The Political Economy of Integration Agreements and the Crisis: Coping Strategies for Small States Carol Wise University of Southern California Summary Burden of the crisis has fallen on international trade Financial sectors and GDP growth took a hit but are rebounding quickly The crisis has helped to highlight reform success and effective strategies already underway My focus: Chile & Peru Summary: Chile & Peru Unilateral trade liberalization (Chile 1970s, Peru 1990s) Pro-active approach to bilateral & mini-lateral trade negotiations/agreements Simultaneous reform and modernization of services Liberal FDI regime Export-led Development Model Chile: FTAs with Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, EFTA, Japan, Mexico, MERCOSUR, Panama, Peru, Republic of Korea, U.S. Economic Association Agreements with Brunei, New Zealand, Singapore, EU Partial Preferential Agreements: India, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Argentina Export-led Development Model Peru: FTAs: Canada, Chile, Singapore, U.S., (Signed but not yet in force: China, Thailand) Framework Agreements: MERCOSUR-Peru, MERCOSUR-Andean Community Partial Preferential Agreements: Andean Community – Argentina, Andean Community – Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Mexico Merchandise Export Growth (percentage change in US$, seasonally adjusted annual rates) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Developing Countries East Asia and the Pacific China Eastern Europe South Asia -20 -40 -60 -80 ECLAC – Latin America: the missing financial crisis p.12 Latin America 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 International Bank Loans Outstanding 200 (change in billions of US$ adjusted for exchange rate changes) 150 100 50 0 Developing Countries Asia China India Eastern and Central Europe Russia -50 -100 -150 -200 -250 ECLAC – Latin America: the missing financial crisis p.12 Latin America Brazil 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 Latin America's GDP Growth Deceleration (percentage) 15 10 5 0 Latin America Mexico Argentina Peru Brazil -5 -10 -15 ECLAC – Latin America: the missing financial crisis p.17 Chile 2007 2008 2009F Cumulative Deceleration Chile vs LAC-7 GDP Growth and Investment Growth 30 25 20 Chile GDP Growth (%) LAC-7 GDP Growth (%) Chile Investment Growth (%) LAC-7 Investment Growth (% ) 15 10 5 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 IADB - Latin American and Caribbean Macro Watch Country Table Peru vs LAC-7 GDP Growth and Investment Growth 30 25 20 Peru GDP Growth (%) LAC-7 GDP Growth (%) Peru Investment Growth (%) LAC-7 Investment Growth (% ) 15 10 5 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 IADB - Latin American and Caribbean Macro Watch Country Table LAC-7, Peru, Chile: GDP per capita 12000 10000 8000 LAC-7 Average per capita GDP Peru per capita GDP Chile per capita GDP 6000 4000 2000 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 IMF - World Economic Outlook Database 2006 2007 2008 Chile vs LAC-7 External Accounts 8 6 4 2 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Chile Current Account (% of GDP) LAC-7 Current Account (% of GDP) Chile Capital Account (% of GDP) LAC-7 Capital Account (% of GDP) -2 -4 -6 -8 IADB - Latin American and Caribbean Macro Watch Country Table Peru vs LAC-7 External Accounts 10 8 6 4 Peru Current Account (% of GDP) LAC-7 Current Account (% of GDP) Peru Capital Account (% of GDP) LAC-7 Capital Account (% of GDP) 2 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 -2 -4 IADB - Latin American and Caribbean Macro Watch Country Table Chile vs LAC-7 FDI and International Reserves 5 100000 90000 4 80000 3 70000 2 60000 Chile FDI (Millions of US $s) LAC-7 FDI (Millions of US $s) 50000 40000 Chile International Reserves (% of GDP) LAC-7 International Reserves (% of GDP) 1 0 30000 2004 2005 2006 2007 -1 20000 10000 -2 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 -3 IADB - Latin American and Caribbean Macro Watch Country Table 2008 Peru vs LAC-7 FDI and International Reserves 100000 12 90000 10 80000 70000 8 60000 Peru FDI (Millions of US $s) LAC-7 FDI (Millions of US $s) 50000 40000 Peru International Reserves (% of GDP) LAC-7 International Reserves (% of GDP) 6 4 30000 20000 2 10000 0 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 IADB - Latin American and Caribbean Macro Watch Country Table 2008 Coping Strategies with FTAs Pragmatically negotiating over “old” & “new” trade agenda within these agreements Prime example: each had negotiated separate bilateral FTAs with the two largest markets in the world---the U.S. and China In each case, the FTA with the U.S. focuses on the new trade agenda (investment, services, intellectual property) While each country's China FTA is primarily about the old trade agenda (market access for primary goods) What accounts for this dual approach? In China, complementary endowment factors and the very simplicity of these agreements With the U.S., ability and willingness of these countries to negotiate the new trade agenda In both countries, policy makers are looking to reap gains from previous liberalization and reforms in areas that top the new trade agenda Economic Freedom Ranking 60 140 120 50 100 40 80 United States Chile Peru 30 China Chile Peru 60 20 40 10 20 0 0 Row 1 Row 1 • United States: 6 Chile: 11 • Peru: 57 China: 132 Heritage Foundation – 2009 Index of Economic Freedom Doing Business 140 120 100 80 LAC-7 average Chile Peru 60 40 20 0 Ease of Doing Business Starting a Business Registering Property Dealing with Construction Permits Enforcing Contracts Protecting Investors The World Bank Group – Doing Business Economy Rankings What lies beneath these indicators? “Chile's financial system is among the region's and the world's most stable and developed. Banking is efficient, with strict limits on lending to a single debtor or group of related companies. Reforms that include capitalization requirements and shareholder obligations have increased competition and widened the range of operations for banks and other financial services.” Heritage Foundation – 2009 Index of Economic Freedom What lies beneath the indicators? “Peru's financial sector continues to grow, becoming more competitive in providing a wide range of financial services for domestic business activity. The banking sector has undergone a transformation through consolidation. Credit to the private sector has increased steadily, and nonperforming loans have declined to less than 5 percent of total loans. The government has strengthened prudential standards and disclosure requirements. Credit is allocated on market terms, and foreign investors can obtain credit in the domestic market.” Heritage Foundation – 2009 Index of Economic Freedom Conclusions, Coping Strategies • Countries in the region are reaping the gains from prior liberalization, deregulation, reform • In the case of Chile and Peru, we see a proactive approach toward advancing on both the old and the new trade agenda • Bilateral FTAs with China and the U.S. have proved to be effective coping tools vis-a-vis the recent crisis In the medium run..... • This is the most effective way for these states to counter the stagnation in trade negotiations at the multilateral level • Could this be a possible path forward for other small open growing economies on the move?
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz