DØ Higgs II Gordon Watts for the collaboration Outline Channels HWW* H SM, TopColor, 4th Generation SM, TopColor, Fermiphobic Higgs H++H--++-bbhbbbb Triplet models; LR symmetric SUSY High tan b Current Status, Future Possibilities Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 2 * HWW Production & Decay SM production primarily gluon fusion Analysis looks for decay to lnln where l=e, Basic Analysis Cuts Lepton ID (High pT, medium pT) Mass & angle cuts to eliminate Z & * Missing Transverse Energy Actual Cuts for Each Channel listed on web Cap on Jet Activity (40 GeV) pages Cross Section Limit Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 3 * HWW ee e Lumi 118 pb-1 102 pb-1 114 pb-1 Obs 0 1 1 Expected 1.1±0.8 0.9±0.5 0.95±0.12 In mass range 114-200 GeV/c2 sBR (ee+e) < 0.45–2.8 pb sBR () < 0.2–0.7 pb This will probably not be a SM search in Run II Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 4 * HWW Expectations Efficiency Currently x2 less than Higgs/SUSY workgroup result Mostly in Lepton ID Internal version of analysis has much better ID efficiency using more advanced tools SM Not at the Tevatron Non-SM Enhanced coupling for WW in top color and 4th generation models. Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 5 H SM Rate is too low to be observed at the Tevatron • Models with suppressed fermion-Higgs coupling • Some Universal ED models Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 Excluded non-SM MH[GeV/c2] 6 H Assume SM Higgs Production Cross-Section pp hX X Photon ID, Apply Sliding Mass Window Cut Events/8 GeV DØ RunII Preliminary M Limit DØ RunII Preliminary Data SM BG Sum DY QCD Top Color Higgs Assume BR(H) = 1 d(M) ~ 2.5 GeV/c2 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 Luminosity = 51.8 pb-1 7 HExpectations With 50 pb-1 and BR=1 we expected a larger limit Higgs/SUSY WGR Working on bringing down the jet-photon misidentification rate Top Color Higgs Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 8 ±± H Production qqZ /*H++H-- • Higgs Triplet Model • LR Symmetric versions • Attractive as alternative to SUSY (CP, Mn) • Sharply falling s at the Tevatron Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 9 ±± H Production DØ look in the muon channel •e, t(harder) possible • Requires >=2 isolated • opening angle cuts (Z) • 2 of like sign (preselection) Analysis Cuts e = (0.47-0.50)±0.01 for MH = 80-200 GeV/c2 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 10 ±± H Results • Luminosity = 107 pb-1 • M(H±±) > 95 GeV @ 95% c.l. (right-handed) • M(H±±) > 116 GeV @ 95% c.l. (left-handed) – world’s best limit Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 • Efficiency will improve with improved lepton ID • Under Verification • Cross section is sharply falling • 80 GeV/c2, 31 events • 200 GeV/c2, 0.48 events 11 SUSY Large tan b Search Promising SUSY channel at the Higgs/SUSY WS ~tanb Since then • Great deal of theory work • NLO cross sections almost done • Generation parameters better understood • bh channel better developed Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 CP-odd Higgs Production 12 SUSY Large tan b Search • Jet ID • b-tagging • b-tag e3 • dijet mass window cut • HF Jet Corrections CompHEP + Pythia MC mh = 120 GeV/c2 Higgs WG DØ Expectations Coming soon to a conference near you … Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 13 If we didn’t show this… Indirect Higgs Search… LEPEWWG Sum’03 Further Constrain the SM dMt < 2.5 GeV/c2 Currently 5.1 GeV/c2* dMW < 40 MeV/c2 Currently 59 MeV/c2 * We have a long way to go… *these are combined, Run II predictions are per experiment Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 14 Workshop Plots & Efficiencies The Public Higgs pages contain most plots and many more efficiency numbers: www-d0.fnal.gov At Work Physics Groups Higgs Public Documents. Look at the 2003 result links. Details Anyone here from DØ has access to our internal notes and should be able to answer further questions during this conference! Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 15 Conclusions • • Initial results for , WW*, and H++H-- shown. Analysis for hbb forthcoming. Other non-SM analyses being worked on – Charged Higgs, taus, etc. • All results shown based on old version of analysis software • Data Set Size • No detailed study of TeV Run II Reach • Stay tuned! – Results to be released for winter conferences should have improved understanding of detector. – Tracking and b-tagging in particular. – About 100 pb-1 of data shown. – Winter conferences should have over 200 pb-1! – Run 2b Si cancellation strongly affects any analysis dependent on tracking (btagging, electron identification, muon identification, etc). – DØ is still studying how best to optimize the new situation. Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’2003 10/07/2003 16
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz