Materials & Methods Unless otherwise noted, all protocol information was derived from the original paper, references from the original paper, or information obtained directly from the authors. An asterix (*) indicates data or information provided by the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology core team. A hashtag (#) indicates information provided by the replicating lab. Protocol 1: Treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines with olaparib This protocol describes how to treat Ewing’s sarcoma cells with the PARP inhibitor olaparib, as seen in Figure 4C and Supplemental Figure 16. Sampling: The experiment will use XXXX biological replicates for a final power of XX%. o See Power calculations for details. Each experiment will consist of six cohorts: o Each cohort contains ES1, ES6, ES7, ES8, MHH-ES-1 and DoTc2-4510 cells o Cohort 1: cells treated with vehicle only o Cohort 2: cells treated with 0.1 µM olaparib o Cohort 3: cells treated with 0.32 µM olaparib o Cohort 4: cells treated with 1 µM olaparib o Cohort 5: cells treated with 3.2 µM olaparib o Cohort 6: cells treated with 10 µM olaparib Materials and Reagents: Reagent Olaparib DMSO PBS Giemsa stain Methanol ES1 cells ES6 cells ES7 cells ES8 cells MHH-ES-1 cells DoTc2-4510 cells Type Drug Reagent Reagent Reagent Reagent Cells Cells Cells Cells Cells Cells Manufacturer Catalog # Comments Procedure: Notes: All cell lines will be sent for STR profiling and mycoplasma testing Can the authors specify for each cell line if it was maintained in RPMI or DMEM? Olaparib is maintained as a 10 mM stock in DMSO at -80°C. Each aliquot is subjected to no more than 5 freeze-thaw cycles. 1. Plate cells at low density in 35 mm culture plates. a. How many cells per plate is considered low density? b. Plate 6 plates per cell line. c. Let adhere overnight. 1 2. The following day, treat cells with varying concentrations of drug. a. See Cohorts for details. 3. Replace media and drug every 3-4 days. 4. After 7 to 21 days, when sufficient colonies are visible, fix cells for quantification. a. Can the authors tell us how long each cell line took to show sufficient colonies? Is that based solely on the growth of the vehicle-treated cells? b. Wash cells once in PBS. c. Fix in ice-cold methanol for 30 minutes while gently shaking. i. What temperature at while shaking? d. Remove ethanol and add Giemsa stain at 1:20 dilution. Incubate overnight shaking. i. At room temperature? e. The following day rinse cells with water and air dry. 5. Take brightfield images of plate and quantify number of colonies on each plate. a. Were colonies counted manually? 6. Determine and record the concentration at which colony formation was reduced by >90%. 7. Repeat the experiment an additional XXX times. Known differences from the original study: The replication attempt will only examine Ewing’s sarcoma derived cell lines and the BRCA deficient control, and will exclude the remaining cell lines derived from osteosarcoma, soft tissue and epithelium. Provisions for quality control: All data obtained from the experiment - raw data, data analysis, control data and quality control data - will be made publicly available, either in the published manuscript or as an open access dataset available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nbryi/). Protocol 2: Addition of EWS-FLI1 confers sensitivity to olaparib This protocol describes how to transform MEFs with EWS-FLI1 and then assess the effect of olaparib treatment on cell viability, as seen in Figure 4E. Sampling: The experiment will be repeataed XX times for a final power of XX%. o See Power calculations for details. Each experiment consists of XX cohorts: o Each cohort has three cell lines: EWS-FUS1 transformed MEFs FUS-CHOP transformed MEFs SK-N-MC cells o Cohort 1: cells treated with vehicle only o Cohort 2: cells treated with 0.39 µM olaparib 2 o o o o o Cohort 3: cells treated with 0.78 µM olaparib Cohort 4: cells treated with 1.56 µM olaparib Cohort 5: cells treated with 3.13 µM olaparib Cohort 6: cells treated with 6.25 µM olaparib Cohort 7: cells treated with 12.5 µM olaparib Materials and Reagents: Reagent EWS-FLI1 transformed mouse mesenchymal cells FUS-CHOP transformed mouse mesenchymal cells SK-N-MC cells Olaparib DMSO 4% formaldehyde Syto60 fluorescent nucleic acid stain Type Cells Manufacturer Catalog # Cells Cells Drug Reagent Reagent Reagent Comments Can you provide this reagent? Can you provide this reagent? Invitrogen Procedure: All cell lines will be sent for STR profiling and mycoplasma testing Can the authors specify for each cell line if it was maintained in RPMI or DMEM? Olaparib is maintained as a 10 µM stock in DMSO at -80°C. Each aliquot is subjected to no more than 5 freeze-thaw cycles. 1. Seed cells in 96-well plates and let grow overnight. a. Authors, can you provide the transformed MEFS (EWS-FLI1 and FUSCHOP) and the SK-N-MC cells? If not, can you provide the plasmids used to generate the cells? b. Authors, how did you confirm transformation of the MEFs? Can you share a detailed protocol for that step as well in order for the replicating lab to also confirm transformation of the MEFs? 2. The next day, treat cells with a range of concentrations of olaparib. a. See Cohorts for details. b. Incubate for 72 hours. i. Does the media need to be changed during this period? 3. Fix cells in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 minutes. a. What temperature were cells fixed at? 4. Stain cells with 1 µM Syto60 fluorescent nucleara dye for 1 hour. a. Are the any more details you can provide for this step? Was Syto60 washed out of the cells prior to signal reading? 5. Measure fluorescent signal intensity with a fluorescent plate reader. a. Authors, what is the make and model of the instrument you used? b. What reader control are necessary; for example, are blank wells loaded only with media but no cells required for identifying background levels of fluorescence? c. Excitation wavelength: 630 nm 3 d. Emission wavelength: 694 nm 6. Repeat experiment XX additional times. Known differences from the original study: None yet Provisions for quality control: All data obtained from the experiment - raw data, data analysis, control data and quality control data - will be made publicly available, either in the published manuscript or as an open access dataset available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nbryi/). Protocol 3: Depletion of EWS-FLI1 from A673 cells This protocol describes how to deplete EWS-FLI1 from A673 cells, which harbor the translocation endogenously, and assess the cells’ sensitivity to olaparib, as seen in Figure 4F and Supplemental Figure 20. Sampling: The experiment will be repeated XX times for a final power of XX%. o See Power calculations for details. Each experiment consists of XX cohorts: o Each cohort contains 6 cell lines: Untreated siControl transfected cells Untreated siEF1 transfected cells siControl transfected cells treated with DMSO siControl transfected cells treated with a given concentration of olaparib siEF1 transfected cells treated with DMSO siEF1 transfected cells treated with a given concentration of olaparib o Cohort 1: A673 cells treated with vehicle only o Cohort 2: o qRT-PCR cohort: siControl transfected cells treated with DMSO siControl transfected cells treated 1.3 µM olaparib siEF1 transfected cells treated with DMSO siEF1 transfected cells treated with 1.3 µM olaparib Materials and Reagents: Reagent Type A673 cells Olaparib DMSO siEF1 Cells Drug Reagent Reagent siCT control siRNA Reagent Manufacturer Catalog # Comments 5'GGCAGCAGAACCCUUCUUACG3’ Qiagen 4 Cell Titer 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay Kit Promega G3582 Procedure: Notes: All cell lines will be sent for STR profiling and mycoplasma testing Can the authors specify for each cell line if it was maintained in RPMI or DMEM? Olaparib is maintained as a 10 mM stock in DMSO at -80°C. Each aliquot is subjected to no more than 5 freeze-thaw cycles. 1. Plate A673 cells in a 96-well plate. a. How many cells were seeded per well? b. Allow to adhere overnight. 2. Transfect cells with siControl or siEF1 siRNAs. a. What transfection reagent did you use? b. Can you provide a step by step protocol for the siRNA transfection? 3. Immediately after siRNA transfection, treat cells with varying concentrations of olaparib or vehicle (DMSO). a. See Cohorts for details; include untreated cells and cells treated with vehicle only b. What were the exact concentrations of DMSO used? c. Authors, how was the DMSO reading generated for each olaparib comparison? Was the amount of DMSO added per well calculated based on the corresponding concentration of olaparib and added to a paired DMSO-only well? d. Incubate cells for 72 hours. i. Was the media changed during this time? 4. qRT-PCR to confirm knockdown of EWS-FLI1 expression: a. Can you please provide a detailed protocol for RNA extraction and qRTPCR conditions? b. What were the primers used? What were the cycling conditions used? c. What gene did you use as an internal control? 5. Measure cell viability by using the Cell Titer 96 well aqueous one assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions. a. Add 20 µL Cell Titer 96 Aqueous solution reagent per well containing 100 µL media. b. Incubate plate at 37°C in humidified 5% CO2 for 1 to 4 hours. i. How long were your plates incubated for? c. Record absorbance at 490 nm using a plate reader. i. What was the make and model of the plate reader you used? ii. What absorbance controls did you use; ex: well containing media without any cells (blank wells)? 6. Repeat experiment XX times. 5 Known differences from the original study: None yet Provisions for quality control: All data obtained from the experiment - raw data, data analysis, control data and quality control data - will be made publicly available, either in the published manuscript or as an open access dataset available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/nbryi/). 6 Power Calculations Protocol 1: Summary of original data Note: data estimated from published figure. Authors, can you provide any variance data you have as well as the number of replicates you ran? Figure 4C Mean SEM SD N ES1 cells 1 ES6 cells 1 ES7 cells 0.32 ES8 cells 1 MHH-ES-1 cells 0.32 DoTc2-4510 cells 0.32 Stdev was calculated using formula SD = SEM*(SQRT n) Protocol 2: Summary of original data Authors, can you please provide the mean and SEM or SD for Figure 4D? Figure 4D Mean SEM SD N HeLaSF Control 3 1 µM olaparib 3 5 µM olaparib 3 U-2-OS Control 3 1 µM olaparib 3 5 µM olaparib 3 MHH-ES-1 Control 3 1 µM olaparib 3 5 µM olaparib 3 ES7 Control 3 1 µM olaparib 3 5 µM olaparib 3 ES8 Control 3 1 µM olaparib 3 5 µM olaparib 3 Stdev was calculated using formula SD = SEM*(SQRT n) Protocol 3: Summary of original data Authors, can you please provide the mean and sem or SD for Figure 4E? Figure 4E Mean SEM SD N EWS-FLI1 0 µM olaparib 3 transformed MEFs 0.39 µM olaparib 3 0.78 µM olaparib 3 1.56 µM olaparib 3 3.13 µM olaparib 3 7 6.25 µM olaparib 12.5 µM olaparib FUS-CHOP 0 µM olaparib transformed MEFs 0.39 µM olaparib 0.78 µM olaparib 1.56 µM olaparib 3.13 µM olaparib 6.25 µM olaparib 12.5 µM olaparib SK-N-MC 0 µM olaparib 0.39 µM olaparib 0.78 µM olaparib 1.56 µM olaparib 3.13 µM olaparib 6.25 µM olaparib 12.5 µM olaparib Stdev was calculated using formula SD = SEM*(SQRT n) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Protocol 4: Summary of original data Authors, can you please provide the mean and sem or sd, as well as the concentrations of olaparib used, for Figure 4F? actFigure 4F Mean SEM SD N siControl DMSO 0 µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib siControl olaparib 0 µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib siEF1 DMSO 0 µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 XX µM olaparib 3 8 XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib siEF1 olaparib 0 µM olaparib XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib XX µM olaparib Stdev was calculated using formula SD = SEM*(SQRT n) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 Acknowledgements: The Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology core team would like to thank the original authors, in particular AUTHOR and AUTHOR, for generously sharing critical information as well as reagents to ensure the fidelity and quality of this replication attempt. We thank Courtney Soderberg at the Center for Open Science for assistance with statistical analyses. We would also like to thanks the following companies for generously donating reagents to the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology; BioLegend, Charles River Laboratories, Corning Incorporated, DDC Medical, EMD Millipore, Harlan Laboratories, LI-COR Biosciences, Mirus Bio, Novus Biologicals, and Sigma-Aldrich. 10 References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 11
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz