01/06/2016
Por qué indicadores?
MAWP
Base de datos de
Indicadores
Indicators’ database
Iñigo Ortiz de Urbina
NEEMO
Madrid
31 mayo 2016
Shorter
version
Executive Agency for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (EASME)
LIFE Performance Indicators
LIFE Call for Proposals 2016
At the end of the project
Algunas pistas:
Debemos preguntarnos desde el principio qué
beneficios cuantitativos (directos e indirectos) va
a aportar nuestro proyecto: ambientales,
sociales y económicos
El diseño del proyecto debe tener en cuenta la
consecución de estos objetivos
Beneficios directos vs beneficios potenciales
(análisis de la línea base)
Acciones específicas para cálculo de
indicadores (NO ES UN TRABAJO SOLO DE
GABINETE): sistema de monitorización, redes
de medida -> oportunidad
Objective
Estimated Impact Estimated Impact
(absolute values)
(in %)*
Indicators
Please comment and give brief explainations of
assumptions used for the calculation
* Change expected (in %) compared to the initial situation. Please explain reference data used to set the initial situation.
This is normally directly linked to the baseline you have developed in the proposal.
Reduction of
greenhouse gas
emissions (GHG)
Improved Environmental and
Climate Performance
(including resilience to climate
change)
Air quality and
emissions
Reduction /
substitution of
dangerous
substances
CO2
tons / year
% change
Methane
Other GHG (please
specify)
tons / year
% change
tons / year
% change
Air Pollutants (please
in ppm
specify: NOx, PM, etc)
% change
Irritant / Corrosive / Toxic (gr/kg/tons) / year
% change
Mutagenic /
Carcinogenic
Persistent /
Bioaccumulative
(gr/kg/tons) / year
% change
(gr/kg/tons) / year
% change
Waste Reduction
tons / year
% change
Improved resilience to
flooding
inhabitants
(improved
conditions)
% change
Please specify origin: Prevention, reuse, recycling, etc.
Waste management
Water
hectars
(improved
conditions)
% change
m3/year
% change
Raw materials
tons / year
% change
Reduced water
consumption
m3 / year
Improved W ater Quality
Reduced resource
consumption
(excluding energy)
Better use of natural
resources
Water
Energy
Forestry
Sustainable land use,
agriculture and forestry
Energy from Renewable
kwh / year
Energy Sources
Reduced energy
kwh / year
consumption
Reforested areas;
increase in area under
sustainable forest
management
ha
% change
% change
% change
% change
Agriculture
Areas of agricultural land
under sustainable
ha
management
% change
Soil / Land
Soil Surface improved
ha
% change
Areas progressing
towards improvement or
restoration or in a
ha
favourable conservation
status
% change
Habitats
Please limit to a maximun of 3 most relevant habitats
targeted by your proposal
1
01/06/2016
De excel a base de datos…
Uso de los datos
7.1.
SUB-PROGRAMME FOR ENVIRONMENT
Environment and Resource Efficiency
Projects according to Article 18(a) and (b) of the LIFE Regulation
Thematic priorities Quantitative outcomes Quantitative Qualitative outcomes
outcomes
LIFE
WATER
(including the
marine
environment)
Qualitative
outcomes LIFE
Targets/
Milestones 2017
No. of ongoing or
740*
finalised projects
addressing
(inland/transitional/c
oastal) water bodies
with bad ecological
status
Percentage of ongoing or 5 %*
finalised projects
implementing replicable or
transferable actions and
progressing towards good
ecological status at project
level
80%
No. of water bodies 392*
with poor ecological
status targeted by
ongoing or finalised
projects
902*
Water bodies
(inland/transitional/coastal)
covered by ongoing or
finalised projects
implementing replicable or
transferable actions set up
to improve their ecological
status
100
Preguntas
2