5. What is the average grade given to the graduates of the program in the final project/
final seminar/thesis in each of the last three years? Please present (in the format of
histogram) the grades distribution of the final project/final seminar/thesis.
Fig. 5.1: The grade distribution of seminar "Children's Literature",
Elementary English class, 2014
9
8
7
freq.
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
Fig. 5.1: Among the Elementary English class students, the average is 75.0 and S.D is relatively high
11.9, in 2014.
Fig. 5. 2: The grade distribution of seminar "Children's Literature",
Elementary English class, 2015
18
16
14
freq.
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
Fig. 5.2: Among the Elementary English class students, the average is 73.1 and S.D is relatively low
5.3, in 2015.
Fig. 5.3:The grade distribution of seminar "Children's Literature",
Elementary English class, 2016
25
freq.
20
15
10
5
0
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
Fig. 5.3: Among the Elementary English class students, the average is 88.3 and S.D is relatively low
4.9, in 2016.
Freq.
Fig. 5.4: The grade distribution of seminar "Modern literature", High
English class, 2014
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
60
70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
Fig. 5.4: Among the High English class students, the average is 76.9 and S.D is relatively high 9.5, in
2014.
Fig. 5.5: The grade distribution of seminar "Modern literature", High
English class, 2015
10
Freq.
8
6
4
2
0
60
70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
Fig. 5.5: Among the High English class students, the average is 75.5 and S.D is relatively high 7.1, in
2015.
Freq.
Fig. 5.6: The grade distribution of seminar "Modern literature", High
English class, 2015
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
Fig. 5.6: Among the High English class students, the average is 75.8 and S.D is relatively high 7.3, in
2016.
3.. In the format of a histogram, please present the range of psychometric test scores or the
equivalent and the range of matriculation averages of the students that were admitted to the
program in the last five years. If there is a discrepancy between the admission criteria and the
de facto admission data, please elaborate.
Fig. 3.1: Distribution of psychometric scores, 2012
18
16
14
freq.
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
475
475-500 500-525 525-550 550-575 575-600 600-625 625-650 650-675 675-700
Average
529.3
Median
517.0
S.D
47.3
Fig. 3.1: Among the English track students, the distributions of the psychometric scores are
right-tailed scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high
averages of scores. The C.V (a coefficient of variation is defined as the ratio of the standard
deviation to the mean) shows the extent of variability in relation to the mean of the population
(high level of C.V high variability in the variable). In 2012 the C.V is 0.089.
Fig. 3.2: Distribution of matriculation averages , 2012
30
25
freq.
20
15
10
5
0
92
92-95
Average
100.0
95-100
100-105
Median
99.5
105-110
110-115
S.D
5.3
Fig. 3.2: Among the English track students, the distributions of the matriculation averages are
approximate to normal distribution. In 2012 the C.V is 0.053.
Fig. 3.3: Distribution of match scores, 2012
35
30
freq.
25
20
15
10
5
0
525-550
Average
569.3
550-575
575-600
Median
552.0
600-625
625-650
S.D
39.6
650-675
Fig. 3.3: Among the English track students, the distributions of match scores are right-tailed
scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high averages
of scores. In 2012 the C.V is 0.069.
freq.
Fig. 3.4: Distribution of psychometric scores, 2013
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
475
475-500 500-525 525-550 550-575 575-600 600-625 625-650 650-675 675-700
Average
526.3
Median
506.0
S.D
52.5
Fig. 3.4: Among the English track students, the distributions of psychometric scores are righttailed scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high
averages of scores. In 2013 the C.V is 0.099.
Fig. 3.5: Distribution of matriculation averages , 2013
30
25
freq.
20
15
10
5
0
92
92-95
Average
98.8
95-100
100-105
Median
98.8
105-110
110-115
S.D
4.2
Fig. 3.5: Among the English track students, the distributions of the matriculation averages are
approximate to normal distribution. In 2013 the C.V is 0.042.
Fig. 3.6: Distribution of match scores, 2013
30
25
freq.
20
15
10
5
0
525
525-550
Average
570.5
550-575
575-600
Median
559.5
600-625
625-650
S.D
35.8
650-675
Fig. 3.6: Among the English track students, the distributions of match scores are right-tailed
scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high averages
of scores. In 2013 the C.V is 0.062.
Fig. 3.7: Distribution of psychometric scores, 2014
14
12
freq.
10
8
6
4
2
0
475-500
500-525
Average
526.0
525-550
550-575
575-600
Median
519.0
600-625
625-675
S.D
38.9
Fig. 3.7: Among the English track students, the distributions of psychometric scores are righttailed scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high
averages of scores. In 2014 the C.V is 0.073.
freq.
Fig. 3.8: Distribution of matriculation averages , 2014
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
92
92-95
95-100
100-105
105-110
110-115
Average
99.0
Median
98.4
S.D
5.5
Fig. 3.8: Among the English track students, the distributions of the matriculation averages are
approximate to normal distribution. In 2014 the C.V is 0.055.
Fig. 3.9: Distribution of match scores, 2014
30
25
freq.
20
15
10
5
0
525
Average
572.6
525-550 550-575 575-600 600-625 625-650 650-675
Median
560.5
675+
S.D
35.7
Fig. 3.9: Among the English track students, the distributions of match scores are right-tailed
scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high averages
of scores. In 2014 the C.V is 0.062.
Fig. 3.10: Distribution of psychometric scores, 2015
16
14
12
freq.
10
8
6
4
2
0
475-500 500-525 525-550 550-575 575-600 600-625 625-650 650-675
Average
534.9
Median
527.5
675+
S.D
50.6
Fig. 3.10: Among the English track students, the distributions of psychometric scores are righttailed scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high
averages of scores. In 2015 the C.V is 0.094.
Fig. 3.11: Distribution of matriculation averages , 2015
25
freq.
20
15
10
5
0
92
92-95
95-100
100-105
105-110
110-115
Average
98.7
Median
98.4
S.D
5.7
Fig. 3.11: Among the English track students, the distributions of the matriculation averages are
approximate to normal distribution with Left tail thick. In 2015 the C.V is 0.057.
freq.
Fig. 3.12: Distribution of match scores, 2015
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
525-550 550-575 575-600 600-625 625-650 650-675 675-700
Average
575.5
Median
560.0
700+
S.D
39.3
Fig. 3.12: Among the English track students, the distributions of match scores are right-tailed
scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high averages
of scores. In 2015 the C.V is 0.068.
Fig. 3.13:Distribution of psychometric scores, 2016
12
10
freq.
8
6
4
2
0
475-500
500-525
Average
530.2
525-550
550-575
Median
514.0
575-600
600-625
625-650
S.D
47.4
Fig. 3.13: Among the English track students, the distributions of psychometric scores are righttailed scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high
averages of scores. In 2016 the C.V is 0.089.
freq.
Fig. 3.14: Distribution of matriculation averages ,
2016
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
92
92-95
95-100
100-105
105-110
110-115
Average
98.6
Median
98.3
S.D
5.6
Fig. 3.14: Among the English track students, the distributions of the matriculation averages are
approximate to normal distribution with Left tail thick. In 2016 the C.V is 0.056.
Fig. 3.15: Distribution of match scores, 2016
30
25
freq.
20
15
10
5
0
525-550
Average
582.7
550-575
575-600
Median
573.0
600-625
625-650
650-675
675-700
S.D
39.2
Fig. 3.15: Among the English track students, the distributions of match scores are right-tailed
scores, indicating a high polarity of distributions and small mass of students with high averages
of scores. In 2016 the C.V is 0.067.
Fig. 3.16: Average scores in psychometric, English
track, years 2012-2106
535.0
530.0
525.0
520.0
515.0
510.0
505.0
500.0
495.0
490.0
485.0
480.0
475.0
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Fig. 3.16: shows the distribution of the psychometrics' average scores by years 2012-2016
among the English track students. the average scores in psychometric look similar, their range
varies from 526 to 532. In 2015 there was an increase relative to other years.
Fig: 3.17: Average grades in matriculation, English track,
years 2012-2106
100.0
98.0
96.0
94.0
92.0
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Fig. 3.17: shows the distribution of the matriculation's average grades by years 2012-2016
among the English track students. the average scores in matriculation look similar especially
between 2013 to 2016. The averages range from 98 to 99. In 2012 there was an increase
relative to other years.
Fig. 3.18: Average scores in match score, English track,
years 2012-2106
595.0
575.0
555.0
535.0
515.0
495.0
475.0
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Fig. 3.18: shows the distribution of the match scores average by years 2012-2016 among the
English track students. the average scores are growing over the years. The averages range
from 555 to 575. In 2016 there was an increase relative to other years.