07/20/2017
Page 1 of 12
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (“MISO”) Informal Requests and Resolutions of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Pursuant to Attachment HH (Dispute Resolution Procedures) of MISO’s Tariff and ADR Business Practices Manual
Date
Date
Request for
Status of
Date
Party
Dispute
Resolution of
ADR
Resolution
Posted on
Requesting
Received by
Informal
Posted on
ADR
MISO
Nature of the Dispute
Web
Resolution of the Dispute
Negotiations
Web
Dow Chemical seeks compensation
The Dow
03/17/17
04/19/17
Pending
Pending
Pending
relating to adverse impacts from
Chemical
negative day-ahead prices for the period
Company
Illinois Power
Marketing
Company
04/14/17
Big Rivers
Electric
Corporation
05/18/17
Uncia Energy,
LP – Series A
06/16/17
June 27, 2016 to Sept. 24, 2016, which
MISO allegedly has not explained
satisfactorily.
Illinois Power Marketing Company
seeks compensation for congestion
charges resulting from MISO’s alleged
incorrect, reverse definition of a
flowgate from MISO into PJM on
December 29, 2016, which caused the
Duck Creek unit to be dispatched higher
by PJM and to incur high congestion
costs.
Big Rivers Electric Corporation seeks
relief from reduced dispatch, and lower
day-ahead prices, of its Wilson unit due
to heavy congestion from April 7-22,
2017, which allegedly resulted because
MISO’s next-day and day-ahead models
did not promptly reflect a new
combined-cycle plant that became
operational on April 7, 2017.
Uncia Energy, LP – Series A seeks
compensation based on its claim that a
particular transmission constraint was
not relieved when, pursuant to
Schedule 28A of MISO’s Tariff relating
to Transmission Constraint Demand
Curves (“TCDCs”), MISO made
temporary overrides of the Marginal
Value Limits (“MVLs”) in multiple
hours in the Real-Time Market on
February 19-20, 2017 to relieve the
constraint.
05/05/17
Pending
Pending
Pending
06/14/17
Pending
Pending
Pending
07/19/17
Pending
Pending
Pending
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
Great River
Energy
Page 2 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received by
MISO
01/05/16
Nature of the Dispute
Great River Energy (“GRE”) seeks
compensation relating to allegedly
improper mitigation of Real-Time
Revenue Sufficiency Guarantee
(“RSG”) Make-Whole Payments for
three separate events on January 7,
2014 and February 10, 2014.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
02/26/16
Great Lakes
Utilities
01/20/16
Great Lakes Utilities seeks
compensation relating to allegedly
improper mitigation of Make-Whole
Payments for Voltage and Local
Reliability (“VLR”) Commitments
during the period October 6, 2015
through November 23, 2015.
02/26/16
Uncia Energy,
LP – Series A
02/03/16
Uncia Energy, LP – Series A seeks
compensation for Financial
Transmission Right (“FTR”) losses
that allegedly resulted from
improper binding of a transmission
constraint in the September 17,
2015 Day-Ahead Market.
02/26/16
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO determined (i) RSG
payments for GRE’s Lakefield units
should not have been mitigated for
Operating Hour ending (“HE”) 13
through HE15 on January 7, 2014, but
were otherwise correctly mitigated for the
earlier hours of January 7; and (ii) the
Lakefield and Pleasant Valley units were
correctly mitigated on February 10.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO determined there are no
legal or equitable grounds to excuse Great
Lakes Utilities’ non-compliance with the
Tariff requirement that a Market
Participant consult with the IMM before
submitting any offers that exceed existing
Reference Levels.
On 01/23/17, MISO requested a limited,
one-time waiver of its Tariff, seeking
authorization to perform corrective
settlements to address the use of
erroneous congestion information that
rendered inaccurate the pricing of certain
Commercial Pricing Nodes in MISO’s
Day-Ahead Energy and Operating
Reserve Market for September 17, 2015,
and the congestion revenues and charges
for associated Financial Transmission
Rights.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
(Partially
Granted)
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
11/22/16
(Denied)
05/26/16
Pending FERC
action in
Docket No.
ER17-842-000
Pending
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
Page 3 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received by
MISO
03/14/16
Nature of the Dispute
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. seeks
compensation in the form of makewhole payments for the Minimum
Down Time and ensuing start-up
costs of its PUPP 2 unit that was
manually redispatched to zero on
August 19, 2015.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
05/19/16
Entergy
Arkansas, Inc.
06/27/16
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. seeks
compensation in the form of makewhole payments for the Minimum
Down Time and ensuing start-up
costs of its PUPP 2 unit that was
manually redispatched to zero on
April 29, 2016.
07/20/16
Entergy New
Orleans, Inc.
06/27/16
Entergy New Orleans, Inc. seeks
compensation in the form of makewhole payments for the Minimum
Down Time and ensuing start-up
costs of its PUPP 1 unit that was
manually redispatched to zero on
April 29, 2016.
07/20/16
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO resolved to grant Entergy
Arkansas relief only with regard to the
Minimum Down Time, and to pursue
future Tariff revisions that would provide
for start-up costs to be recovered by
Resources coming back online after
having been manually redispatched down
to zero.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO resolved to grant Entergy
Arkansas relief only with regard to the
Minimum Down Time, and to pursue
future Tariff revisions that would provide
for start-up costs to be recovered by
Resources coming back online after
having been manually redispatched down
to zero.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO resolved to grant Entergy
New Orleans relief only with regard to
the Minimum Down Time, and to pursue
future Tariff revisions that would provide
for start-up costs to be recovered by
Resources coming back online after
having been manually redispatched down
to zero.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
(Partially
Granted)
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
04/07/17
(Partially
Granted)
04/07/17
(Partially
Granted)
04/07/17
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
Exelon
Generation
Company, LLC
Page 4 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received by
MISO
04/13/16
Nature of the Dispute
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
seeks compensation in the form of
make-whole payments for the
Frontier TX 1 generation facility
that was committed through the
Reliability Assessment &
Commitment (RAC) process on
May 13, 24, 25, and 26, 2015.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
05/19/16
Exelon
Generation
Company, LLC
04/13/16
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
seeks compensation in the form of
make-whole payments for the
Frontier TX 1 generation facility
that was manually redispatched on
January 6, 2016.
05/19/16
Exelon
Generation
Company, LLC
07/19/16
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
seeks compensation in the form of
make-whole payments for the
Frontier TX 2 generation facility
that was committed by the RAC
process on May 25 and 26, 2015.
07/20/16
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO resolved to grant limited
relief for extended commitment periods
on May 13-14 that were overlooked due
to a DART software glitch, which has
been corrected. The remainder of
Exelon’s claims were denied as Frontier
TX 1 failed to meet the Tariff’s ramp rate,
dispatchability and/or Economic
Minimum Dispatch eligibility
requirements for full real-time Revenue
Sufficiency Guarantee Make-Whole
Payments.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO resolved to deny
Exelon’s claims, as Frontier TX 1 failed
to meet the Tariff’s ramp rate eligibility
requirements for full real-time Revenue
Sufficiency Guarantee Make-Whole
Payments.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO resolved to grant limited
relief involving extended commitment
periods on May 25-26 that were
overlooked due to a DART software
issue, which has been corrected. The
remainder of Exelon’s claims were denied
as Frontier TX 2 failed to meet the
Tariff’s ramp rate eligibility requirements
for full real-time Revenue Sufficiency
Guarantee Make-Whole Payments.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
(Partially
Granted)
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
05/17/17
(Denied)
05/17/17
(Partially
Granted)
05/17/17
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
Great River
Energy
Page 5 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received by
MISO
04/15/16
E.ON Climate
& Renewables
North America,
LLC
04/20/16
Invenergy
Thermal
Development
LLC
07/05/16
Nature of the Dispute
Great River Energy seeks
compensation for losses from
negative Day-Ahead LMPs for Coal
Creek 1 that allegedly resulted from
erroneous modeling of congestion
on September 17, 2015.
E.ON Climate & Renewables North
America, LLC seeks compensation
for losses from improper binding of
constraints allegedly resulting from
erroneous use of low MVA ratings
in modeling of the upgraded
transmission line between Goodland
and Seafield for certain hours
between January 2 to February 10,
2016.
Invenergy Thermal Development
LLC disputes interconnection study
deposits it is being required to pay
in connection with studies being
performed by American
Transmission Company, LLC
(“ATC”) for Project J394.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
05/19/16
05/19/16
07/20/16
Resolution of the Dispute
On 01/23/17, MISO requested a limited,
one-time waiver of its Tariff, seeking
authorization to perform corrective
settlements to address the use of
erroneous congestion information that
rendered inaccurate the pricing of certain
Commercial Pricing Nodes in MISO’s
Day-Ahead Energy and Operating
Reserve Market for September 17, 2015,
and the congestion revenues and charges
for associated Financial Transmission
Rights.
Pending
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO determined that it
complied with Attachment X’s
requirements to provide notice and
explanations of the increased estimate of
System Impact Study (“SIS”) costs.
Accordingly, MISO denies Invenergy’s
request that ATC be held to its initial SIS
cost estimate. Per Attachment X,
Invenergy is required to pay the increased
study deposit on or before 12/18/16 or
Project J394 shall be deemed withdrawn
via written notice pursuant to Section 8.3
of Attachment X.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
Pending FERC
action in
Docket No.
ER17-842-000
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
Pending
Pending
Pending
Denied
11/21/16
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
DTE Electric
Company
Page 6 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received by
MISO
01/07/15
Wisconsin
Electric Power
Company (d/b/a
We Energies)
02/03/15
DC Energy
Midwest, LLC
02/09/15
Entergy
Arkansas, LLC
05/04/15
Entergy
Arkansas, LLC
11/16/15
Nature of the Dispute
DTE Electric Company seeks
recovery of Schedule 17 charges
assessed at its Ludington Pumped
Storage Facility pursuant to prior
FERC orders exempting such
facility from such charges.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
02/13/15
Wisconsin Electric disputes the
calculation of variable compensation and compensation during a test
of its Presque Isle Power Plant
under a System Support Resource
Agreement with MISO.
DC Energy Midwest, LLC seeks to
recover the value of FTRs acquired
at the 2013/2014 Annual FTR
Auction, and the Jan. and Feb. 2014
monthly auctions, claiming that the
associated Interface Commercial
Pricing Nodes were defined a
certain way at the auctions, but that
MISO settled the FTRs based on a
subsequent redefinition of such
nodes.
Entergy Arkansas, LLC seeks
compensation in the form of makewhole payments for its units that
were manually redispatched on
December 9 and 21, 2014.
03/17/15
Entergy Arkansas, LLC seeks
compensation in the form of makewhole payments for one of its units
manually redispatched on
April 27-28, 2014.
12/04/15
03/17/15
05/20/15
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO granted DTE’s request
for reimbursement of Schedule 17
charges on DTE’s Ludington Pumped
Storage Facility for the period June 1,
2011 to August 19, 2014 and
September 30 to October 17, 2014.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO partly granted Wisconsin
Electric’s ADR request (i.e., regarding
the use of Actual Energy Injections to
determine variable compensation and to
compensate any must-run energy).
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO disagreed with DC
Energy’s position that the redefinition of
the SPP Interfaces was inappropriate, and
that the redefinition should not have been
applied to DC Energy’s FTRs.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO granted Entergy Arkansas
equitable relief during certain hours of
Manual Redispatch. MISO will file a
request for waiver of its Tariff seeking
FERC authorization in order to
implement such relief.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO granted Entergy Arkansas
equitable relief during certain hours of
Manual Redispatch. MISO will file a
request for waiver of its Tariff seeking
FERC authorization in order to
implement such relief.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
Granted
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
02/29/16
(Partially
Granted)
02/16/16
(Denied)
04/27/15
(Denied)
See FERC
Order Denying
Request for
Waiver, 156
FERC ¶ 61,229
(2016)
(Denied)
See FERC
Order Denying
Request for
Waiver, 156
FERC ¶ 61,229
(2016)
04/28/16
04/28/16
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
Entergy
Louisiana LLC
Page 7 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received by
MISO
05/15/14
Exelon
Generation
Company, LLC
05/23/14
Wolverine
Power Supply
Cooperative,
Inc.
05/28/14
Nature of the Dispute
Entergy Louisiana LLC seeks
compensation for the day-ahead
award of its Ninemile 5 Generating
Unit for the March 23, 2014
Operating Day due to an alleged
erroneous start signal.
Exelon seeks compensation relating
to alleged improper control mode
signals on January 25-26, 2014.
Wolverine seeks compensation
relating to Real-Time Revenue
Sufficiency Guarantee Make Whole
Payments that were mitigated on
February 24, February 28, March 3
and March 6, 2014.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
06/10/14
06/26/14
06/11/14
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO determined Entergy
Louisiana should be compensated for the
operation of its Ninemile 5 Generating
Unit based on its real-time dispatch.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO granted Exelon relief
because zero control mode signals
resulted from MISO’s premature
replacement of ICCP links.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO deemed it appropriate
under the circumstances to grant
Wolverine Real-Time Revenue
Sufficiency Guarantee (“RSG”) makewhole payments that would have resulted
based on updated cost information it had
tried to upload, consistent with the MISO
Tariff’s RSG-related provisions, and the
underlying principle of ensuring that
Generation Resources are made whole to
their cost of operation.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
(Granted)
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
01/08/15
(Granted)
11/25/14
(Granted)
See FERC
Order Granting
Tariff Waiver,
152 FERC
¶ 61,101 (2015)
03/26/15
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
The Dow
Chemical
Company
Page 8 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received
by MISO
06/11/14
Vitol Inc.
06/20/14
NRG Power
Marketing LLC
07/24/14
Nature of the Dispute
Dow Chemical seeks relief from
losses suffered when allegedly
improper temperature rating
adjustments resulted in large negative
Locational Marginal Prices
(“LMPs”) for the EES.DOWCHEM
node on April 1, 2014 and several
ensuing dates.
Vitol seeks a determination that the
Commercial Pricing Node definitions
MISO used to award monthly and
annual FTRs at certain nodes be used
to settle the corresponding FTR
positions obtained by Vitol in the
monthly and annual auctions, which
would allegedly reduce the amounts
owed by Vitol for the months of
March – May 2014.
NRG Power Marketing LLC seeks
recovery of the hedging value
allegedly lost by FTRs it purchased
in the 2013/2014 Annual FTR
Auction, and the November 2013
Multi-Period Monthly Auction due to
the subsequent redefinition or
“collapsing” of MISO South’s
Interface CPNodes.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
07/14/14
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO granted Dow Chemical
relief for costs incurred because
automatic midnight reversion to normal
equipment default ratings on several dates
unduly caused binding constraints that
resulted in significantly negative LMPs.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
(Granted)
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
01/08/15
07/03/14
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO disagreed with Vitol’s
position that the redefinition of the SPP
Interfaces was inappropriate, and that the
redefinition should not have been applied
to Vitol’s FTRs.
(Denied)
12/05/14
08/14/14
Following discussions with MISO
management, MISO denied NRG’s ADR
request, finding that (i) the redefinition of
the MISO South Interface CPNodes was
appropriate and (ii) the redefinition was
properly applied to NRG’s FTRs.
(Denied)
04/01/15
See also, FERC Order denying NRG’s
Complaint against MISO, issued on
02/01/16 in Docket No. EL16-3-000,
154 FERC ¶ 61,069 (2016).
07/20/2017
Page 9 of 12
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (“MISO”) Informal Requests and Resolutions of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Pursuant to Attachment HH (Dispute Resolution Procedures) of MISO’s Tariff and ADR Business Practices Manual
Party
Requesting
ADR
Exelon
Generation
Company, LLC
Date
Dispute
Received
by MISO
09/03/14
Nature of the Dispute
Exelon seeks relief from allegedly
improper mitigation of its combined
cycle facility below its production
costs during certain Operating Days
in December 2013 and January,
February, and March 2014.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
10/09/14
New Ulm
Public Utilities
(NUPUC)
10/10/14
NUPUC seeks compensation for its
unit’s emergency dispatch on
March 4, 2014, for which MISO
allegedly received incorrect meter
data.
11/20/14
Union Electric
Company (d/b/a
Ameren
Missouri)
10/21/14
Ameren Missouri seeks correction of
an alleged under-allocation of ARRs
for 2014-15 that it claims is due to
MISO’s receipt and use of EMS
model substation load information.
11/20/14
DC Energy
Midwest, LLC
10/22/14
DC Energy Midwest, LLC seeks
restoration of FTRs that it purchased
in the 2014/2015 Annual FTR
Auction on paths between points
modeled inside and outside of MISO
South, and that MISO subsequently
nullified as Same-Bus FTRs.
11/07/14
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO determined that Exelon’s
Frontier generation facility (i) was
correctly mitigated on certain dates,
(ii) should be excused from mitigation on
two dates, and (iii) should have mitigation
reduced on some dates.
Following discussions with MISO
management, MISO partially granted
NUPUC’s Request for ADR. Such relief
excludes amounts that exceed the
applicable Reference Level and that relate
to start-up costs for which the unit is not
eligible.
Following discussions with MISO
management, MISO partially granted
Ameren Missouri’s Request for ADR.
MISO concluded it would be reasonable
and equitable to grant Ameren relief for
the reduction of Stage 1B ARR
allocations attributable to the unsuitable
load data to model the Franklin
substation’s load. MISO also determined
that no relief is warranted for the
reduction in allocation due to relevant
transmission constraints, and ARR
nomination patterns.
Following discussions with MISO
management, MISO denied the ADR
request because the FTRs involved
sources and sinks that are physically in
the same electrical location, and as such
are Same-Bus FTRs.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
(Partially
Granted)
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
11/04/15
(Partially
Granted)
08/10/15
(Partially
Granted)
See FERC
Order Granting
Tariff Waiver,
154 FERC
¶ 61,059 (2016)
10/12/15
(Denied)
11/21/14
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
DC Energy
Midwest, LLC
Big Rivers
Electric
Corporation
Page 10 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received by
MISO
11/25/14
(Demand for
Arbitration)
12/11/14
Nature of the Dispute
In its Demand for Arbitration, DC
Energy Midwest, LLC seeks
restoration of FTRs that it
purchased in the 2014/2015 Annual
FTR Auction on paths between
points modeled inside and outside
of MISO South, and that MISO
subsequently nullified as Same-Bus
FTRs.
Big Rivers Electric Corporation
seeks recovery of overcharges
allegedly resulting from an
inaccurately calculated Marginal
Congestion Component of the DayAhead Locational Marginal Price at
the BREC.CENTURY Pricing Node
on August 8, 9, 15, 18, 19 and 20,
2014.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
12/05/14
02/13/15
Resolution of the Dispute
MISO and DC Energy have reached an
informal resolution of DC Energy’s
dispute regarding MISO’s rejection of,
and untimely refund of the price of,
certain FTRs that cleared in the 20142015 Annual FTR Auction at a positive
price based on the consistent modeling of
the relevant CPNodes in the Day Ahead
and FTR markets.
Following discussions with MISO
management, MISO resolved to grant Big
Rivers partial relief (i.e., for the
overstated congestion on
August 9 and 20, 2014).
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
On 11/03/15, a
Stipulated
Order
Dismissing
Arbitration was
issued by the
Arbitration
Panel.
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
11/04/15
(Partially
Granted)
See FERC
Order Granting
Tariff Waiver,
154 FERC
¶ 61,255 (2016)
12/17/15
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
17 Members/
Market
Participants
Page 11 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received
by MISO
03/08/13
Nature of the Dispute
The dispute involves MISO’s refund
of approximately $6.9 million in
market-to-market payments to PJM
pursuant to MISO’s interpretation of
certain language contained within the
Joint Operating Agreement between
MISO and PJM.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
03/22/13
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions between disputing
parties and management officials, MISO
confirmed that the $6.9 million refund to
PJM was necessary and appropriate
pursuant to Sections 8.1.2 and 11.2.3 of
Attachment 2 (Congestion Management
Process) of the MISO/PJM Joint
Operating Agreement.
Please note: The settlement agreement in
this proceeding was approved by FERC
in Docket No. EL13-75-000. See,
Indicated Load-Serving Entities v.
Midcontinent Independent System
Operator, Inc. and PJM Interconnection,
LLC, 150 FERC ¶ 61,082 (2015).
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
(Denied)
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
05/14/13
07/20/2017
Party
Requesting
ADR
Muscatine
Power & Water
Page 12 of 12
Date
Dispute
Received
by MISO
07/22/13
Nature of the Dispute
Muscatine seeks compensation for
the loss of revenue due to an alleged
software error.
Date
Request for
ADR
Posted on
Web
09/06/13
True North
Trading
07/24/13
This dispute concerns virtual bidding
at combined cycle units.
09/06/13
Minnesota
Municipal
Power Agency
10/07/13
12/19/13
Northern States
Power
Company, agent
for North
Central Power
Company and
Northwestern
Wisconsin
Electric
Company
12/10/13
Minnesota Municipal Power
Agency’s dispute concerns MISO’s
denial of start-up costs because the
C-Mode status did not change when
MISO requested a unit to be
dispatched.
This dispute concerns an erroneous
Day-Ahead Market Demand Bid that
was submitted and cleared on
November 20, 2013 for Operating
Day November 21, 2013.
01/24/14
Resolution of the Dispute
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO confirmed that lost
opportunity costs are not compensated by
MISO or contemplated in MISO’s Tariff.
Following discussions with management
officials, it was confirmed MISO’s
Markets Settlements Business Practices
Manual specifies combined cycle units
are settled at an aggregate level.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO agreed to pay Minnesota
Municipal for start-up costs for the
July 17-18, 2013 Operating Days.
Following discussions with management
officials, MISO agreed to issue a
Miscellaneous Adjustment for Operating
Day November 21, 2013 based on an
analysis of what MISO’s Market
Settlements would have calculated with
corrected MW values for the impacted
Operating Day, and certain adjustments.
Status of
Resolution of
Informal
Negotiations
(Denied)
Date
Resolution
Posted on
Web
12/19/13
(Denied)
12/19/13
(Granted)
03/12/14
(Granted)
07/25/14