so the amount of calcium in the final product should therefore
be limited (Arvizu-Higuera et al., 1997; McHugh et al., 2001; RodríguezMontesinos et al., 2005).
14.3.8 Pressing and conversion of alginic acid to sodium alginate
The alginic acid is pressed to remove excess water using a screw press or
S-press. Materials like alginic acid that tend to pack or are otherwise considered unpressable can be successfully processed using this equipment. The
water is continuously drained from three areas of the press, reducing the
hydraulic load. The screw press is equipped with a separate main drive and
cone motors for independent speed control and retention time in the press.
The alginic acid should contain 25% solids for the next step (modified from
Bepex: http://www.bepex.com/spress.htm)
The alginic acid fibers are placed in a double planetary mixer, and enough
alcohol is added to maintain a 55:45 alcohol:water ratio. For an estimation
of the appropriate alcohol level to be used during neutralization, it is necessary to determine the amount of water remaining in the alginic acid fibers.
This is obtained by subtracting the expected weight of the dry alginate (based
on prior analysis in the laboratory) from the weight of the wet alginic acid.
An additional option is to determine the moisture content of alginic acid.
For example, a sample of pressed alginic acid (wet) with a starting weight of
23 kg contains 2.3 kg of sodium alginate, and is estimated to contain 20.7 L
of water. This accounts for 55% of the content, so the volume of alcohol
needed to obtain a proportion of 45% is found as follows: V = (45 × 20.7) /
55 = 16.9 L. Therefore 16.9 L of alcohol should be added to the fibers.
The next step is to add enough Na2CO3 powder to achieve a pH of 8 in the
fibers. After stirring for 15 minutes the pH is measured; a sample of the fibers
is dissolved in water and the pH is measured in the solution with pH paper.
Alcohol may cause some interference in the pH measurement, and generally
the pH of the alginate in solution will be one point lower than the pH measured in the fibers with alcohol. The approximate amount of Na2CO3 to add
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 485
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
is 0.25 parts per one part of the sodium alginate to be obtained. In this step
the Na2CO3 can be replaced for K2CO3 to obtain potassium alginate. At this
stage, the function of the alcohol is to keep the sodium alginate insoluble
during the conversion process. Because alcohol is expensive, this must subsequently be recovered by distillation to reduce costs. It is estimated that only
2% of alcohol will be lost in the recovery operation.
Sodium alginate can also be obtained without the use of alcohol. To do this,
the alginic acid is directly mixed with sodium carbonate. However, in this case the
fibrous consistency is lost and the product must be passed through an extruder
to obtain pellets. These pellets are subsequently dried and pulverized (McHugh,
1987; Arvizu-Higuera et al., 2002; Hernández-Carmona et al., 2002).
14.3.9 Drying, milling and blending
Drying is carried out on trays in a hot-air oven at 60°C until the alginate
reaches 12% moisture. On a large scale, is better to use a fluidized-bed dryer
with a vibrating screen and hot air blowing up through the screen (McHugh,
1987). Milling is carried out in a turbine mill or fixed hammer mill. Most
alginate products require a particle size lower than 60 mesh (250 microns),
which can be achieved using a 3 mm mesh on the miller. To obtain a smaller
particle size, the fine particles are separated and the coarse particles are milled
with a 0.5 mm mesh size. In some cases a smaller size is required, and a third
milling is then necessary. To separate the alginate by size, a five vibration mesh
system is used with the follow size meshes: 30 (0.594 mm), 60 (0.250 mm), 80
(0.177 mm), 100 (0.149 mm) and 120 (0.125 mm). If the alginate is fluffy, it
is harder to obtain fine alginate particles. Even after a third milling, 16% of
the particles still will not pass through mesh 30 (Hernández-Carmona et al.,
2002). More expensive modern equipment for drying, milling and screening
is available (Fig. 14.2).
14.3.10 Quality control
The alginate obtained is analyzed in the laboratory to determine the viscosity
of the product in 1% solution. The quality of the alginates (in terms of viscosity) varies according to various biological, environmental and processing
factors. Therefore the products obtained may have different viscosities and
should be blended to provide consistent quality. For blending the alginate a
‘V’-type blender can be used. The varied viscosities obtained from different
batches can be combined to produce a specific viscosity: alginates with viscosity of 800 mPa·s can be produced by blending batches from 600 to higher than
1000 mPa·s. Alginates with mPa·s are produced by blending batches from 150
to 600 mPa·s; alginates with 80 mPa·s are obtained by blending batches from
40 to 150 mPa.s and products with 30 mPa·s are prepared by blending batches
from 10 to 80 mPa·s. Generally, the final product is packaged in cardboard
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
486 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
kegs of 22.5 kg with a plastic bag inside. Alginates are analyzed for the following properties:
• Viscosity in 1% of the solution, both before and after the addition of 0.5%
of sodium hexametaphosphate. Viscosity is measured with a viscometer
and the product is classified for sale by its viscosity according to the following ranges (mPa·s): very low (25–35), low (70–100), medium (340–460)
and high (680–920).
• The pH of the alginate solution, which, at 1%, should be 6.1–7.8.
• Particle size distribution. The regular products are sold at particle sizes
between 30 and 60 mesh and the refined between 100 and 150 mesh.
• Moisture, which must be less than 12%.
• Ash, the standard is in the range 18–27%.
• Calcium content, the standard is between 0.3% and 1%.
• Purity, which should be between 96% and 98% (Food Chemical Codex,
1981; Kelco, 1996).
14.3.11 Future trends in alginate extraction
An alternative method proposed for the alkaline extraction step employs a
twin-screw extruder, and is called reactive extrusion. This technique appears
to be more efficient than batch processing in a number of ways: process time
is reduced to a few minutes, water and reactant are reduced, yield may be
increased by 15%, and rheological properties are enhanced. All of these
enhancements are due to the high level of shearing and mixing efficiency with
the reactant. The reduced processing time lowers the level of depolymerization phenomena, thus increasing the alginate quality. This is a continuous
process that makes the alginate extraction interesting from both an economic
and an environmental perspective (Vauchel et al., 2008a, 2008b). Yield is also
increased because of the reduced quantity of seaweed particles in the process
(Vauchel et al., 2009).
14.4 Agar
Agar is a strongly gelling hydrocolloid from marine red algae. Its main structure
is chemically characterized by repetitive units of D-galactose and 3,6-anhydroL-galactose. Substitution with sulfates, methyl ethers, and/or pyruvate ketals
can occur at various sites in the polysaccharide chain. The substitution pattern
of these groups depends on both the algae species and the extraction method
used which can promote desulfation, causing an increase in agar quality. In
Gelidium and Pterocladia, desulfation occurs as a natural internal transformation through an enzymatic process, whereas in Gracilaria it is not converted
in the needed amount during the seaweed’s lifetime. Therefore when agar is
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 487
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
produced at an industrial level, it is necessary to promote desulfation by means
of a chemical method before extracting the agar. The conventional agar production process can be described in key stages of pre-treatment, extraction,
filtration, concentration, and dehydration. In the current industrial practice of
producing agar, large quantities of sodium hydroxide at elevated temperatures
are used for several hours. Agar, being a viscous material, transfers energy
poorly and large thermal gradients can result in sub-optimal conversions and
result in loss of product. In this context, new extraction techniques have been
tested in the last decade to accelerate the reaction based on microwave-assisted
extraction (MAE).The MAE requires less energy and solvent than conventional processes while generating fewer wastes and can be designed as an alternative eco-friendly agar extraction method.
14.4.1 Historical background
Agar is a mixture of polysaccharides that occur in the cell matrix of marine
red algae (Rhodophyta). The biological function of agar is to give a flexible
structure to the seaweeds, helping them stand the varying stresses of currents
and wave motion (Craigie, 1990). Our ability to exploit the ‘inventions’ of
nature for our own benefit has led to the use of agar as a gelling agent in
a large number of food and industrial applications. The Japanese were the
first to accidentally discover the original manufacturing method for extracting and purifying agar in 1658. The documented story described by Armisén
and Galatas (1987) tells that a Japanese officer arrived at a little inn where the
innkeeper, Minoya Tarozaemon, offered him for dinner a traditional seaweed
jelly dish, which had been prepared by cooking Gelidium with water. After
dinner the surplus jelly was thrown outdoors by the innkeeper. The jelly froze
during the night, then thawed and dried in the sun, leaving a dry, white residue.
Tarozaemon found that when this was boiled in water and cooled, it produced
a clearer jelly than was originally produced. This was named ‘kanten’, which
literally translates as ‘frozen sky’. This name describes figuratively the natural
method of freeze-thawing which has been used since its discovery right up to
the present day.
The use of agar in foods was widespread throughout the Far East, including Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea, the Philippines and Indonesia. In fact, the
name agar-agar (nowadays called solely ‘agar’) is Malayan, where agar means
jelly. In the Polynesian languages, the repeated word gives added emphasis;
agar-agar is therefore translated as pure-jelly. Upon its later introduction into
Europe, the Malayan term became attached to the Japanese seaweed extract
(UNDP/FAO, 1990). As the first phycocolloid used (200 years prior to alginates or carrageenans) agar was one of the first food ingredients approved
as GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) by the FDA (Food and Drug
Administration) in 1972. It also passed all other toxicological, teratological
and mutagenic tests (Armisén, 1995). Popular culture associates agar consumption with longevity. In addition, because it consists of around 80%
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
488 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
fiber, this phycocolloid is consumed to serve as an excellent intestinal regulator, playing an important role in the functional food market (Maeda et al.,
2005). Although the processed food industry is still the primary market for
agar, there is an attractive market for the derivative products bacteriological agar and agarose, as microbiological and electrophoresis media respectively. Among the seaweed hydrocolloids agar, carrageenan and alginate, agar
has the higher price, currently estimated at US$18/kg in 2009 (Bixler and
Porse, 2011).
14.4.2 Sources of agarophytes
The world agar industry mainly uses the following genera: Gelidium, harvested from wild beds in Spain, Portugal, Morocco, Japan, Korea, Mexico,
France, USA, China, Chile and South Africa; Gracilaria, the only agar source
that is commercially cultivated at present in Indonesia and Chile and to a far
lesser degree in Malaysia, Thailand and China; and Pterocladia, harvested
from wild beds in the Azores (Portugal) and New Zealand (Fig. 14.1). The
genera Gracilaria and Gelidium are the dominant industrial seaweeds for agar
extraction. Gelidium species were the original materials used in Japan, but
shortages during World War II led to the employment of Gracilaria species,
to counteract the lack of Gelidium. About 9600 tons of agar (valued at US$
173 million) were produced worldwide in 2009 (Fig. 14.1) and Gracilaria has
become the preferred seaweed for the production of food grade agar. This is
due to the success of its cultivation, the increase in its availability and subsequent competitive prices (Bixler and Porse, 2011). The data obtained by the
same authors show an increase of 69% in Gracilaria harvesting for the period
of 1999 to 2009 and a decline of 73.3% of Gelidium in the same period. For
further details see McHugh (2003).
14.4.3 Chemistry of agar and mechanism of gelation
Agar is composed of a heterogeneous mixture of molecules, built on a
disaccharide repeating unit of 3-linked β-D-galactopyranosyl and 4-linked
3,6-anhydro-α-L-galactopyranosyl residue. Substitution with sulfate hemiesters, methyl ethers and/or pyruvate ketals can occur at various sites in the
polysaccharide chain. The pattern of substitution depends on various aspects:
environmental factors, such as hydrodynamic conditions, availability and
quality of light and nutrients; physiological factors such reproductive stage
and nutritional state; and the extraction and isolation conditions of agar.
Agar polysaccharides isolated from Gracilaria are typically more sulfated
than those obtained from Gelidium and Pterocladia, with the pattern of sulfation dominated by the esterification of C-6 of the linked galactose L-unit.
This L-galactose 6-sulfated residue is synthesized in Gracilaria as a biological precursor of the 3,6-anhydro-L-galactose, and is enzymatically converted
to the anhydrous form by sulphohydrolases (Murano, 1995). However, this
enzymatic activity seems to be lower than that which occurs in Gelidium and
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 489
Pterocladia. A higher number of unfinished 6-sulfated molecules are therefore
found in agars from Gracilaria, producing none gelling or weak gel-forming
polysaccharides. Thus, the physical properties of the resulting agar (gel
strength, gelling and melting temperatures) are linked to their chemical structures. The gelling ability of agars from most Gracilaria species can be considerably improved by adopting an alkali treatment before extraction, which
increases the proportion of 3,6-anhydrogalactose. This reaction occurs when
6-sulfated-L-galactose units are present; by heating the polysaccharide in
strong alkaline media, the 3-OH group can be ionized, producing an intramolecular nucleophilic displacement of the sulfate group in position 6. This reaction is highly specific and no other sulfate group is affected (Murano, 1995).
Agar gelation occurs through a helical conformation of agar polysaccharides.
These helices can be aggregated by hydrogen bonds. Consequently, the typical
hysteresis of the thermoreversible order-disorder transition of agar can be
highly perturbed by the presence of charged groups, which can interfere with
intermolecular hydrogen bonding (Lahaye and Rochas, 1991). For further
details on the agar gelation mechanism, see Armisén and Galatas (2000).
One of the most remarkable features of agar gels is their thermoreversibility. Agar melts by heating to a temperature over 85°C, depending on the
algal species, but becomes a gel again upon cooling. The gelling temperature
is affected by the methoxyl groups, which vary depending on the algal species
used (Guiseley, 1970). In particular, the extent of methoxylation of agar polymers from Gracilaria is significantly higher than Gelidium and Pterocladia, and
this difference is reflected in their gelling temperatures, which are in the range
of 40–42°C in Gracilaria species, compared to 34–36°C for Gelidiaceae.
14.4.4 Agar for food applications
Traditionally three grades of agar with different gelling characteristics are
recognized: food-grade, bacteriological agar and agarose (a neutral fraction
of agar which has widespread use today for gel electrophoresis analysis).
Bacteriological agars are usually prepared from Gelidium and Pterocladia,
because agars from Gracilaria have gelling temperature above 40°C. Agarose
is usually obtained from Gelidium, although some preparations of this more
neutral molecule can be produced from certain select Gracilaria species
(Murano, 1995).
Agar is employed as a vegetarian gelatin with high fiber content, and is
also used as a replacement in icings, glazes, processed cheeses and sweets.
The use of agar in food applications is based on its ability to form gels, and
the unique properties of these gels. Agar dissolves in boiling water and, when
cooled, forms a thermoreversible, clear, colorless and odorless gel. In contrast
to gelatin gels that melt around 37°C, agar gels do not melt until heated to
85°C or higher. The large difference between the gelling and melting temperatures (temperature hysteresis) is unusual, and unique to agar. In spite of
agar having a very similar structure to carrageenan, it melts and gels at higher
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
490 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
temperatures, and many of its applications take advantage of this difference.
As an example, agar is found to have specific uses in pastry fillings and glazes,
which can be applied before the pastry is baked without melting in the oven.
The agar consumption for this segment of the market was 6050 tons during 2009 (Bixler and Porse, 2011). The same authors highlight the fact that
although in processed meats carrageenan is the preferred water binder or texturing agent of choice, agar holds on to the gelatin replacement market in
canned meats and aspics, with a market of 150 tons during 2009. The texture
of agar in fruit jellies also helps it compete with kappa-carrageenan jellies,
and the agar texture is preferred in Asia, particularly in Japan, where agar
is a traditional ingredient which has been in use for hundreds of years. In
the modern day it is one of the hydrocolloids that is available in many Asian
grocery stores, and is sold as strips, in square form and more recently in tablet
form. In western countries agar is sold through specialized stores as a ‘natural
food and functional seaweed product’ with a market of 2000 tons in 2009
(Bixler and Porse, 2011).
Though species of Gracilaria generally produce agars with low gelling
capacity or low gel strengths, they are considered the most important source
of commercially valuable agar for the food industry, mainly due to the availability of the biomass due to culturing, and the improved quality that can be
obtained via the use of the alkali treatment. Furthermore, new dimensions in
the application of Gracilaria agars are opening thanks to the discovery of its
sugar-reactive property, an important effect by which an agar may increase
the gel strength after the addition of sucrose (40–60%), increasing its commercial interest (Matsuhashi, 1990). However, since sugar consumption is
directly related to diabetes and obesity, there is an increased interest in sugarfree products. This presents a different set of challenges, as low sugar content
leads to difficulties in gel formation of this kind of agar, with a decrease in
texture, stability and uniformity. However, in response to this, a recent study
demonstrated that by replacing sucrose with inulin-type fructans the strength
of the agar gel may also increase (Kronberga et al., 2011). Since oligosaccharides produce a lower caloric content (around 2 kcal/g) the authors stated
that sugar may be replaced by inulin for those who like to consume agar jelly
(where sugar is used) and have weight problems.
14.4.5 New insights into agar uses and potential markets
About 90% of the agar produced is used in food applications, with the remaining 10% put to bacteriological and biotechnological uses. For further details
on these different uses and the corresponding type of algae required, see
Armisén and Galatas (2000) and Bixler and Porse (2011). Though food applications continue to grow, non-traditional uses of agar are continuously being
tested. In the biomaterials field, agar, either by itself or in blends with other
biopolymers, appears to impart favorable properties to plastic films, improving resistance, clarity and increasing biodegradability (Madera-Santana
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 491
et al., 2009, 2010; Madera-Santana et al., 2011). Nevertheless, agar is more
expensive than starch (commonly used for this application), which limits its
large-scale use. Recently, the development of materials formed with magnetic
particles inside an organic matrix have received great attention due to the
possibility of inducing, by external magnetic fields, controlled changes in temperature and physical properties of the material. In biomedicine, such hybrid
compounds with micro- or nanoparticles can be used as auxiliary elements
for the diagnosis and treatment of diverse diseases. They also exhibit properties that are desirable in the development of smart materials for biodegradable matrices. The application of alternating magnets to the electromagnetic
fields could induce heating of the magnetic particles inside a biocompatible polymeric matrix, and the effects of such magnetic particles in agar are
already being explored with promising results (Hsieh et al., 2010; Chang et al.,
2011).
14.5 Conventional agar extraction methods
The production process of agar can be separated into certain key stages: pretreatment, extraction, filtration, concentration and dehydration (Fig. 14.3).
Details of each stage are given in Matsuhashi (1990, pp. 6–14), McHugh
(2003, pp. 17–21) and Armisén (2000, pp. 23–26).
14.5.1 Pre-treatments
In order to obtain the purest possible extraction, seaweeds are first washed
to remove sand, salts, shells and other foreign matter. There are some differences in the pre-treatment depending on the genus used. For Gelidium, this
stage consists of a corrective treatment with a mild alkaline solution (usually
sodium carbonate) to eliminate the pigment phycoerythrin and to macerate
and prepare the seaweed for a better extraction. For Gracilaria, alkali treatment before extraction is performed to increase gel strength. The seaweeds are
heated at 85–90°C in a sodium hydroxide solution, at concentrations ranging
from 0.5% to 7% NaOH, for 1–2 hours. The concentration of the alkali, as
well as temperature and time, must be adapted to each species of Gracilaria
to obtain as much desulfation as possible while avoiding the yield losses that
this process can cause (Freile-Pelegrin and Robledo, 1997; Freile-Pelegrin and
Murano, 2005). After removal of the alkali, the seaweeds are washed with
water and, occasionally, with very weak acid to neutralize any residual alkali.
14.5.2 Extraction and filtration
Agar extraction necessarily involves cooking the seaweeds in an excess of
water at boiling point. To promote a good extraction, careful addition of
acid to adjust the pH to 6.3–6.5 is generally required. Extraction under pressure reduces processing time and increases the yield of agar. However, whilst
both the pressure method and acid cooking are effective for agar extraction,
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
492 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
both of these conditions are potentially destructive to the extracted agar.
Therefore optimum extraction conditions have to be established for each kind
of seaweed. The agar dissolved in the water must be filtered to remove the
residual seaweed, and the hot filtrate is cooled to form a gel. Depending on
the agar quality sought, the gel may be treated with bleach (usually sodium
hypochlorite) to reduce any color. Following such a treatment, the gel must
be washed to remove the bleach, leaving a gel which contains about 1% agar.
The remaining 99% is water and must be removed from the gel, either by a
freeze-thaw process or by squeezing it out using pressure.
14.5.3 Concentration by freezing-thawing method
The traditional technique adapted by Minoya Tarozaemon based on freezing
and thawing is still in use to a small extent to produce ‘natural agar’ in the
oriental craft industry (Matsuhashi, 1990). This technique begns with careful washing of Gelidium amansii, employing devices similar to those used to
wash tea-leaves. In the past, the adjustment of pH during extraction was conducted with vinegar or sake but now diluted sulfuric acid is more commonly
employed. The liquid extract is filtered while hot through cotton bags, poured
into wooden trays and allowed to gel by cooling. Depending of the volume
of gel, it can be cut into square bars or extruded to produce strips 25–40 cm
long before the natural freeze-thaw process is used to dewater and concentrate
the gel prior to drying. The seaweed extract, which normally contains 1–1.2%
of agar during the process, is concentrated after thawing and straining (normally by centrifugation) to contain 10 to 12% agar – a tenfold increase. The
eluted water carries away oligomers, organic and inorganic salts, and proteins
from the algae, including the phycoerythrins responsible for producing the
red color of the Rhodophyceae family.
