Minutes of 2011 Fall Meeting of ACI 310 Decorative Concrete, October 16, 2011, Attendees to the meeting : Michael Smith Larry Rowland Crisman, Jennifer K Dorfmueller, Daniel P Hoyt, David Luke, Allyn C Metzger, Scott C Murray, Michael E Reardon, Joe A Nick Sorrentino Jim Vermillion Name Status Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting Voting 10-16-11 X X X X X X X X X X X Liason 601,303 124 email Janet White Associate X US Bureau of Reclamation; [email protected] Bent Mikkelsen Bonnie King Dionne HutchingsOjeda Duane Carey Hiram Ball Jennifer Grubb Visitor Visitor Visitor X X X Concrete Décor [email protected] Visitor Visitor Visitor X X X Scott Shafer Visitor X [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 522 [email protected] [email protected] 340 [email protected] [email protected] 303,601 [email protected] [email protected] WOC, [email protected] [email protected] dcarey@wrmeadows [email protected] Simpson Gumpertz & Heger (SGH) [email protected] [email protected] Quorum: 17 Voting / Need 7 / In attendance: 11 1. The Meeting was called to Order and identified; ACI 310 is a technical committee which will produce a document for TAC review to establish a document on Decorative Concrete applications, first as a Guide and ultimately, as a Standard for practices and acceptable quality. 2. Self introductions by attendees 3. Minutes of Spring 2011 Meeting were approved as submitted – Motion/Second by Allyn Luke/David Hoyt 4. ACI Committee Liaisons Report 124, Larry, Notable concrete call for submissions. 302 – Scott M. reports that the Committee has not met, nothing new to report. 303 – Dorf, has been reappointed as Chair. 308 - Mike Murray is chair for this sub committee. 601D - Nick reported that 601 is moving ahead with their document. 5. Curing Decorative Concrete Task Force – Mike reviewed some of the concerns of the approach the Task Force is taking. Need to consider Interior and Exterior applications. The discussions and work of the TF continue. 6. Comments and reviews of Integrated Document. a. Discussed the input from Ballot #2. b. Went through the comments and changes recommended by Dave Hoyt. (A specific accounting for how each negative was resolved will be posted to the Committee website). A general description of the actions taken to resolve Dave’s negatives are outlined here: Dave Hoyt’s Comment # 1. P. 10, line 9 - Withdrawn without condition by commentator Dave Hoyt 2. P. 18, line 17 - Found persuasive, deleted lines 17-20 replaced with text from Jamey Farny 3. P. 21, line 3 - Found persuasive, resolved by adopting new text worked on in committee. 4. P. 22, lines 12-22 - Found persuasive, adopted new text suggested by Jim Vermillion & worked on in committee. 5. Same as Item 4. 6. P. 24, lines 5-16 - Found persuasive, adopted new text suggested by Jim Vermillion & worked on in committee. 7. P. 24, lines 19 - Found persuasive 23 removed noted text. 8. P. 33, line 18- Found persuasive added proper reference to ACI 302 9. P. 36, lines 17-19 - Withdrawn without condition by commentator Dave Hoyt 10. P. 42, line 1 – Found persuasive removed “design mix” 11. P. 43, line 5 – Found persuasive added text “cement paste”. 12. P. 43, line 15 – Found persuasive remove text “excessive”. 13. P. 44, lines 7-12 – Found persuasive, resolved by adopting new text worked on in committee. 14. P. 49 lines 1-3 – Found persuasive, resolved by adopting new text worked on in committee. 15. P. 53, line 5 - Withdrawn without condition by commentator Dave Hoyt 16. P. 64, lines 7-8 – Found persuasive, resolved by adopting new text worked on in committee. 17. P. 65, lines 20-22 – Found persuasive, resolved by adopting new text worked on in committee. 7. No new or old business was brought up. Adjourned 5:22
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz