International Relations Theory Liberalism GYÖRGY László, PhD assistant professor Budapest University of Technology and Economics http://english.www.bme.hu/ [email protected] Basic Vocabulary of Liberalism John Locke Jeremy Bentham 1. Positive view of human nature (individuals are self-interested, but... cooperative) 2. Liberal, civic society and modernization 3. Belief in progress (World War I, II, End of the Cold War = “The end of history?” (Fukuyama, 1989, 1992), 9/11) Robert Keohane: “possibility of cumulative progress” 4. State as constitutional entity = Rechtsstaat (respect citizens rights to life, liberty and property) (Locke) 5. International law (Jeremy Bentham): it was the rational interests of states to adhere to international law in their foreign policies 6. Republics will establish perpetual peace (Kant) Francis Fukuyama Robert Keohane Basic Vocabulary of Liberalism Classical liberalism FOCUS freedom, peace, progress, cooperation EARLY THINKERS Locke (1632-1704) The rule of law Bentham (1748-1832) Liberal states respect international law Kant (1724-1804) ‘Republics will establish perpetual peace’ Federation of states Basic liberal assumptions Human progress Human reason Cooperation The process of modernization: development of the modern state Basic Strands of Liberalism Sociological liberalism Interdependence liberalism Institutional liberalism Republican liberalism Sociological Liberalism • Transnationalism (Rosenau) • Security community (Deutsch) • Word Society: ‘Cobweb model’ (Burton) • Sociological liberal macro-level analysis (Rosenau): anarchic system has not disappeared, but a ‘multicentric world has emerged James Rosenau Karl Deutsch The Cobweb Model “crosscutting” and overlapping groups Billiard balls collide Cobweb of groups: conflicts muted Rosenau’s five principle Citizens become important variables... in global politics for at least five reasons 1. The erosion and dispersion of state and governmental power 2. The rise of new media, use of computers, growth of foreign travel, and migration and the spread of educational institutions... has enhanced the analytic skills of individuals James Rosenau 3. The rise of global interdependence issues (AIDS, terrorism, environmental pollution) make citizens more active 4. Revolution of information technologies... make possible to follow events 5. Leaders are increasingly becoming followers because individuals are becoming increasingly aware.... Definition Sociological liberalism: a branch of liberal thinking which stresses that IR is not only about state-state relations; it is also about transnational relations, i.e. relations between people, groups and organizations belonging to different countries. The emphasis on society as well as the state, on many different types of actor and not just national governments, has led some to identify liberal thought by the term ‘pluralism’. Basic Strands of Liberalism Sociological liberalism Interdependence liberalism Institutional liberalism Republican liberalism Interdependence Liberalism • Mutual dependence (Rosencrance, 1986, 1995, 1999) • Economic development and foreign trade are more • • • • • adequate and less costly means of achieving prominence and prosperity Brute force is no longer the key to success, but highly qualified labour, access to information, and financial capital Most economically successful countries of the post-war period are the so called ‘trading states’ (Germany, Japan) High division of labour in the international economy increases interdependence and decreases the risk of war Functionalist theory of integration (Mitrany, 1966): cooperation should be arranged by technical experts and not by politicians. Neofunctionalist theory (Haas): integration is not only technical, but political as well. ‘Political actors are persuaded to shift their loyalties...’. ‘Spillover’; One way process ‘Complex Interdependence’ • Power and Interdependence (Keohane Robert Keohane and Nye, 1977, 2001): post-war ‘complex interdependence’ is qualitatively different from earlier kinds of interdependence • ‘High politics’ as security and survival vs ‘low politics’ as social and economic affairs are not easily separable anymore 1. Intergovernmental relations on many different levels via many different actors and branches of government 2. Host of transnational relations outside of the state 3. Military force is less useful Joseph Nye ‘Complex Interdependence’ • IR is becoming more like domestic politics (issues/coalitions) 1. States will pursue different goals simultaneously + NGOs + corporations. 2. Power allocation, resources to specific issue areas. 3. The importance of international organizations will increase, because of small countries.... • Time and space: after the 1950s and in the industrialized, pluralist countries ‘Complex Interdependence’ Realism or Interdependence • ‘It is not impossible to imagine dramatic conflict or revolutionary • change in which the use of threat of military force over an economic issue or among advanced industrial countries might become plausible. Then realist assumptions would again be a reliable guide to events,’ (Keohane and Nye, 1977) Complex interdependence should supplement realism Basic Strands of Liberalism Sociological liberalism Interdependence liberalism Institutional liberalism Republican liberalism Institutional Liberalism • Beneficial effect of institutions (from jungle to zoo) vs realism: mere ‘scraps of paper’ • What is an international institution? International organization, or a set of rule=regime • Behaviouralistic, scientific approach • Scope: number of issue areas • Depth: • Commonality: the degree to which expectations are shared • Specificity: the degree to which expectations are clearly specified • Autonomy: the degree of independence of the institution Institutional Liberalism The role of institutions • Provide a flow of information and opportunities to negotiate • Enhance the ability of governments to monitor others’ compliance • Strengthen prevailing expectations about the solidity of international agreements Evidence of the 1990s: Neorealism vs institutional liberalism Institutional Liberalism A typology of international and transnational organizations GOAL OF ORGANIZATION Regional Universal TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP Specific General Intergovernmental NATO, NAFTA AU (African Union) Supranational ECSC EU Transnational European Movement Intergovernmental European AntiPoverty Network WHO, IAEA Supranational IMF (?) - Transnational Amnesty International World Federalist Association UN Sociological liberalism Interdependence liberalism Institutional liberalism Republican liberalism Republican Liberalism • Basic assumption: liberal democracies are more peaceful and law-abiding... • ‘Manifesto’: Perpetual Peace. • (Immanuel Kant, 1795) 1. The Civil Constitution of every State Immanuel Kant shall be Republican (domestic political cultures based on peaceful conflict resolution) 2. The Right of Nations shall be based on a federation of Free States (common moral values) 3. Cosmopolitan Right shall be limited to Conditions of Universal Hospitality (Universal Human Rights and Commitments) Democratic zone of peace • Transformation in the 1990’s. ‘The evidence is not supportive of any profound optimism’. Why? Continued one sided dependence Neoliberalism and neorealism: the MAINSTREAM • Problem solving paradigms: interested in status quo (so called atlantic researchers) • Different view points originated from different values • At least see the same world, but from different view points • System maintainers (neoliberalism and neorealism) vs system criticizers (structuralism) main values: welfare, justice, fairness Neoliberalism • Shaped by the assumptions of sociological, interdependence, institutional and republican liberalism • These countries promote free trade and democracy in their foreign policy programs. • Roots: examples of atlantic integration • See institutions as the mediator and the means to • • achieve cooperation. Regimes and institutions help govern a competitive and anarchic international system and they encourage, and at times require, multilateralism and cooperation as a means of securing national interests Cooperation only when mutual gains achievable Belief in absolute gains Neoliberalism Neoliberals favourite example in the 1990ies Coalition of the willing 2003 The neo-neo debate Neorealism Neoliberalism International System Anarchic. Anarchy put more constraints Anarchic. NRs minimize the on the state and NLs minimize the importance of international interimportance of survival as the goal of dependence and regimes state Focus Relative power, security, survival in a competitive (and anarchic) international system, “high politics” Economic welfare, international political economy (IPE), environment, “low politics” International cooperation Will not happen unless states make it happen. Hard to achieve, difficult to maintain, and dependent on state power Easy to achieve in areas where states have mutual interests Gains The fundamental goal of states in cooperative relationships is to prevent others from gaining more. (Relative gains) Actors with common interests try to maximize absolute gains Emphasis Capabilities over intentions and interests Intentions and preferences Institutions and regimes Do not mitigate the constraining effects Significant forces in international of anarchy on cooperation relations, that facilitate cooperation The neo-neo debate • NR and NL are mainstream theories on mainstream issues. 1. What about inequality; 2. Society and domestic politics; 3. Ethical and moral issues backed by the society and international networks. 4. What about a less state-centric world? Weak liberals vs strong liberals Weak liberals Strong liberals Anarchy Progressive change with irreversible longterm effects Restricted role for international institutions Higher standard of living, more peaceful world Democracies won’t turn back to autocracy anymore States co-existing within the constraints of the security dilemma War is too expensive, quitting cooperation is too expensive Liberalism and World Order • Deudney and Ikenberry (1999) - strong liberals 1. Security co-binding 2. Penetrated reciprocal hegemony 3. Semi-sovereign and partial great powers (Germany, Japan) 4. Economic openness 5. Civic identity • These characteristics (will) survive after the collapse of the Soviet Union as well • Kagan (2003): Power and Paradise: Americans from the Mars, Europeans from the Venus Liberalism and World Order • Isaiah Berlin (1969): • Negative liberty (linked to property) vs Positive liberty (health, economic resources, education) • Liberalism of Restraint vs Liberalism of Imposition (Wilson, Kennedy, Bush, Blair) - wants to go out and forcefully change the world in a liberal direction The World is Flat (2005) The World is Flat (2005) The World is Flat (2005) The World is Flat (2005) 1. Globalization 1.0: 1492-1820 2. Globalization 2.0: 1820-2000 3. Globalization 3.0: 2000- The World is Flat (2005) 1. 1989.11.09. 2. 1995.08.09. 3. Workflow 4. Outsourcing 5. Offshoring 6. Open sourcing 7. Wal-Mart supply chaining 8. Insourcing 9. Informing 10. Steroids The World is Flat (2005) • Triple convergence 1. 10 flatting factor at once 2. Learning how to cooperate horizontally 3. 3 billion people are joining the system (or at least 10% of it) The World is Flat (2005) • Critique 1. What if resources become scarce? 2. What about vertical interdependence? 3. What about those who cannot or do not want to join the system?
© Copyright 2026 Paperzz