Phycologia (2006) Volume 45 (6), 642–647
Published 1 November 2006
Photosynthetic inorganic carbon utilization of gametophytes and
sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae)
XU ZHANG1, HANHUA HU2*
1
AND
TIANWEI TAN1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Bioprocess, College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology,
Beijing 100029, P. R. China
2
State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Wuhan 430072, P. R. China
X. ZHANG, H. HU AND T. TAN. 2006. Photosynthetic inorganic carbon utilization of gametophytes and sporophytes of Undaria
pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae). Phycologia 45: 642–647. DOI: 10.2216/05-28.1
The characteristics of inorganic carbon assimilation by photosynthesis were investigated in male and female gametophytes
and juvenile sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida. Gametophytes and sporophytes have detectable extracellular and intracellular carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity, and the CA inhibitor, acetazolamide (AZ), significantly inhibited their photosynthesis
O2 evolution. In pH-drift experiments, it was found that gametophytes did not raise the final pH of seawater above 9.00
(CO2 concentrations of about 2.2 ␮M), indicating a low ability to utilize inorganic carbon. In contrast, sporophytes rapidly
raised pH to over 9.53 and depleted the free CO2 concentration to less than 0.16 ␮M. The apparent photosynthetic affinity
for CO2 was almost the same for gametophytes and sporophytes, whereas gametophytes had a much lower affinity for
HCO3⫺ than sporophytes. Two inhibitors of band 3 anion exchange protein (DIDS and SITS) inhibited the photosynthesis
of gametophytes but not that of sporophytes. It was indicated that both gametophytes and sporophytes were capable of
using HCO3⫺, which involved the external CA activity, and a direct HCO3⫺ use also occurred in the former, but the latter
showed a greater capacity of HCO3⫺ use than the former. In addition, male and female gametophytes did not show great
differences in the inorganic carbon uptake mechanism underlying photosynthesis.
KEY WORDS: Carbonic anhydrase, Gametophytes, Inorganic carbon, Photosynthesis, Sporophytes, Undaria pinnatifida
INTRODUCTION
Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar is a brown macroalga,
originally endemic to Japan. Used mainly as seafood, U. pinnatifida is economically important and has been commercially
cultivated in China, Japan and Korea. U. pinnatifida has been
accidentally introduced in Australia, New Zealand and Europe
via ballast water discharged from ships and has become a
marine pest in the natural ecosystems of some areas (Hay &
Luckens 1987; Fletcher & Manfredi 1995).
Undaria pinnatifida has an annual life history that alternates between microscopic stages (spores and gametophytes)
and the visible kelp stage (sporophytes). Within its native
range, U. pinnatifida exhibits a strongly defined annual growth
cycle. The sporophytes grow through winter and mature in
early to midspring. As sea temperatures increase, the sporophytes produce haploid spores by meiosis that germinate and
grow into microscopic haploid gametophytes (male and female). As seawater temperatures drop, fusion of eggs and
sperm produced by the dioecious gametophytes gives rise to
the next season’s sporophytes (Li 1995).
The total amount of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in
seawater includes dissolved CO2 (CO2(aq)), HCO3⫺ and CO32⫺.
Within the normal pH range of seawater (8.0 to 8.3) and at
equilibrium with atmospheric CO2, the bulk of DIC is HCO3⫺.
Its concentration is approximately 2 mM, whereas the level
of CO2(aq) is 12 to 15 ␮M, at 25⬚C (Sukenik et al. 1997).
Johnston (1991) concluded that marine macroalgae display at
* Corresponding author ([email protected]).
642
least three mechanisms of DIC assimilation: (1) diffusive
CO2(aq) uptake; (2) CO2(aq) uptake dependent on extracellular
CA catalyzed dehydration of HCO3⫺; and (3) direct transport
of HCO3⫺ into the cell. The mechanism of DIC utilization is
species-dependent. Many marine macroalgae are able to utilize HCO3⫺ in addition to CO2(aq) (Sand-Jensen & Gordon
1984; Beer & Shragge 1987; Surif & Raven 1989; Maberly
1990; Mercado et al. 1997; Israel et al. 1999). On the other
hand, CO2(aq) is the only source of DIC for some macroalgae
(Maberly 1990). The ability to deplete DIC is linked with the
ecology or taxonomy of the species (Surif & Raven 1989;
Maberly 1990). However, the influence of life history phase
on DIC acquisition has not been investigated in many brown
macroalgae.
The aims of this work were to investigate and distinguish
the DIC acquisition mechanisms of gametophytes (including
male and female) and juvenile sporophytes of U. pinnatifida,
which might help to increase the production of the economic
seaweed through the appropriate supply of carbon source in
different developmental stages.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Organisms and growth conditions
Gametophytes of U. pinnatifida were obtained as an axenic
culture from the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy
of Sciences, and were cultured as previously described (Pang
& Wu 1996). The filamentous male (5–10 ␮m broad) and
Zhang et al.: Inorganic carbon utilization in Undaria
female (10–20 ␮m broad) gametophytes were fragmented by
sonication at 100 W for 1 min, and were harvested by centrifugation at 1000 ⫻ g for 3 min at 25⬚C. The sonicated
gametophytes were observed under microscope, and it was
found that they did not burst and were able to grow into juvenile sporophytes. Then the gametophytes were washed and
resuspended in the solution to be used in the subsequent experiments.
Juvenile sporophytes (1–2 mm) of U. pinnatifida were obtained by mixing male and female gametophytes together in
a container with a rough surface glass plate as substratum.
The culture conditions proposed by Pang & Wu (1996) were
adopted: 17⬚C, 60 ␮mol photons m⫺2 s⫺1, with a 12 : 12 h
light/dark cycle.
Measurement of pH change in external solution
About 0.5 g fresh weight (FW) of male or female gametophytes, or juvenile sporophyte blades of U. pinnatifida were
placed in 50 ml glass bottles, which were filled with sterilized
seawater, fitted with a pH electrode and stirred with a magnetic bar to measure the pH drift. After sealing to prevent CO2
exchange with the atmosphere, bottles were incubated at 25⬚C
and 40 ␮mol photons m⫺2 s⫺1 for gametophytes, and 17⬚C and
60 ␮mol photons m⫺2 s⫺1 for sporophytes. The pH was recorded continuously until no increase was observed for at
least 1 h.
Measurement of net photosynthetic rates
Net photosynthetic rates were measured as O2 evolution with
a DW2/2 oxygen electrode (Hansatech Ltd, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, UK) under the same conditions as for pH drift experiments with red LED as light sources. The measuring chamber
contained 2.0 ml sterilized seawater or artificial seawater
(ASW: 400 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, 30 mM Na2SO4, 10
mM CaCl2, 10 mM KCl) (Lyman & Fleming 1940) and 0.05
g FW male or female gametophytes, or juvenile sporophyte
blades of U. pinnatifida. Photosynthetic rates were expressed
as micromoles of O2 per milligram of chlorophyll a per hour.
Chlorophyll a was measured by centrifuging the algae at
3000 ⫻ g for 10 min at 4⬚C. The pellet was resuspended in 2
ml 90% (v/v) acetone, extracted for 24 h at 4⬚C, and then
centrifuged at 10,000 ⫻ g for 10 min at 4⬚C to remove debris.
Chlorophyll a in the extract was measured using the equations
of Jeffrey & Humphrey (1975).
Photosynthetic response to pH change
To determine photosynthetic response to pH change, algae
were transferred to the O2 electrode chamber containing natural seawater (at 2.3 mM DIC) at different pH, using 25 mM
MES, TRIS or CAPS (Sigma Co., St. Louis, USA) as buffers.
Photosynthetic response to external inorganic carbon
To determine the photosynthetic response to external inorganic carbon, algae were immersed in inorganic carbon–free
ASW buffered with 25 mM TRIS for pH 8.3 or 25 mM CAPS
for pH 9.3. After sealing the system and providing illumination, the algae were allowed to consume any residual DIC,
until no net O2 evolution was observed. Increasing levels of
freshly prepared NaHCO3 solution were then injected into the
643
chamber and O2 evolution was recorded. Apparent half-saturation values (K1/2) were estimated for DIC and CO2(aq) using
the Michaelis–Menten equation.
Measurement of carbonic anhydrase activity
The activity of intra- and extracellular CA was measured as
the ability of a sample to catalyze the hydration rate of CO2(aq)
to HCO3⫺. About 0.5 g FW male or female gametophytes, or
pieces of sporophyte thallus were sampled for extracellular
CA determinations, and the algal homogenates (using a tissue
homogenizer at 4⬚C) were used to measure total (intra- and
extracellular) CA. According to the method of Israel et al.
(1999), the samples were immersed in 50 ml CO2(aq)–free
ASW at pH 8.2 (5 mM TRIS-HCl) at 4⬚C. The reaction was
started by introducing 10 ml ice-cold CO2(aq)–saturated distilled water into the mixture. Enzyme units (EU) were calculated from the time taken to lower the pH from 8.2 to 6.3
using the following equation:
EU ⫽ 10(t0/tc ⫺ 1)/mg chlorophyll a
where t0 is the time for the uncatalyzed reaction and tc is the
time for the catalyzed reaction.
Measurement of alkalinity and total DIC, and the
calculation of CO2(aq) and HCO3⫺
Alkalinity was measured as described by Parsons et al. (1989).
Total DIC was calculated from carbonate alkalinity (Calk) and
pH according to Stumm & Morgan (1970).
[DIC] ⫽ (Calk ⫹ [H⫹ ] ⫺ [OH⫺ ])/(a1 ⫹ 2a2 )
a 0 ⫽ (1 ⫹ K1 /[H⫹ ] ⫹ K1K2 /[H⫹ ] 2 )⫺1
a1 ⫽ (1 ⫹ [H⫹ ]/K1 ⫹ K2 /[H⫹ ])⫺1
a2 ⫽ (1 ⫹ [H⫹ ]/K1 /K2 ⫹ [H⫹ ]/K2 )⫺1
[CO2(aq) ] ⫽ a 0 [DIC]
[HCO3⫺ ] ⫽ a1 [DIC]
where K1 and K2 are the first and second apparent dissociation
constants of H2CO3, according to Goyet & Poisson (1989):
pK1 ⫽ 812.27/T ⫹ 3.356 ⫺ (0.0017 ⫻ S ⫻ ln T)
⫹ (0.000091 ⫻ S 2)
pK2 ⫽ 1450.87/T ⫹ 4.604 ⫺ (0.00385 ⫻ S ⫻ ln T)
⫹ (0.000182 ⫻ S 2)
where T is absolute temperature and S is salinity.
Inhibitors
Three inhibitors (Sigma Co., St. Louis, USA) were used: AZ;
4⬘,4⬘-diisothiocyanatosilbene-2,2-disulphonic acid (DIDS);
and 4-acetamido-4⬘-isothiocyanostilbene-2,2⬘-disulphonic acid
(SITS). Changes of the net photosynthetic rates of gametophytes or sporophytes of U. pinnatifida submerged in seawater
were compared before and after the exposure to 200 ␮M AZ,
300 ␮M DIDS or 600 ␮M SITS.
Statistics
The data were expressed as the mean values ⫾ standard deviation (s). Statistical significance of the means was tested
644
Phycologia, Vol. 45 (6), 2006
Fig. 1. The pH drift for gametophytes and sporophytes of Undaria
pinnatifida in natural seawater (pH 8.28) at 25⬚C and 40 ␮mol photons
m⫺2 s⫺1 for gametophytes, and 17⬚C and 60 ␮mol photons m⫺2 s⫺1 for
sporophytes. Mean ⫾ s, n ⫽ 5.
with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a
Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test
for multiple comparisons using the commercial software Statistica 6.0 (StatSoft Inc, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA). The significance level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS
Drifts of pH in a closed system
For male and female gametophytes of U. pinnatifida, the pH
of seawater increased steadily from 8.28 to maximal values
of 8.82 and 8.81, respectively, after illumination for 10 h in
a closed system (Fig. 1). No significant difference was observed between male and female gametophytes in the rate of
alkalization (P ⬎ 0.05). Over the same time period, juvenile
sporophytes increased the pH of seawater from 8.28 to 9.53
(Fig. 1). The final inorganic carbon concentrations were calculated from the pH values. For male and female gametophytes, the concentration of CO2(aq) approached 2.20 ␮M and
HCO3⫺ decreased by only 30%, from 2.00 mM to 1.36–1.40
mM. The residual inorganic carbon concentrations at the end
of the pH drift experiments with sporophytes were significantly lower than for gametophytes, with CO2(aq) at 0.16 ␮M
(F2,12 ⫽ 11,724.60, P ⬍ 0.0001) and HCO3⫺ at 0.52 mM (F2,12
⫽ 639.59, P ⬍ 0.0001).
Net photosynthetic rate response to pH variations
Rates of photosynthesis of both gametophytes and sporophytes were maximal at pH 7.2 and 8.3, and approached zero
at pH 10.3 (Fig. 2). From pH 8.3 to 9.3, the photosynthesis
of gametophytes decreased but that of sporophytes did not
change. The effects of low pH (⬍ 7.2) on photosynthesis were
greater for female gametophytes than for males. Dark respiration rates of sporophytes did not vary significantly between
Fig. 2. Rates of net photosynthesis (NPS) and dark respiration (RES)
of gametophytes and sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida in natural
seawater [2.3 mM dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC)] at different pH.
Mean ⫾ s, n ⫽ 6.
pH 5.5 and 9.3 (F4,25 ⫽ 0.48, P ⫽ 0.7529), but increased by
about 40% at pH 10.3. For gametophytes, dark respiration
increased at pH above and below that of seawater.
Photosynthetic response to external inorganic carbon
The apparent half-saturation values for DIC were similar for
male and female gametophytes (Table 1), but juvenile sporophytes had a higher affinity (lower K1/2) for DIC than gametophytes (for pH 8.3: F2,12 ⫽ 14.42, P ⫽ 0.0006; for pH 9.3:
F2,12 ⫽ 145.12, P ⬍ 0.0001). Gametophytes tested at pH 8.3
had a higher affinity for DIC than those tested at pH 9.3, but
the affinity for DIC of sporophytes was not affected by pH.
The affinity for dissolved CO2 did not differ between gametophytes and sporophytes (F2,12 ⫽ 1.62, P ⫽ 0.2389).
Zhang et al.: Inorganic carbon utilization in Undaria
645
Table 1. Apparent half-saturation values (K1/2) of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) at pH 8.3 and 9.3 and CO2 at pH 8.3 for gametophytes and
sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida. Mean ⫾ s, n ⫽ 5.
K1/2 (DIC) (mM)
1,2
pH 9.3
pH 8.3
1.522 ⫾ 0.282
1.254 ⫾ 0.0521
0.955 ⫾ 0.0402
F2,12 ⫽ 14.42, P ⫽ 0.0006
2.133 ⫾ 0.183
1.950 ⫾ 0.0491
1.015 ⫾ 0.0372
F2,12 ⫽ 145.12, P ⬍ 0.0001
18 ⫾ 7
15 ⫾ 51
11 ⫾ 61
F2,12 ⫽ 1.62, P ⫽ 0.2389
1
Male gametophytes
Female gametophytes
Juvenile sporophytes
ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD
K1/2(CO2(aq)) (␮M)
pH 8.3
1
1
Within each column, different superscripts indicate means that are significantly different.
Carbonic anhydrase activity
DISCUSSION
Gametophytes and sporophytes of U. pinnatifida were tested
for carbonic anhydrase activity in crude extracts (total) and in
intact cells (extracellular). Both extracellular and intracellular
CA were detected in U. pinnatifida (Table 2). Sporophytes had
higher internal and external CA activities than gametophytes,
and a smaller proportion of the total CA activity was external.
The CA activities of male and female gametophytes were similar.
The results indicate that, while both gametophytes and sporophytes of U. pinnatifida can utilize HCO3⫺ in addition to
Effects of inhibitors
When the membrane-impermeable CA inhibitor, AZ, was added to seawater in the pH drift experiments, the maximal pH
of seawater after 60 min was not greatly reduced relative to
controls in male and female gametophytes (from 8.65 to 8.52
and from 8.62 to 8.54, respectively; Fig. 3). For juvenile sporophytes, however, the addition of AZ reduced the maximal
pH after 60 min from 8.72 to 8.41.
DIDS and SITS are inhibitors of the band 3 anion exchange
protein, which is the most common HCO3⫺ transporting protein in biological systems (Smith 1988), and their effects (and
that of AZ) on net photosynthetic O2 evolution rates were
compared for gametophytes and sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida (Table 3). All three inhibitors had similar effects on
male and female gametophytes, but their effects on juvenile
sporophytes were significantly lower than on gametophytes
(for AZ: F2,15 ⫽ 11.59, P ⫽ 0.0009; for DIDS: F2,15 ⫽ 35.75,
P ⬍ 0.0001; for SITS: F2,15 ⫽ 43.09, P ⬍ 0.0001). Addition
of DIDS and SITS did not inhibit the O2 evolution rate of
sporophytes significantly (P ⬎ 0.05).
Table 2. External and total carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity of
gametophytes and sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida. Mean ⫾ s,
n ⫽ 5.
CA activity
(EU mg⫺1 chlorophyll a)1
Male gametophytes
Female gametophytes
Juvenile sporophytes
ANOVA, followed by
Tukey’s HSD
1
External
Total
22.6 ⫾ 5.4
26.8 ⫾ 7.22
45.3 ⫾ 6.73
F2,12 ⫽ 17.48,
P ⫽ 0.0003
72 ⫾ 162
67 ⫾ 122
215 ⫾ 563
F2,12 ⫽ 30.03,
P ⬍ 0.0001
2
External
CA as a
percentage of
total CA
31.4%
40.0%
21.1%
EU, enzyme units.
Within each column, different superscripts indicate means that are
significantly different.
2,3
Fig. 3. The pH drift for gametophytes and sporophytes of Undaria
pinnatifida in natural seawater (pH 8.28) without acetazolamide (AZ)
(䡵) or with 200 ␮M AZ (䉱). Mean ⫾ s, n ⫽ 4⬃6.
646
Phycologia, Vol. 45 (6), 2006
Table 3. Percentage of photosynthetic activity of gametophytes and
sporophytes of Undaria pinnatifida that remains after 10 min in natural seawater containing one of three inhibitors (200 ␮M AZ, 300 ␮M
DIDS or 600 ␮M SITS). Mean ⫾ s, n ⫽ 6.
Remaining photosynthetic activity (%)
Male
Female
Juvenile
Inhibitor1 gametophytes gametophytes sporophytes
AZ
66.5 ⫾ 6.72
58.6 ⫾ 5.72
77.4 ⫾ 7.83
DIDS
63.6 ⫾ 7.02
68.4 ⫾ 6.92
92.8 ⫾ 5.23
SITS
76.0 ⫾ 4.92
67.4 ⫾ 8.22
99.8 ⫾ 5.13
ANOVA,
followed by
Tukey’s HSD
F2,15 ⫽ 11.59,
P ⫽ 0.0009
F2,15 ⫽ 35.75,
P ⬍ 0.0001
F2,15 ⫽ 43.09,
P ⬍ 0.0001
1 AZ, acetazolamide; DIDS, 4⬘,4⬘-diisothiocyanatosilbene-2,2-disulphonic acid; SITS, 4-acetamido-4⬘-isothiocyanostilbene-2,2⬘-disulphonic acid.
2,3 Within each row, different superscripts indicate means that are
significantly different.
CO2(aq) for photosynthesis, there are some differences in the
photosynthetic carbon metabolism of the life history phases.
U. pinnatifida is a member of Laminariales and usually grows
in intertidal rock-pools down to the subtidal zone. Maberly
(1990) showed that, based on the pH-drift technique, Laminaria saccharina, L. digitata and L. hyperborea could use
HCO3⫺. The final pH recorded for these macroalgae were
9.20–9.76, and the concentrations of DIC, CO2(aq) and HCO3⫺
were 1.56–1.28 mM, 0.61–0.06 ␮M and 0.84–0.31 mM, respectively. For sporophytes of U. pinnatifida, the final concentrations of DIC, CO2(aq) and HCO3⫺ were 1.36 mM, 0.16
␮M and 0.52 mM. The ability of sporophytes of U. pinnatifida
to use HCO3⫺ in photosynthesis and the extent of the operation
of CO2(aq) concentrating mechanism, seems therefore similar
to other members of the Laminariales. However, the affinity
for DIC of sporophytes of U. pinnatifida, was greater than
that reported for other Laminariales, whose apparent half-saturation values for DIC all exceed 1.50 mM (Maberly 1990).
The pH around seaweeds with efficient HCO3⫺ uptake systems increases rapidly to pH 9.0 or higher (Maberly 1990).
However, in the present study pH did not reach 9.0 in closed
systems containing gametophytes of U. pinnatifida, which indicated that gametophytes had much lower abilities to use
HCO3⫺. On the other hand, at pH 8.0 and above, the principal
species of inorganic carbon in seawater was HCO3⫺, with CO2
concentration decreasing from 15 ␮M to nearly zero at pH
10.0. Parallel with the increase of pH from 8.3 to 9.3 and the
decrease of CO2 concentration, photosynthetic rate was reduced drastically, suggesting that gametophytes counted firstly
on free CO2 concentration to drive photosynthesis. It was evident that gametophytes had a limited capacity for HCO3⫺ utilization.
It is well recognized that the activity of carbonic anhydrase
is involved in the utilization of HCO3⫺ during the period of
photosynthesis (Johnston 1991; Haglund et al. 1992; Mercado
et al. 1998). The extracellular CA catalyzes the conversion of
HCO3⫺ to CO2, which is taken up through the plasma membrane and then fixed in photosynthesis. The present results
showed that both gametophytes and sporophytes of U. pinnatifida exhibited CA activities detected potentiometically,
and the CA inhibitor, AZ, significantly inhibited their photosynthesis O2 evolution and alkalization rate. This suggested
that both gametophytes and sporophytes of U. pinnatifida
were capable of using HCO3⫺, which involved the external
CA activity. The ability of using HCO3⫺ by means of this
mechanism is generally reduced sharply by increased pH, and
is essentially very poor at above pH 9.5 (Axelsson et al. 1995,
2000).
The use of HCO3⫺ following its direct uptake has been described in some green macroalgae and red algae (Johnston et
al. 1992; Axelsson et al. 1995; Larsson et al. 1997; Andria et
al. 1999). The photosynthetic O2 evolution by gametophytes
of U. pinnatifida was depressed remarkably by the anion exchanger inhibitor, DIDS and/or SITS, implying that the mechanism of U. pinnatifida by direct uptake played an important
role in the inorganic carbon utilization in the gametophytes of
the brown macroalgae, U. pinnatifida. However, the photosynthesis of sporophytes was not affected by putative anionexchange inhibitor DIDS or SITS, which suggested that a
DIDS- or SITS-sensitive anion-exchange-type HCO3⫺ transporter was unlikely to be present in DIC acquisition by sporophytes. On the other hand, the effects of DIDS upon indirect
measures of DIC acquisition should be interpreted cautiously
as DIDS may have nonspecific effects upon whole cell function, and affect transport processes not directly related to
HCO3⫺ uptake (Young et al. 2001). HCO3⫺ can be transported
into the cells against an electrochemical gradient, which requires the energy provided via a plasmalemma-associated
ATPase (Axelsson & Beer 2001). ATPases show negligible
DIDS sensitivity, so a DIDS-susceptible component of DIC
acquisition may be regarded as distinct from ATPase-mediated
transport (Young et al. 2001). The HCO3⫺ transport system
identified in sporophytes of U. pinnatifida in our study could
be further catalyzed by extracellular CA activity, which might
be the primary way of utilizing DIC for sporophytes.
In general, algae possessing direct HCO3⫺ uptake mechanism exhibit a greater affinity for DIC than the algae with
only the indirect HCO3⫺ utilization catalysed by CA activity
(Axelsson et al. 1995, 1999). However, our present experiments showed this is not necessarily so in such macroalga as
U. pinnatifida. While gametophytes of U. pinnatifida had a
lower affinity for DIC than sporophytes, the former could take
up HCO3⫺ directly and the latter hardly possessed the mechanism of direct HCO3⫺ uptake. Perhaps the mechanism of direct HCO3⫺ use occurring in gametophytes was too poor to
accumulate DIC intracellularly and thereby to raise the DIC
affinity.
The final pH values of over 9.2 (equivalent to 0.6 ␮M CO2
in seawater) have been viewed as an indicator of HCO3⫺ use
in macroalgae. The higher final pH values, the greater the
ability of HCO3⫺ using (Maberly 1990; Johnston et al. 1992).
Thus, the higher final pH values in sporophytes also suggested
that sporophytes had a greater ability of HCO3⫺ use than gametophytes. Such a higher HCO3⫺ use capacity in juvenile
sporophytes might be related with their greater demands for
DIC to mature.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by the Key Laboratory of Bioprocess of Beijing, P.R. China (SYS100100421).
Zhang et al.: Inorganic carbon utilization in Undaria
REFERENCES
ANDRı́A J.R., PÉREZ-LLORÉNS J.L. & VERGARA J.J. 1999. Mechanisms
of inorganic carbon acquisition in Gracilaria gaditana nom. prov.
(Rhodophyta). Planta 208: 564–573.
AXELSSON L. & BEER S. 2001. Carbon limitation. In: Algal Adaptation
to Environmental Stresses—Physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms (Ed. by L.C. Rai & J.P. Gaur), pp. 21–43. Springer
Verlag Press, Berlin, Germany.
AXELSSON L., RYBERG H. & BEER S. 1995. Two modes of bicarbonate
utilization in the marine green macroalga Ulva lactuca. Plant, Cell
and Environment 18: 439–445.
AXELSSON L., LARSSON C. & RYBERG H. 1999. Affinity, capacity and
oxygen sensitivity of the two different mechanisms for bicarbonate
utilization in Ulva lactuca L. (Chlorophyta). Plant, Cell and Environment 22: 969–978.
AXELSSON L., MERCADO J. & FIGUEROA F. 2000. Utilization of HCO3⫺
at high pH by the brown macroalga Laminaria saccharina. European Journal of Phycology 35: 53–59.
BEER S. & SHRAGGE B. 1987. Photosynthetic carbon metabolism in
Enteromorpha compressa (Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 23:
580–584.
FLETCHER R.L. & MANFREDI C. 1995. The occurrence of Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) on the South coast of England. Botanica Marina 38: 355–358.
GOYET C. & POISSON A. 1989. New determination of carbonic acid
dissociation constants in seawater as a function of temperature and
salinity. Deep-Sea Research 36: 1635–1654.
HAGLUND K., RAMAZANOV Z., MTOLERA M. & PEDERSÉN M. 1992.
Role of external carbonic anhydrase in light-dependent alkalization
by Fucus serratus L., and Laminaria saccharina (L.) Lamour.
(Phaeophyta). Planta 188: 1–6.
HAY C.H. & LUCKENS P.A. 1987. The Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida
(Phaeophyta: Laminariales) found in a New Zealand harbour. New
Zealand Journal of Botany 25: 329–332.
ISRAEL A., KATZ S., DUBINSKY Z., MERRILL J.E. & FRIEDLANDER M.
1999. Photosynthetic inorganic carbon utilization and growth of
Porphyra linearis (Rhodophyta). Journal of Applied Phycology 11:
447–453.
JEFFREY S.W. & HUMPHREY G.F. 1975. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants,
algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochemie und Physiologie der
Pflanzen 16: 191–194.
JOHNSTON A.M. 1991. The acquisition of inorganic carbon by marine
macroalgae. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 1123–1132.
JOHNSTON A.M., MABERLY S.C. & RAVEN J.A. 1992. The acquisition
of inorganic carbon for four red macroalgae. Oecologia 92: 317–
326.
LARSSON C., AXELSSON L., RYBERG H. & BEER S. 1997. Photosynthetic
647
carbon utilization by Enteromorpha intestinalis (Chlorophyta) from
a Swedish rockpool. European Journal of Phycology 32: 49–54.
LI H.J. 1995. Cultivation of Undaria pinnatifida and Gelidium divaricatum. Qingdao Press, Qingdao, China. 47–80 pp.
LYMAN J. & FLEMING R.H. 1940. Composition of sea water. Journal
of Marine Research 3: 134–146.
MABERLY S.C. 1990. Exogenous sources of inorganic carbon for photosynthesis by marine macroalgae. Journal of Phycology 26: 439–
449.
MERCADO J.M., NIELL F.X. & FIGUEROA F.L. 1997. Regulation of the
mechanism for HCO3⫺ use by the inorganic carbon level in Porphyra leucosticta Thur. In Le Jolis (Rhodophyta). Planta 201: 319–
325.
MERCADO J.M., GORDILLO F.J.L., FIGUEROA F.L. & NIELL F.X. 1998.
External carbonic anhydrase and affinity for inorganic carbon in
intertidal macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and
Ecology 221: 209–220.
PANG S.J. & WU C.Y. 1996. Study on gametophyte vegetative growth
of Undaria pinnatifida and its applications. Chinese Journal of
Oceanology and Limnology 14: 205–211.
PARSONS T., MAITA Y. & Lalli C.M. 1989. A manual of chemical and
biological methods for sea water analysis. Pergamon Press, London.
142–148 pp.
SAND-JENSEN K. & GORDON D.M. 1984. Differential ability of marine
and freshwater macrophytes to utilize HCO3⫺ and CO2. Marine Biology 80: 247–253.
SMITH R.G. 1988. Inorganic carbon transport in biological systems.
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 90B: 639–654.
STUMM W. & MORGAN J.J. 1970. Aquatic chemistry. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 118–160 pp.
SUKENIK A., TCHERNOV D., KAPLAN A., HUERTAS E., LUBIAN L.M. &
LIVNE A. 1997. Uptake, efflux, and photosynthetic utilization of
inorganic carbon by the marine eustigmatophyte Nannochloropsis
sp. Journal of Phycology 33: 969–974.
SURIF M.B. & RAVEN J.A. 1989. Exogenous inorganic carbon sources
for photosynthesis in seawater by members of the Fucales and Laminariales (Phaeophyta): ecological and taxonomic implications. Oecologia 78: 97–105.
YOUNG E., GIORDANO M. & BEARDALL J. 2001. Inorganic carbon acquisition by Dunaliella tertiolecta (Chlorophyta) involves external
carbonic anhydrase and direct HCO3⫺ utilisation (insensitive to the
anion exchange inhibitor DIDS). European Journal of Phycology
36: 81–88.
Received 2 May 2005; accepted 1 May 2006
Associate editor: C. Amsler