Chapter ~7 Strategic Pricing in Hospital Sector - 172 - Chapter - 7 Strategic Pricing in Hospital Sector A ccording to one of the leading experts on pricing, m ost service organizations use a naieve and u n so p h isticated ap p ro ach to pricing w ith o u t regard to u n d erly in g shifts in d em and, the rate th a t su p p ly can be expanded, prices of available su b stitu tes, consideration of the pricevolum e relationship, or the availability of fu tu re substitutes. The hospitals are not exception to this. 7.1 Key ways of customer evaluation of Pricing for Hospital Service There are three key differences betw een custom er ev alu atio n of pricing for services and goods. 1) C ustom ers often have inaccurate or lim ited reference prices for services. 2) Price is a key signal of quality in services. 3) M onetary price is n o t the only price relev an t to service custom ers. Service p roviders m u st u n d erstan d how custom ers perceive prices and price changes and w h at role does price p lay in consum er decisions about services. Reference price is a price p o in t in m em ory for a good or service and can consist of the price last p aid , the price m ost frequently p aid or the average of all prices custom ers have p aid for sim ilar offerings. You can com pare your reference prices w ith the actual price of these services from the p ro v id ers in your hom etow n. Because services are intangible and are n o t created on a factory assem bly line, service firm s have great flexibility in the configurations of services they offer. It is very difficult to answ er ab o u t prices for a m edical check-up. If you are like m ost consum ers, y ou probably w an ted m ore inform ation before you offered a reference price. You probably w anted to know w hat type of check u p the physician is providing. Does it include x-rays and other diagnostic tests? W hat types of tests? H ow long does it take? If the check u p is u n d ertak en sim ply to get a signature on a h ealth form or a m arriage certificate, the doctor m ay take a brief m edical history, listen for a h eartb eat and m easure blood pressure. If, how ever, the checkup is to m onitor a chronic ailm ent such - 173 - diabetes for high blood pressure, the doctor may be more thorough. Here the high degree of variability exists across providers of services. 7.2 Difficulty in Pricing of Hospital Services Not every physician defines a checkup the same way. Many providers are unable or uncoiling to estimate price in advance. Medical service providers are rarely willing or even able to estimate a price in advance. The fundamental reason in many cases is that they do not know themselves what the services will involve until they have fully examined the patient. Another factor that results in the inaccuracy of reference prices is that individual customer needs vary. Perhaps that is why price is not featured in service advertising. Individual customer needs also vary. Doctor's fees also vary depending on their experience and expertise. Different categories of hospitals also charge differently for the same treatment. 7.3 The role of non-monetary costs In recent years economists have recognized that monetary price is not the only sacrifice consumers make to obtain services. Non-monetary costs represent other sources of sacrifice perceived by consumers when buying and using a service. Time costs, search costs and psychological costs often enter into the evaluation of whether to buy or rebuy a service and may at times be more important concerns than monetary price. Consider the investment you make to exercise, see a physician. Not only are you paying money to receive these services; you are also expending time. Time becomes a sacrifice made to receive service in multiple ways. The average waiting time in physician's offices is 20.6 minutes, according to the American Medical Association with 22 minutes for family practice doctors and 23 minutes for paediatricians, orthopedic surgeons and gynaecologists. Waiting time for a service is virtually always longer and less predictable than waiting time to buy goods. Customers often have to wait for an available appointment from a doctor. Virtually all of us have expended waiting time to receive services. Search costs - the effort invested to identify and select among services you desire - are also higher for services than for physical goods. Prices for services are rarely displayed on shelves of service establishments. These prices are often known only when customer has decided to experience the service. Each service establishment offers one brand of a service. In medical service a customer must initiate contact with several different hospitals to get _ 174 . information across sellers. Again the medical service cost is compared with the goodwill & skill of the doctors in that particular hospital. If you choose physician A you are probably most concerned about monetary costs you are willing to wait for an appointment and in the waiting room of the physician's office. If you choose physician B over physician A, your time and convenience costs are slightly more important than your monetary costs because you are willing to pay Rs.1000 more to reduce the waiting time. If you choose physician C, you are much more sensitive to time and convenience costs, including travel time than to monetary costs - you are willing to pay three times what you would pay for physician A to avoid the other non-monetary costs and if you choose physician D, you are someone who wants to minimize psychological costs as well, in this case fear and pain. Thus, customers are willing to pay to avoid the other costs. One of the intriguing aspects of pricing is that buyers are likely to use price as an indicator of both service costs and service quality. Price is at once an attraction variable and a repellent. Customer's use of price as an indicator of quality depends on several factors, one of which is the other information available to them. Customers may believe that price is the best indicator of quality. In high risk situations such as medical treatment, the customer will look to price as a surrogate for quality. Price sets expectations of quality. So service prices must be determined carefully. Pricing too low can lead to inaccurate inferences about the quality of the service. Pricing too high can set expectations that may be difficult to match in service delivery. 7.4 Price Elasticity For most of the healthcare strategy planners, 'what is the right price for my product ?' is a common question. The way out is to have a target profitability and price the product based on the cost estimates sounds easy, but it is difficult to execute, especially for services like healthcare. First of all accurate cost estimates are almost impossible. Secondly competition and price sensitivity of demand varies widely, depending on the kind of services that are provided. Healthcare services, in general are less price elastic, unless they are of the preventive nature according to studies. A rich businessman might not think twice before choosing the most renowned surgeon in town for his dad's bypass surgery but the same person might compare prices before deciding on his daughter's vision correction procedure. In cases of emergency, more often than not, non-price attributes have a major role in deciding the demand for - 175 - healthcare services. However, pricing has to fit into the overall vision and has to be complementary with the other important aspects like the location of hospital, nature of the target customers and level of technology offered. All these factors have to be taken into account by the strategists, before he decides to go in for a differentiating strategy or a cost leadership strategy or a mixed one. Pricing is unquestionably an important part of devising a strategy, as it has a major influence on the performance of hospitals. Return from the business is extremely sensitive to the level of pricing. A 10% increase in price leads to a doubling of operating profit margins, according to a study done by Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA), USA. Pricing has a greater significance in the Indian Scenario, where the insurance coverage is minimal, with more than 80% of the expenses being out of pocket. What determines the costs of healthcare services? Is it cost or competition ? Healthcare services is one of the vary few industry where the product or service is at times priced below its cots, according to Dr.P.M.Bhujang, Medical Director, Sir H.N.Hospital, Mumbai. He says that competition more often dictates pricing. The role of competition in pricing depends on how important cost is as a dealing factor for consumers of healthcare services. Medical care is found to be less price elastic than clothing, household appliances etc. according to conventional economics. COST FACOR P ric e E le a s tic ity o f V a rio u s C a te g o rie s □ □ 0 .2 H o u s in g E le c tr ic ity B re a d M e d ic a l C a re C lo th in g H o u s e h o ld A p p lia n c e s M o to r V e h ic le s R e s ta u ra n t M e a ls Diagram 7.1 (Source: McConnellC. Am i Brue Stanley. Economics 12lh Edition) - 176 - It is fo u n d to h a v e a p ric e e la s tic ity of n e g a tiv e 0-31, m e a n in g th a t a 10% in crease in p ric e s w o u ld re s u lt in a d eclin e in d e m a n d by 3.1%. H o w ev er s e n s itiv ity to p ric in g o f h e a lth care serv ices co u ld be h ig h e r in In d ia , as th e m a jo rity of th e p o p u la tio n is u n a b le to b e a r th e e x p en ses for q u a lity h e a lth c a re . P rice e la stic ity also v a rie s d e p e n d in g o n th e n a tu re of th e tre a tm e n t. O u t p a tie n t c h arg es are fo u n d to be m o re s e n sitiv e th a n in p a tie n t c h arg es, a cc o rd in g to H FM A . F u rth e r p ric e s e n s itiv ity is fo u n d to be th e h ig h e s t w ith in d e n ta l care a n d so m e w h a t lo w e r in m e d ic in e c o n su m p tio n an d lo w e st in o p e n h e a lth c a re , a c c o rd in g to e m p iric a l re s e a rc h d o n e b y th e N a tio n a l B oard of H e a lth a n d W elfare, S w eden. 7.5 Approaches to Pricing h o sp ita l service The co st-b ase d an d c o m p e titio n b a se d p ric in g a p p ro a c h e s are b a se d on the in s titu te a n d its c o m p e tito rs ra th e r th a n on c u sto m ers. C u sto m e rs m ay lack re fe re n c e p ric e s, m a y be se n sitiv e to n o n -m o n e ta ry p ric e s an d m ay ju d g e q u a lity o n th e b a sis of p ric e . A ll of th e se facto rs can a n d s h o u ld be a c c o u n te d fo r in a c o m p a n y 's p ric in g d e cisio n s. D e m a n d -b a se d p ric in g in v o lv e s s e ttin g p ric e s c o n sis te n t w ith c u sto m e r p e rc e p tio n s of v a lu e : p ric e s are b a se d on w h a t c u sto m e rs w ill p a y fo r th e serv ices p ro v id e d . H ere n o n -m o n e ta ry co sts a n d b e n e fits m u s t be fa c to re d in to th e c a lc u la tio n of p e rc e iv e d v a lu e to th e c u sto m e r. W hen serv ices save tim e , in c o n v en ien c e an d p sy c h o lo g ic a l a n d sea rc h co sts, the c u sto m e r is lik e ly to be w illin g to p a y a h ig h e r m o n e ta ry p ric e . W hen c u sto m e rs d isc u ss v a lu e , th e y u se th e te rm in m an y d iffe re n t w ay s a n d ta lk a b o u t m y ria d a ttrib u te s o r c o m p o n en ts. C u sto m e rs d e fin e v a lu e in fo u r w ay s (1) value is low price (2) value is whatever I want in a service or product. (3) value is the quality I get for the price I pay. (4) value is w hat I get for what I give. - 177 - Value is low price. • • • • Value is everything 1 want in a service. Discounting Odd pricing Synchro-pricing Penetration pricing \ [ if IS Value is the quality 1get for the price 1pay. • Prestige pricing • Skimming pricing Value is all that 1get for all that 1give. • • • • • Value pricing • Market segmentation pricing Price framing Price bundling Complementary pricing Resuits-based pricing Diagram 7.2 (Source : Zeithamal & Bitner) In healthcare services also, customers have different perceived values. While what is received varies across customers, as does what is given, value represents a trade-off of the give and get components. So give and get components of value are distributed into manageable pieces that can be useful in quantifying value. When the customer is concerned with the 'get' components monetary price is not of primary concern. Some of the corporate hospitals have luxurious rooms for a particular segment of the societies i.e. celebrities, politicians and rich businessmen. For them the value is associated with prestige and status. When the value for the customer is to match quality level and price level, there are different categories of hospitals catering to varied segments. 7.6 Indian Scenario Looking at the Indian scenario, for the low income population in rural areas, the choice boils down to the government hospitals. A thriving middle class in semi-urban areas forms a large group. In most of the cases, their decision is highly influenced by the word of mouth. This group has an expected range for the cost of their treatment and they work within this budget. Today a middle level manager with a family of four, spends between Rs.8,000 and Rs.12,000 a year on healthcare, compared to just Rs.2,000 in the late 80's according to the report on healthcare by CII. In order to attract this group, hospitals should understand the expected range, and keep the prices within - 178 - that. However, variations within the range might have lesser impact on the decision. In times of emergency, the choice of the hospital by the m iddle class and lower middle class also depends on the extent of help that they can gather. This help, which most often comes from the close relatives and friends acts as an informal insurance of India, according to Joe Curian, CEO, S.L.Raheja Hospital, Mumbai. Coming to the high-income group in India, price is not a very important factor as can be seen from the high occupancy rates in the large private hospitals. Prices in corporate and high-end hospitals are still within the grab of this group. A person earning more than Rs.25,000 per month would not have great difficulty in arranging money for a 6-7 day procedure. Costing Rs.5,000-6,000 per day considering that the high income group forms a small proportion of the population, it can be concluded that competition has a major role in determining the pricing in India. Pricing in Indian hospitals is currently controlled by the demand supply balance and should be decided that way, according to Joe Curian. He says that the increasing dem and for healthcare services in India from the middle income group, who have access to health information and a higher propensity to spend on health needs is bound to cause a demand - supply imbalance in some areas and push up the prices. Incentives given by the government to start hospitals at appropriate areas according to Curian, can remedy the situation. 7.7 The role of cost in deciding Pricing Costs too, have a part in deciding the prices, bu t play second fiddle to competition in the Indian Scenario, especially if the hospital is still at the stage of making a name in the market. In a competition led pricing scenario, hospitals have little choice but to cut costs in order to make money. This has been taken up actively even in most trust managed hospitals in India. Hinduja Hospital has a costing department in order to maintain a strict control on costs. A high cost structure would more often lead to trouble as the hospital would fail to match the aggressive pricing followed in the market. A large hospital which leverages on its scale to achieve cost leadership is in a better position to control pricing in the market, leaving the inefficient players at a disadvantage. There is another pertinent question faced by an entrepreneur setting up a new hospital. Should he aim at cost leadership, which at times requires scale in the form of hospital chains or should he try to provide differentiated services - 179 - w ith d if f e r e n tia te d p ric in g ? The a n s w e r d e p e n d s on facto rs like ty p e of h o s p ita l s p e c ia lity or m u lti s p e c ia lity , a n d th e ta rg e t g r o u p of p a tie n ts . For a s p e c ia lity h o s p ita l ta r g e tin g th e elite class, a d if f e r e n tia tin g s tr a te g y w o u l d h e lp to b r e a k e v e n faster. The e lem en t of d iff e r e n tia tio n , w h ic h is m o st o fte n te c h n o lo g y , c o u ld in v o lv e a d d itio n a l in v e s tm e n ts . H o w e v e r c o n s id e rin g the fact th a t r e p u t a t i o n p la y s th e m o s t im p o r ta n t p a r t in a ttra c tin g th e elite class in la rg e cities, th e a d d itio n a l i n v e s t m e n t c o u ld give s u s ta in a b le p ric in g p o w e r. For th o se h o s p ita ls , w h ic h a d o p t a s tra te g y m id w a y b e tw e e n d if f e r e n tia tio n a n d cost le a d e r s h ip , in itia l p o s itio n in g b eco m es e x tre m e ly im p o r ta n t. By p r ic in g th e p r o c e d u r e s at a h ig h level, th e y expose th e m s e lv e s to th e ris k of c o m p e titio n . As th e c o m p e titio n in te n s ifie s, th e y w o u ld be fo rce d to c u t prices. V o lu m e s fail to p ic k u p as th e h o s p ita l c o n tin u e s to h a v e a r e p u ta tio n as h ig h -p r ic e d a n d as a re s u lt, p r o f its are hit. P ric in g h ig h sele c tiv e ly b a s e d on th e u n d e r s t a n d i n g of th e p ric e e la s tic ity of th e d e m a n d for v a rio u s s erv ice s, w o u ld be a b e tte r o p tio n for s u c h h o s p ita ls . F u rth e r, in itia l p ric e d e cisio n s are a lw a y s b e tte r m a d e w h e n th e p la n n in g is m o re fo r lo n g te rm r a th e r th a n for s h o r t- te r m r e tu r n s . 7.8 D isp a rities in Pricing If th e th o u g h t of b e in g a d m itte d to a h o s p ita l is n o t fo r b id d in g e n o u g h , fo rk in g o u t m o n e y to p a y th o s e e n d le s s h o s p ita l b ills is a n ig h tm a r e in itself. R eceiv in g th e b e s t a v a ila b le tr e a tm e n t is no jo k e c o n s id e rin g th e in co m e le v els of a n a v e ra g e In d ia n . A C a rd ia c b y p a s s s u r g e r y in a h ig h - e n d h o s p ita l in M u m b a i can cost a s ta g g e rin g Rs.3 lak h , a n d c o u ld be e v e n m o re d e p e n d in g o n th e c o m p le x ity a n d sp e c ia lis t s u r g e o n fees. T h o u g h o th e r cities are c h e a p e r, th e g ap is n o t v e ry w id e . H o w e v e r, h u g e d iffe re n c e s are s e e n in ra te s for n o n -c a rd ia c p r o c e d u r e s acro ss cities a n d e v e n in tra -c ity . H e a lth c a re costs are m o re or less in lin e w ith th e cost of liv in g in d if f e r e n t cities. The g iv e n c h a rt s h o w s th e co sts of p r o c e d u r e s in m e tro s a n d n o n —m e tro s . - 180 - CITYSCAPE Cost of Procedures In Metros and Non-Metros High Metros Medium Low Highest NonMetros Medium Lowest Cardiac Bypass 250000 164990 110750 200000 140000 101500 Angioplasty 143000 104993 44300 115000 82500 47000 230000 168400 92500 205000 115000 79500 48500 32790 19500 41250 25000 15876 40500 21550 15140 27650 16575 11000 Normal Delivery 38300 12000 4855 16050 7820 5450 Cesarean Delivery 67100 33500 14100 30000 15795 10500 Hysterectomy 56000 33175 15000 43725 27149 10925 Joint Replacement 158850 142500 121130 160000 102500 82294 Heart Value Replacement Laproscopic Cholecystectomy Laproscopic Appendicectomy Source : ETIG Health care Survey The charges for the different p ro c e d u re s v a ry form case to case a n d city to city. T h o u g h s ta n d a r d iz a tio n is long w ay off, relief m ay be at h an d w ith the possibility of the roof-high rates com ing do w n , especially for cardiac p ro c e d u re s , acc o rd in g to in d u s tr y officials. C o n su m a b le s form a h u g e cost c o m p o n e n t in some cardiac p ro c e d u re s a n d high-end co n su m ab les are largely im p o rted . Large h ospital chains will have b e tte r b a rg a in in g p o w e r, thus lo w erin g their co n su m ab les and b en efitin g the consum er. Till that h a p p e n s , the pockets w o u ld em p ty d e p e n d in g on the city in w h ich one lives in and the h o sp ita l one goes to. - 181 - METRO BEAT Overall Healthcare Cost Across Cities Diagram 7.3 (Source : ET1G Healthcare Survey) 7.9 T h e r isin g cost o f H ea lth ca re T o d a y life s a v i n g p r o c e d u r e s cos t a b o m b . The r i s i n g cost of q u a l i t y h e a l t h c a r e p i n c h e s h a r d , e s p e c i a l l y w h e n g i v e n the g e n e r a l i n c o m e le v e ls in th e c o u n t r y . But it is p r u d e n t to u n d e r s t a n d th e r e a s o n s for s o m e h o s p i t a l s c h a r g i n g h i g h e r , s o m e lo w e r , b e f o r e c h o o s i n g w h e r e to g et o n e s e l f t r e a t e d . S u r g e o n ' s fees a n d c o n s u m a b l e s t o g e t h e r f o r m a l m o s t h a l f of to ta l cos ts, w h i l e r o o m r e n t s a n d o p e r a t i o n t h e a t r e c h a r g e s t o g e t h e r fo rm 25% of th e to t a l co s ts a c c o r d i n g to ET H e a l t h c a r e S u r v e y . It h a s al so b e e n s e e n t h a t m a x i m u m v a r i a t i o n s a c r o s s h o s p i t a l s ar e for th e c o n s u m a b l e co s ts a n d r o o m r e n t s . T h e p r o p o r t i o n s g i v e n in th e t a b le ar e th e a v e r a g e s of t h o s e c h a r g e d b y a s a m p l e g r o u p of h o s p i t a l s f r o m the s u r v e y . For th e C a r d i a c p r o c e d u r e s , th e y c o n s i d e r e d b y p a s s s u r g e r y a n d a n g i o p l a s t y , w h i l e for t h e n o n cardiac procedures, they have considered laparoscopic cholecystectom y, cesarean delivery and norm al delivery. - 182 - 7.10 Money For Everything Major Cost Components as a Proportion of Total Procedure Cost 35% 32% 32% ' 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 0 T C h a rg e s C o n s u m a b le s (In c lu d e s S u rg e o n /C o n s u lta n ts ' C o s t o f M e d ic in e ) Room Rent □ O v e r a ll Diagram 7.4 O th e rs Fees* ■ C a rd ia c □ N o n - C a r d ia c (Source - ETIG Healthcare Survey) * Does not include visiting consultants fees applicable in Cardiac Procedures. One conclusion is that the proportion varies significantly with the procedure, since surgeon charges and consumable costs are different. In the case of cardiac procedures, consumables assume substantial proportions, especially in case of angioplasty where it accounts for more than 40$ of the costs. This is mainly because of costly balloons, catheters and injections to remove clots, used in the process. These are mostly imported and are expensive. For example a balloon costs anywhere between Rs.30,000 and Rs.70,000. Costs of consumables vary widely across the hospitals too. The cost of operation theatre, consumables for angioplasty in Holy Family Hospital, Mumbai is Rs. 70,000, while that in Woodlands Hospital, Kolkatta is Rs.25,000. The variations in consumable costs are mainly due to the varying preferences of doctors. Within a single hospital itself there could be a lot of heterogeneity in the preferences of doctors. This is due to the varying degrees of confidence that doctors excludes charges of the visiting surgeons, which is substantial in the case of cardiac procedures, especially bypass surgery. Even in case of in- - 183 - house surgeon's fees, there are big differences across hospitals. Wockhardt Hospital and Heart Institute, Bangalore charge Rs.12,000 as Surgeon's charges for cardiac bypass surgery, while hospitals like W oodlands in Kolkata and Lilawati Hospital in Mumbai charge more than have in various brands. He also adds that there is a difference in perception between imported brands and indigenous ones. Another explanation for the asymmetry in consumable costs is the policy of some hospitals to use reusable balloons while others use disposable ones. The second largest cost component, surgeon's fees, is understandably large in all procedures. It is a huge variable element, depending on the location, surgeon's skills and demand. This is applicable in both cardiac and non cardiac procedures. It should be noted that the surgeon's fee here double that amount. The cost of procedures is much higher in Mumbai, mainly due to the high doctor's fees. Unlike consumables and surgeon's fees which are specific to each procedure, room rent is used as the universal parameter to measure how expensive a hospital is. The survey shows that room rent is not the best parameter to decide which hospital to get operated in, as room rents on an average form just 12.6% of the cost of the procedure. For most of the surgical procedures, it can be seen that operation theatre charges and ICU charges are as significant as the rcom rents. Operation theatre charges in general range from Rs.1,500 to Rs.3,000 per hour, depending on the hospitals. ICU charges too are significant. In general, the patient spends 1.5 - 2 times what he or she spends as room rent for the stay in ICU. Major hospitals are taking various steps to minimize the stay in ICU. Hospitals have been trying to keep this cost low and do this by reducing the average length of study. Certain protocols followed in diagnosis, use of highend technology like non-invasive, surgical methods and strict focus on value addition during the patient's stay are various steps taken by hospitals to reduce the average length of stay (ALOS). Major hospitals are already aware of the advantages of reducing ALOS as illustrated in the table. Average length of stay (ALOS) Across H ospitals in India ALOS 5.3 9.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 6.0 Hinduja Bombay Hospital Breach Candy Wockhardt, Bangalore Ruby H all, Pune Apollo Hospitals - 184 In case of hospitals running at low occupancies, the first priority of the management would be to increase it. ALOS varies widely across sepcialities and techniques. The basic premise is the focus on value addition. Value addition in the form of various treatments is w hat brings profits to hospitals. So pricing in healthcare services depends c n various parameters. Apart from the major components mentioned above, there are m any other miscellaneous cost heads, which hospitals end up incurring as a part of all the procedures. Laboratory costs, anaesthesiologist's fees and admission charges are some of them. Hospitals can try to minimize the laboratory charges by outsourcing but in India most of the major hospitals are integrated leading to higher overheads. It is further important to take a note of the surcharges, which are high in case of the trust managed hospital. To compensate for the charity treatments, offered to 20% of the patients, the government has allowed trust managed hospitals to charge a surcharge upto 20% on the patient's bill, excluding consumables. This surcharge also varies from hospital to hospital. 7.11 Strategic Levers There is_an interesting article by Kimes and Chase (1998), titled, "the strategic levers of yield Management" in which they have argued that yield is dependent primarily on the price and the duration that a customer uses the service for. By manipulating these two strategic levers, the yield from any service business can be controlled. The first strategic lever is price. The second lever is duration. In healthcare context, this is defined in terms of time spent at the service location. The service efficiency can affect the time spent. If there is an untrained and unmotivated service provider, he could delay service and lower the yield that is otherwise possible w ith a given capacity. However the authors argue that if you can predict the duration, and at the same time maintain the flexibility to increase or decrease prices, you can increase yields from a given service business. Quadrant - 1 Movies Quadrant - 2 Airlines Quadrant - 3 Restaurants Quadrant - 4 Hospitals Diagram 7.5 (Source: Services Marketing by R.Nargundkar) - 185 - 7.12 Cost Containment In Hospitals "This hospital is really costly" is the commonest complaint voiced by a patient when he avails the services of a hospital. The expression has been taken quite seriously in various countries and efforts are being made to control the cost of healthcare delivery by implementation of cost containment measures or standardization of price through the interventions of TPAs, HMOs and health insurance companies in the West. In our country, the interest of corporate players in the private healthcare delivery model is on the surge and more and more private spend on the healthcare infrastructure has been projected. The increase in spend has resulted In better hospitals in terms of infrastructure, technology and treatment of tertiary and quaternary ailments in the country. Unfortunately, the private spend has shown regionalization and this has resulted in rise in competition in the tertiary and quaternary care segment. Even if the corporate don't look forward to the returns on the investment, they want their hospitals to be financially self-sustainable models. Due to rapid changes in the technology and pressure to acquire these technologies, hospitals need patients and patients in turn want a very cost-effective hospital. For a hospital to increase the throughput, it is very important that it provides quality healthcare at a very affordable price and that is possible, only if the cost containment mechanism is in place and the strict compliance with the cost containment protocols is practiced. Any hospital's cost containment protocol can be evolved in the under mentioned: 1) Formation of the cost containment team The cost containment team should be very carefully constituted. The chairman of the team should be Chief Executive Officer supported by the head of administration and head of accounts with representatives of each department. The main role of the team should be critical evaluation of the organization and to do a cost benefit analysis for each activity. - 186 - 2) Implementation of strategic service unit Total productivity management views a hospital as a group of strategic service unit (SSU), each SSU with individual resource input, methods of productivity assessment, measures to enhance productivity in terms of volumetric turnover and control mechanism for quality improvement and maintenance. If the strategic service unit concept is applied to each department, then it is very easy to track down resource utilization for each department and the cost factor associated with each resource. 3) Identification of department Once the hospital is broken down into SSUs, it is very easy for the finance department to identify the department with maximum utilization of a particular resource, link it to the departmental productivity and identify the department with a discrepancy in the resource cash inflow and service cash outflow. 4) Study of the activity chain A study of the activity chain has to be carried out and the operation research tools and techniques can be applied to diagnose the sequence of the events. If each department has well dominated standard operating procedure (SOP), then it is very easy to analyse the activity chain. The focus should be on identifying the resources and the quantum required to complete each activity in the chain. 7.13 Application of business process re-engineering Business process re-engineering (BPR) is a problem solving approach that emphasizes radical redesign of business process to achieve dramatic improvements in critical contemporary measures of performance such as cost, quality, service and speed. Application of BPR will help in realignment of the activity chain, thereby helping in the elimination of the wasteful activities and reduction of the cost. The bigger issue in the use of BPR technique is compromised with the seamless environment, customer convenience and medical operations. Any cost containment exercise should not affect the clinical outcome. - 187 - 7.14 Cost Containment measures 1. Human resource interventions (a) Activity linked recruitment Hospitals should evaluate the quantum of patient flow to the various departments and adhere to the activity linked recruitment and development. The occupancy level of the wards and utilization pattern of the OT should be critically scrutinized to find the optim um staff levels. It is always advisable to pay more salary to the staff and get the optim um level of w ork done rath er th an over staffing the hospital. The ideal b ed to staff ratio is 1:4. O rganisations w ith a ratio of less then 1:4 are ideally staffed b u t hospitals w ith bed to staff ratio m ore than 1:4 n eed to u n d ertak e rig h t sizing exercise. (b) Automation of HR functions A utom ation of HR functions m ay ap p ear to be a costly and tim e taking m easure, b u t in the long term it h elp s trem en d o u sly in cutting cost. For exam ple, if a hospital has a p ro v isio n of com puterized ap plication bank, then huge am ount of data can be stored an d applications can be retrieved on need basis and m oney can be saved as n u m b er of advertisem ent released w ill reduce. (c) Training & development interventions H osp ital's train in g program m e sh o u ld be focused aro u n d "train the train er" concept, w herein the HR d ep artm en t should identify line m anagers w ho can effectively im p a rt train in g and tra in them in conducting in-house program m e. This helps in cutting the cost of the external train in g program m e and also the effect w ill be m uch m ore as line m angers w ill be using live exam ples to train the staff. (d) Multi-tasking of the sta ff HR d ep artm en t sh ould carry o u t th o ro u g h job analysis and w rite detailed job responsibilities. This w ill help in elim inating the duplication of job activities and h elp in cutting the cost of HR. Also opportunities to m erge job responsibilities should be id en tified to im plem ent the concept of m ultitask in g . For exam ple, p o in t liftm an cum security g u ard cum d riv er for h o sp ita l security. The job train in g should be im plem ented to execute m ulti-tasking. - 188 - (e) Reassessment o f the employee benefits In many hospitals, employees are given certain benefits like free hospitalization, medicines, subsidized food, free beverages etc. in order to cut cost. Hospitals can set the limits and systems wherein every employee benefit is accounted. For example, free medicine to the employee can be given on hospital doctor's prescriptions only. Setting up limits, like medicine worth a fixed amount will be given per annum per employee will help tremendously in cost containment. 2. Material management interventions (a) Collective procurement Hospitals with a common interest of cost containment can come together to form a collective procurement group. There are many items from medicine to stationary which are required commonly by all hospitals. If such items can be identified and hospitals can define average consumption per item per month, then it is quite possible to negotiate with the vendors and get huge quantity discounts. This type of model can be very well utilized with mutual trust, ~ faith and confidence even by the competing hospitals. (b) Effective inventory control Inventory control programme of hospital should be focused on the extent of probable use, storage cost, obsolescence, transport cost, investment cost, cost to purchase, market condition and price trends, time required for delivery, availability of a substitute, cash flow and substitutes available. Every hospital should try and reduce the inventory levels and see that unnecessary inventories are avoided. Probably in case of operation theaters, we can have three day inventory management for planned cases and a week's inventory pattern for emergency cases. 3. Energy saving interventions Hospital management should publicise the objective of energy conservation in a very aggressive manner. Hospitals can put posters in cafeteria, employee mess, change rooms, clean utility, and dirty utility to educate people on energy conservation. Employees as well as patients should be sensitized to the fact that conserving energy in a small, individual way adds up to significant saving when multiplied with all users. If hospital is under construction or on an expansion drive, then the design should cater for - 189 - maximum use of sunlight. Light harvesting is a costly option but can he tried to reduce the cost in long term. In short, if these few interventions are practiced it is quite possible to reduce the cost of service delivery and then the onus lies on the finance team to do costing and price the services in such a way that healthcare and the hospital becomes affordable to all. The objective of cost containment cannot be achieved only through planning. Execution needs an organization culture which has to cascade from the top. The cost-containment philosophy should be drilled down to the lowest level hierarchy. The major challenge lies in bringing a behavioural change in the employees guided by appropriate leadership which motivates the change. 7.15 Price Mix In the I n d i a n s e t t i n g w h e r e a n u m b e r of p e r s o n s a r e f o u n d b e l o w th e p o v e r t y line, it is a c h a l l e n g i n g ta sk to f o r m u l a t e s u c h a p r i c i n g s t r a t e g y w h i c h is f o u n d s u c c e s s f u l in s u b s e r v i n g the soc ial i n t e r e s t s . Of late, th e h o s p i t a l s n e e d to i n v e s t a lot on the s o p h i s t i c a t e d e q u i p m e n t a n d t e c h n o l o g i e s to i m p r o v e the q u a l i t y of m e d i c a l aid. I n c r e a s i n g co s t o n i n p u t s is f o u n d a g g r a v a t i n g the t a s k of s e t t i n g a fee s t r u c t u r e w h i c h m a k e s p o s s i b l e a fair s y n c h r o n i z a t i o n of u s e r s ' a n d h o s p i t a l s ' i n t e r e s t s . P a r a d o x i c a l l y in a w e l f a r e s t a t e , e v e n the a f f l u e n t s e c t i o n s of th e s o c i e t y e x p e c t s lo w co st s e r v i c e s f r o m so cia l i n s t i t u t i o n s in g e n e r a l a n d h o s p i t a l s in p a r t i c u l a r . T h i s is f o u n d c o m p l i c a t i n g the t a s k of i n n o v a t i n g th e s e r v i c e s in t u n e w i t h th e l a t e s t d e v e l o p m e n t s in the field of m e d i c a l s ci en c es . It is a g a i n s t th is b a c k g r o u n d t h a t w e find a l m o s t all th e h o s p i t a l s , s p e c i a l l y m a n a g e d by g o v e r n m e n t in a d e p l e t e d c o n d i t i o n . T h e e x c h e q u e r f i n d s it d i f f i c u l t to f in a n c e h o s p i t a l s a n d f u r t h e r the g o v e r n m e n t a l r e g u l a t i o n s al so cl ose d o o r s for the g e n e r a t i o n of f i n a n c e f r o m the i n t e r n a l s o u r c e s . The u l t i m a t e s u f f e r e r s a r e th e s o c i e t y a n d s p e c i a l l y th e p o o r e r s e c t i o n s s in ce th e a f f l u e n t s e c t i o n s h a v e a n o p t i o n to av ai l the e x p e n s i v e m e d i c a l s e r v i c e s m a d e a v a i l a b l e b y th e p r i v a t e h o s p i t a l s . The s o c i e t a l m a r k e t i n g p r i n c i p l e s m a k e a n a d v o c a c y in f a v o u r of p r o t e c t i n g th e p u b l i c i n t e r e s t s b u t it is n o t m e a n t th a t th e h o s p i t a l s h a v e a u n i f o r m p r i c i n g / f e e s t r u c t u r e for all th e u s e r s . It is r i g h t to m e n t i o n t h a t th e s o c ia l m a r k e t i n g p r i n c i p l e s al so f o c u s o n i n c r e a s i n g th e o r g a n i z a t i o n a l ef f ic ac y to d e l i v e r y th e b es t. The m o t i v e is to i m p r o v e th e q u a l i t y a n d this - 190 - necessitates a big budget for innovation. A gainst this background, the hospitals are supposed to adopt such a p ricin g /fee strategy w hich opens doors for the developm ent of hospitals. The fee structure for hospitals thus should be in p ro p o rtio n to the incomes of users w hich w ould engineer a sound foundation for qualitative or quantitative im provem ents. In the follow ing figure, the p ricin g /fee strategy for a hospital focuses on incom e-based fee. No Income Group §• ,5>p 5 ■KQ" a Cost + Surplus to make up the losses, from 4 ►wIncome Group >5 n Cost + Losses from 3 Middle Income Group to iu igh Income Group Middle Income Group Low Income Group No Income Groups * Hospitals Public/ Private Fee/ Charge Discriminatory Pricing/ Fee Diagram 7.b For a social institution like hospital, we rind a discriminatory fee structure suitable since it provides even weaker sections of the society an opportunity to avail the quality medical services. Besides, the hospitals are also in a position to innovate the services to keep pace with the latest development in the medical sciences. Of course, the sections used to avail free of charge services would not welcome it but we have no option since the dying hospitals cannot be healthy or at least be recovered unless we allow them an opportunity to generate finance from the internal sources. - 191 - 4 = N o income g r o u p . H e / s h e is n o t in a p o s i t i o n to earn s o m e t h i n g a n d so free of claarge services. 3 = Low income g r o u p . H e / s h e e a r n s s o m e t h i n g a nd so s h o u l d c o n t r i b u t e a p o r t i o n of cost. 2 = M id d le inc ome g r oup. H e / s h e e a r n s mo re th a n low income g r o u p and so s h o u l d m a k e up the losses on ac c o u n t of low income g r o u p , c a te g o ry 3. 1 = H ig h income g r o u p . H e / s h e e a r n s m o re a nd so s h o u ld m a k e up the losses on a c c o u n t of c a te g o ry 4. Such a fee s t r u c t u r e w o u l d be a p p li c a b le for n o r m a l cases but w h e n we find t h r u s t a reas, the hospitals can bring some i m p r o v e m e n t s b u t the m o tiv e " s u r p l u s g e n e r a t i o n " s h o u l d not e st a b li s h an ed ge over the m o tiv e " p u b l i c in te re st s. " 7,16 P u b l i c / Private H ea lt h c a r e in I n d i a The h e a l t h care sector in India, esp ec iall y the p r i m a r y h e a l t h care s ys te m, has been m a n a g e d la rgely by s o m e small g o v e r n m e n t in it ia ti v e s a n d the p ublic h e a lt h care s yste m. But the d e m a n d for he al t h care is m u c h la r g e r a nd m a n y of the c u r r e n t in iti a tiv e do not p e r c o l a t e to the gra s sr o o t s. The m a i n re a so ns are high m e di c al costs, lack of i n f r a s t r u c t u r e a nd a w a r e n e s s , a n d p a uci ty of g o v e r n m e n t ' s in it ia ti v e s in this area. It is qu it e e v i d e n t from the table '111 H e a lt h ' , th a t the g o v e r n m e n t e x p e n d i t u r e on he al t h care as a p e r c e n t a g e of total e x p e n d i t u r e has be en d e c li n in g year on year. F u r th e r , the table ' O u t Of P o c k e t' sh o w s the in c re a s in g e x p e n d i t u r e from i n d i v i d u a l s ' sav ings. It is b e y o n d d o u b t t h a t the p u b l i c h e a l t h c ar e s y s t e m in I n d i a c a n n o t live u p t o th e h u g e d e m a n d for h e a l t h c ar e s e r v i c e s . The p r i v a t e s e c t o r n e e d s to s t e p in a n d ta k e c h a r g e . But h e r e the i m p e d i m e n t is the c o s t of t h e s e s e r v i c e s a n d the a b i l i t y of the p o p u l a t i o n to a f f o r d t h e m . H e a l t h c ar e s e r v i c e s in I n d i a a re no d o u b t e x p e n s i v e a n d m o r e t h a n a n y t h i n g , it is the c o s t t h a t acts as a d e t e r r e n t for the l a r g e p o p u l a t i o n . - 192 - ILL HEALTH D eclining Trend of E xpenditure on H ealth O utlay in India First Plan (1951-56) 65.2 3.3 Second Plan (1956-61) 140.8 3 Third Plan (1961-66) 225.9 2.6 A nnual Plans (1966-69) 140.2 2.1 Fourth Plan (1969-74) 335.5 2.1 Fifth Plan (1974-79) 760.8 1.9 Annual Plan (1979-80) 223.1 1.8 Sixth Plan (1980-85) 1821.1 1.9 Seventh Plan (1985-90) 3392.9 1.9 A nnual Plans (1990-92) 1965.6 1.6 Eight Plan (1992-97) 7575.9 1.7 Source : 15th report of pricing & availability of drugs There is an increasing need to bridge the gap betw een the cost to the patient and his affordability. Once the patient knows that he need not w orry about - 193 - the cost of medical procedures, he will ensure that he goes in for the best medical service. The best solution here is health insurance - a community insurance where the insurer covers a diverse risk portfolio and at the same time, patients are provided relief from high and medical costs. Out of Pocket : Sources of Expenditure on Healthcare Public Sector C e n tre 5 54 6.6 2.1 0.1 S ta te s 4981 59.3 18.6 1.1 M u n ic ip a litie s 126 1.5 0.5 <0.1 E xte rn a l A id 118 1.4 0.5 <0.1 S u b -T o ta l 5779 68.8 2 1 .5 1.3 O u t of P o c k e t 20160 240 7 5 .2 4.5 P riva te E m p lo y e rs 3 19 3.8 1.2 0.1 E S IS C o n trib u tio n s 2 02 2.4 0.8 <0.1 O th e r S o u rc e s 361 4.3 1.4 0.1 S u b -T o ta l 21042 2 5 0 .5 7 8 .5 4.7 Total 26821 319.3 100 6 Private Sector (Source : Peter Berman 1996) X-X=X=X=X-X~X-X-X - 194 -
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz