Thoughts on a New Market Mechanism David Hone Senior Climate Change Adviser Group CO2 Shell International Petroleum Company Limited Chairman International Emissions Trading Association Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc CONFIDENTIAL A question of scale A major transition is required from the current paradigm From micro-funding / financing to very large scale project financing From small scale local projects to large scale regional change From billion dollar public funding to trillion dollar carbon market financing Project financing An existing “market mechanism” The conventional view of the CDM The “carbon market” Project activity CERs issued The full market mechanism in operation Carbon market design within the Kyoto Protocol National compliance National mechanism, e.g. cap and trade Project financing Project activity CERs issued International registry AAUs issued Agreed target A carbon market is a key enabler for change New technology mechanisms evolve (e.g. for CCS) China adopts ETS approach CDM evolves to includes sectors CDM Forestry mechanism Japan technology standards Norwegian ETS 2000 Maximum scale at Expanding EU-ETS EU-ETS lowest cost to society 2005 Pre-Kyoto Danish-ETS UK-ETS 2010 Kyoto I 2015 Kyoto II / LCA 2020 Linkages develop between various approaches and more approaches appear 2025 ADP / Linkage framework New Zealand ETS Australian ETS US States or Federal carbon pricing Global shipping carbon price The “glue” that makes the current system work is the Assigned Amount Unit (AAU) The AAU; • Establishes compatible supply / demand across boarders; • Ensures legitimacy and environmental integrity; • Binds systems together with a common MRV protocol; • Leads to the management of emissions on an absolute basis. Linkage is simplest between compatible systems with absolute targets. Otherwise complex arrangements such as gateways may need to be developed. National emissions management Emissions management against an absolute target is key to linking. Developed Developing But that can mean a managed decrease or a managed increase. 2015-2019 2020-2024 2025-2029 2030-2034 2035-2039 2040-2044 Can easily be cascaded into the economy via “cap-and-trade” But other policy instruments can be used within the economy provided the government is prepared to manage the risk. Core to a New Market Mechanism would be an instrument which mimics the role of the AAU Oversight body e.g. UNFCCC Programme seeks recognition International allowance allocation, mimics the role of the AAU Total Global GHG Emissions The market builds up over time 2015 Progressive build - up as national programmes are developed 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 We need a more holistic view which seeks to create a functioning carbon market. CDM International Carbon Market Opt-In Sectoral crediting Domestic Mitigation Efforts Supported domestic actions Domestic Actions GCF Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc CONFIDENTIAL 05 / 2010 12
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz