An Integrated View of North American Biosphere Carbon Flux Inter-annual Variability: from satellite CO2 to phenology Junjie Liu1, Kevin Bowman1, Dave Schimel1, Nick Parazoo1, Anthony Bloom1, Meemong Lee1, Kevin Gurney2, Dimitris Menemenlis1 1. Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology 2. Arizona State University A-train Symposium April, 2017 Global carbon cycle Fossil fuel photosynthesis Atmospheric buildup http://www.bigskyco2.org/ • About 50% of fossil fuel emissions remained in the atmosphere • The land and ocean sink have large interannual variability • The net biosphere sink is the difference between gross primary production (GPP) and respiration Focus of this study: North American Temperate North American temperate Fossil fuel (FF) 2011 Atmospheric buildup FF over North American Temperate • FF over the region is about 20% of the global FF How much of this FF has been absorbed by biosphere over the region? What is the interannual variability of this net biosphere flux? What is the impact of drought events on net biosphere fluxes and carbon exchange processes? 2012 A. W. King et al.: North America’s net terrestrial CO2 exchange with the atmos Previous studies… ean ± 1 standard deviation (σ) of annual net land–atmosphere exchange of CO2 -C (Tg C yr− 1 ) for North America by deca 0–2009 period. Unit: TgC/year Method Atmospheric inversion a In-situ Inventory: atmospheric flow approach b Terrestrial biosphere modeling c Inventory: production approach b 1990–1999 2000–2009 − 929 ± 477 -929±477 − 890 ± 400 -890±400 − 159 − 370 ± 138 − 83 − 348 − 359 ± 111 − 270 Best estimates Mean ± σ − 385 ± 382 − 467 ± 285 Median (interquartile range) − 264 (− 510 to − 140) − 354 (− 492 to − 328) Mode > −in-situ 500 < 0 based > − 400 < 0 • North American biosphere flux from 1990–2009 -890±409 − 890 ± 409 − 356 − 364 ± 120 − 280 King et al., 2015 − 472 ± 281 − 360 (− 496 to − 337) > − 400 < 0 flux inversion has about 50% uncertainty; The multi-model mean and standard deviation of the time-period means of the RECCAP-selected TransCom3 inversions of Peylin et al. (2013). See Methods section. Note that there is single inventory estimate and thus no “multi-model” mean or standard deviation. The multi-model mean and standard deviation of the time-period means of 10 RECCAP-Trendy models’ time-averaged annual NBP (see Methods ction). 120 W 60 W individual models are identified in Table 1 (p. 6703) of et al. (2013). North America here is defined by the com tion of TransCom3 (Baker et al., 2006) regions “North A ican Boreal” and “North American Temperate” (Fig. 2 2.2 Terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) Methodology A-train OCO-2 Japanese GOSAT 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Column CO2 Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation (CMS-Flux) net biosphere exchange 2015 Methodology A-train OCO-2 Japanese GOSAT 2010 2011 2012 Column CO2 2013 2014 2015 Solar Induced Chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) MODIS Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation (CMS-Flux) EVI net biosphere exchange Gross Primary Production (GPP) Net biosphere carbon flux constrained by satellite CO2 observations North America North American Temperate 2 1.5 GtC/year GtC/year 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 biosphere fossil air born ff 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 • Mean net biosphere sink is 1.2 ± 0.2 GtC with 0.2 GtC interannual variability Biosphere, fossil fuel, and atmospheric buildup North America North American Temperate 2 1.5 GtC/year GtC/year 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 ? 2010 2010 2011 biosphere fossil air born ff 2012 2013 2014 2015 2015 • Mean (2010-2015) fossil fuel emission is 1.8 GtC; mean atmospheric build up is 0.6 GtC • Mean FF air borne fraction is 33% (ranging from 17% to 54%) 2011 and 2012 drought impact on biosphere carbon fluxes 2011 and 2012 precipitation anomaly 2011 precip anomaly 2012 precip anomaly 2011 drought impact 2011 drought impact 3 Precip 2.5 mm/day 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 drought impact 3 2.8 Precip 2.5 2.6 mm/day 2 2.5 1.5 2.4 2.3 1 2.2 0.5 2.1 0 2 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0.1 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 GtC/year -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5 SIF-GPP 2.7 Net Biosphere Exchange 2015 2010 2011 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 2012 2013 2014 2015 MODIS-EVI 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 drought impact 0.31 0.3 Fossil fuel -0.01 Δ GPP (2011-2015) Δ NBE (2011-2015) -0.31 • Relative to 2015, the 2011 Texas-Mexican drought reduced biosphere sink by 0.3±0.1 GtC, which is comparable to regional FF. 2012 drought 2012 drought impact 3 Precip mm/day 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 drought impact 3 5.2 Precip mm/day 2.5 4.8 2 4.6 1.5 4.4 1 4.2 0.5 4 0 3.8 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 -0.2 GtC/year SIF-GPP 5 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1 Net Biosphere Exchange 2015 2010 2011 0.3 0.28 2015 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 2012 2013 2014 2015 MODIS-EVI 2010 2011 •-1.2Lowes precipitation and smallest biosphere C sink in 2012; • Annual GPP and EVI anomaly are not significant 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 drought impact on seasonality Precip anomaly EVI 2010 2012 2015 2010 2012 2015 SIF-GPP T anomaly • Warmer and wetter at the beginning of the year=> higher EVI and GPP at the beginning • Drought peaked in June and July Impact of 2012 drought impact 0.9 0.22 Fossil fuel 0.1 -0.12 Δ GPP (2011-2015) Δ NBE (2011-2015) • The net biosphere sink was reduced by 0.22±0.17 GtC which is 24% of regional FF emissions. Impact of 2011 and 2012 drought 0.9 0.31 0.3 0.22 -0.01 -0.31 0.1 Fossil fuel Δ GPP (2011-2015) -0.12 Δ NBE (2011-2015) • Both drought increased the FF air borne fraction; 2011 drought increased local FF air borne fraction by 100%, while 2012 drought increased local FF air borne fraction by 24% • 2011 drought had larger impact on net biosphere carbon fluxes than 2012 drought Conclusions Synergistic use of A-train observations is critical to quantify and understand biosphere carbon flux interannual variability . • Mean FF air borne fraction over North American Temperate is 33%; with variability ranging from 17% to 54% • Drought events have large impact on regional FF air borne fraction. Backup Net biosphere exchange Fossil fuel Airborne Carbon 0.71 0.47 0.41 0.12 0.1 -0.13 -0.25 0.0 7 0.1 7 0.26 0.22 0 -0.19 -0.47 -0.45 Seasonality Net biome exchange 2010 2011 2015 Precipitation anomaly EVI T anomaly SIF-GPP Net flux difference between 2011 and 2010 Black: FLUXCOM Green: top-down Net biosphere flux difference between 2012 and 2010 Black: FLUXCOM Red: top-down • Increased uptake in April and reduced uptake in July, which are consistent with fluxnet upscaled FLUXCOM product Methodology A-train OCO-2 Japanese GOSAT 2010 2011 2012 A--Train 2013 2014 2015 500 Column CO2 Solar Induced Chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) MODIS Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation (CMS-Flux) EVI net biosphere exchange Gross Primary Production (GPP) Independent Evaluation FLUXCOM Upscaled FLUXNET fluxes
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz