- A broker
- He in tie and jacket,
so he seems to be a
man of wealth and
position.
- Have responsibility
and seriously about this
case: ‘If we’re going to
discuss this case, let’s stick
to the facts’.(p.9)
- Well educated man.
- A practiced speaker
who presents himself
well at all the times.
-
Juror #4

 Have background about social’s life and understand
about the condition to grow up that will affect to a
child: ‘’ Slums are breeding grounds for criminals.
Children from slum backgrounds are potential menaces to
society.’’(p. 12)
 Rational and logical with all evidence that he gave
such as detail about the process of murder or the
women saw the boy cross the road after he killed his
father).
Juror #4

 Only concern with the facts:‘’ This case is based on as
reasonable and logical progression of facts. Let’s keep it
there’’ (p.27)
 Have a little bit of smug and stubborn:’’ There’ no
reason why they can’t be persuaded to do it
again’’(p.42)
 8th juror conducts a simple experiment showing that
4th Juror is unable to accurately recall detail of a
movie he recently saw, although he wasn’t under an
emotional strain. But he still think the boy is guilty
by some ‘’ reasonable doubt’’.
Juror #4

 Finally, he changes his vote. Because he having been
convinced and swayed towards reasonable doubt by
the argument about the second witness and her
eyesight.
 Juror #4 is second – last juror to change his vote to
the boy is not guilty.
Conclusion

 Juror #4 is a person who expand all ‘reasonable
doubt’’ in ‘’ Twelve Angry Men’’ that reveal and
convince to all reader that the boy is not guilty by all
argument is logical and rational.
 Help people have consideration all our decision. Not
hurry when decisive anything if we don’t make sure
and clearly understand about it.
