2016
Jela Tvrdoňová
RDP objectives
Overall LDS
objective(s)
Horizontal
evaluation
question
Judgment
criteria
Specific LDS
objectives
Specific
evaluation
questions
Judgment
criteria
Operational
measure
Objectives
Inputs (€)
Measures,
activities,
projects
Linking intervention logic
with evaluation elements –
consistency!
Impact
indicators
Expected
impacts
Result
indicators
Expected
results
Output
indicators
Expected
outputs
Efficiency
Effectiveness
SWOT and
needs
assessment
Re-visiting of intervention
logic – coherence!
2
Quality of elaboration
Evaluation and monitoring framework has to serve and
the tool of the evaluation of the strategy
implementation Indicators of this framework are:
 Evaluation: Impact indicators – measuring expected
impacts - changes in the strategy area and at the level of
strategic objective
 Evaluation/monitoring: Result indicators measuring
expected results within the group of beneficiaries and at
the specific objectives level
 Monitoring: output indicators measuring changes at the
operational objectives/measures level
For each indicator the baseline value and the baseline/start
period shall be set up, as well as target value at the end
of the intervention. This shall be as realistic as possible
 Judging
the interlink of the M&E framework
with the LDS intervention logic
 Judging interlink of the selected eligible
activities and output indicators, as well as
specific objectives, expected results and
result indicators, further strategic objective,
expected impacts and impact indicators
 In the broad sense M&E framework reflects
the situation analysis, which also represents
the baseline situation description against
what the final intervention stage with be
judged (impacts and results)
Each question ranking 1 – 5: 1 – worst, 5 – best






The evaluation questions are consistent with objectives
and result and impact indicators
The impact and result indicators are properly set up
allowing to measure expected impacts and results and
answer evaluation questions
The output indicators are properly set up so that the
monitoring of outputs at activity/measure level can be
carried on
The compulsory indicators are properly set up in
accordance with the CMEF axes 3 and 4
The M&E framework is properly elaborated with setting
baselines, targets and means of verification of data
collection
The methodology of data collection and elaboration is
properly described as well as self-evaluation mechanism