14.5.4 Concentration by syneresis method
An alternative method to reduce water content in the gel is based on syneresis. The
agar gel is placed between porous filter cloths and squeezed in a hydraulic press
to remove water. This syneresis technique has spread rapidly all over the world
due to the reduction in energy costs it facilitates. As a comparative example, the
freezing method requires ice production of c.100 tons to produce one ton of agar,
which requires far greater energy than the low energy consumption of the syneresis method. Furthermore, agar purity increases in the syneresis method because a
greater quantity of water and soluble impurities can be removed (Fig. 14.3).
14.5.5 Future trends in agar extraction: eco-friendly agar extraction as an
alternative to conventional methods
Agar extraction is a relatively mature industry in terms of manufacturing
methods and applications. Today, most processors are using press/syneresis technology, although some still favor freezing/thawing technology or a
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 493
Pretreatment
Washed and cleaned algae
Gelidium
Heat with a mild Na2CO3 solution
to eliminate pigments and to
improve water penetration
Gracilaria
Heat with NaOH solution (0.57%) to promote as much
desulfation as possible and wash
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Extraction
Filtration
Gelation
Freezingthawing
BleachingDialysis
BleachingDialysis
Syneresis
Drying
Milling
Agar
Fig. 14.3
Flow diagram for agar production.
mixture of these approaches. While the basic processes may not have changed,
improvements in presses and freezing equipment are being implemented to
improve efficiency and reduce energy requirements (Bixler and Porse, 2011).
However, in the current industrial practice of agar extraction, large quantities
of solvents are still used during bleaching, pre-treatment and during alkaline
modification. These steps must be carefully controlled to avoid the considerable pollution generated by outflows of bleaching agents, alkaline residues
and large quantities of ‘sodium agaropectinates’. Moreover, if an agar for
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
494 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
industrial purposes can be obtained without the need for an alkaline treatment step, it may be more attractive from both an ecological and an economic point of view. This has been made possible for algae cultured through
a special enzymatic process. This process is activated by darkness and salinity
treatments to the biomass before being harvested (Yu and Pedersén, 1990;
Rincones et al., 1993; Freile-Pelegrin et al., 2002). In this context, ‘green’ technologies used to produce biomass, together with eco-friendly agar extraction
methods, have arisen as alternatives to those used conventionally.
Photobleaching extraction process
The chloride gas produced by the bleaching process, which is conducted to
achieve the pure white color of agar, can adversely affect the health of workers (Warburton, 2005). Furthermore, the effluents produced by bleaching
constitute a pollution problem. In response to these problems, a novel agar
photobleaching extraction process has recently been developed and patented
by Jin et al. (2006) and Li et al. (2008). This process exploits the ‘green’ energy
of sunlight and is based on the photochemical degradation of colored organic
matters (CDOM). The authors claim that when solar radiation is absorbed by
the CDOM in surface water, a rich variety of photochemical reactions will
ensue. Such reactions are involved in energy transfer, electron transfer, and
free radical reactions that lead to the cleavage of a variety of photoproducts,
and to a reduction of average molecular mass. Furthermore, the enhanced
mineralization produced helps to reduce dissolved inorganic compounds
(DIC), such as carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and other forms of dissolved organic carbon (DOC).
The CDOM photolysis is accompanied by a reduction in the absorption
coefficients of the dissolved organic matter across the ultraviolet and visible
spectral regions. This reduction in absorbance of light is termed ‘photobleaching’ (Gao and Zepp, 1998, cited in Li et al., 2008). Gracilaria lemaneiformis
and Gracilaria asiatica, growing as aquaculture bioremediation along the
coasts of Liaodong Peninsula, China, were investigated in relation to agar
production using the photobleaching extraction process (Li et al., 2008). The
duration of photobleaching was demonstrated to have a significant impact
on agar gel strength. To explain this response, the authors suggest that ‘agar
with repeating sulfate-connected disaccharides underwent photolysis with the
free radicals during the photobleaching process in water, which improved the
gel strength by decreasing the sulfate content and increasing the 3,6-anhydroL-galactose levels’. The above results indicate that the agar photobleaching
extraction process is a feasible method for Gracilaria species and has good
potential as an application of green technology.
Microwave-assisted extraction
In the last decade, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) has been successfully applied to various fields of analytical chemistry. This technique involves
the use of microwave energy to heat solvents in contact with a sample. The
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 495
algal matrix is highly susceptible to microwave irradiation, owing to the high
natural moisture content. Rapid internal heating of these structures brings
about effective cell rupture, releasing the analytes into the cold solvent
(Mandal et al., 2007). The main advantages of the proposed procedure are
the reduced consumption of solvents (in comparison to solvent consumption
of traditional methods), the lower level of energy required and the reduced
extraction time.
Recently, Sousa et al. (2010) reported the first extraction of an agar using
MAE from Gracilaria vermiculophylla, from an integrated multitrophic aquaculture (IMTA) system. The authors obtained higher yields and reproducibility, as well as higher gel strength, in comparison to conventional extraction
methods. The MAE approach supports sustainable development, as it requires
less energy and solvent than conventional processes, whilst generating fewer
waste products. This research suggests the feasibility of using MAE as a ‘green’
technology for the production of superior quality agar gels.
In the so-called integrated polyculture systems, recently grouped under
the term IMTA systems, the wastes generated during the growth of a species
are ‘recycled’ to become ‘food’ for another, so that different aquatic resources
are interacting positively with each other (Robledo and Freile-Pelegrin,
2011). The implementation of this concept in the context of fish farming is to
improve the utilization of marine resources, increase the profitability of these
activities and ensure the sustainability of aquaculture. In this context seaweeds play a critical role, as they are primary producers capable of converting
dissolved substances that have been excreted by organisms of other trophic
levels into additional crops.
In addition to its biofiltration efficacy, the economic value of the biomass
should be considered when choosing the seaweed species to work with in
IMTA systems. Gracilaria is one of the most cultivated and valuable seaweeds
worldwide. Adopting the IMTA approach with this genus has already produced good examples of significant revenues for the fish aquaculture industry
(Neori et al., 2000; Chopin et al., 2001; Abreu et al., 2011). Green technology
for the large-scale production of important agarophytes as IMTA systems,
together with the use of eco-friendly agar extraction methods, are key to the
future of the agar industry.
14.6 Carrageenan
Carrageenan is a phycocolloid, extracted from different genera of red seaweeds, where this substance plays a structural function. It is a strongly ionic
polysaccharide, composed of galactose with different degree and pattern of
sulfates distributed in the polymeric chain, which impart characteristic solubility properties. Some carrageenans are soluble in cold water, with only viscosifing properties, whereas others are soluble only in hot water and have
the ability to form a thermoreversible gel, with potassium or calcium ions.
It is widely used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. The extraction
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
496 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
process of carrageenans from seaweeds is divided into two process lines based
on the purity of the product obtained. In the first method, it is necessary to
dissolve the polysaccharide in the solution, then it is filtered to remove solid
particles, and the carrageenans are recovered from the solution and impurities
by precipitation with an organic solvent or with potassium salts. In the second
method, the carrageenan is actually not extracted – seaweed is treated usually
with alkaline solution, then soluble impurities are removed, leaving mostly
carrageenan and cellulose, which are dried and milled. Although with this
second process the carrageenan is more impure, it is cheaper, making it more
attractive and favoring the development of new uses. Recently the market for
carrageenans is growing, making it essential to search for new raw materials
and improved technologies with less impact on the environment.
14.6.1 Historical background
Carrageenan is the generic name of a family of natural, water soluble polysaccharides, isolated from several kinds of red seaweeds. Carrageenan, composed of sulfated galactans, have both gel-forming abilities and viscosifying
properties. In addition to forming thermoreversible gels, they are labile at
high temperatures in acidic conditions. Historical use of carrageenan can be
tracked back in Europe, where for about 600 years a substance obtained by
cooking certain red seaweeds has been used as a thickening and stabilizing
agent in foods. In Europe and North America, a kind of flan (blancmange)
was made by cooking red seaweeds as Chondrus crispus or Gigartina stellata
in milk (van de Velde and de Ruiter, 2002). The name ‘carragee’ seems to have
been introduced around 1829, derived from the Irish word, carraigeen, meaning ‘rock moss’ in reference to the seaweed C. crispus or ‘Irish moss’ (Mitchell
and Guiry, 1983). The name carrageenin was first used by Stanford in 1862 to
refer to the gelatinous water extract from C. crispus (Tseng, 1946). Nowadays,
the term ‘carrageenan’has become accepted, in agreement with the use of the
-an suffix, within the polysaccharide nomenclature (Stanley, 1987).
Formerly, the carrageenan process was based on the direct use of
sun-bleached seaweeds. The first procedure for obtaining carrageenan was
developed by Schmidt in the USA in 1844 (Armisén, 2000). Commercial carrageenan production was then initiated in Maine, USA (1937), where C. crispus from Maine and the Maritime Provinces Canada, was used as the main
raw material. It was known that carrageenan was a heterogeneous compound,
made up of galactose and ester sulfate, but very little was understood about
its structure. In 1953, Smith and Cook, using crude carrageenan from C. crispus, were able to separate two fractions based on their solubility in potassium
chloride solution. One fraction precipitated selectively by potassium ions
(Kappa), while the other fraction remained in the solution, as it was nonsensitive to potassium ions (Lambda).
The existence in carrageenans of more than two fractions within a C.
crispus extract was demonstrated by Pernas et al. (1967). They carried out a
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 497
Table 14.1
Carrageenan type
General properties
Kappa
Form strong and rigid gel with potassium salts.
Brittle gels with calcium salts.
Shown syneresis.
Synergy with locust bean gum
Form strong gels with calcium salts.
Elastic and clear gels.
Gel is freeze-thaw stable.
Gels without syneresis.
Non gelling with potassium ions, form high viscosity
solutions.
Soluble in concentrated salt solutions.
Iota
Lambda
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Main commercial carrageenans and their functional properties
Source: Modified from Moirano, 1977.
fractional precipitation with KCl and found not only kappa and lambda fractions, but instead a continuous spectrum of carrageenans, each with different
chemical compositions and properties. Further studies, derived from the red
seaweed Eucheuma spinosum, elucidated a third type of carrageenan; the iotacarrageenan (Rees, 1969). Many carrageenan types have now been described
(mu, kappa, nu, iota, theta and lambda among others), each of them with
specific physicochemical properties, differing in amounts of 3,6-anhydro-Dgalactose, and degree and pattern of sulfation (Painter, 1983; Craigie, 1990).
Despite the wide carrageenan variety found in nature, from a commercial
point of view there are three main commercial carrageenans: kappa, iota
and lambda. They are differentiated by their sensitivity to potassium ions,
and their uses are related to their ability to form viscous solutions or gels
(Table 14.1).
14.6.2 Sources of carrageenophytes
Chondrus crispus, commonly known as ‘Irish moss’, was the original raw
material for carrageenan production. However, as demand increased and new
applications appeared, it was necessary to find a new supply of raw materials.
Since different species produce different types of carrageenan, new seaweed
species were incorporated into carrageenan manufacture (Table 14.2). Thus
the availability of particular seaweed species determines their commercial use
(McHugh, 2003).
It is unusual for one seaweed to be reported as containing a single carrageenan type, as seaweeds generally contain molecules of the hybrid type,
in which repeating units of different carrageenans exist in the same molecule
(i.e. kappa-iota hybrids) (Usov et al., 1980; Usov, 1998; Craigie, 1990; van de
Velde, 2008). In seaweeds which are members of Gigartinaceae, carrageenans of the kappa family (hybrids kappa-iota) are produced by gametophytes,
whereas hybrids of the lambda family (lambda, xi and pi) are produced by
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
498 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Table 14.2
produced
Main seaweeds used in carrageenan production and carrageenan type
Seaweed
Life stage
Carrageenan type
Chondrus crispus1
Gametophyte
Tetrasporic
Gametophyte
Tetrasporic
Gametophyte
Tetrasporic (absent phase)
Gametophyte
Tetrasporic
Gametophyte
Tetrasporic
Kappa/iota (κ/ι)
Lambda (λ)
κ/ι
λ
κ/ι
Chondracanthus
canaliculatus2,3
Mastocarpus stellatus1
Gigartina skottsbergii4
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Sarcothalia crispata5
Furcellaria lumbricalis6
Kappaphycus alvarezii1
Eucheuma denticulatum7
Betaphycus gelatinum8
Hypnea9
κ/ι
λ
κ/ι
Deviant λ
Kappa/beta (κ/β)
Mainly kappa (κ/ι)
Mainly ι
Mainly beta (β)
κ/ι
1
Bellion et al., 1983; 2 Penman and Rees, 1973; 3 McCandless et al., 1983; 4 Matulewicz et al.,
1989; 5 Ayal and Matsuhiro, 1987; 6 Usov and Arkhipova, 1981; 7 Usov and Shashkov, 1985;
8
Greer and Yaphe, 1984; 9 McCandless, 1978, 1981.
tetrasporophytes (McCandless et al., 1973; Craigie, 1990). In contrast, the
genus Eucheuma produces different types of carrageenan depending of the
species, with no differences between life cycles (Craigie, 1990) (Table 14.2).
Nowadays the carrageenan industry uses a wide number of seaweed species; all of these belong to seven Rodophyta families: Gigartinaceae,
Solieraceae, Rhabdoniaceae, Hypnaceae, Phyllophoraceae, Furcellariaceae
and Rhodophyllidaceae (Dawes et al., 1977; Deslandes et al., 1985).
C. crispus continues to be used in the industry, but only in limited quantities. It is mainly harvested from natural stocks in the USA (coast of Maine
and Massachusetts), Canada (Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island) and
France. In the mid 1960s, there was an increased interest in Eucheuma species
from the Philippines and Indonesia, such as Kappaphycus alvarezii (formerly
E. cottonnii) and E. denticulatum (formerly E. spinosum). These were first harvested from natural stocks, but by the early 1970s Eucheuma farming was being
developed in both countries. Cultivation also spread to Tanzania (Zanzibar),
Vietnam and some of the Pacific Islands, such as those of Kiribati. Wild
Betaphycus gelatinum (formerly E. gelatinae) is mainly harvested in China,
Taiwan Province of China and the Philippines, and it is both harvested and
cultivated on Hainan Island (McHugh, 2003) (Fig. 14.1). Several Gigartina
species from natural stocks are harvested in South America, particularly in
Chile, Argentina, Peru and Mexico (Fig. 14.1, Table 14.3).
In the last decade, seaweed production increased by 17%, exceeding
202 000 dried tons per year, and valued at over 70 million USD. Recent data
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 499
Table 14.3 Carrageenan sources and origin of raw materials used in carrageenan
manufacture
Seaweed species
Old name
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Chondrus crispus
Furcellaria spp
Mastocarpus
stellatus
Kappaphycus
alvarezii
Eucheuma
denticulatum
Betaphycus
gelatinum
Gigartina
skottsbergii
Sarcothalia
crispata
Mazzaella
laminaroides
Hypnea
musciformis
Chondracanthus
canaliculatus
Source
Country
Natural stocks
United States, Canada,
France, Spain,
Portugal
Denmark, Russia
Spain, Portugal,
Morocco.
Philippines, Indonesia,
Tanzania, Vietnam,
Kiribati Islands
Natural stocks
Gigartina stellata Natural stocks
Eucheuma
cottonii
Eucheuma
spinosum
Eucheuma
gelatinae
Mostly farming
Mostly farming
Natural stocks
Hainan Island,
Philippines, China
and Taiwan
Chile, Argentina
Iridaea ciliata
Natural stocks
Chile
Iridaea
laminaroides
Natural stocks
Chile
Natural stocks
Brazil
Natural stocks
Mexico
Gigartina
canaliculata
Farming and
Natural stocks
Sources: Stanley, 1987 and McHugh, 2003, 2006.
has shown that K. alvarezii accounts for roughly 80% of the total production.
By 2009, carrageenans had the highest production level among the phycocolloids (50 000 tons). Despite the lower unitary price, carrageenans account
for roughly 50% of phycocolloids sales (Fig. 14.1). The current price of carrageenans (2012) is related, among other characteristics, to the purity of the
product; regular products are about US$6–15/kg. Table 14.3 shows the different carrageenan sources used in carrageenan manufacture (Stanley, 1987;
McHugh, 2003, 2006).
14.6.3 Chemistry of carrageenan
Carrageenan, together with agar and furcellaran (formerly Danish agar),
belong to the family of linear polysaccharides derived from red seaweeds
called sulfated galactans. Instead of some structural particularities, they
are broadly differentiated from each other by their sulfation degree, where
agar yields 3–4% sulfate, furcellaran yields 8 to 19% (actually belonging to
the carrageenan family), and carrageenan more than 20% (Moirano, 1977).
The carrageenan molecule has a repeating structure of alternating 1,3-linked
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
500 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
β-D-galactopyranosyl and 1,4-linked α-D-galactopyranosyl units, where the
3-linked unit can be unsulfated, 2-sulfated or 4-sulfated. The 4-linked unit
can occur as 2-sulfate, 6-sulfate, 2,6-sulfate, 3,6-anhydride or 3,6-anhydride
2-sulfate (Stanley, 1987, Craigie, 1990).
There are many individual carrageenan types, each one named in Greek letters, following the originally proposed nomenclature (Smith and Cook, 1953).
The carrageenans are then grouped into three main families: the Kappa family, including kappa (κ) and iota (ι) carrageenans; the Beta family including
beta (β) and omega (ω), and the Lambda family which include theta (θ) and
pi (π) (Table 14.4). In each of these families there are different related precursor structures. For more information on this classification, see Greer and
Yaphe (1984) and Craigie (1990). Because of the large number of carrageenan
structures defined at present, the carrageenan nomenclature is becoming more
confusing. To reverse this, Knutsen et al. (1994), proposed a more systematic
nomenclature for carrageenan and agars, based on the IUPAC (International
Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) nomenclature. However, for the purpose of this work we will continue using the Greek prefix letters. The different carrageenan structures differ in the 3,6-anhydrogalactose and ester sulfate
contents. Variations in these components influence hydration, gel strength
and texture, melting and setting temperatures, syneresis and synergism. These
differences are controlled and created by seaweed selection, processing and
blending of different extracts (Imeson et al., 1977, 2000).
14.6.4 Carrageenan for food applications
Traditionally, the main applications of carrageenan are in the food industry.
In order to explore why carrageenan is so well suited to these applications, we
will first briefly describe the properties of the main commercial types. In the
fields of food, drugs and cosmetics, these are generally used at concentrations
as low as 0.01 to 1.0% (Hansen, 1987). Kappa and iota carrageenan have
the ability to form gels with potassium and calcium ions. Kappa carrageenan
forms the strongest gel, while gels of iota are more elastic. The binding of cations in carrageenans reduces the effective charge density of the helical chains,
subsequently promoting helix aggregation and the formation of a threedimensional gel structure (Williams, 2009). Kappa reacts with potassium ions
to form strong, rigid gels, while the reaction with calcium ions produces gels
that are brittle (Table 14.1). Kappa gels can be set with as little as 0.5% in
water and 0.2% in milk (Imeson, 2000). Gels with only kappa carrageenan
can suffer syneresis (water bleeding), but this problem can be solved by using
appropriate blends of kappa with iota or lambda carrageenan, which reduce
the rigidity of the gel, improving the water retention ability (Imeson, 2000).
Another way to eliminate the syneresis of kappa gels is by making blends
with different gums, such as locust bean gum or konjac flour. Such gums produce a synergistic effect, improving the elasticity and the gel strength. This,
in turn, allows a reduction in the amount of kappa carrageenan needed to
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 501
maintain the required gel strength, rendering the gels more elastic, clear and
free of syneresis (Williams, 2009). Iota carrageenan has the ability to form
stronger gels with calcium ions than potassium; the iota gels are elastic and
free of syneresis. These iota gels also exhibit thixotropic flow behavior, meaning that the gel can be stirred and will flow like a thick liquid (syrup), before,
in repose again, gradually re-forming back into a gel. The iota carrageenan
has vast uses in frozen desserts, where it gives a smooth, creamier texture to
the final product. Lambda carrageenan is a very soluble polysaccharide in
cold or hot solutions and is soluble with all salts at any concentration, with
low concentrations imparting high viscosity to solutions.
Until the late 1970s, carrageenan use in food products was mainly confined
to milk products, due to the unique ability of carrageenan to interact with the
casein in milk. A very low carrageenan concentration can keep milk solids in
suspension and stabilize them. This prevents whey separation in cheese products and enhances the formation of fine crystals in milk ice cream, producing a
creamier texture in the mouth. Such properties mean these carrageenans have
been used widely in milk product applications, including in cheese production, cocoa suspensions, chocolate milk products and milk gel flans, amongst
others. In this line of applications, kappa and lambda carrageenan obtained
from Gigartinales give excellent results.
Another area that has been positively drawing on carrageenan production
since the early 1980s is the meat industry, where carrageenans are now extensively used, particularly those obtained from Eucheuma species. The great
ability of kappa carrageenan to hold water makes this product very suitable
as a replacement for fat in meat products, where it improves the final texture.
Kappa carrageenans are employed in the production of ham, lean ham and
hamburgers, processed meat, reconstituted seafood and poultry products. To
obtain the optimum results, the carrageenans are commonly blended with
others gums, such as locust bean gum or konjac flour, improving the characteristics of the product and making an important reduction to the amount
of carrageenan needed. As a part of the commercialization of carrageenan,
producers now make gum blends which are appropriately tailored for the specific applications required.
Carrageenans also have important uses in water gel applications, such as
gummy candies, fruit gels, fruit juices and marmalades, for example, as well
as in toothpaste, bakery products and slow release capsules (Imeson, 2000;
Bixler and Porse, 2011).
14.6.5
New insights for carrageenan uses and
potential markets
Following the initial success of commercial carrageenan production for food
product applications, diverse new uses are continuing to emerge across a
range of areas, including water applications, candies, freshener gels, cosmetics and in the meat industry, for example. Nowadays the food uses account
for 90% of commercially produced carrageenan (Bixler and Porse, 2011),
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Kappa carrageenan family
O
-O SO
3
CH2OH
O
O
HO
O
HO
O
HO
O
HO
CH2OH
CH2OH
-O SO
3
CH2OH
O
HO
O
HO
Precursors
HO
O
O
Nù
HO
H 2C
-O SO
3
Mù
HO
H2C
HO
H2C
-O SO
3
Psi
O
-O SO
3
Gamma
O
H2C
-O SO
3
O
O
O
O
SO3-
O
OH
OSO3
OH
Idealized molecular structures of different carrageenan families
Beta carrageenan family
Table 14.4
CH2OH
CH2OH
O
-O SO
3
CH2OH
O
-O SO
3
CH2OH
O
HO
O
HO
HO
O
HO
O
HO
O
HO
O
Iota
O
Kappa
O
Omega
O
Beta
O
O
O
OH
O
OSO3-
O
OH
O
-O SO
3
O
O
O
Idealized terminal structures
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
CH2OH
Xi
O
HO
O
HO
O
-O SO
3
CH2OH
Delta
O
HO
O
-O SO
3
CH2OH
Lambda
O
HO
Source: Modified from Greer and Yaphe, 1984.
Lambda carrageenan family
O
O
O
O
HO
H2COH
HO
H2C
-O SO
3
HO
H2C
-O SO
3
O
O
OSO3-
OSO3-
OSO3-
Alfa
O
HO
O
CH2OH
HO
O
-O SO
3
CH2OH
Theta
O
HO
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
O
O
O
O
OSO3-
O
OSO3-
O
504 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Table 14.5
Carrageenan use (%) by market segment
Market segment/year
Meat
Dairy
Water gels
Toothpaste
Others
1996
1999
2009
31
44
15
8
4
24
29
11
4
5
37
28
17
4
4
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Source: Bixler, 2006 and Bixler and Porse, 2011.
with the dairy and meat industries the main application sectors (Table 14.5).
In the last decade a production increase of 18% (from 42 000 to 50 000 m
tons) was observed in the carrageenan market, mostly reflected in meat and
water gel applications (Bixler, 1996; Bixler and Porse, 2011). It is difficult to
predict how future substantial changes could alter the carrageenan market.
However, emerging economies such as China and Brazil are already having an
important impact on the raw materials; increased use of these raw products is
reflected in the current seaweed and carrageenan prices, in turn affecting the
expansion of the carrageenan market.
Further increases in carrageenan use and new applications can be expected
as understanding of their value as bioactive compounds develops. This bioactivity is associated with the sulfate content, and some novel commercial
products are using it for its antiviral properties. Carraguard™, for example, is
used as a sexual lubricant and microbicide, and it is further suspected that it
may have a protective effect against the human papilloma viruses (HPV), herpes simplex viruses (HSV) and against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Despite the presence in the market of some commercial products, more trials
must be conducted with this kind of application before the full potential in
this area can be assessed.
14.7 Conventional carrageenan extraction methods
Carrageenan is present in some types of red seaweeds as a water soluble anionic
polysaccharide. In the plant, it is mostly found immersed in the cell wall and
cell matrix, functioning as a structural polysaccharide and contributing to the
rigidity and flexibility of the plant (Lobban and Harrison, 1994). In the cell
wall, carrageenans have strong interactions with proteins, pigments, minerals
and others polysaccharides, such as cellulose and hemicelluloses, alongside
various other seaweed components.
In order to use the functional properties of the carrageenans as a product, there are two main lines of processing: a) refined carrageenan, which
involves extraction in aqueous solution, filtration and precipitation and
b) semi-refined carrageenan, where the carrageenan is retained in the seaweed
while other seaweed components are eliminated (Schweiger et al., 1992).
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 505
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
14.7.1
Refined carrageenan
Alcohol process
This is the first commercial process used. The objective is to get the carrageenan free of the other seaweed components, before further separating the
carrageenan from the cell wall materials, solubilizing it in an aqueous solution. Firstly, in order to remove sand, salts, shells and other foreign matter,
the dry seaweeds are washed with running water. The extraction is then carried out with a mild alkaline solution (sodium bicarbonate) at pH 8 to 9,
at a ratio of 1:50 (solid:liquid) which is boiled for two hours. When the carrageenan is in solution, the cellulose and other insoluble material are discarded
via different clarification processes, most commonly by filtration using a filter
aid on a pressure filter (Fig. 14.4).
To recover the carrageenan from the solution, and to reduce the alcohol
needed to produce a precipitate, the clear solution is vacuum evaporated
to approximately a third of the original volume. The precipitation is carried via an organic solvent, commonly isopropyl alcohol (proportion 2:1,
solvent:extract), and the carrageenan is precipitated whilst the water and
soluble impurities remain in solution. This process produces the so-called
‘refined carrageenan’. Already successfully applied to the processing of C.
crispus and different Gigartina species, this methodology can be used to
Dry seaweeds
Alkaline treatment
KOH ≥5% 80°C
Washing
Extraction
Boiling with NaHCO3
pH 8–9
Neutralization
Extraction
Boiling with NaHCO3
pH 8–9
Filtration
Filtration
Concentration
by vacuum evaporation
Concentration
by vacuum evaporation
Alcohol precipitation
ethanol or isopropanol
Drum drying
Purifying
Ethanol: Water
Mixture
Alcohol recovery
by distillation
KCl precipitation
Drying
Crude carrageenan
Dewatering
By freeze-thaw
or pressing
Drying
Milling
Milling
Blending
a Kappa, iota or lambda
Milling
Blending
b Kappa, iota or lambda
Milling
Blending
c
Kappa, iota or lambda
d
Blending
Kappa, carrageenan
Fig. 14.4 Flow chart for refined carrageenan production, where the three left options
(a, b and c) can be used to process any kind of seaweeds (Gigartinales species) while
the KCl (d) option is only for kappa carrageenan-producing species (i.e. Kappaphycus
and gametophytes from Gigartinales).
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
506 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
process any seaweed. Importantly, this means it can be used to produce
any kind of carrageenan (Fig. 14.4c). Until now this methodology is the
only alternative for obtaining the highly soluble lambda carrageenan. The
disadvantage of this method is the high cost involved in the distillation of
large volumes of alcohol and the purchase of the necessary explosion-proof
equipment.
Potassium chloride process
This is a variant of the alcohol process which also involves the carrageenan initially being in a solution. However, the difference is in the precipitation method
used; instead of using alcohol, KCl to 1% (w/v) is added, and a gel is formed by
lowering the temperature on a counter current pipe. Dewatering is achieved via
a freeze-thaw process or by pressing the gel, as in the agar process. While this
process is cheaper than the alcohol-based method, it is exclusive to the production of kappa carrageenan. This is, however, an appropriate methodology for
processing gametophytes of the Gigartinaceae family and such kappa carrageenan-bearing seaweed as Kappaphycus alvarezii and other Eucheuma species
(Fig. 14.4d).
Drum drying process
A third alternative for producing refined carrageenan differs from the other
methods in that the carrageenan is recovered directly from the aqueous solution. Instead of precipitation, the water is removed by evaporation. This can
be accomplished through the use of a steam heated, single or double drum
dryer. The best performance is achieved in a vacuum chamber, which speeds
up the process and prevents excessive thermal breakdown of the carrageenan molecule. The carrageenan is then recovered as flakes which contain
some soluble impurities (Fig. 14.4a). In order to equal the quality produced
by the alcohol precipitation method, these impurities need to be removed,
which can be achieved by solubilization with an alcohol: water mixture
(≥ 60:40). This process is cheaper and uses much less alcohol than the
aforementioned alcohol precipitation method. However, the economy
of the process is similarly influenced by the alcohol recovery efficiency.
This process can be applied to the production of any carrageenan type
(Fig. 14.4b).
14.7.2 Alternative carrageenan extraction methods
After the success in Eucheuma farming in Philippines, further developments
led to the production of E. cottonii flour, which was applied in the manufacture of canned pet food. By the early 1980s, the quality of the flour had
improved to a level that allowed its use in food applications, especially in areas
where clarity was not a requisite, as in the meat industry, for example. The
products used for such applications, known as Semi-refined Carrageenan
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 507
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
(SRC), Philippines Natural Grade (PNG) or Philippines Eucheuma Seaweed
(PES), were subsequently accepted by the FDA in the USA.
14.7.3 Semi-refined carrageenan
In this process the carrageenan is never actually extracted from the seaweed.
Instead, it is retained in the seaweed, but all other components (including
soluble proteins, minerals, pigments and fats) are, as far as possible, eliminated from the seaweed. The process for producing this kind of product
involves obtaining fresh or dried seaweed, such as Kappaphycus alvarezii or
Eucheuma denticulatum, which is then subjected to an alkali treatment with
a hot alkali solution: KOH or Ca(OH)2 at ≥ 5% in seawater at 70–80°C for
over 1 h. After this treatment, some of the sulfate groups are released, and
3,6-anhydro-galactose is formed, improving the gel strength of the product.
The hot alkali and subsequent washing removes residual minerals, proteins
and fats, leaving the carrageenan and some residual cellulose in the seaweeds.
The alkali-treated seaweed is chopped into small pieces, bleached, dried and
milled. Sometimes the dried product is chopped into pieces but not milled,
and is sold as a raw material for the production of refined carrageenan. This
(a)
(b)
Eucheuma species
Gigartina species
Dry
seaweeds
Dry
seaweeds
Alkaline treatment
KOH ≥5% 70–80°C
Alkaline treatment
Ethanol: Water KOH ≥5%
70–80°C
Neutralization
Ethanol washing
Sun drying
Drying
Milling
Milling
Blending
Blending
Semi refined kappa
carrageenan
(alkali treated cottonii)
(ATC)
Semi refined kappa II
carrageenan
Ethanol recovery
by distillation
Fig. 14.5 Flow chart of semi-refined carrageenan production, where the carrageenan
actually is not extracted from the seaweed. Usually the seaweeds are alkali treated in
order to increase the gel strength (a) in alkaline water solution for Eucheuma species
or (b) for Gigartina in alkaline alcohol media; the final product in all cases contains
seaweed particles.
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
508 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
product is called alkali-treated cottonii (ATC), alkali-treated cottonii chips
(ATCC), or even simply cottonii chips (Fig. 14.5a) (McHugh, 2003).
14.7.4 Mixed carrageenan extraction methods
A hybrid process has been developed in which raw materials are treated in
the same manner as in the semi-refined process, retaining carrageenan in the
seaweed, but instead of using the water alkaline solution, the alkali treatment is carried out in an alcohol slurry (Fromholt, 1998). The proportion of
alcohol in the alcohol:water mixture used for the treatment should be high
enough to inhibit carrageenan dissolution. This proportion is usually above
60:40 at 80°C at high alkali concentration (commonly KOH ≥ 5%), which is
usually sufficient to dissolve such impurities as pigments, fats, minerals and
other components. Although this process is more expensive than the semirefined process, the alcohol used can be recovered efficiently (Fig. 14.5b).
The advantage of this process is that it can potentially be used to process
any seaweed.
The other processing line commonly used in carrageenan extraction is
called selective extraction. In this process, the carrageenans are selectively
extracted by inhibiting the solubility of one type of carrageenan and increasing the solubility of others. In mixtures of kappa–lambda species, kappa
carrageenan is kept in the seaweed using an optimum KCl concentration
and low temperature (20–30°C) treatment (Fig. 14.6). This allows the extraction of lambda carrageenan and/or precursors as mu and nu carrageenans
(Stancioff, 1965). Soluble lambda carrageenan and precursors are separated and precipitated with alcohol (Fig. 14.6a), while kappa is processed
as semi-refined via drying and milling (Fig. 14.6b). Alternatively, the kappa
carrageenan can be extracted into a solution by increasing the temperature;
after filtration, it is recovered with alcohol or KCl as refined carrageenan
(Fig. 14.6c). This process can be modified by applying alkali treatment to
raw seaweeds.
14.7.5 Future trends in carrageenan extraction
The development and employment of innovative MAE techniques can have
a favorable effect on process efficiency to reduce the cost of algal polysaccharide extraction. The microwave method allows selective and localized heating
of materials without requiring the application of excessive energy. This technology involves the use of non-refractive materials and clear transport pipes,
which allow the heating process to be successfully achieved (Kluck, 1970).
Another advantage of this methodology is that less heat damage is done to
the carrageenan molecule, as the heat is applied over a shorter period of time
(Scott, 1984) In addition, smaller amounts of water and alkali are needed
for this method, due to the improved efficiency, leading to a reduction in the
environmental impact.
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 509
Seaweeds
Dry
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Water extraction
20°C, KCl
Extraction
Boiling NaHCO3
pH 8–9
Seaweed
residue
Centrifugation
Drying
Liquid
Milling
(b)
Filtration
Filtration
Ethanol
precipitation
≥70%
Ethanol or KCl
precipitation
Drying
Drying
Milling
Milling
(a)
(c)
Lambda
Carrageenan
Kappa Carrageenan
Kappa Carrageenan
Seaweed
residue
14.6 Flow chart of selective carrageenan production, suitable for species like Chondrus
and Gigartina where lambda carrageenan is selectively extracted at low temperature in
the presence of potassium salts (a) keeping the insoluble kappa carrageenan in the
seaweed, then recovering directly from the seaweed residue (b), or by further extraction
and precipitation procedure (c).
14.8 Conclusions
The search for new functional ingredients from natural sources is one of the
most important challenges in food science and technology. It is driven by
a social demand for new functional foods with scientifically demonstrated
health properties. Marine algae are well known natural sources of gums, such
as alginate, agar and carrageenan. Once their usefulness in the food, pharmaceutical and other industries has been well demonstrated, it will be necessary
to overcome the scarcity and poor quality of some raw materials. This may
be achieved through the development on an industrial scale of the so-called
integrated polyculture systems, and improved processing technology for the
production and purification by environment-friendly extraction processes in a
fast, cost-effective and non-aggressive way.
14.9 References
ABREU, MH, PEREIRA, R, YARISH, CH, BUSCHMANN, A
and SOUSA-PINTO, I (2011), ‘IMTA
with Gracilaria vermiculophylla: productivity and nutrient removal performance of
the seaweed in a land-based pilot scale system’, Aquaculture, vol. 312, pp. 77–87.
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
510 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
ALIREZA-RAZAVI, A, KHODADADI, A, BAGHER-ESLAMI, M, ESHRAGHI, S
and MIRSHAFIEY, A
(2008), ‘Therapeutic effect of sodium alginate in experimental chronic ulcerative colitis’, Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–18.
ARMISÉN, R (1995), ‘World-wide use and importance of Gracilaria’, Journal of Applied
Phycology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 231–243.
ARMISÉN, AR (2000), ‘Ficocoloides. Polisacáridos de las algas marinas’, ed., Madrid
(España).
ARMISÉN, R and GALATAS, F (1987), ‘Production, properties and uses of agar’, In: DJ
McHugh (ed), Production and Utilization of Products from Commercial Seaweeds,
FAO Fisheries Technical Papers 288, Rome.
ARMISEN, R and GALATAS, F (2000), ‘Agar’, In: G Phillips and P Williams (eds), Handbook
of Hydrocolloids, Boca Raton, Florida, CRC.
ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL, HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G and RODRÍGUEZ-MONTESINOS, YE (1995),
‘Batch and continuous flow system during the acid pre-extraction stage in the alginate extraction process’, Ciencias Marinas, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 25–37.
ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL, HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G and RODRÍGUEZ-MONTESINOS, YE (1996),
‘Effect of temperature and extraction time on the process to obtain alginate from
Macrocystis pyrifera’, Ciencias Marinas, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 511–521.
ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL, HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G and RODRÍGUEZ-MONTESINOS, YE (1997),
‘Effect of the type of precipitation on the process to obtain sodium alginate: calcium alginate method and alginic acid method’, Ciencias Marinas, vol. 23, no. 2,
pp. 195–207.
ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL, HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G and RODRÍGUEZ-MONTESINOS, YE (2002),
‘Parameters afecting the conversion of alginic acid to sodium alginate’, Ciencias
Marinas, vol. 28, no. 1, pp 27–36.
AYAL, HA and MATSUHIRO, B (1987), ‘Polysaccharides from nuclear phases of Iridaea
ciliata and I. membranacea’, Hidrobiologia, 151/152, pp. 531–534.
BELLION, C, BRIGAND, G, PROME JC, WELTI, D and BOCIEK, S (1983), ‘Identification et caractérisation des précurseurs biologiques des carraghénanes par spectroscopie de
RMN 13C’, Carbohydrate Research, vol. 119, pp. 31–48.
BIXLER, H (1996), ‘Recent developments in manufacturing and marketing carrageenan’,
Hydrobiologia vol. 326, no. 32, pp. 735–37.
BIXLER, HJ and PORSE, H (2011), ‘A decade of change in the seaweed hydrocolloids
industry’, Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 23, pp. 321–335.
CALUMPONG, HP, MAYPA, AP and MAGBANUA, M (1999), ‘Population and alginate yield and
quality assessment of four Sargassum species in Negros Island, central Philippines’,
Hydrobiologia, vol. 398, no. 399, pp. 211–215.
CHANG, PR, YU, J, MA, X and ANDERSON, DP (2011), ‘Polysaccharides as stabilizers for the
synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles’, Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, pp. 640–644.
CHOPIN, T, BUSCHMANN, AH, HALLIN, C, TROELL, M, KAUTSKY, N, NEORI, A, KRAEMER, GP,
ZERTUCHE-GONZALEZ, JA and NEEFUS, C (2001), ‘Integrating seaweeds into marine
aquaculture systems: a key toward sustainability’, Journal of Applied Phycology,
vol. 37, pp. 975–986.
COPPI, G, IANNUCCELLI, V, LEO, E, BERNABEI, MT and CAMERONI, R (2001), ‘ChitosanAlginate microparticles as a protein carrier’, Drug Development and Industrial
Pharmacy, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 393–400.
CRAIGIE, J (1990), ‘Cell wall’, In: KM Cole and RG Sheath (eds), Biology of the Red
Algae, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
DAVIS, TA, RAMIREZ, M, MUCCI, A and LARSEN, B (2004), ‘Extraction, isolation and cadmium binding of alginate from Sargassum spp’, Journal of Applied Phycology, vol.
16, no. 4, pp. 275–284.
DAWES, CJ, STANLEY, NF and STANCIOFF, DJ (1977), ‘Seasonal and reproductive aspects
of plant chemistry and ι-carrageenan from Floridean Eucheuma (Rhodophyta,
Gigartinales)’, Botanica Marina, vol. 20, pp. 137–147.
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 511
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
DE STEFANO, C, GIANGUZZA, A, PIAZZESE, D
and SAMMARTANO, S (2005), ‘Modelling of
proton and metal exchange in the alginate biopolymer’, Analytical and Bioanalytical
Chemistry, vol. 383, no. 4, pp. 587–596.
DESLANDES, E, FLOC´CH JY, BODEAU-BELLION, C, BRAULT, D and BRAUD, JP (1985), ‘Evidence
for ι-carrageenans in Solieria chordialis (Solieriaceae) and Calliblepharis jubata,
Calliblepharis ciliata, Cystoclonium purpureum (Rhodophyllidaceae)’, Botanica
Marina, vol. 28, pp. 317–18.
DRAGET, KI, SMIDSROD, O, and SKJAK-BRAEK, G (2005), ‘Alginates from algae’, In: A
Steinbüchel and SK Rhee (eds), Polysaccharides and Polyamides in the Food Industry:
Properties, Production and Patents I. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
FENORADOSOA, TA, ALI, G, DELATTRE, C, LAROCHE, C, PETIT, E, WADOUACHI, A and
MICHAUD, P (2010), ‘Extraction and characterization of an alginate from the brown
seaweed Sargassum turbinarioides Grunow’, Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 22,
pp. 131–137.
Food Chemicals Codex (1981), Third Edition, Washington, DC, National Academy
Press.
FREILE-PELEGRIN, Y, and MURANO, E (2005), ‘Agars from three species of Gracilaria
(Rhodophyta) from Yucatán Peninsula’, Bioresource Technology, vol. 96,
pp. 295–302.
FREILE-PELEGRIN, Y, and ROBLEDO, D (1997), ‘Influence of alkali treatment on agar
from Gracilaria cornea from Yucatán, Mexico’, Journal of Applied Phycology, vol.
9, pp. 533–539.
FREILE-PELEGRIN, Y, ROBLEDO, D, PEDERSÉN, M, BRUNO, E and RÖNNQVIST, J (2002),‘Effect
of dark and salinity treatment in the yield and quality of agar from Gracilaria cornea (Rhodophyceae)’, Ciencias Marinas, vol. 28, no 3, pp. 289–296.
FROMHOLT, LP (1998), ‘Carrageenan-containing product and a method of producing
same’. US Patent No. 5,777,102.
GAO, HZ and ZEPP, RG (1998), ‘Factors influencing photoreactions of dissolved organic
matter in coastal river of the southern United States’, Environmental Science
Technology, vol. 32, pp. 2940–2946.
GORENŠEK, M and BUKOŠEK, V (2006), ‘Zinc and alginate for multipurpose textiles’, Acta
Chimica Slovenica, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 223–228.
GREER, CW and YAPHE, W (1984), ‘Characterization of hybrid (beta-kappa-gamma) carrageenan from Eucheuma gelatinae J. Agardh (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae) using carrageenases, infrared and 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy’, Botanica
Marina, vol. 27, pp. 473–478.
GUISELEY, KB (1970), ‘The relationship between methoxyl content and gelling temperature of agarose’, Carbohydrate Research, vol. 13, pp. 247–256.
HANSEN, M (1987), E for additives. Thorson Publishing Group. Wellingborough.
HAUG, A (1964). Composition and properties of alginates. Report 30. Norwegian
Institute Seaweed Research, Throndheim, Norway.
HAUG, A, LARSEN, B and SMIDSROD, O (1966), ‘A study of the constitution of alginic acid
by partial acid hydrolysis’, Acta Chemica Scandinavica, vol. 20, pp. 183–190.
HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G and AGUIRRE-VILCHIS, M (1987), ‘Propiedades de intercambio
iónico de Macrocystis pyrifera durante la pre-extracción ácida, para la extracción de
alginatos’, Investigaciones Marinas CICIMAR, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 53–64.
HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G and CASAS-VALDEZ, MM (1985), ‘Precipitación del ácido
algínico y su conversión a alginato de sodio en muestras de Macrocystis pyrifera’,
Investigaciones Marinas. CICIMAR, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–28.
HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G, MCHUGH, DJ, ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL and RODRÍGUEZMONTESINOS, YE (1999a), ‘Pilot plant scale extraction of alginate from Macrocystis
pyrifera. Part 1. The effect of pre-extraction treatments on the yield and quality of
alginate’, Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 10. no. 6, pp. 507–513.
HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G, MCHUGH, DJ, ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL and RODRÍGUEZMONTESINOS, YE (2002), ‘Pilot plant scale extraction of alginates from Macrocystis
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
512 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
pyrifera 4. Conversion of alginic acid to sodium alginate, drying and milling’,
Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 445–451.
HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G, MCHUGH, DJ and LÓPEZ-GUTIÉRREZ, F (1999b), ‘Pilot plant
scale extraction of alginates from Macrocystis pyrifera. 2. Studies on extraction conditions and methods of separating the alkaline-insoluble residue’ Journal of Applied
Phycology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 493–502.
HORN, SJ, AASEN, IM and ØSTGAARD, K (2000), ‘Ethanol production from seaweed extract’,
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 25, pp. 249–254.
HSIEH, S, HUANG, BY, HSIEH, SL, WU, CC, WU, CH, LIN, PY, HUANG, YS and CHANG, CW
(2010), ‘Green fabrication of agar-conjugated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles’,
Nanotechnology, vol. 21, 445601, Epub 2010 Oct 8.
IMESON, AP (2000), ‘Carrageenan’, In GO. Phillips and PA. Williams (eds.), Handbook
of Hydrocolloids, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 87–102.
IMESON, AP, LEDWARD, DA and MITCHELL, JR (1977) ‘On the nature of the interaction
between some anionic polysaccharides and proteins’, Journal of the Science of Food
and Agriculture, vol. 28, pp. 661–667.
ISTINI, SO and KUSUNOSE, M (1994), ‘Methods of analysis of agar, carrageenan and alginates in seaweeds’, Bulletin of Marine Science and Fisheries. Kochi University, vol.
14, pp. 49–55.
IWASAKI, K and MATSUBARA, Y (2000), ‘Purification of alginate oligosaccharides
with root growth-promoting activity toward lettuce’, Bioscience Biotechnology &
Biochemistry, vol. 64, pp. 1067–1070.
JIN, Y, LI, HY, ZHANG, W, CONG, XJ and LIU, YL (2006), ‘Development of an eco-friendly
agar extraction technique from the red seaweed Gracilaria spp’, Chinese patent No.
200610047762.2.
KELCO (1996). ‘Alginate products for scientific water control’, USA pp 1–33.
KLUCK, JH (1970), ‘Microwave apparatus for rapid heating of fluids’, US Patent N.
3535482.
KNUTSEN, SH, MYSLABODSKI, DE, LARSEN, B and USOV, AI (1994), ‘A modified system of
nomenclature for red algal galactans’, Botanica Marina, 37, 163–169.
KRONBERGA, M, KARKLINA, D, MURNIECE, I and KRUMA, Z (2011), ‘Changes of agar-agar
gel properties after replacing sucrose by inulin syrup’, in E Straumite (ed), Proceedings
of 6th Baltic Conference on Food Science and Technology FOODBALT-2011,
‘Innovations for Food Science and Production’, Latvia University of Agriculture,
Jelgava, Latvia.
LAHAYE, M and ROCHAS, C (1991), ‘Chemical structure and physico-chemical properties
of agar’, Hydrobiologia, vol. 221, pp. 137–148.
LI, HY, YU, XJ, JIN, Y, ZHANG, W and LIU, YL (2008), ‘Development of an eco-friendly agar
extraction technique from the red seaweed Gracilaria lemaneiformis’, Bioresource
Technology, vol. 99, pp. 3301–3305.
LOBBAN, CS and PJ HARRISON (1994), Seaweed Ecology and Physiology, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
MADERA-SANTANA, TJ, MISRA, M, DRZAL, LT, ROBLEDO, D and FREILE-PELEGRIN, Y (2009),
‘Preparation and characterization of biodegradable agar/poly (butylene adipaterco-terephatalate) composites’, Polymer Engineering and Science, vol. 49, no. 6,
pp. 1117–1126.
MADERA-SANTANA, T, ROBLEDO, D, AZAMAR, JA, RÍOS-SOBERANIS, CR and FREILE-PELEGRIN,
Y (2010), ‘Preparation and characterization of low density polyethylene agar biocomposites: torque-rheological, mechanical, thermal and morphological properties’, Polymer Engineering and Science, vol. 50, pp. 585–591.
MADERA-SANTANA, T, ROBLEDO, D and FREILE-PELEGRIN, Y (2011), ‘Physicochemical
properties of biodegradable polyvinyl alcohol–agar films from the red algae
Hydropuntia cornea’, Marine Biotechnology, vol. 13, pp. 793–800.
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 513
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
MAEDA, H, YAMAMOTO, R, HIRAO, K and TOCHIKUBO, O
(2005), ‘Effects of agar (kanten)
diet on obese patients with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes’, Diabetes,
Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 40–46.
MANDAL, V, MOHAN, Y and HEMALATHA, S (2007), ‘Microwave assisted extraction: an innovative and promising extraction tool for medicinal plant research’, Pharmacognosy
Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–18.
MATSUHASHI, T (1990), ‘Agar’, In: P Harris (ed.), Food Gels, London, Elsevier Science
Publishers Ltd.
MATULEWICZ, MC, CIANCIA, M, NOSEDA, MD and CEREZO, AS (1989), ‘The carrageenan
systems from tetrasporic and cystocarpic stages of Gigartina skottsbergii’,
Phytochemistry, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2937 2941.
MCCANDLESS, EL (1978), ‘The importance of cell wall constituents in algal taxonomy’,
In: DEG Irvine and JH Price (eds), Modern Approaches to the Taxonomy of Red and
Brown Algae, London Academic Press, pp. 63–85.
MCCANDLESS, EL, CRAIGIE, JS and WALTER, JE (1973), ‘Carrageenans in the gametophytic
and sporophytic stages of Chondrus crispus’, Planta (Berl) 112: 201–212.
MCCANDLESS, EL, WEST, JA and GUIRY, MD (1983), ‘Carrageenan patterns in the
Gigartinaceae’, Biochem System Ecol, vol. 11, pp. 175–182.
MCHUGH, DJ (1987), ‘Production and utilization of products from commercial seaweeds’, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 288. Roma.
MCHUGH, DJ (2003), ‘A guide to the seaweed industry’, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper,
no. 441, Rome.
MCHUGH, DJ (2006), ‘The seaweed industry in the Pacific islands’, ACIAR Working
Paper No. 61.
MCHUGH, DJ, HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G, ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL and RODRÍGUEZ
MONTESINOS, YE (2001), ‘Pilot plant scale extraction of alginates from Macrocystis
pyrifera. 3. Precipitation, bleaching and conversion of calcium alginate to alginic
acid’, Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 89–106.
MCPEAK, RH and GLANZ, D (1984), ‘Harvesting California’s kelp forest’, Oceanus, vol.
27, no. 1, pp. 19–26.
MITCHELL, ME and GUIRY, MD (1983), ‘Carrageen: a local habitation or a name?’, Journal
of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 9, pp. 347–351.
MOEN, E, HORN, S and OSTGAARD, K (1997), ‘Alginate degradation during anaerobic
digestion of Laminaria hyperborea stipes’, Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 9,
pp. 157–166.
MOIRANO, AL (1977), ‘Sulfated seaweed polysaccharides’, In: HD Graham (ed.), Food
Colloids, Westport, CT, AVI Publishing Co., pp. 347–381.
MØRC, ÝA (2008), ‘ Novel Alginate Microcapsules for Cell Therapy’, Ph. D. Thesis,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
MURANO, E (1995), ‘Chemical structure and quality of agars from Gracilaria’, Journal
of Applied Phycology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 245–254.
MURILLO-ÁLVAREZ, JI and HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G (2007), ‘Monomer composition and
sequence of sodium alginate extracted at pilot plant scales from three commercially
important seaweeds from México’, Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 19, no. 5,
pp. 545–548.
MYKLESTAD, S (1968), ‘Ion-exchange of Brown algae. Determination of rate mechanism for calcium hydrogen ion exchange for particles from Laminaria hyperborea
and Laminaria digitata’, Journal of Applied Chemistry, vol. 18, pp. 30–36.
NAGAOKA, M, SHIBATA, H, KIMURA-TAKAGI, I and HASHIMOTO, S (2000), ‘Anti-ulcer effects
and biological activities of polysaccharides from marine algae’, BioFactors, vol. 12,
pp 267–274.
NEORI, A, SHPIGEL, M and BEN-EZRA, D (2000), ‘Sustainable integrated system for culture
of fish, seaweed and abalone’, Aquaculture, vol. 186, pp. 279–291.
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
514 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
NISHIGAWA, K (1985), ‘Extract method of
alginic acid’, In: K Nishigawa and M Chthara
(eds), Research Methods of Algae, pp. 624–626.
PAINTER, TJ (1983), ‘Algal polysaccharides’, In: GO Aspinall (ed.), The Polysaccharides,
vol. 2, New York, Academic Press, pp. 195–285.
PAJIC-LIJAKOVIC, I, PLAVSIC, M, NEDOVIC, V and BUGARSKI, B (2007), ‘Investigation of
Ca-alginate hydrogel rheological behavior in conjunction with immobilized yeast
cell growth dynamics’ Journal of Microencapsulation, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 420–429.
PENMAN, A and REES, DA (1973), ‘Carrageenans-Part IX: Methylation analysis of
galactan sulphates from Furcellaria fastigiata, Gigartina canaliculata, Gigartina
chamissoi, Gigartina atropurpurea, Ahnfeltia durvillaei, Gymnogongrus furcellatus,
Eucheuma cottonii, Eucheuma spinosum, Eucheuma isiforme, Eucheuma uncinatum,
Aghardiella tenera, Pachymenia hymantophora and Gloiopeltis cervicornis, Structure
of ε-carrageenan’, Journal of Chemical Society, Perkin Trans 1, pp. 2182–2187.
PERNAS, AJ, SMIDSRØD, O, LARSEN, B and HAUG, A (1967), ‘Chemical heterogeneity of
Carrageenans as shown by fractional precipitation with potassium chloride’, Acta
Chemica Scandinavica, vol. 21, pp. 98–110.
REES, D (1969), ‘Structure, conformation, and mechanism in the formation of polysaccharide gels and networks’, Adv Carbohyd Chem Biochem, vol. 24, pp. 267–332
REYES-TISNADO, R, LÓPEZ-GUTIÉRREZ, F, HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G, VERNON-CARTER, J
and CASTRO-MOROYOQUI, P (2004), ‘Sodium and potassium alginates extracted from
Macrocystis pyrifera algae for use in dental impression materials’ Ciencias Marinas,
vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 189–199.
RINCONES, RE, YU, S and PEDERSÉN, M (1993), ‘Effect of dark treatment on the starch degradation and the agar quality of cultivated Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta,
Gracilariales) from Venezuela’, Hydrobiologia, vol. 260, no. 261, pp. 633–640.
ROBLEDO, D and FREILE-PELEGRIN, Y (2011), ‘Managing the interactions between plants
and animals in marine multi-trophic aquaculture: integrated shrimp and valuable
low food chain organisms with seaweeds’, In: Z Dubinsky and J Seckbach (eds),
All Flesh is Grass, Plant-Animal Interrelationships Series: Cellular Origin, Life in
Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology, vol. 16, 1st edition, Springer.
RODRÍGUEZ-MONTESINOS, YE, ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL and HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G (2008),
‘Seasonal variation on size and chemical constituents of Sargassum sinicola Setchel
et Gardner from Bahía de La Paz, Baja California Sur, México’, Phycological
Research, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 34–39.
RODRÍGUEZ-MONTESINOS, YE, HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G and ARVIZU-HIGUERA, DL (2005),
‘Aprovechamiento de los líquidos residuales en la etapa de conversión de alginato de
calcio en ácido algínico durante el proceso de producción de alginatos’, Oceánides,
vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–7.
SCHULDT, U and HUNKELER, D (2007), ‘Alginate-cellulose sulphate-oligocation microcapsules: Optimization of mass transport and mechanical properties’, Journal of
Microencapsulation, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–10.
SCHWEIGER, RJ, GUARDADO-PUENTES, J, HERNANDEZ-GARIBAY, E, CALOCA-QUIÑONES, C
and BAUTISTA-ALCANTAR, J (1992), ‘Planta Piloto de Carragenanos’, Reporte interno.
Centro Regional de Investigación Pesquera de Ensenada. INP.
SCOTT, GV (1984), ‘Increasing viscosity of carrageenan-containing composition with
microwave radiation’, US Patent No. 4,478,818.
SMIDSROD, O and DRAGET, KI (1996), ‘Chemistry and physical properties of alginates’,
Carbohydrates in Europe, vol. 14, pp. 6–13.
SMITH, DB AND COOK, WH (1953), ‘Fractionation of carrageenin’, Archives of Biochemistry
and Biophysics, vol. 45, pp. 232–233.
SOUSA, AMM, ALVES, VD, MORAIS, S, DELERUE-MATOS, C and GONÇALVES, MP (2010). ‘Agar
extraction from integrated multitrophic aquacultured Gracilaria vermiculophylla:
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
Technologies for the extraction of algal polysaccharides 515
evaluation of a microwave-assisted process using response surface methodology’,
Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, pp. 3258–3267.
STANCIOFF, DJ (1965), ‘Selective extraction of hydrocolloid fractions from sea plants’,
US Patent No. 3176003.
STANLEY, N (1987), ‘Production, properties and uses of carrageenan’, In: DJ McHugh
(ed.), Production and Utilization of Products from Commercial Seaweeds, FAO
Fisheries Technical Papers 288, Rome.FAO, pp. 116–146.
TANG, JC, TANIGUCHI, H, CHU, H, ZHOU, Q and NAGATA, S (2009), ‘Isolation and characterization of alginate degrading bacteria for disposal of seaweeds waste’, Letters in
Applied Microbiology, vol. 48, pp. 38–43.
TAVARES-SALGADO, L, TOMAZETTO, R, PAES-CINELLI, L, FARINA, M and MENEZES-AMADOFILHO, G (2007), ‘The influence of brown algae alginates on phenolic compounds
capability of ultraviolet radiation absorption in vitro’, Brazilian Journal of
Oceanography, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 145–154.
TRUUS, K, VAHER, M and TAURE, I (2001), ‘Algal biomass from Fucus vesiculosus
(Phaeophyta): investigation of the mineral and alginate components’, Proceedings
of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 95–103.
TSENG, CK (1946), ‘Phycocolloids: useful seaweed polysaccharides’, In: J Alexander
(ed.) Colloid Chemistry: Theoretical and Applied, Vol. 6, New York, Reinhold,
pp. 629–734.
UNDP/FAO (1990), ‘Training manual on Gracilaria culture and seaweed processing in
China’, Training Manual 6. Regional sea- farming development and demonstration
project (RAS/90/002)-UNDP/FAO, People’s Republic of China, China.
USOV, AI (1998), ‘Structural analysis of red seaweed galactans of agar and carrageenan
groups’, Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 12, pp. 301–308.
USOV, AI and ARKHIPOVA, VS (1981), ‘Polysaccharides of algae. XXX. Methylation
of κ-carrageenan type polysaccharides of the red seaweeds Tichocarpus crinitus
(Gmel.) Rupr., Furcellaria fastigiata (Huds.) Lam. and Phyllophora nervosa (De
Cand.) Grev’, – Bioorganicheskaya Khimiya, vol. 7, pp. 385–390.
USOV, AI and SHASHKOV, AS (1985), ‘Polysaccharides of algae. XXXIV: Detection of
iota-carrageenan in Phyllophora brodiaei (Turn.) J. Ag. (Rhodophyta) using 13
C-NMR spectroscopy’, Botanica Marina, vol. 28, pp. 367–373.
USOV, AI, YAROTSKY, SV and SHASHKOV, A (1980), ‘13 C NMR spectroscopy of red algal
galactans’, Biopolymers, vol. 19, pp. 977–990.
VAN DE VELDE, F (2008), ‘Structure and function of hybrid carrageenans’, Food
Hydrocolloids, vol. 22, pp. 727–734.
VAN DE VELDE, F and DE RUITER, GA (2002), ‘Carrageenan’, In: EJ Vandamme, SD Baets,
A Steinbèuchel (eds), Biopolymers V 6 Polysaccharides II. Polysaccharides from
Eukaryotes. Wiley, Weinheim, pp. 245–274.
VAUCHEL, P, ARHALIASS, A, LEGRAND, J, KAAS, R and BARON, R (2008a), ‘Decrease in
dynamic viscosity and average molecular weight of alginate from Laminaria digitata
during alkaline extraction’, Journal of Phycology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 515–517.
VAUCHEL, P, KAAS, R, ARHALIASS, A, BARON, R and LEGRAND J (2008b) ‘A new process
for extracting alginates from Laminaria digitata: Reactive extrusion’, Food and
Bioprocess Technology vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 297–300.
VAUCHEL, P, LEROUX, K, KAAS, R, ARHALIASS, A, BARON, R AND LEGRAND, J (2009), ‘Kinetics
modeling of alginate alkaline extraction from Laminaria digitata’, Bioresource
Technology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 1291–1296.
WARBURTON, RN (2005), ‘Patient safety-how much is enough?’, Health Policy, vol. 71,
pp. 223–232.
WILLIAMS, PA (2009), ‘Molecular interactions of plant and algal polysaccharides’,
Structural Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 299–30.
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013
516 Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals
(2007), ‘Alginate from the macroalgae Sargassum sinicola as a novel source for microbial immobilization material in
wastewater treatment and plant growth promotion’, Journal of Applied Phycology,
vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 43–53.
YOUNIS, YMH, TECLEAB, S, GHEZA, T and RAHAMA, IH (2000), ‘Determination of the biomass and phycocolloid contents of some marine algae from Eritrea’, Journal KAU:
Marine Science, vol. 11, pp. 19–25.
YU, S and PEDERSÉN, M (1990), ‘The effect of salinfity changes on the activity of
α-galactosidase of the red algae Gracilaria tenuistipitata and G. sordida’, Botanica
Marina, vol. 33, pp. 385–391.
Copyrighted Material downloaded from Woodhead Publishing Online
Delivered by http://www.woodheadpublishingonline.com
Gustavo Hernández-Carmona (212-72-727)
Tuesday, November 05, 2013 6:52:08 PM
IP Address: 148.204.122.221
YABUR, R, BASHAN, Y AND HERNÁNDEZ-CARMONA, G
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2013