POLYMORPHISM UNDER STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION Model: We employ a sinusoidal fitness function, since we are interested in the effects of phenotypic plasticity on the levels of genetic polymorphism under periodic, predictable environments. In natural populations, however, even though the period of environmental variation is predicable (typically annual), the severity of environmental seasons may vary across years. For example, while effects such as average daylight length are predictable, effects such as average temperature or food abundance may experience severe perturbations across years. We therefore studied the effects of genomic storage in the presence of stochastic variation in the severity of each season. To test robustness of the genomic storage effect against stochastic perturbations in environmental effects, we examine the effects of random fluctuations around predicted seasonal effects on the levels of genetic polymorphism via Monte Carlo simulations. We consider periodic environmental effect on fitness according to ๐ ! = (1 + ๐ฃ !! )๐ max sin 2๐ ! !!! ! , with a stochastic environmental shift v! 2t # ~ Normal(0,ฯ), where ฯ quantifies average !" #$ C within-season departure from the unperturbed fitness function. The stochastic perturbations perturb the geometric mean fitnesses of alleles at both of the loci, temporarily breaking quasineutrality across the cycle of fitness oscillations at the target locus. Simulations including stochastic environmental perturbations (ฯ = 0.05, ฯ = 0.1, or ฯ = 0.2) were performed on a subset of parameters given in the main text with p = 1. Results: We find that balanced polymorphism arising from genomic storage is robust to stochastic perturbations in the magnitude fitness oscillations between seasons (Figure S1). Even with inter-seasonal stochastic variation in the magnitude of oscillations as large as ฯ = 0.2, we find the same qualitative pattern of elevated polymorphism as with a deterministic fitness function (electronic supplementary material Figure S1 top block). In addition to perturbed environmental effects, we also undertook simulations that stochastically varied the season length, C. To do so, we randomly skipped or repeated sinusoidal environmental effect (according to fn. above) for one in ten generations, which effectively increases or decreases the number of generations per season, randomly. Once again, the genomic storage effect continued to produce significantly elevated diversity. These results demonstrate that the genomic storage effect can contribute to balanced polymorphism in populations that are exposed both to drift and to environmental perturbations in season severity and duration. Figure S1. Genomic storage effect promotes diversity even with stochastic environmental perturbations. Here, the periodic environmental effect on fitness !!! ๐ ! = (1 + ๐ฃ !! ๐ max sin 2๐ ! , varied ! randomly between seasons, with v! 2t # ~ !" #$ C Normal(0,ฯ,) drawn each season. In the bottom block, we also perturbed the periods of fitness oscillations (C) such that sinusoidal environmental effect (๐ ! ) is either repeated or skipped with probability 1/10 in each generation. The ensembleaverage levels of diversity are shown as a function of the season length (C, increasing vertically within major blocks), the expected magnitude of periodic selection (smax, increasing horizontally within each panel), and the recombination rate (r = 0.0001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.25 and 0.5, varying horizontally within minor blocks), with p = 1. We simulated an ensemble of 5x107 replicate populations of size N = 105, each run for 100N generations.
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz