Walker Precinct Matthew Moynihan, Mike Prichett, Maia Smith, and David Hoffman Yard Signs American Flags in Walker Precinct Median Age Percent of Persons 25 and Over with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher Percent of Persons 18 and Over Who Are Veterans Percent of Households With Income of Less than $10,000 Percent of Households With Income of $100,000 or more Median Household Income TM-P066. Per Capita Income in 1999: 2000 Partisanship – Voting Walker is mostly Democratic, like the rest of Charlottesville Charlottesville precincts are overwhelmingly liberal relative to the 5th Congressional District: Goode: 4 term Representative C-ville voted: Weed 71% - Goode 29% Comparative Partisanship Walker Precinct votes more Republican than the rest of Charlottesville (at least since 1992). Walker often votes similarly to Recreation and Clark precincts. Congressional Election by Percentage of Precincts - 2004 100% 2 338 5 2 1 3 4 6 741 577 2 174 279 795 3 261 422 747 80% 60% Write-ins 40% 936 947 1,797 Goode 778 834 1,090 1,649 1,379 1,192 20% 0% Central Recreation Absentee Precinct Clark Carver Walker Benjamin Tonsler Charlottesville City Precincts Jefferson Park Venable Alumni Hall Weed Presidential Elections by Precinct - 2004 100% 90% 1 8 3 2 3 773 412 707 80% 2 1 2 712 564 274 1,716 1,446 845 Jefferson Park Venable 143 246 338 3 70% 60% 50% 40% 936 1,854 1,133 859 1,018 1,268 30% 20% 10% 0% Central Absentee Precinct Recreation Clark Carver Walker Benjamin Tonsler Alumni Hall Write-ins Badnarik Peroutka Charlottesville City Precincts Bush Kerry Why? This may be attributed to the generally wealthy/middle-class and suburban constituency. R-1 is low density residential area Political Participation: Voting Walker precinct shows high political activity in the form of voting. In 2000, the Walker District had the highest percentage of total voters for President and Congress out of the total population, out of registered voters, and voting age population. Political Participation: Voting in the 2004 General Election 80% 70% 60% RECREATION CLARK 50% CARVER 40% WALKER BENJAMIN TONSLER 30% JEFFERSON PARK VENABLE 20% ALUMNI HALL 10% 0% Total Population 18+ Population Registered Voters Political Participation: Voting Walker had the highest percentage of Registered voters of the 18+ population in 2000. This means that not only are the constituents “politically active”, but also that they are eligible to vote. Registered Voters of those 18+ 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% RECREATION CLARK CARVER WALKER BENJAMIN TONSLER JEFFERSON PARK Charlottesville Precincts VENABLE ALUMNI HALL precinct: Walker 80.00 60.00 age AGE AGE 40.00 20.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 Yearsyearsreg Registered 50.00 60.00 Voting in City Council Elections City Council Elections demonstrate political involvement because turnout is generally much less than national or state-wide elections. Walker has had the highest number of voters as a percentage of registered voters since 1984. Percentage Voting in City Council Elections out of Registered Voters -2004 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Alumni Hall Carver Clark Firehouse Jefferson Recreation Venable Park Charlottesville Precincts Walker Exit Polls: Signs Precinct Sign No Sign Carver 31.2% 67.8% Clark 41.7% 58.3% Tonsler Venable 29.8% 26.0% 70.2% 74.0% Walker 34.7% 65.3% Total 33.0% 67.0% Exit Polls: Volunteering Precinct Carver Clark Tonsler Venable Volunteer 24.6% 22.6% 18.4% 19.7% Stayed Home 75.4% 77.4% 81.6% 80.3% Walker 16.3% 83.7% Total 20.3% 79.7% Exit Polls: MONEY Precinct Carver Clark Tonsler Venable Gave Money 36.2% 35.2% 19.3% 18.0% No Money 63.8% 64.8% 80.7% 82.0% Walker 36.4% 63.6% Total 29.4% 70.6% Republican Mobilization precinct * repvote Crosstabulation repvote yes precinct Carver Clark Tonsler Venable Walker Total Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct 18 14.1% 17 13.5% 11 9.6% 18 14.2% 45 31.5% 109 17.1% no 110 85.9% 109 86.5% 103 90.4% 109 85.8% 98 68.5% 529 82.9% Democratic Mobilization precinct * demvote Crosstabulation demvote precinct Carver Clark Tonsler Venable Walker Total Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct yes no 55 42.6% 78 61.4% 57 50.0% 46 36.2% 75 52.8% 311 48.7% 74 57.4% 49 38.6% 57 50.0% 81 63.8% 67 47.2% 328 51.3% Republican Request for Contributions pnumber * repcash Crosstabulation Carver Clark Tonsler Venable Walker Total Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber repcash 1.00 yes 2.00 no 19 109 14.8% 85.2% 10 113 8.1% 91.9% 11 103 9.6% 90.4% 18 109 14.2% 85.8% 31 111 21.8% 78.2% 89 545 14.0% 86.0% Democratic Request for Contributions pnumber * demcash Crosstabulation Carver Clark Tonsler Venable Walker Total Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber Count % within pnumber demcas h 1.00 yes 2.00 no 51 76 40.2% 59.8% 62 62 50.0% 50.0% 38 76 33.3% 66.7% 35 92 27.6% 72.4% 59 82 41.8% 58.2% 245 388 38.7% 61.3% Walker Campaign Contributions Republican Party Bush $3,080 Democratic Party Kerry $18,580 Avg. $513 Avg. $502 RNC $3,105 DNC Avg. $516 Avg. $453 $7,697 Other $4,860 Avg. $540 Walker Mobilization Voters in Walker Precinct are sought after by both parties. Consistently high levels of turnout in Walker Precinct make it valuable to both political parties The wealth of Walker Precinct desired by both parties Education Levels education 60 less than high school High school Associate or Bachelor 50 MA/MBA JD Ph.D Count 40 30 20 10 0 Carver Clark Tonsler Precinct Venable Walker Health Insurance precinct * insuranc Crosstabulation insuranc precinct Carver Clark Tonsler Venable Walker Total Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct yes 113 89.7% 104 86.7% 89 82.4% 104 83.2% 132 93.6% 542 87.4% no 13 10.3% 16 13.3% 19 17.6% 21 16.8% 9 6.4% 78 12.6% Income income 60 lt 25k 25 to 50k 50 to 75k 75 to 100k 50 100 to 200k 200k Count 40 30 20 10 0 Carver Clark Tonsler precinct Venable Walker Home Ownership precinct * rentown Crosstabulation rentown Carver Clark Tonsler Venable Walker Total Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct Count % within precinct own rent 63 50.8% 77 61.1% 53 48.6% 34 27.6% 108 78.8% 335 54.1% 61 49.2% 49 38.9% 56 51.4% 89 72.4% 29 21.2% 284 45.9% Walker Precinct voters are wealthy, well-educated and in better economic positions than most of Charlottesville Issues Charlottesville Issues w/o Walker Walker Precinct Issues Negative Bus h Character Morals & Values Terroris m and Homeland s ecurity Iraq/Afghanis tan/Draft Health Economy Foreign Affairs Other Valid Percent 5.5 6.3 3.1 16.4 26.6 3.1 10.2 5.5 Negative Bush Character Morals & Values Terroris m and Homeland s ecurity Iraq/Afghanis tan/Draft Health Economy Foreign Affairs Other Valid Percent 10.2 2.8 3.5 7.9 31.3 5.1 8.6 7.2 Walker’s Issues Walker Precinct favors issues that reflect its tendency to vote for conservative politicians, compared to the rest of Charlottesville Key Indicators of VA 2004 Election Bush wins VA voters making $30 K – $50 K/Yr. Bush wins VA voters making > $50 K/Yr. Bush’s issue strengths: taxes, terrorism, moral values. Kerry’s issue strengths: Iraq, economy/jobs, health-care. Key Indicators, Part II Bush’s best qualities: religious faith, honesty, trustworthiness, strong leadership, clear stand on issues. Kerry’s best qualities: caring, intelligence, most likely to produce change. Bush: Strongest showing in rural and suburban areas. Kerry: Strongest showing in small cities and urban areas (50% - 48%). Per Capita Income in 1999 Per Capita Income in 1999 PER CAPITA INCOME IN 1999 Census Data Call Numbers TM-P017 Median Age TM-P040 People Over 25 with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher TM-P044 People 18 Years and Older That Are Veterans TM-P061 Households With Income Less than $10,000 TM-P062 Households With Income More than $100,000 TM-P064 Median Household Income Sources City Council Elections http://www.charlottesville.org Virginia State Board of Elections http://www.sbe.state.va.us/ Federal Election Project: http://www.american.edu/academic.depts/s pa/ccps/fepindex.html Map: http://www.charlottesville.org Campaign Funds: http://www.fundrace.org
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz