E1841
2016
DRY
BEAN
Grower Survey
of Production, Pest Problems
and Pesticide Use
in Minnesota and North Dakota
J.J. Knodel, P.B. Beauzay, G.J. Endres,
D.W. Franzen, H.J. Kandel, S.G. Markell,
J.M. Osorno, J.S. Pasche and R.K. Zollinger
North Dakota State University
In cooperation with the
Northarvest Bean Growers Association
1•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
March 2017
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................4
Acknowledgments .....................................................................................................................................................................................4
Production ..................................................................................................................................................................................................5
Table 1.
Number of Northarvest dry bean growers responding, acres planted by respondents and total state acres in 2016 ...........5
Table 2.
Dry bean production by county in 2016.................................................................................................................................5
Table 3.
Dry bean acres planted, harvested, irrigated, on tile-drained ground and damaged by water in 2016 .................................6
Table 4.
Dry bean market classes grown in 2016 ...............................................................................................................................6
Table 5.
Dry bean varieties grown in 2016..........................................................................................................................................7
Table 6.
Dry bean production problems reported in 2016...................................................................................................................8
Table 7.
Purchased seed size problems that affected acreage planting intentions in 2016................................................................9
Table 8.
Row spacing by dry bean market class in 2016 ....................................................................................................................9
Table 9.
Seeding rate by dry bean market class in 2016 ..................................................................................................................10
Table 10. Difference between seeding rate and established plant stand for dry bean market classes grown in 2016. ......................10
Table 11. Percent of total dry bean acres harvested by direct combining in 2016. .............................................................................11
Table 12. Estimated yield loss in harvested dry beans in 2016. .........................................................................................................11
Table 13. Dry bean field tillage practices in 2016. ..............................................................................................................................12
Agronomy .................................................................................................................................................................................................12
Table 14. Ground rolling on dry bean fields in 2016. ..........................................................................................................................12
Table 15. Ground rolling and direct harvest on dry bean fields in 2016..............................................................................................13
Table 16. Use of fertilizers on dry bean fields in 2016 ........................................................................................................................13
Table 17. Fertilizer application methods on dry bean fields in 2016 ...................................................................................................13
Table 18. Use of soil test prior to fertilization of dry bean fields in 2016. ............................................................................................14
Table 19. Use of Rhizobium inoculants on dry bean fields in 2016.....................................................................................................14
Table 20. Use of site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) on dry bean fields in 2016. ..................................................................14
Table 21. Desiccants used on dry beans in 2016 ...............................................................................................................................15
Table 22. Desiccant tank-mixes used on dry beans in 2016...............................................................................................................15
Table 23. Frequency of crops in dry bean crop rotation program, 2012-2015. ...................................................................................16
Table 24. Number of years dry beans are grown in dry bean crop rotation program..........................................................................16
Insect Pests and Insecticide Use............................................................................................................................................................17
Table 25. Worst insect problem in dry beans in 2016 .........................................................................................................................17
Table 26. Insects ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016 ...........................................................................................18
Table 27. Foliar insecticide use in dry beans in 2016 .........................................................................................................................19
Table 28. Soil insecticide and seed treatment use in dry beans in 2016 ............................................................................................20
Plant Diseases and Fungicide Use .........................................................................................................................................................21
Table 29. Worst disease problem in dry beans in 2016 ......................................................................................................................21
Table 30. Diseases ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016 .......................................................................................22
Table 31. Foliar and banded fungicide use in dry beans in 2016........................................................................................................23
Table 32. In-furrow fungicide use in dry beans in 2016.......................................................................................................................24
Table 33. Fungicide seed treatment use in dry beans in 2016 ...........................................................................................................25
Weeds and Herbicide Use .......................................................................................................................................................................26
Table 34. Worst weed problem in dry beans in 2016 ..........................................................................................................................26
Table 35. Weeds ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016. ..........................................................................................27
Table 36. Weed control practices used in dry beans in 2016 .............................................................................................................28
Table 37. Weed control practices used by dry bean market class in 2016 .........................................................................................29
Scouting and Threshold Practices .........................................................................................................................................................30
Table 38. Scouting practices in dry beans in 2016 .............................................................................................................................30
Table 39. Use of economic thresholds for insects in dry beans in 2016. ............................................................................................30
References ................................................................................................................................................................................................31
APPENDIX I. ..............................................................................................................................................................................................32
2•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
List of Figures
Figure 1.
Northarvest dry bean acres planted by state in 2016 ................................................................................... 5
Figure 2.
Northarvest dry bean production by county in 2016 ..................................................................................... 5
Figure 3.
Northarvest respondents’ reported acres from Table 3 ................................................................................. 6
Figure 4.
Northarvest dry bean market classes grown in 2016 ................................................................................... 6
Figure 5.
Northarvest respondents’ reported acres for dry bean production problems in 2016 ................................... 8
Figure 6.
Northarvest percent of dry bean acres harvested by direct combining in 2016.......................................... 11
Figure 7.
Northarvest estimated yield loss in harvested dry beans in 2016 .............................................................. 11
Figure 8.
Northarvest dry bean field tillage practices in 2016 .................................................................................... 12
Figure 9.
Northarvest ground rolling on dry bean fields in 2016 ................................................................................ 12
Figure 10. Northarvest use of fertilizers on dry bean fields in 2016............................................................................. 13
Figure 11. Northarvest fertilizer application methods on dry bean fields in 2016 ........................................................ 13
Figure 12. Northarvest use of soil test in 2016 ............................................................................................................ 14
Figure 13. Northarvest use of inoculant in 2016 .......................................................................................................... 14
Figure 14. Northarvest use of site-specific nutrient management in 2016................................................................... 14
Figure 15. Northarvest desiccants used on dry beans in 2016.................................................................................... 15
Figure 16. Northarvest frequency of major crops in dry bean crop rotation program, 2012-2015 ............................... 16
Figure 17. Northarvest number of years dry beans are grown in dry bean crop rotation program .............................. 16
Figure 18. Northarvest worst insect problem in dry beans in 2016 .............................................................................. 17
Figure 19. Northarvest insects ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016 ............................................... 18
Figure 20. Northarvest foliar insecticide use in dry beans in 2016 .............................................................................. 19
Figure 21. Northarvest insecticide seed treatment and soil insecticide use in dry beans in 2016 ............................... 20
Figure 22. Northarvest worst disease problem in dry beans in 2016 ........................................................................... 21
Figure 23. Northarvest diseases ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016 ............................................ 22
Figure 24. Northarvest foliar and banded fungicide use in dry beans in 2016............................................................. 24
Figure 25. Northarvest fungicide application method in dry beans in 2016 ................................................................. 24
Figure 26. Northarvest in-furrow fungicide use in dry beans in 2016 .......................................................................... 24
Figure 27. Northarvest fungicide seed treatment use in dry beans in 2016 ................................................................ 25
Figure 28. Northarvest worst weed problem in dry beans in 2016 .............................................................................. 26
Figure 29. Northarvest weeds ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016 ................................................ 27
Figure 30. Northarvest weed control practices used in dry beans in 2016 .................................................................. 28
3•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Introduction
The 2016 dry bean grower survey is the 27th annual survey of varieties grown,
pest problems, pesticide use and grower practices of the Northarvest Bean
Growers Association, an association of dry edible bean growers in Minnesota
and North Dakota. Research and Extension faculty at North Dakota State
University and the directors of the Northarvest Bean Growers Association
developed the survey form (Appendix I). The survey was mailed to all
Northarvest bean growers. All participants in the survey were anonymous.
Results of previous surveys dated 1987-1992, 1994-2000, 2002 and
2004-2015 have been published (see References). No surveys were
conducted in 1993 and 2001. In 2003, the survey was completed by dry
bean producers who attended the Northarvest Bean Day in Fargo during
the winter. However, the lack of responses made processing and analyses
of results unreliable, so no report was compiled.
Data reported in the figures represent totals for the entire Northarvest
survey unless otherwise noted. Data reported in the tables are broken
down by state and also are totaled for the entire Northarvest survey.
Percent values in tables and figures are rounded to one decimal for
clear presentation. Consequently, percent values in some tables and
figures may not total exactly 100 (e.g. 99.9 or 100.1) when the presented
values are added. Other instances in which percent values do not total
100 are explained in footnotes to the tables.
Throughout this report, trade names of chemicals often are presented
as an aid for clearer communication. Mention of trade names does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation by North Dakota State
University or the Northarvest Bean Growers Association.
Acknowledgments
A grant from the Northarvest Bean Growers Association funded the survey.
4•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Production
Table 1. Number of Northarvest dry bean growers
responding, acres planted by respondents and
total state acres in 2016.
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
No. of
Respondents’
Total
Acres surveyed
respondents
acres
acresa
(% of total)
Growers
Minnesota
48
26,357
155,000
17
North Dakota
92
59,755
625,000
9.6
Northarvest
140
86,112
780,000
11
a
Total of dry bean acres planted for Minnesota and North Dakota (source: USDA
National Agricultural Statistics Service).
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Minnesota
North Dakota
Figure 1. Northarvest dry bean acres planted
by state in 2016 (respondents’ acres only).
Table 2. Dry bean production by county in 2016.
No. of
respondentsa
8
5
2
3
5
3
3
4
1
1
1
4
3
2
2
2
1
2
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
No. of
respondentsa
19
13
8
8
10
7
3
5
12
3
4
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Minnesota
Acresb North Dakota
Acresb
Polk
4,235
Grand Forks
11,701
Wadena
2,655
Pembina
7,702
Hubbard
2,613
Benson
6,880
Norman
1,842
Wells
5,827
Swift
1,774
Steele
3,996
Otter Tail
1,694
Traill
3,708
Stevens
1,503
Nelson
3,315
Mahnomen
1,383
Ramsey
3,073
Becker
1,000
Walsh
2,762
Stearns
900
Cass
1,659
Pope
750
Griggs
1,543
Renville
711
LaMoure
1,000
Grant
705
Barnes
800
Kandiyohi
630
Richland
800
Benton
606
McLean
759
Marshall
540
Dickey
750
Douglas
530
Pierce
720
Clay
452
Cavalier
650
Morrison
446
Foster
500
Big Stone
365
Ransom
500
Traverse
300
Stutsman
450
Beltrami
293
Eddy
340
Sherburne
200
Sheridan
150
Chippewa
120
Rolette
95
Todd
60
Towner
75
Brown
50
Total
26,357 Total
59,755
a
Some respondents had dry bean acreage in more than one county.
b
Respondents’ acres only.
5•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Figure 2. Northarvest dry bean production by
county in 2016 (respondents’ acres only).
Acres reported
(no.)a
Acres reported
(%)a
26,357
25,128
12,130
5,516
1,676
1,230
100
95.3
46.0
20.9
6.4
4.7
59,755
54,916
1,206
2,465
11,869
4,833
100
91.9
2.0
4.1
19.9
8.1
86,112
80,044
13,336
7,981
13,545
6,063
100
93.0
15.5
9.3
15.7
7.0
Minnesota
Planted
Harvested
Irrigated
Tile-drained
Water damage (beans harvested)
Water damage (beans not harvested)
North Dakota
Planted
Harvested
Irrigated
Tile-drained
Water damage (beans harvested)
Water damage (beans not harvested)
Northarvest
Planted
Harvested
Irrigated
Tile-drained
Water damage (beans harvested)
Water damage (beans not harvested)
a
Respondents’ acres only.
Table 4. Dry bean market classes
grown in 2016.
Acres reported
Market class
(no.)a
Minnesota
Kidney
14,553
Navy
6,648
Black
3,303
Pinto
1,163
Pink
535
Small Red
155
Great Northern
0
Total
26,357
North Dakota
Pinto
44,527
Navy
8,040
Black
5,808
Great Northern
600
Kidney
433
Pink
267
Small Red
80
Total
59,755
Northarvest
Pinto
45,690
Kidney
14,986
Navy
14,688
Black
9,111
Pink
802
Great Northern
600
Small Red
235
Total
86,112
a
Respondents’ acres only.
Acres reported
(%)a
55.2
25.2
12.5
4.4
2.0
0.6
0
100
74.5
13.5
9.7
1.0
0.7
0.4
0.1
100
53.1
17.4
17.1
10.6
0.9
0.7
0.3
100
Navy
17.1%
Acres Reported
Table 3. Dry bean acres planted, harvested,
irrigated, on tile-drained ground and damaged
by water in 2016.
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 3. Northarvest respondents’
reported acres from Table 3.
Black
10.6%
Pink
0.9%
GN
0.7%
Red
0.3%
Kidney
17.4%
Pinto
53.1%
Northarvest
Pink
Pinto 2.0%
Black
4.4%
12.5%
Red
0.6%
Kidney
55.2%
Navy
25.2%
Minnesota
Black GN Kidney Pink
0.4%
Navy 9.7% 1.0% 0.7%
Red
13.5%
0.1%
Pinto
74.5%
North Dakota
Figure 4. Northarvest dry bean market classes grown in 2016.
6•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 5. Dry bean varieties grown in 2016.
Variety
Class
Eclipse
Black
Zorro
Black
Black Cat
Black
Not specified
Black
Total Black
Black
Orion
GN
Taurus
GN
Total GN
GN
Montcalm
Kidney
Red Hawk
Kidney
Pink Panther
Kidney
Drake
Kidney
Chapparal
Kidney
Cabernet
Kidney
Beluga
Kidney
Clouseau
Kidney
Red Rover
Kidney
Foxfire
Kidney
Talon
Kidney
Dynasty
Kidney
Big Red
Kidney
Total Kidney
Kidney
HMS Medalist
Navy
T9905
Navy
Ensign
Navy
Blizzard
Navy
Vigilant
Navy
COOP 06063
Navy
Not specified
Navy
Vista
Navy
Blizzard
Navy
Navigator
Navy
Indi
Navy
Total Navy
Navy
Floyd
Pink
ISB 473
Pink
Rogers 922
Pink
Not specified
Pink
Total Pink
Pink
Windbreaker
Pinto
La Paz
Pinto
Monterrey
Pinto
Lariat
Pinto
Santa Cruz
Pinto
Vibrant
Pinto
Torreon
Pinto
Sinaloa
Pinto
ND 307
Pinto
Buster
Pinto
El Dorado
Pinto
Stampede
Pinto
ND Palomino
Pinto
Maverick
Pinto
Total Pinto
Pinto
Ruby
Small Red
Merlot
Small Red
Total Red
Small Red
Grand
All
Total
Classes
a
Respondents’ acres only.
b
Percent of respondents’ total dry bean acreage.
c
GN = Great Northern.
7•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Minnesota
1,727
1,576
0
0
3,303
0
0
0
3,134
1,888
1,617
1,510
1,435
1,232
1,216
1,085
1,046
300
45
25
20
14,553
2,109
3,574
300
0
330
90
80
90
0
60
15
6,648
288
90
85
72
535
748
75
0
0
290
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
1,163
155
0
155
%b
6.6
6.0
0
0
12.5
0
0
0
11.9
7.2
6.1
5.7
5.4
4.7
4.6
4.1
4.0
1.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
55.2
8.0
13.6
1.1
0
1.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0
0.2
0.1
25.2
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
2.0
2.8
0.3
0
0
1.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0
4.4
0.6
0
0.6
Acres planteda
North
Dakota
%b
4,515
7.6
880
1.5
300
0.5
113
0.2
5,808
9.7
300
0.5
300
0.5
600
1.0
133
0.2
250
0.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0.1
0
0
0
0
433
0.7
4,329
7.2
2,318
3.9
552
0.9
381
0.6
0
0
140
0.2
210
0.4
0
0
80
0.1
0
0
30
0.1
8,040
13.5
267
0.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
267
0.4
13,592
22.7
13,910
23.3
5,405
9.0
3,119
5.2
2,491
4.2
2,034
3.4
1,180
2.0
1,105
1.8
1,000
1.7
200
0.3
200
0.3
150
0.3
51
0.1
90
0.2
44,527
74.5
0
0
80
0.1
80
0.1
26,357
100
59,755
100
Northarvest
6,242
2,456
300
113
9,111
300
300
600
3,267
2,138
1,617
1,510
1,435
1,232
1,216
1,085
1,046
300
95
25
20
14,986
6,438
5,892
852
381
330
230
290
90
80
60
45
14,688
555
90
85
72
802
14,340
13,985
5,405
3,119
2,781
2,034
1,180
1,105
1,000
200
200
150
101
90
45,690
155
80
235
%b
7.2
2.9
0.3
0.1
10.6
0.3
0.3
0.7
3.8
2.5
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
0.3
0.1
0
0
17.4
7.5
6.8
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
17.1
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.9
16.7
16.2
6.3
3.6
3.2
2.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
53.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
86,112
100
Table 6. Dry bean production problems reported in 2016.
Production problem
Minnesota
Hail
Diseases
Wind
None reported
Weeds
Harvest
Water damage (beans harvested)
Water damage (beans not harvested)
Drought
Emergence/stand
Delayed planting
Applied herbicide injury
Frost
Soil salinity
Herbicide drift injury
North Dakota
Hail
Water damage (beans harvested)
Weeds
Harvest
Diseases
Water damage (beans not harvested)
Emergence/stand
Delayed planting
Wind
Drought
Soil salinity
None reported
Applied herbicide injury
Herbicide drift injury
Micronutrient deficiency
Frost
Northarvest
Hail
Weeds
Water damage (beans harvested)
Harvest
Diseases
Wind
Water damage (beans not harvested)
Emergence/stand
Delayed planting
None reported
Drought
Soil salinity
Applied herbicide injury
Frost
Herbicide drift injury
Micronutrient deficiency
a
Respondents’ acres only.
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
Acres
reported (no.)a
Acres
reported (%)a
22
11
3
3
16
7
17
19
4
2
2
4
1
1
1
45.8
22.9
6.3
6.3
33.3
14.6
35.4
39.6
8.3
4.2
4.2
8.3
2.1
2.1
2.1
7,614
3,090
2,545
2,534
2,510
1,872
1,676
1,230
443
330
256
230
226
145
5
28.9
11.7
9.7
9.6
9.5
7.1
6.4
4.7
1.7
1.3
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.6
0
41
52
32
19
15
55
17
12
14
2
24
2
2
2
1
1
44.6
56.5
34.8
20.7
16.3
59.8
18.5
13.0
15.2
2.2
26.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.1
1.1
15,128
11,869
11,247
8,067
6,577
4,833
3,945
3,913
3,579
2,050
1,072
915
530
154
50
15
25.3
19.9
18.8
13.5
11.0
8.1
6.6
6.5
6.0
3.4
1.8
1.5
0.9
0.3
0.1
0
63
48
69
26
26
17
74
19
14
5
6
25
6
2
3
1
45.0
34.3
49.3
18.6
18.6
12.1
52.9
13.6
10
3.6
4.3
17.9
4.3
1.4
2.1
0.7
22,742
13,757
13,545
9,939
9,667
6,124
6,063
4,275
4,169
3,449
2,493
1,217
760
241
159
50
26.4
16.0
15.7
11.5
11.2
7.1
7.0
5.0
4.8
4.0
2.9
1.4
0.9
0.3
0.2
0.1
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Figure 5. Northarvest respondents’ reported acres for dry bean production
problems in 2016.
8•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 7. Purchased seed size problems that affected acreage planting intentions in 2016.
Variety
Class
Minnesota
Eclipse
Black
Beluga
Kidney
Clouseau
Kidney
HMS
Navy
Medalist
T 9905
Navy
Windbreaker
Pinto
North
Dakota
Eclipse
Black
Beluga
Kidney
Clouseau
Kidney
HMS
Medalist
Navy
T 9905
Navy
Windbreaker
Pinto
La Paz
Pinto
Northarvest
Eclipse
Black
Beluga
Kidney
Clouseau
Kidney
HMS
Medalist
Navy
T 9905
Navy
Windbreaker
Pinto
La Paz
Pinto
a
Respondents’ acres only.
Not enough seed
Respondents
Acres
(no.)
affecteda
Too much seed
Respondents
Acres
(no.)
affecteda
Respondents
(no.)
Acres
reporteda
7
5
3
1,727
1,216
1,085
0
1
0
0
20
0
0
1.6
0
0
0
1
0
0
150
0
0
13.8
13
11
3
2,109
3,574
748
1
1
0
10
20
0
0.5
0.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
4,515
0
0
1
0
0
20
0
0
0.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6
26
43
4,329
2,318
13,592
13,910
0
0
1
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0.4
0
1
0
0
1
5
0
0
5
0.1
0
0
0
18
5
3
6,242
1,216
1,085
1
1
0
20
20
0
0.3
1.6
0
0
0
1
0
0
150
0
0
13.8
26
17
29
44
6,438
5,892
14,340
13,985
1
1
1
0
10
20
50
0
0.2
0.3
0.3
0
1
0
0
1
5
0
0
5
0.1
0
0
0
%
Table 8. Row spacing by dry bean market class in 2016.
Blacka
GNb
Kidney
Navya
Row spacing
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
Minnesota
< 11 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11 to 15 inches
1
8.3
0
0
0
0
2
9.1
16 to 20 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
9.1
21 to 25 inches
9
75.0
0
0
8
47.1
14
63.6
26 to 30 inches
2
16.7
0
0
9
52.9
4
18.2
> 30 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
12
100
0
0
17
100
22
100
North Dakota
< 11 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11 to 15 inches
2
15.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
16 to 20 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5.9
21 to 25 inches
6
46.2
1
100
1
33.3
8
47.1
26 to 30 inches
5
38.5
0
0
2
66.7
8
47.1
> 30 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
13
100
1
100
3
100
17
100
Northarvest
< 11 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11 to 15 inches
3
12.0
0
0
0
0
2
5.1
16 to 20 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
7.7
21 to 25 inches
15
60
1
100
9
45.0
22
56.4
26 to 30 inches
7
28.0
0
0
11
55.0
12
30.8
> 30 inches
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
25
100
1
100
20
100
39
100
a
Black, navy and pinto varieties are typically Type II (upright) varieties.
b
GN = Great Northern.
9•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Pink
No.
%
Pintoa
No.
%
Red
No.
%
0
0
0
1
2
0
3
0
0
0
33.3
66.7
0
100
0
1
0
2
1
0
4
0
25.0
0
50
25.0
0
100
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
100
0
0
100
1
5
5
24
41
1
77
1.3
6.5
6.5
31.2
53.2
1.3
100
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
100
0
100
0
0
0
2
2
0
4
0
0
0
50
50
0
100
1
6
5
26
42
1
81
1.2
7.4
6.2
32.1
51.9
1.2
100
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
50
50
0
100
%
Table 9. Seeding rate by dry bean market class in 2016.
Blackb
GNc
Kidney
Navyb
Seeding ratea
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
Minnesota
< 70,000
0
0
0
0
1
5.9
0
0
70 to 79,000
0
0
0
0
7
41.2
0
0
80 to 89,000
0
0
0
0
6
35.3
0
0
90 to 99,000
1
10
0
0
3
17.6
1
4.8
100 to 109,000
3
30
0
0
0
0
3
14.3
110 to 119,000
2
20
0
0
0
0
9
42.9
120 to 129,000
4
40
0
0
0
0
7
33.3
> 129,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.8
Total
10
100
0
0
17
100
21
100
North Dakota
< 70,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
70 to 79,000
0
0
1
100
3
100
0
0
80 to 89,000
1
9.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
90 to 99,000
2
18.2
0
0
0
0
2
15.4
100 to 109,000
4
36.4
0
0
0
0
2
15.4
110 to 119,000
4
36.4
0
0
0
0
8
61.5
120 to 129,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
7.7
> 129,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
11
100
1
100
3
100
13
100
Northarvest
< 70,000
0
0
0
0
1
5.0
0
0
70 to 79,000
0
0
1
100
10
50
0
0
80 to 89,000
1
4.8
0
0
6
30
0
0
90 to 99,000
3
14.3
0
0
3
15.0
3
8.8
100 to 109,000
7
33.3
0
0
0
0
5
14.7
110 to 119,000
6
28.6
0
0
0
0
17
50
120 to 129,000
4
19.0
0
0
0
0
8
23.5
> 129,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2.9
Total
21
100
1
100
20
100
34
100
a
Live seeds per acre.
b
Black, navy and pinto varieties are typically Type II (upright) varieties.
c
GN = Great Northern
Pink
No.
%
Pintob
No.
%
Red
No.
%
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
25.0
75.0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
50
25.0
25.0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
12
33
25
2
0
1
0
0
73
16.4
45.2
34.2
2.7
0
1.4
0
0
100
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
20
80
0
0
0
0
0
100
12
35
26
3
0
1
0
0
77
15.6
45.5
33.8
3.9
0
1.3
0
0
100
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
Table 10. Difference between seeding rate and established
plant stand for dry bean market classes grown in 2016.
Blackb
GNc
Kidney
Navyb
Differencea
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
Minnesota
< 10,000
2
20
0
0
3
21.4
5
26.3
10 to 19,000
7
70
0
0
9
64.3
12
63.2
20 to 29,000
0
0
0
0
1
7.1
1
5.3
30 to 39,000
1
10
0
0
1
7.1
1
5.3
Total
10
100
0
0
14
100
19
100
North Dakota
< 10,000
0
0
1
100
2
66.7
0
0
10 to 19,000
5
71.4
0
0
1
33.3
7
100
2
0
0
0
20 to 29,000
28.6
0
0
0
30 to 39,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
7
100
1
100
3
100
7
100
Northarvest
< 10,000
2
11.8
1
100
5
29.4
5
19.2
10 to 19,000
12
70.6
0
0
10
58.8
19
73.1
20 to 29,000
2
11.8
0
0
1
5.9
1
3.8
30 to 39,000
1
5.9
0
0
1
5.9
1
3.8
Total
17
100
1
100
17
100
26
100
a
Plants per acre.
b
Black, navy and pinto varieties are typically Type II (upright) varieties.
c
GN = Great Northern
10•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Pink
No.
%
Pintob
No.
%
Red
No.
%
1
1
0
0
2
50
50
0
0
100
1
3
0
0
4
25.0
75.0
0
0
100
0
1
0
0
1
0
100
0
0
100
1
0
0
0
1
100
0
0
0
100
33
21
1
1
56
58.9
37.5
1.8
1.8
100
1
0
0
0
1
100
0
0
0
100
2
1
0
0
3
66.7
33.3
0
0
100
34
24
1
1
60
56.7
40
1.7
1.7
100
1
1
0
0
2
50
50
0
0
100
Acres
reporteda
Acres
reporteda (%)
3,430
0
459
320
5,956
15,037
25,202
13.6
0
1.8
1.3
23.6
59.7
100
10,757
5,687
1,310
3,940
28,675
8,184
58,553
18.4
9.7
2.2
6.7
49.0
14.0
100
14,187
5,687
1,769
4,260
34,631
23,221
83,755
16.9
6.8
2.1
5.1
41.3
27.7
100
Table 12. Estimated yield loss in harvested dry beans
in 2016.
Estimated
yield loss
Minnesota
0%
1-5%
6-10%
11-15%
16-20%
Total
North Dakota
0%
1-5%
6-10%
11-15%
16-20%
Total
Northarvest
0%
1-5%
6-10%
11-15%
16-20%
Total
Direct Harvest
Respondents Respondents
(no.)
(%)
Conventional Harvest
Respondents Respondents
(no.)
(%)
0
12
12
3
2
29
0
41.4
41.4
10.3
6.9
100
1
17
5
0
0
23
4.3
73.9
21.7
0
0
100
0
24
33
15
8
80
0
30
41.3
18.8
10
100
0
25
14
0
0
39
0
64.1
35.9
0
0
100
0
36
45
18
10
109
0
33.0
41.3
16.5
9.2
100
1
42
19
0
0
62
1.6
67.7
30.6
0
0
100
11•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Acres Reported
Percent direct
Respondents Respondents
combined
(no.)
(%)
Minnesota
1 to 25%
3
6.5
26 to 50%
0
0
51 to 75%
2
4.3
76 to 99%
1
2.2
100%
23
50
No direct harvest
17
37.0
Total
46
100
North Dakota
1 to 25%
13
14.4
26 to 50%
7
7.8
51 to 75%
4
4.4
76 to 99%
5
5.6
100%
51
56.7
No direct harvest
10
11.1
Total
90
100
Northarvest
1 to 25%
16
11.8
26 to 50%
7
5.1
51 to 75%
6
4.4
76 to 99%
6
4.4
100%
74
54.4
No direct harvest
27
19.9
Total
136
100
a
Respondents’ harvested acres only.
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Figure 6. Northarvest percent of dry bean
acres harvested by direct combining in
2016.
Direct Harvest
Respondents (%)
Table 11. Percent of total dry bean acres
harvested by direct combining in 2016.
Conventional Harvest
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
1-5%
6-10% 11-15% 16-20%
Percent Yield Loss
Figure 7. Northarvest estimated yield
loss in harvested dry beans in 2016.
Table 13. Dry bean field tillage practices in 2016.
Acres reported
(no.)a
Acres reported
(%)a
22,922
3,435
0
0
26,357
87
13
0
0
100
45,146
8,568
3,871
2,170
59,755
76
14
6
4
100
68,068
12,003
3,871
2,170
86,112
79
14
4
3
100
Acres Reported
Tillage
practice
Minnesota
Conventional
Minimum
Strip-tillage
No-till
Total
North Dakota
Conventional
Minimum
No-till
Strip-tillage
Total
Northarvest
Conventional
Minimum
No-till
Strip-tillage
Total
a
Respondents’ acres only.
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 8. Northarvest dry bean field
tillage practices in 2016.
Agronomy
Table 14. Ground rolling on dry bean fields in 2016.
Respondents
(%)a
Acres reported
(no.)b
Timing
Minnesota
Pre-plant
8
17.8
3,852
14.8
Pre-emerge
16
35.6
3,783
14.6
Post-emerge
3
6.7
1,666
6.4
Did not roll
25
55.6
16,671
64.2
Total
25,972
100
North Dakota
91
Pre-plant
9
9.9
3,549
6.1
Pre-emerge
49
53.8
26,583
45.4
Post-emerge
8
8.8
4,930
8.4
Did not roll
38
41.8
23,510
40.1
Total
58,572
100
Northarvest
136
Pre-plant
17
12.5
7,401
8.8
Pre-emerge
65
47.8
30,366
35.9
Post-emerge
11
8.1
6,596
7.8
Did not roll
63
46.3
40,181
47.5
Total
84,544
100
a
Percentages do not total 100 percent because some respondents practiced more than
one timing.
b
Respondents’ acres only.
12•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
40,000
Acres reported
(%)b
Acres Reported
Respondents
(no.)
45,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Figure 9. Northarvest ground rolling on
dry bean fields in 2016.
Table 15. Ground rolling and direct harvest on dry bean fields in 2016.
Ground Rolling
Percent Direct
Combined
Minnesota
0%
1 to 25%
26 to 50%
51 to 75%
76 to 100%
100%
Total
North Dakota
0%
1 to 25%
26 to 50%
51 to 75%
76 to 100%
100%
Total
Northarvest
0%
1 to 25%
26 to 50%
51 to 75%
76 to 100%
100%
Total
Yes
No
Respondents (no.)
2
1
0
0
0
18
21
Respondents (%)
9.5
4.8
0
0
0
85.7
100
Respondents (no.)
15
2
0
1
1
4
23
Respondents (%)
65.2
8.7
0
4.3
4.3
17.4
100
2
4
4
4
3
47
64
3.1
6.3
6.3
6.3
4.7
73.4
100
8
9
3
0
2
4
26
30.8
34.6
11.5
0
7.7
15.4
100
4
5
4
4
3
65
85
4.7
5.9
4.7
4.7
3.5
76.5
100
23
11
3
1
3
8
49
46.9
22.4
6.1
2.0
6.1
16.3
100
Fertilizer
Minnesota
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Potash
Zinc
Sulfur
North Dakota
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Potash
Zinc
Sulfur
Northarvest
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Potash
Zinc
Sulfur
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
40
36
33
28
27
97.6
87.8
80.5
68.3
65.9
70
61
30
53
26
92.1
80.3
39.5
69.7
34.2
110
97
63
81
53
94.0
82.9
53.8
69.2
45.3
Respondents (%)
Table 16. Use of fertilizers on dry bean fields in 2016.
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Figure 10. Northarvest use of fertilizers on
dry bean fields in 2016.
Fertilizer
Minnesota
Broadcast
In-furrow
Banded
Foliar
North Dakota
Broadcast
In-furrow
Banded
Foliar
Northarvest
Broadcast
In-furrow
Banded
Foliar
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
44
17
12
8
95.7
37.0
26.1
17.4
64
32
21
4
79.0
39.5
25.9
4.9
108
49
33
12
85.0
38.6
26.0
9.4
13•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Respondents (%)
Table 17. Fertilizer application methods on dry bean fields in 2016.
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Figure 11. Northarvest fertilizer application
methods on dry bean fields in 2016.
Soil test
Minnesota
Soil test used
Soil test not used
Total
North Dakota
Soil test used
Soil test not used
Total
Northarvest
Soil test used
Soil test not used
Total
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
40
7
47
85.1
14.9
100
70
19
89
78.7
21.3
100
110
26
136
80.9
19.1
100
Respondents (%)
Table 18. Use of soil test prior to fertilization of
dry bean fields in 2016.
Soil test used
7
37
44
15.9
84.1
100
12
72
84
14.3
85.7
100
19
109
128
14.8
85.2
100
Table 20. Use of site-specific nutrient management
(SSNM) on dry bean fields in 2016.
Soil test
Minnesota
SSNM used
SSNM not used
Total
North Dakota
SSNM used
SSNM not used
Total
Northarvest
SSNM used
SSNM not used
Total
Respondents (no.)
Respondents (%)
13
33
46
28.3
71.7
100
28
59
87
32.2
67.8
100
41
92
133
30.8
69.2
100
14•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Respondents (%)
Respondents
(%)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Inoculant used
Inoculant not
used
Figure 13. Northarvest use of inoculant in
2016.
Respondents (%)
Respondents
(no.)
Soil test not
used
Figure 12. Northarvest use of soil test in
2016.
Table 19. Use of Rhizobium inoculants on dry bean
fields in 2016.
Rhizobium use
Minnesota
Inoculant used
Inoculant not used
Total
North Dakota
Inoculant used
Inoculant not used
Total
Northarvest
Inoculant used
Inoculant not used
Total
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
SSNM used
SSNM not used
Figure 14. Northarvest use of site-specific
nutrient management in 2016.
Table 21. Desiccants used on dry beans in 2016.
Desiccant
Minnesota
Sharpen
No desiccant used
Valor
Paraquat
Sodium chlorate
Glyphosate
Desiccant Total
North Dakota
Sharpen
Glyphosate
Valor
Paraquat
No desiccant used
Sodium chlorate
Desiccant Total
Northarvest
Sharpen
Glyphosate
Valor
Paraquat
No desiccant used
Sodium chlorate
Desiccant Total
a
Respondents’ acres only.
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
Acres
reported
(no.)a
Acres
reported
(%)a
25
11
10
6
5
3
54.3
23.9
21.7
13.0
10.9
6.5
8,847
5,634
5,392
2,351
2,136
580
19,306
35.0
22.3
21.3
9.3
8.5
2.3
91
58
47
21
15
11
0
63.7
51.6
23.1
16.5
12.1
0
35,099
29,201
9,453
8,748
3,405
0
82,501
58.9
49.0
15.9
14.7
5.7
0
137
83
50
31
21
22
5
60.6
36.5
22.6
15.3
16.1
3.6
43,946
29,781
14,845
11,099
9,039
2,136
101,807
51.8
35.1
17.5
13.1
10.7
2.5
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Table 22. Desiccant tank-mixes used on dry beans
in 2016.
Desiccant Combination
Minnesota
Paraquat + Sharpen
Glyphosate + Sharpen
Paraquat + Sodium chlorate
Sharpen + Sodium chlorate
North Dakota
Glyphosate + Sharpen
Glyphosate + Paraquat + Sharpen
Paraquat + Sharpen
Glyphosate + Valor
Paraquat + Valor
Glyphosate + Sharpen + Valor
Sharpen + Valor
Northarvest
Glyphosate + Sharpen
Paraquat + Sharpen
Glyphosate + Paraquat + Sharpen
Glyphosate + Valor
Paraquat + Valor
Glyphosate + Sharpen + Valor
Paraquat + Sodium chlorate
Sharpen + Valor
Sharpen + Sodium chlorate
Respondents' Acres
50,000
Respondents
(no.)
Acres reported
(no.)
3
3
1
1
636
580
515
65
25
3
3
5
4
1
1
14,913
2,761
2,525
1,709
1,037
559
122
28
6
3
5
4
1
1
1
1
15,493
3,161
2,761
1,709
1,037
559
515
122
65
15•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Figure 15. Northarvest desiccants used
on dry beans in 2016.
Table 23. Frequency of crops in dry bean crop
rotation program, 2012-2015.
2014
2013
2012
Respondents
(%)
Respondents
(%)
Respondents
(%)
Respondents
(%)
4-year
average
Respondents
(%)
2.1
68.1
0
0
0
0
4.3
0
14.9
23.4
2.2
21.7
4.3
2.2
4.3
0
8.7
47.8
13.0
10.9
0
44.4
28.9
0
0
0
6.7
11.1
0
13.3
0
40.5
28.6
0
2.4
2.4
0
28.6
9.5
2.4
1.1
43.7
15.5
0.5
1.7
0.6
4.9
21.9
9.4
12.5
6.7
0
39.3
4.5
1.1
1.1
2.2
12.4
1.1
68.5
0
2.3
13.6
43.2
0
0
34.1
8.0
1.1
27.3
2.4
0
42.2
19.3
2.4
2.4
18.1
0
0
49.4
0
1.3
15.4
60.3
1.3
2.6
21.8
2.6
0
24.4
2.3
0.9
27.6
31.8
1.2
1.5
19.1
5.7
0.6
42.4
5.1
0
49.3
2.9
0.7
0
0
2.2
1.5
13.2
0.7
52.9
0.7
1.5
16.4
29.9
0.7
1.5
0
3.0
38.8
9.7
0.7
21.6
1.6
0
43.0
22.7
1.6
0
0
3.9
15.6
0
0
36.7
0
0.8
24.2
49.2
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.7
24.2
5.0
0
16.7
1.9
0.6
33.2
26.2
1.0
0.6
0.2
2.7
20
7.0
0.4
32.0
Table 24. Number of years dry beans are
grown in dry bean crop rotation program.
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
23
23
2
0
0
48
47.9
47.9
4.2
0
0
100
26
32
31
1
2
92
28.3
34.8
33.7
1.1
2.2
100
49
55
33
1
2
140
35.0
39.3
23.6
0.7
1.4
100
16•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Wheat
Soybean
Sugarbeet
Dry Bean
120.0
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
2015 2014 2013 2012 Avg
Figure 16. Northarvest frequency of major
crops in dry bean crop rotation program,
2012-2015.
45
40
Respondents (%)
Number of years
Minnesota
1 of past 5 years
2 of past 5 years
3 of past 5 years
4 of past 5 years
5 of past 5 years
Total
North Dakota
1 of past 5 years
2 of past 5 years
3 of past 5 years
4 of past 5 years
5 of past 5 years
Total
Northarvest
1 of past 5 years
2 of past 5 years
3 of past 5 years
4 of past 5 years
5 of past 5 years
Total
Corn
140.0
Frequency (%)
Crop
Minnesota
Barley
Corn
Dry bean
No crop
Oats
Pea
Potato
Soybean
Sugarbeet
Wheat
North Dakota
Barley
Canola
Corn
Dry bean
No crop
Potato
Soybean
Sugarbeet
Sunflower
Wheat
Northarvest
Barley
Canola
Corn
Dry bean
No crop
Oats
Pea
Potato
Soybean
Sugarbeet
Sunflower
Wheat
2015
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1 of
past 5
years
2 of
past 5
years
3 of
past 5
years
4 of
past 5
years
5 of
past 5
years
Figure 17. Northarvest number of years dry beans
are grown in dry bean crop rotation program.
Insect Pests and Insecticide Use
Table 25. Worst insect problem in dry beans in 2016.
Respondents
Respondents
Insecta
(no.)
(%)
Minnesota
None
34
73.9
Leafhoppers
9
19.6
Seed corn maggot
2
4.3
Spider mites
1
2.2
Total
46
100
North Dakota
None
59
66.3
Cutworms
9
10.1
Wireworms
10
11.2
Grasshoppers
6
6.7
Aphids
2
2.2
Leafhoppers
1
1.1
Armyworms
1
1.1
Bean leaf beetle
1
1.1
Total
89
100
Northarvest
None
93
68.9
Leafhoppers
10
7.4
Cutworms
9
6.7
Wireworms
10
7.4
Grasshoppers
6
4.4
Aphids
2
1.5
Seed corn maggot
2
1.5
Armyworms
1
0.7
Bean leaf beetle
1
0.7
Spider mites
1
0.7
Total
135
100
a
Ranked as No. 1 insect problem by respondents.
b
Respondents’ acres only.
c
Insect problem may not have been present across all reported acres.
Acres reported
(no.)b,c
Acres reported
(%)b,c
15,952
7,748
1,400
102
25,202
63.3
30.7
5.6
0.4
100
37,560
6,398
5,635
4,145
1,630
1,100
365
262
57,095
65.8
11.2
9.9
7.3
2.9
1.9
0.6
0.5
100
53,512
8,848
6,398
5,635
4,145
1,630
1,400
365
262
102
82,297
65.0
10.8
7.8
6.8
5.0
2.0
1.7
0.4
0.3
0.1
100
Acres Reported
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 18. Northarvest worst insect problem in dry beans in 2016.
17•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 26. Insects ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016.
Respondents
Respondents
Insecta
(no.)
(%)
Minnesota
None
34
73.9
Leafhoppers
12
26.1
Cutworms
3
6.5
Aphids
2
4.3
Seed corn maggot
2
4.3
Bean leaf beetle
1
2.2
Spider mites
3
6.5
North Dakota
None
59
66.3
Wireworms
19
21.3
Cutworms
20
22.5
Grasshoppers
14
15.7
Seed corn maggot
3
3.4
Aphids
5
5.6
Leafhoppers
4
4.5
Bean leaf beetle
2
2.2
Armyworms
2
2.2
Spider mites
2
2.2
Northarvest
None
93
68.9
Cutworms
23
17.0
Wireworms
19
14.1
Leafhoppers
16
11.9
Grasshoppers
14
10.4
Aphids
7
5.2
Seed corn maggot
5
3.7
Bean leaf beetle
3
2.2
Spider mites
5
3.7
Armyworms
2
1.5
a
Ranked as No. 1, 2 or 3 insect problem by respondents.
b
Respondents’ acres only.
c
Insect problem may not have been present across all reported acres.
Acres reported
(no.)b,c
Acres reported
(%)b,c
15,952
9,250
2,061
1,980
1,400
940
752
63.3
36.7
8.2
7.9
5.6
3.7
3.0
37,560
12,383
11,828
7,777
3,008
2,707
2,232
1,292
1,265
1,245
65.8
21.7
20.7
13.6
5.3
4.7
3.9
2.3
2.2
2.2
53,512
13,889
12,383
11,482
7,777
4,687
4,408
2,232
1,997
1,265
65.0
16.9
15.0
14.0
9.4
5.7
5.4
2.7
2.4
1.5
Acres Reported
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 19. Northarvest insects ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016.
18•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 27. Foliar insecticide use in dry beans in 2016.
Respondents Respondents Acres reported Acres reported
Insecticide
(no.)
(%)
(no.)a,b
(%)a,b
Minnesota
None
37
77.1
19,171
72.7
Asana XL
4
8.3
2,831
10.7
Hero
1
2.1
2,239
8.5
Baythroid XL
1
2.1
2,180
8.3
Dimethoate
2
4.2
1,445
5.5
Warrior II/generics
4
8.3
1,134
4.3
Brigade/generics
1
2.1
133
0.5
Insecticide Total
9,962
37.8
North Dakota
None
86
94.5
56,307
94.6
Asana XL
2
2.2
1,598
2.7
Brigade/generics
2
2.2
860
1.4
Warrior II/generics
1
1.1
600
1.0
Insecticide Total
3,058
5.1
Northarvest
None
123
88.5
75,478
87.9
Asana XL
6
4.3
4,429
5.2
Hero
1
0.7
2,239
2.6
Baythroid XL
1
0.7
2,180
2.5
Warrior II/generics
5
3.6
1,734
2.0
Dimethoate
2
1.4
1,445
1.7
Brigade/generics
3
2.2
993
1.2
Insecticide Total
13,020
15.2
a
Respondents’ acres only. Multiple applications count as multiple acres.
b
Percentages do not total 100 percent because some respondents treated more
than once with the same product and/or treated the same acreage with more than
one product.
80,000
Acres Reported
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 20. Northarvest foliar insecticide use in dry beans in 2016.
19•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 28. Soil insecticide and seed treatment use in dry beans in 2016.
Respondents Respondents Acres reported Acres reported
Seed Treatment
(no.)
(%)
(no.)a,b
(%)a,b
Minnesota
Cruiser Maxx
24
52.2
15,597
61.7
None
13
28.3
4,801
19.0
Don't know
5
10.9
3,008
11.9
Dyna-Shield Imidacloprid
2
4.3
2,733
10.8
Lorsban
5
10.9
2,337
9.3
Enhance AW
1
2.2
494
2.0
Capture LFR
1
2.2
400
1.6
Cruiser 5FS
1
2.2
281
1.1
Insecticide Total
24,850
98.4
North Dakota
Cruiser Maxx
31
35.2
19,972
35.6
Don't know
24
27.3
14,766
26.3
None
23
26.1
11,671
20.8
Capture LFR
5
5.7
5,500
9.8
Lorsban
10
11.4
5,433
9.7
Cruiser 5FS
4
4.5
1,683
3.0
Gaucho 600
1
1.1
1,040
1.9
Dyna-Shield Imidacloprid
1
1.1
267
0.5
Insecticide Total
48,661
86.6
Northarvest
Cruiser Maxx
55
41.0
35,569
43.7
Don't know
29
21.6
17,774
21.8
None
36
26.9
16,472
20.2
Lorsban
15
11.2
7,770
9.5
Capture LFR
6
4.5
5,900
7.2
Dyna-Shield Imidacloprid
3
2.2
3,000
3.7
Cruiser 5FS
5
3.7
1,964
2.4
Gaucho 600
1
0.7
1,040
1.3
Enhance AW
1
0.7
494
0.6
Insecticide Total
73,511
90.3
a
Respondents’ acres only.
b
Percentages do not total 100 percent because some respondents treated more
than once with the same product and/or treated the same acreage with more than
one product.
*Soil-applied insecticide.
Acres Reported
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Figure 21. Northarvest insecticide seed treatment and soil insecticide use in
dry beans in 2016.
20•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Plant Diseases and Fungicide Use
Table 29. Worst disease problem in dry beans in 2016.
Respondents
Respondents
Diseasea
(no.)
(%)
Minnesota
White mold
27
60
Common bacterial blight
8
17.8
Root rot
5
11.1
None
3
6.7
Bacterial wilt
1
2.2
Anthracnose
1
2.2
Total
45
100
North Dakota
White mold
44
50.6
Common bacterial blight
15
17.2
Root rot
11
12.6
None
7
8.0
Rust
7
8.0
Bacterial wilt
1
1.1
Bacterial brown spot
1
1.1
Viruses (general)
1
1.1
Total
87
100
Northarvest
White mold
71
53.8
Common bacterial blight
23
17.4
Root rot
16
12.1
None
10
7.6
Rust
7
5.3
Bacterial wilt
2
1.5
Bacterial brown spot
1
0.8
Viruses (general)
1
0.8
Anthracnose
1
0.8
Total
132
100
a
Ranked as No. 1 disease problem by respondents.
b
Respondents’ acres only.
c
Disease problem may not have been present across all reported acres.
Acres reported
(no.)b,c
Acres reported
(%)b,c
13,422
7,050
3,999
815
236
50
25,572
52.5
27.6
15.6
3.2
0.9
0.2
100
30,810
9,759
6,845
4,108
3,435
1,200
400
207
56,764
54.3
17.2
12.1
7.2
6.1
2.1
0.7
0.4
100
44,232
16,809
10,844
4,923
3,435
1,436
400
207
50
82,336
53.7
20.4
13.2
6.0
4.2
1.7
0.5
0.3
0.1
100
Acres Reported
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 22. Northarvest worst disease problem in dry beans in 2016.
21•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 30. Diseases ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016.
Respondents
Respondents
Diseasea
(no.)
(%)
Minnesota
White mold
38
84.4
Root rot
22
48.9
Common bacterial blight
21
46.7
Bacterial brown spot
3
6.7
Viruses
3
6.7
Rust
2
4.4
Anthracnose
5
11.1
Halo blight
3
6.7
Bacterial wilt
4
8.9
Bean common mosaic virus
1
2.2
None
3
6.7
North Dakota
White mold
70
80.5
Rust
36
41.4
Common bacterial blight
35
40.2
Root rot
28
32.2
Bacterial brown spot
10
11.5
Anthracnose
6
6.9
None
7
8.0
Bacterial wilt
5
5.7
Halo blight
5
5.7
Viruses
6
6.9
Northarvest
White mold
108
81.8
Common bacterial blight
56
42.4
Root rot
50
37.9
Rust
38
28.8
Bacterial brown spot
13
9.8
Anthracnose
11
8.3
Viruses
9
6.8
Bacterial wilt
9
6.8
None
10
7.6
Halo blight
8
6.1
Bean common mosaic virus
1
0.8
a
Ranked as No. 1, 2 or 3 disease problem by respondents.
b
Respondents’ acres only.
c
Disease problem may not have been present across all reported acres.
Acres reported
(no.)b,c
Acres reported
(%)b,c
22,182
15,148
14,299
4,018
3,430
2,118
1,812
1,325
1,120
940
815
86.7
59.2
55.9
15.7
13.4
8.3
7.1
5.2
4.4
3.7
3.2
45,642
23,114
22,831
15,974
6,831
5,462
4,108
3,860
3,413
1,931
80.4
40.7
40.2
28.1
12.0
9.6
7.2
6.8
6.0
3.4
67,824
37,130
31,122
25,232
10,849
7,274
5,361
4,980
4,923
4,738
940
82.4
45.1
37.8
30.6
13.2
8.8
6.5
6.0
6.0
5.8
1.1
Acres Reported
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 23. Northarvest diseases ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016.
22•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 31. Foliar and banded fungicide use in dry beans in 2016.
Total
acres
treated
(no.)a
Total
acres
treated
(%)a,b
Acres
treated by
ground
(no.)a
Acres
treated by
ground
(%)a
Acres
treated by
air
(no.)a
Acres
treated by
air
(%)a
Resp.
Resp.
Fungicide
(no.)
(%)b
Minnesota
Endura
20
42.6
15,692
59.9
9,001
17.9
6,691
13.3
Topsin broadcast
26
55.3
15,195
58.0
10,187
20.3
5,008
10
Proline broadcast
8
17.0
5,634
21.5
4,250
8.5
1,384
2.8
Omega
1
2.1
3,623
13.8
3,623
7.2
0
0
ProPulse
1
2.1
2,239
8.5
2,239
4.5
0
0
Priaxor
2
4.3
2,178
8.3
1,878
3.7
300
0.6
Calcium
1
2.1
1,750
6.7
1,750
3.5
0
0
Incognito
2
4.3
940
3.6
940
1.9
0
0
Aproach
1
2.1
900
3.4
900
1.8
0
0
Headline
1
2.1
800
3.1
800
1.6
0
0
Copper
2
4.3
656
2.5
0
0
656
1.3
Champion
1
2.1
409
1.6
0
0
409
0.8
Contans
1
2.1
200
0.8
200
0.4
0
0
None
9
19.1
3,185
12.2
Fungicide Total
50,216
35,768
71.2
14,448
28.8
North Dakota
Topsin broadcast
38
43.2
32,177
56.3
28,785
39.5
3,392
4.7
Endura
23
26.1
14,852
26.0
12,219
16.8
2,633
3.6
Incognito
6
6.8
7,115
12.4
6,615
9.1
500
0.7
Tebuconazole
7
8.0
6,000
10.5
6,000
8.2
0
0
Priaxor
9
10.2
5,828
10.2
5,258
7.2
570
0.8
Topsin banded
4
4.5
3,824
6.7
3,824
5.2
0
0
Omega
3
3.4
1,400
2.4
1,200
1.6
200
0.3
Headline
4
4.5
770
1.3
723
1.0
47
0.1
Quadris Opti
1
1.1
400
0.7
400
0.5
0
0
Proline banded
1
1.1
320
0.6
320
0.4
0
0
Aproach
1
1.1
260
0.5
0
0
260
0.4
None
19
21.6
6,009
10.5
Fungicide Total
72,946
65,344
89.6
7,602
10.4
Northarvest
Topsin broadcast
64
47.4
47,372
56.8
38,972
31.6
8,400
6.8
Endura
43
31.9
30,544
36.6
21,220
17.2
9,324
7.6
Incognito
8
5.9
8,055
9.7
7,555
6.1
500
0.4
Priaxor
11
8.1
8,006
9.6
7,136
5.8
870
0.7
Tebuconazole
7
5.2
6,000
7.2
6,000
4.9
0
0
Proline broadcast
8
5.9
5,634
6.8
4,250
3.5
1,384
1.1
Omega
4
3.0
5,023
6.0
4,823
3.9
200
0.2
Topsin banded
4
3.0
3,824
4.6
3,824
3.1
0
0
ProPulse
1
0.7
2,239
2.7
2,239
1.8
0
0
Calcium
1
0.7
1,750
2.1
1,750
1.4
0
0
Headline
5
3.7
1,570
1.9
1,523
1.2
47
0
Aproach
2
1.5
1,160
1.4
900
0.7
260
0.2
Copper
2
1.5
656
0.8
0
0
656
0.5
Champion
1
0.7
409
0.5
0
0
409
0.3
Quadris Opti
1
0.7
400
0.5
400
0.3
0
0
Proline banded
1
0.7
320
0.4
320
0.3
0
0
Contans
1
0.7
200
0.2
200
0.2
0
0
None
28
20.7
9,194
11.0
0
0
Fungicide Total
123,162
101,112
82.1
22,050
17.9
a
Respondents’ acres only. Includes acreage treated more than once with the same product.
b
Percentages do not total 100 percent because some respondents treated more than once with the same product and/or treated the
same acreage with more than one product.
23•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
120,000
100,000
Acres Reported
Acres Reported
50,000
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
Ground
Figure 24. Northarvest foliar and banded fungicide use in dry beans
in 2016.
Figure 25. Northarvest fungicide
application method in dry beans
in 2016.
Table 32. In-furrow fungicide use in dry beans in 2016.
Seed treatment
Minnesota
Headline
Endura
None
Fungicide Total
North Dakota
Endura
Headline
None
Fungicide Total
Northarvest
Headline
Endura
None
Fungicide Total
a
Respondents’ acres only.
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
Total acres
treated (no.)a
Total acres
treated (%)a
4
1
41
46
8.7
2.2
89.1
100
3,145
800
21,316
3,945
12.5
3.2
84.4
15.6
1
1
88
90
1.1
1.1
97.8
100
1,200
30
55,854
1,230
2.1
0.1
96.7
2.1
5
2
129
136
3.7
1.5
94.9
100
3,175
2,000
77,170
5,175
3.8
2.4
93.0
6.2
90,000
Acres Reported
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Headline
Endura
Figure 26. Northarvest in-furrow fungicide use in dry beans in 2016.
24•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Air
None
Table 33. Fungicide seed treatment use in dry beans in 2016.
Acres Reported
Respondents
Respondents
Total acres
Total acres
Seed treatment
(no.)
(%)b
treated (no.)a
treated (%)a,b
Minnesota
ApronMaxx
29
63.0
16,148
63.9
Rancona
10
21.7
7,907
31.3
Vibrance
7
15.2
3,511
13.9
Apron, Apron XL
5
10.9
3,020
12.0
Maxim
5
10.9
2,951
11.7
Dynasty
9
19.6
2,744
10.9
Don't know
4
8.7
2,466
9.8
Stamina
2
4.3
1,209
4.8
Headline
1
2.2
800
3.2
Thiram
1
2.2
350
1.4
Rancona Summit
1
2.2
281
1.1
None
7
15.2
3,237
12.8
Seed Treatment Total
41,387
North Dakota
ApronMaxx
40
44.9
25,514
44.6
Don't know
19
21.3
11,551
20.2
Maxim
12
13.5
8,801
15.4
Dynasty
12
13.5
8,204
14.3
Rancona
10
11.2
7,394
12.9
Apron, Apron XL
10
11.2
6,936
12.1
Captan
4
4.5
3,120
5.5
Vibrance
6
6.7
3,054
5.3
Metalaxyl
2
2.2
2,700
4.7
Stamina
3
3.4
2,215
3.9
Streptomycin
1
1.1
860
1.5
None
19
21.3
9,707
17.0
Seed Treatment Total
80,349
Northarvest
ApronMaxx
69
51.1
41,662
50.5
Rancona
20
14.8
15,301
18.6
Don't know
23
17.0
14,017
17.0
Maxim
17
12.6
11,752
14.3
Dynasty
21
15.6
10,948
13.3
Apron, Apron XL
15
11.1
9,956
12.1
Vibrance
13
9.6
6,565
8.0
Stamina
5
3.7
3,424
4.2
Captan
4
3.0
3,120
3.8
Metalaxyl
2
1.5
2,700
3.3
Streptomycin
1
0.7
860
1.0
Headline
1
0.7
800
1.0
Thiram
1
0.7
350
0.4
Rancona Summit
1
0.7
281
0.3
None
26
19.3
12,944
15.7
Seed Treatment Total
121,736
a
Respondents’ acres only. Includes acreage treated with more than one product.
b
Percentages do not total 100 percent because some respondents treated the same acreage with more than one product.
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Figure 27. Northarvest fungicide seed treatment use in dry beans in 2016.
25•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Weeds and Herbicide Use
Table 34. Worst weed problem in dry beans in 2016.
26•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Acres
reported (%)b,c
40.6
27.2
13.1
6.7
4.4
3.6
2.9
1.2
0.4
100
27.6
12.3
11.4
10.6
8.0
6.4
5.0
4.8
4.2
3.8
3.5
1.3
0.7
0.4
100
19.5
17.5
16.6
11.9
8.8
4.5
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.0
2.9
2.7
1.1
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.1
100
Figure 28. Northarvest worst weed problem in dry beans in 2016.
ResponResponAcres
dents (no.) dents (%) reported (no.)b,c
Weeda
Minnesota
Lambsquarters
15
32.6
10,000
Ragweed
11
23.9
6,697
Nightshade
4
8.7
3,239
Waterhemp
8
17.4
1,653
Biennial wormwood
2
4.3
1,080
Smartweed
1
2.2
885
Redroot pigweed
3
6.5
710
Clover
1
2.2
293
None
1
2.2
102
Total
46
100
24,659
North Dakota
Kochia
24
26.4
16,452
Ragweed
6
6.6
7,301
Nightshade
10
11.0
6,768
Biennial wormwood
12
13.2
6,298
Lambsquarters
9
9.9
4,755
Volunteer grain
6
6.6
3,795
Wild mustard
7
7.7
2,967
Cocklebur
3
3.3
2,887
Wild buckwheat
4
4.4
2,520
Foxtail
2
2.2
2,264
Redroot pigweed
5
5.5
2,098
Waterhemp
1
1.1
800
Wild oat
1
1.1
400
Canada thistle
1
1.1
250
Total
91
100
59,555
Northharvest
Kochia
24
17.5
16,452
Lambsquarters
24
17.5
14,755
Ragweed
17
12.4
13,998
Nightshade
14
10.2
10,007
Biennial wormwood
14
10.2
7,378
Volunteer grain
6
4.4
3,795
Wild mustard
7
5.1
2,967
Cocklebur
3
2.2
2,887
Redroot pigweed
8
5.8
2,808
Wild buckwheat
4
2.9
2,520
Waterhemp
9
6.6
2,453
Foxtail
2
1.5
2,264
Smartweed
1
0.7
885
Wild oat
1
0.7
400
Clover
1
0.7
293
Canada thistle
1
0.7
250
None
1
0.7
102
Total
137
100
84,214
a
Ranked as No. 1 weed problem by respondents.
b
Respondents’ acres only.
c
Weed problem may not have been present across all reported acres.
Table 35. Weeds ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016.
Weeda
Minnesota
Lambsquarters
Ragweed
Redroot pigweed
Nightshade
Acres Reported
Waterhemp
Wild buckwheat
Biennial
wormwood
Foxtail
Sunflower
Smartweed
Wild mustard
Kochia
Canada thistle
Volunteer grain
Clover
None
Venice mallow
Cocklebur
North Dakota
Kochia
Biennial
wormwood
Ragweed
Lambsquarters
Nightshade
Volunteer grain
Redroot pigweed
Wild buckwheat
Cocklebur
Wild mustard
Foxtail
Canada thistle
Waterhemp
Lanceleaf sage
Black medic
Venice mallow
Dandelion
Wild oat
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
Acres
reported
(no.)b
Acres
reported
(%)b
37
23
15
9
80.4
50
32.6
19.6
19,507
13,274
9,084
7,395
79.1
53.8
36.8
30
13
6
28.3
13.0
5,689
3,813
23.1
15.5
5
3
3
4
2
2
4
2
1
1
1
1
10.9
6.5
6.5
8.7
4.3
4.3
8.7
4.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2,292
1,565
1,530
1,501
1,110
1,080
691
506
293
102
83
65
9.3
6.3
6.2
6.1
4.5
4.4
2.8
2.1
1.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
42
46.2
30,426
51.1
31
26
30
25
24
19
14
12
17
5
8
6
2
2
2
1
2
34.1
28.6
33.0
27.5
26.4
20.9
15.4
13.2
18.7
5.5
8.8
6.6
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.1
2.2
21,475
20,973
18,139
16,618
14,316
11,395
8,612
8,300
7,486
5,691
4,666
2,504
1,824
1,600
1,280
700
660
36.1
35.2
30.5
27.9
24.0
19.1
14.5
13.9
12.6
9.6
7.8
4.2
3.1
2.7
2.1
1.2
1.1
Weeda
Northarvest
Lambsquarters
Ragweed
Kochia
Nightshade
Biennial
wormwood
Redroot pigweed
Volunteer grain
Wild buckwheat
Wild mustard
Cocklebur
Waterhemp
Foxtail
Canada thistle
Lanceleaf sage
Black medic
Sunflower
Smartweed
Venice mallow
Dandelion
Wild oat
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
Acres
reported
(no.)b
Acres
reported
(%)b
67
49
44
34
48.9
35.8
32.1
24.8
37,646
34,247
31,506
24,013
44.7
40.7
37.4
28.5
36
34
26.3
24.8
23,767
20,479
28.2
24.3
26
20
19
13
19
8
12
2
2
3
4
3
1
2
19.0
14.6
13.9
9.5
13.9
5.8
8.8
1.5
1.5
2.2
2.9
2.2
0.7
1.5
14,822
12,425
8,596
8,365
8,193
7,256
5,357
1,824
1,600
1,530
1,501
1,363
700
660
17.6
14.8
10.2
9.9
9.7
8.6
6.4
2.2
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.6
0.8
0.8
293
102
0.3
0.1
Clover
1
0.7
None
1
0.7
a
Ranked as No. 1, 2 or 3 weed by respondents.
b
Respondents’ acres only.
c
Weed problem may not have been present
across all reported acres.
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 29. Northarvest weeds ranked as one of the three worst in dry beans in 2016.
27•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 36. Weed control practices used in dry beans in 2016.
Acres Reported
Herbicide or
other practice
Minnesota
Raptor
Basagran/generics
Reflex
Sonalan
Select/generics
Prowl
Outlook
Dual
Rezult
Poast
Trifluralin
Permit
Eptam
Assure
Glyphosate (preplant)
BroadAxe
Pursuit
Varisto
Fusilade DX
Cultivation
Manual labor
Rotary hoe
Herbicide Total
North Dakota
Raptor
Basagran/generics
Reflex
Select/generics
Trifluralin
Spartan Charge
Sonalan
Rezult
Glyphosate (preplant)
Prowl
Spartan Elite
Assure
Pursuit
Permit
Poast
Dual
BroadAxe
Outlook
Fusilade DX
Eptam
Varisto
Cultivation
Rotary hoe
Cover crop
Manual labor
None
Herbicide Total
Acres
reported (no.)a
Acres
reported (%)b
24,545
21,421
12,636
9,149
6,853
6,298
5,599
4,318
4,115
3,907
3,750
3,700
3,256
1,870
1,760
592
509
226
205
13,285
2,746
345
114,709
93.1
81.3
47.9
34.7
26.0
23.9
21.2
16.4
15.6
14.8
14.2
14.0
12.4
7.1
6.7
2.2
1.9
0.9
0.8
50.4
10.4
1.3
55,132
54,044
40,196
30,814
12,411
12,257
12,211
12,106
9,812
9,792
8,422
7,807
6,475
3,845
2,047
1,824
1,432
1,320
720
560
180
20,550
2,885
927
454
400
283,407
92.7
90.8
67.6
51.8
20.9
20.6
20.5
20.3
16.5
16.5
14.2
13.1
10.9
6.5
3.4
3.1
2.4
2.2
1.2
0.9
0.3
34.5
4.8
1.6
0.8
0.7
Herbicide or
other practice
Northarvest
Raptor
Basagran/generics
Reflex
Select/generics
Sonalan
Rezult
Trifluralin
Prowl
Spartan Charge
Glyphosate (preplant)
Assure
Spartan Elite
Permit
Pursuit
Outlook
Dual
Poast
Eptam
BroadAxe
Fusilade DX
Varisto
Cultivation
Rotary hoe
Manual labor
Cover crop
None
Herbicide Total
Acres
reported (no.)a
Acres
reported (%)b
79,677
75,465
52,832
37,667
21,360
16,221
16,161
16,090
12,257
11,572
9,677
8,422
7,545
6,984
6,919
6,142
5,954
3,816
2,024
925
406
33,835
3,230
3,200
927
400
398,116
92.8
87.9
61.5
43.9
24.9
18.9
18.8
18.7
14.3
13.5
11.3
9.8
8.8
8.1
8.1
7.2
6.9
4.4
2.4
1.1
0.5
39.4
3.8
3.7
1.1
0.5
a
Respondents’ acres only. Includes acreage
treated more than once with the same product.
b
Percentages do not total 100 percent because
some respondents treated more than once with
the same product and/or treated the same
acreage with more than one product.
c
Herbicide total does not include cultivation,
rotary hoe or manual labor acres.
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Figure 30. Northarvest weed control practices used in dry beans in 2016.
28•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Table 37. Weed control practices used by dry bean market class in 2016.
Herbicide or
other practice
Minnesota
Assure
Basagran/generics
BroadAxe
Dual
Eptam
Fusilade DX
Glyphosate (preplant)
Outlook
Permit
Poast
Prowl
Pursuit
Raptor
Reflex
Rezult
Select/generics
Sonalan
Trifluralin
Varisto
Cultivation
Rotary hoe
Manual labor
North Dakota
Assure
Basagran/generics
BroadAxe
Dual
Eptam
Fusilade DX
Glyphosate (preplant)
Outlook
Permit
Poast
Prowl
Pursuit
Raptor
Reflex
Rezult
Select/generics
Sonalan
Spartan Charge
Spartan Elite
Trifluralin
Varisto
Cultivation
Rotary hoe
Manual labor
Cover crop
None
Northarvest
Assure
Basagran/generics
BroadAxe
Dual
Eptam
Fusilade DX
Glyphosate (preplant)
Outlook
Permit
Poast
Prowl
Pursuit
Raptor
Reflex
Rezult
Select/generics
Sonalan
Spartan Charge
Spartan Elite
Trifluralin
Varisto
a
Black
Great
Northern
3.4
10.4
2.1
5.1
1.1
0.6
0
1.6
2.9
0
2.2
0.5
11.8
7.5
0
5.2
3.3
0
0
1.9
0.8
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
47.8
0
8.7
6.7
0
6.3
16.4
7.7
11.6
15.8
0
53.7
18.3
7.2
8.6
11.7
11.4
0
25.3
0.3
7.7
3.4
9.6
0
0
0
0.4
3.7
0
0
0
2.4
2.0
9.1
6.0
1.2
3.6
2.1
2.1
0.2
1.1
0
3.0
2.0
0.4
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0.4
0
0
0
0
3.4
9.9
0.6
1.6
0.3
0.4
2.5
0.5
0.9
0
2.3
1.5
9.9
6.5
0.9
4.1
2.5
1.5
0.1
0.8
0
0.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.7
0
0
0
0
0.7
0
0
0
0.7
0
0
0
Kidney
Navy
% Acres Treateda,b
Pink
Pinto
Red
3.7
16.1
0.2
2.2
4.5
0.2
0.4
2.9
2.8
0
3.6
0.3
22.0
17.1
5.9
11.0
15.8
2.8
0.9
14.9
0
0.9
0
2.1
0
0.3
0
0
0
0.3
0.6
0.6
1.1
1.1
1.8
0.3
1.4
0
0.3
0
0
0.9
0
0
0
4.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
1.1
0
3.3
4.2
1.1
1.1
3.1
0
0
6.2
0.2
0
0
0.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.6
0
0
0.6
0.6
0
0
0.6
0
0
1.2
0
0
0
0.6
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0.2
0
0.7
0
0.6
0.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0
0
0.2
0
0
0.5
13.6
0.5
1.8
0
0
0.3
0.3
0.7
0
1.0
1.0
13.4
13.3
3.5
9.0
4.7
0.3
0
5.0
0
8.3
0.8
0
0
0
0
0.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.4
0
0
0
0
8.1
66.5
1.9
1.3
0.9
0.8
12.5
1.7
4.5
3.4
12.4
7.9
69.5
46.4
15.6
39.2
13.7
17.0
14.0
14.8
0.1
22.4
2.1
0.2
1.6
0.7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0
0
0
0.1
0
0
0.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
15.1
0
2.7
2.1
0
1.9
5.2
2.5
3.6
5.4
0
16.9
6.1
2.2
2.6
3.6
0
0
3.5
0.1
1.5
14.4
0.4
1.9
1.4
0.1
0.4
1.1
1.4
0
1.8
0.8
16.0
14.5
4.2
9.6
8.1
0.2
0
4.3
0.3
0
0.9
0
0.1
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.1
0.4
0
0.1
0
0
0
0
5.6
47.4
1.3
0.9
0.7
0.6
8.7
1.1
3.1
3.0
8.9
5.5
49.2
33.4
11.2
27.5
10.5
11.8
9.7
10.2
0.1
0
0.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.3
0
0
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.1
Respondents’ acres only. Includes acreage treated more than once with the same product.
Percentages do not total 100 percent because some respondents treated more than once
with the same product and/or treated the same acreage with more than one product.
b
29•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Herbicide or
Great
Black Northern
Kidney
Navy
Pink Pinto Red
other practice
Cultivation
2.7
0.3
7.8
10.3
0.6
17.4
0.4
Rotary hoe
1.6
0
0.1
0.5
0
1.5
0
Manual labor
0.8
0
2.5
0.3
0
0.1
0
Cover crop
0
0
0
0
0
1.1
0
None
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
a
Respondents’ acres only. Includes acreage treated more than once with the same product.
b
Percentages do not total 100 percent because some respondents treated more than once
with the same product and/or treated the same acreage with more than one product.
Scouting and Threshold Practices
Table 38. Scouting practices in dry beans in 2016.
Minnesota
Grower
Crop consultant
Both
Don’t scout
Total
North Dakota
Insects
ResponRespondents (no.) dents (%)
27
57.4
18
38.3
2
4.3
0
0
47
100
Diseases
ResponRespondents (no.) dents (%)
25
53.2
18
38.3
3
6.4
1
2.1
47
100
Weeds
ResponRespondents (no.) dents (%)
27
57.4
17
36.2
3
6.4
0
0
47
100
Grower
Crop consultant
Both
Don’t scout
Total
Northarvest
38
40
5
6
89
42.7
44.9
5.6
6.7
100
43
41
3
0
87
49.4
47.1
3.5
0
100
43
40
6
0
89
48.3
44.9
6.7
0
100
Grower
Crop consultant
Both
Don’t scout
Total
65
58
7
6
136
47.8
42.6
5.1
4.4
100
68
59
8
1
136
50
43.4
5.9
0.7
100
70
57
9
0
136
51.5
41.9
6.6
0
100
Table 39. Use of economic thresholds for insects in dry beans in 2016.
Minnesota
Economic thresholds used
Economic thresholds not used
Total
North Dakota
Economic thresholds used
Economic thresholds not used
Total
Northarvest
Economic thresholds used
Economic thresholds not used
Total
30•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Respondents
(no.)
Respondents
(%)
43
2
45
95.6
4.4
100
91
1
92
98.9
1.1
100
134
3
137
97.8
2.2
100
References
Bradley, C.A., and Luecke, J.L. 2004. 2002 Dry Bean Grower
Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in Minnesota
and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. PP-1265.
Knodel, J.J., Beauzay, P.B., Endres, G.J., Franzen, D.W.,
Kandel, H.J., Markell, S.G., Osorno, J.M., Pasche, J.S., and
Zollinger, R.K. 2016. 2015 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Production,
Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota.
NDSU Extension Rpt. E-1802.
Knodel, J.J., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W., Kandel, H.J.,
Markell, S.G., Osorno, J.M., Pasche, J.S., and Zollinger, R.K.
2015. 2014 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Production, Pest
Problems and Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota.
NDSU Extension Rpt. E-1750.
Knodel, J.J., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W., Kandel, H.J.,
Markell, S.G., Osorno, J.M., Pasche, J.S., and Zollinger, R.K.
2014. 2013 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Production, Pest
Problems and Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota.
NDSU Extension Rpt. E-1710.
Knodel, J.J., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W., Kandel, H.J., Markell,
S.G., Osorno, J.M., and Zollinger, R.K. 2013. 2012 Dry Bean
Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in
Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. E-1640.
Knodel, J.J., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W., Kandel, H.J., Markell,
S.G., Osorno, J.M., and Zollinger, R.K. 2012. 2011 Dry Bean
Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in
Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. E-1602.
Knodel, J.J., Luecke, J.L., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W.,
Kandel, H.J., Markell, S.G., Osorno, J.M., and Zollinger, R.K.
2011. 2010 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and
Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension
Rpt. E-1522 (revised).
Knodel, J.J., Luecke, J.L., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W.,
Kandel, H.J., Markell, S.G., Osorno, J.M., and Zollinger, R.K.
2010. 2009 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and
Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension
Rpt. E-1421 (revised).
Knodel, J.J., Luecke, J.L., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W.,
Kandel, H.J., Markell, S.G., Osorno, J.M., and Zollinger, R.K.
2009. 2008 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and
Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension
Rpt. E-1421 (revised).
Knodel, J.J., Luecke, J.L., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W.,
Kandel, H.J., Markell, S.G., Osorno, J.M., and Zollinger, R.K.
2008. 2007 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and
Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension
Rpt. PP-1392.
Knodel, J.J., Luecke, J.L., Beauzay, P.B., Franzen, D.W.,
Kandel, H.J., Markell, S.G., Osorno, J.M., and Zollinger, R.K.
2008. 2006 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and
Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension
Rpt. PP-1265 (revised).
Knodel, J.J., Bradley, C.A., Luecke, J.L., and Mars, G.A. 2008.
2004 and 2005 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and
Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension
Rpt. PP-1265 (revised).
31•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Lamey, H.A., Berglund, D.R., McMullen, M.P., Luecke, J.L., Venette,
J.R., McBride, D.K., Zollinger, R.K., and Grafton, K.F. 1993. 1991
Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide Use
in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. 13.
Lamey, H.A., Berglund, D.R., McMullen, M.P., Luecke, J.L., Zollinger,
R.K., Glogoza, P.A., Venette, J.R., McBride, D.K., and Grafton,
K.F. 1994. 1992 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and
Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension
Rpt. 19.
Lamey, H.A., Berglund, D.R., McMullen, M.P., Zollinger, R.K., Venette,
J.R., McBride, D.K., Venette, S.J., and Venette, R.C. 1992. 1990
Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in
Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. 10.
Lamey, H.A., Dexter, A.G., McBride, D.K., Venette, R.C., and Venette,
J.R. 1990. Problems and Practices of Northarvest Dry Bean
Growers in 1988. N.D. Farm Res. 48(20):6-11, 14.
Lamey, H.A., McMullen, M.P., Glogoza, P.A., Zollinger, R.K., Luecke,
J.L., Berglund, D.R., Venette, J.R., and Grafton, K.F. 1998. 1996
Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in
Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. 44.
Lamey, H.A., Zollinger, R.K., Luecke, J.L., Berglund, D.R., Glogoza,
P.A., and Grafton, K.F. 2001. 2000 Dry Bean Grower Survey of
Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in Minnesota and North Dakota.
NDSU Extension Rpt. 72.
Lamey, H.A., Zollinger, R.K., McBride, D.K., Venette, R.C., and
Venette, J.R. 1991. Production Problems and Practices of
Northarvest Dry Bean Growers in 1989. N.D. Farm Res.
29(2):17-24.
Lamey, H.A., Zollinger, R.K., McMullen, M.P., Luecke, J.L., Grafton,
K.F., Berglund, D.R., Venette, J.R., and Glogoza, P.A. 1996.
1994 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide
Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. 28.
Lamey, H.A., Zollinger, R.K., Venette, J.R., Berglund, D.R., Luecke,
J.L., Grafton, K.F., and Glogoza, P.A. 1997. 1995 Dry Bean
Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in
Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. 33.
Lamey, H.A., Zollinger, R.K., Venette, J.R., McMullen, M.P., Luecke,
J.L., Glogoza, P.A., Grafton, K.F., and Berglund, D.R. 1999. 1997
Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide Use in
Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. 47.
Lamey, H.A., Zollinger, R.K., McMullen, M.P., Luecke, J.L., Venette,
J.R., Berglund, D.R., Grafton, K.F., and Glogoza, P.A. 1999.
1998 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide
Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. 58.
Lamey, H.A., Zollinger, R.K., McMullen, M.P., Luecke, J.L., Venette,
J.R., Berglund, D.R., Grafton, K.F., and Glogoza, P.A. 2000.
1999 Dry Bean Grower Survey of Pest Problems and Pesticide
Use in Minnesota and North Dakota. NDSU Extension Rpt. 64.
Venette, J.R., Lamey, H.A., Peterson, D.E., and Venette, R.C.
1989. Problems and Practices of Dry Edible Bean Production in
North Dakota and Minnesota, 1987. N.D. Farm Res. 46(5):25-31.
APPENDIX I.
Please complete all requested information on practices, pest problems and pesticide use for your 2016 dry bean crop.
State
Minnesota
County
Acres
Bean Class
1.
2.
Black
3.
North Dakota
1.
2.
3.
Great
Northern
Dry Bean Production in 2016
Acres
Total dry bean acres planted
Total dry bean acres harvested
Total irrigated acres
Total dry bean acres on tile-drained ground
Dry bean acres with hail damage
Kidney
Dry bean acres with frost damage
Dry Bean Production Problems in 2016 (please
complete the table)
Problem
Acres
Affected
Bean
Class
1. Applied herbicide injury
*List herbicide in No. 1
2. Herbicide drift injury
*List herbicide if known
Navy
3. Delayed planting
4. Emergence/stand
5. Harvest
6. Disease
7. Insects
Pink
8. Weeds
9. Micronutrient deficiency
10. Water damage (beans
drowned/not harvested)
11. Water damage (beans still
harvested)
12. Hail damage
Pinto
13. Frost damage
14. Wind damage
15. Drought
16. Soil salinity
17. Other (specify)
Small Red
Other Class
32•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
Dry Beans Grown in 2016
Variety
Black Cat
Eclipse
Zorro
Other (specify)
Aries
Matterhorn
Orion
Powderhorn
Taurus
Other (specify)
Beluga
Big Red
Cabernet
Cal Early LRK
Clouseau
Foxfire
Majesty
Montcalm
Pink Panther
Red Hawk
Red Rover
Other (specify)
Avalanche
Ensign
HMS Medalist
Indi
Merlin
Navigator
Norstar
T 9905
Teton
Vigilant
Vista
Other (specify)
Floyd
ISB 473
Sedona
Other (specify)
Buster
La Paz
Lariat
Maverick
Monterrey
ND 307
Santa Cruz
Sequoia
Sinaloa
Sonora
Stampede
Vibrant
Windbreaker
Other (specify)
Merlot
Rio Rojo
Ruby
Other (specify)
Other variety (specify)
Acres
Agronomy
Nitrogen
Please list row spacing and plants per acre for each
bean class that you planted in 2016.
Class
Row
Spacing
(inches)
Live Seeds
Planted Per
Acre OR
Pounds Per
Acre
Established
Stand (Plants
Per Acre)
Phosphate
Potash
Zinc
Sulfur
Did you inoculate with
Rhizobium?
Yes
No
Did you soil test prior to fertilizer
application?
Yes
No
Did you use site-specific nutrient
management for any fertilizers?
Yes
No
What fertilizer application methods did you use for dry
beans in 2016? Please circle all methods you used.
Broadcast Banded In-furrow Foliar
Did the size of your purchased seed affect your ability
to plant your intended acreage in 2016?
Problem
Number of
Acres (short
or long)
Variety(ies)
Harvest. Please circle one answer for each question.
What percentage of your dry bean crop was harvested
using direct combining in 2016?
0%
1-25%
26-50%
51-75%
76-100%
Not enough seed
Your estimated yield loss using direct combining?
Too much seed
0%
No problem
Please list the crops in your dry bean crop rotation
program for all fields you planted to dry bean in 2016.
Year
16-20%
N/A
Your estimated yield loss using conventional
combining?
0%
1-5%
6-10% 11-15% 16-20%
1-5%
6-10%
11-15%
N/A
List of Crops
Insecticides and Insect Pests
2015
Foliar Insecticides Used on Dry Beans in 2016. If you
did not use a foliar insecticide, please write “0” for
acres treated.
2014
2013
2012
Please list acreage for each tillage type listed below for
your dry bean fields in 2016.
Tillage Type
Acreage
Conventional
Foliar
Insecticide
(write in
name or
number
from the
list below)
Acres
Treated
No. of
Applications
Minimum
Strip-till
No-till
Application
Method (circle
one for each
application)
air
ground
air
ground
air
ground
Foliar Insecticide Products
Did you use a ground roller on your dry bean ground in
2016?
Timing
Bean
class
Acres
rolled
What percent of
rolled acres did you
direct combine?
Preplant
Pre-emerge
Postemerge
Didn’t roll
Fertilizer program for dry beans in 2016. Please indicate
pounds per acre for fertilizer components and answer
the questions.
33•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
1. Asana XL
6. Mustang
Maxx
2. Baythroid XL
7. Tombstone
3. Brigade/generics
8. Warrior /
generics
4. Dimethoate
9. None used
5. Hero
10. Other
(specify)
Seed Treatment Insecticides Used on Dry Beans in
2016. If you did not use a seed treatment insecticide,
please write “0” for acres treated.
Seed Treatment Insecticide
(write in name or number
from the list below)
Seed Treatment Fungicide
(write in name or number from
the list below)
Acres
Treated
Acres
Treated
Seed Treatment Insecticide Products
1. Attendant 600 FS / 600
7. Gaucho 600
Seed Treatment Fungicide Products
2. Capture LFR
8. Lorsban
1. Apron
11. Rancona
3. Cruiser 5FS
9. None used
2. ApronMaxx
12. Rancona Summit
4. Cruiser Maxx
10. Other (please specify)
3. Captan
13. Stamina
5. Dyna-Shield Imidacloprid 5
11. Don’t know
4. Dynasty
14. Spirato
5. EverGol Energy
15. Thiram
6. Headline
16. Trilex 2000
7. Maxim
17. Trilex Summit
8. Metalaxyl
18. Vibrance
9. Obvius
19. None used
10. Prevail
20. Other (please specify)
6. Enhance AW
Worst Insect/Mite Problem in 2016. Please rank 1-3, with
1 = worst. Please mark ONLY three.
Insect/Mite Pest
Rank
Armyworms
Aphids
Cutworms
In-furrow Fungicide Applications Made on Dry Beans in
2016. If you did not make an in-furrow fungicide
application, please write “0” for acres treated.
Bean leaf beetle
Foliage caterpillars
Grasshoppers
In-furrow Fungicide
(write in name or number
from Foliar Fungicide
Products List)
Leafhoppers
Seed corn maggots
Acres
Treated
Spider mites
Wireworms
None
Fungicides and Disease Problems
Worst Disease Problem in 2016. Please rank 1-3, with
1 = worst. Please mark ONLY three.
Foliar Fungicides Used on Dry Beans in 2016. If you did
not use a fungicide, please write “0” for acres treated.
Foliar Fungicide
(write in name or
number) from the
list below)
Disease
Anthracnose
Acres
Treated
No. of
Applications
Application
Method
(circle one)
Bacterial brown spot
air
ground
Common bacterial blight
air
ground
Halo blight
Foliar Fungicide Products
Bacterial wilt
Bean common mosaic virus
1. Aproach
10. Omega
19. Rorval
Other viruses (general)
2. Cannonball
11. Priaxor
20. Serenade
Root rot
3. Champion
12. Proline
21. Switch
Rust
22. Tebuconazole /
generics
23. Topsin
(banded)
24. Topsin
(broadcast)
White mold
4. Copper
13. Proline (band)
5. Contans
14. Proline (broad)
6. Endura
15. ProPulse
7. Headline
16. Quadris /
Amstar
25. Vertisan
8. Incognito
17. Quadris Opti
26. Other (specify)
9. Microthiol
18. Quilt
27. None used
Seed Treatment Fungicides Used on Dry Beans in 2016. If
you did not use a seed treatment fungicide, please write
“0” for acres treated.
34•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
None
Herbicides and Weed Problems
Rank
Herbicides and Weed Problems
Weed Control Practices Used on Dry Beans in 2016.
Count double herbicide applications, double cultivation,
etc., as double acres.
Weed Control Used
(write in name or number
from the list below)
Bean
Class
Acres
Treated
Desiccants Used on Dry Beans in 2016.
Count double applications as double acres.
Desiccant Used
(Write in name or number
from the list below. If tank
mixed, please write products
on the same line. Example:
1+3 or Glyphosate+Sharpen)
Bean
Class
Acres
Treated
Desiccant Products
1. Glyphosate
2. Paraquat
3. Sharpen
Weed Control Products and Practices
1. Assure
11. Permit
21. Spartan Elite
2. Basagran/generics
12. Poast
22. Trifluralin
3. BroadAxe
13. Prowl
23. Cultivation
4. Dual/generics
14. Pursuit
24. Rotary hoe
5. Eptam
15. Raptor
25. Manual labor
6. Fusilade DX
16. Reflex
26. Other
7. Glyphosate (preplant)
17. Rezult
27. None used
8. Glyphosate (preharvest)
18. Select/generics
9. Glyphosate (postharvest)
19. Sonalan
10. Outlook
20. Spartan/Charge
Rank
Weed
B. wormwood
Smartweed
Black medic
Sunflower
Canada thistle
Venice mallow
Cocklebur
Volunteer canola
Foxtail
Volunteer grain
Kochia
Waterhemp
Lambsquarters
Wild buckwheat
Lanceleaf sage
Wild mustard
Nightshade
Wild oat
Ragweed
Other
Redroot pigweed
None
35•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower Survey
5. Valor
Field Scouting
Field Scouting in Dry Beans in 2016. For each question,
please circle the best answer that applies to your
operation.
How do you scout your dry bean fields for insects?
I do it
Crop consultant
Don’t scout
How do you scout your dry bean fields for diseases?
Worst Weed Problem. Please rank 1-3, with 1 = worst.
Please mark ONLY three.
Weed
4. Sodium chlorate (Leafex, Defol)
Rank
I do it
Crop consultant
Don’t scout
How do you scout your dry bean fields for weeds?
I do it
Crop consultant
Don’t scout
Do you follow recommended economic thresholds when
making insect control decisions?
Yes
No
Thank you for completing the 2016
Dry Bean Grower Survey!
Cover photos by
H.J. Kandel
(top – dry beans)
J.J. Knodel
(middle – red-legged grasshopper)
D. Wirth
(bottom – weeds in dry bean field)
For more information on this and other topics, see www.ag.ndsu.edu
NDSU encourages you to use and share this content, but please do so under the conditions of our Creative Commons license.
You may copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this work as long as you give full attribution, don’t use the work for commercial purposes
and share your resulting work similarly. For more information, visit www.ag.ndsu.edu/agcomm/creative-commons.
County commissions, North Dakota State University and U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. NDSU does not discriminate in its programs and activities on the basis of age,
color, gender expression/identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, participation in lawful off-campus activity, physical or mental disability, pregnancy, public assistance status,
race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, spousal relationship to current employee, or veteran status, as applicable. Direct inquiries to Vice Provost for Title IX/ADA Coordinator, Old Main 201,
NDSU Main Campus, 701-231-7708, ndsu.eoaa.ndsu.edu. This publication will be made available in alternative formats for people with disabilities upon request, 701-231-7881.
36•E18412016 Dry Bean Grower
Survey
1M-2-08; 600-12-08; 600-6-09; 400-4-10; 400-2-11; 300-2-12; 400-2-13; 300-3-14; 400-3-15; 400-3-16; 400-3-17